Ankle SprainNCT02945618
Neurocryostimulation for Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain
A study testing Neurocryostimulation and Ice in people with Ankle Sprain, run by Laval University at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The objective of this exploratory randomized control trial is to compare, in participants with acute lateral ankle sprain (LAS) , the reduction of symptoms and functional limitations between two groups of subjects who undergo a conventional rehabilitation program with (experimental group) or without CRYOFOS… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ankle Sprain
- What is being tested?
- Neurocryostimulation and Ice
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jun 2015to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- LAS three days or less before the first evaluation session
- presence of a lateral hematoma and swelling
- tenderness at the anterior lateral ligament without or with anterior drawer instability
Who cannot join
- present a bony ankle injury (indicated by Ottawa ankle rules)
- had sustained a similar injury of the same joint within the last 6 months
- require bed rest, hospitalisation, casting or surgery
- had a previous fracture of the same ankle
- signs or symptoms of a previous injury at any of the other joints of the lower limbs or trunk
- contraindication to cryotherapy including cryoglobulinemia, peripheral vascular disease or Raynaud's syndrome
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Laval University
Québec, G1V 0A6
Jean Tittley, MSc cand., 418 656-5501, jean_tittley@yahoo.com
Jean Tittley, MSc cand.
About this study
Official title: Neurocryostimulation for the Treatment of Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain : a Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
The objective of this exploratory randomized control trial is to compare, in participants with acute lateral ankle sprain (LAS) , the reduction of symptoms and functional limitations between two groups of subjects who undergo a conventional rehabilitation program with (experimental group) or without CRYOFOS (comparison group). The hypothesis is that CRYOFOS will lead to a faster reduction of symptoms and functional limitations, and a faster return to daily living activities.Thirty-six participants of 18 years of age and older with acute LAS (sustained a LAS three days or less before the first evaluation session) will be recruited and randomly assigned to either a group receiving conventional rehabilitation program with the addition of CRYOFOS (experimental group; n=18), or to a group only receiving the conventional rehabilitation program (comparison group; n=18). This single-blind (evaluator), parallel-group RCT will include five evaluation sessions over 6 weeks (baseline, day 7, week 2, week 4 and week 6) and 8 treatment sessions (1st and 2nd weeks: 3 sessions/week; 3rd and 4th weeks: 1 session/week) during a 4-week period. The primary outcome will be the functional limitations, evaluated using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS).
Read the detailed description
Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) is one of the most common reasons for primary care office and emergency department visits, with an overall incidence of 2.15 per 1,000 person-years in the United States.In its acute phase, LAS is associated with swelling, haematoma and pain over the anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments, as well as ligamentous laxity of these ligaments. Interventions following acute LAS are based upon the three stages of biological ligament healing: inflammatory phase, proliferation phase (6 weeks to 3 months after trauma) and remodelling or maturation phase (until 1 year after trauma). The initial treatment during inflammatory phase is directed towards avoiding or diminishing excess swelling and ongoing injury, thus optimizing the healing process. Therefore, RICE (Rest, Ice [cryotherapy], Compression, Elevation) is the treatment of choice for the first 7 to 10 days to reduce pain and swelling. Cryotherapy has been used for a long time in rehabilitation; mainly using ice, cool packs or cold water. Lately, a new device, the CRYOFOS, has been developed to provide more performing ways to use cryotherapy. CRYOFOS uses a fluid (hyperbaric CO²) that is sprayed in the form of dry ice on the body region to be treated. It leads to a so-called thermal shock, which sees the skin temperature cooled from 32 ˚C to 2-4 ˚C in 30 sec.While CRYOFOS seems, theoretically, better than other cooling procedures, its superiority has never been determined following acute injuries such as LAS. Considering the extensive use of cold in the management of acute LAS, it would be even more relevant to examine the impact of cryotherapy on both the reduction of symptoms and the functional limitations of subjects who sustained a LAS.
The objective of this exploratory randomized control trial is to compare, in participants with acute lateral ankle sprain (LAS) , the reduction of symptoms and functional limitations between two groups of subjects who undergo a conventional rehabilitation program with (experimental group) or without CRYOFOS (comparison group). The hypothesis is that CRYOFOS will lead to a faster reduction of symptoms and functional limitations, and a faster return to daily living activities.Thirty-six participants of 18 years of age and older with acute LAS (sustained a LAS three days or less before the first evaluation session) will be recruited and randomly assigned to either a group receiving conventional rehabilitation program with the addition of CRYOFOS (experimental group; n=18), or to a group only receiving the conventional rehabilitation program (comparison group; n=18). This single-blind (evaluator), parallel-group RCT will include five evaluation sessions over 6 weeks (baseline, day 7, week 2, week 4 and week 6) and 8 treatment sessions (1st and 2nd weeks: 3 sessions/week; 3rd and 4th weeks: 1 session/week) during a 4-week period. The primary outcome will be the functional limitations, evaluated using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). Secondary outcomes will include the level of ankle pain, evaluated using Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NPRS), weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (also called Bent Knee DorsiFlexion test), assessed with the maximal advancement of the tibia over the talus in a weight-bearing position, and joint swelling, using the Figure-of-Eight method.
Both groups will receive the same conventional program consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing. However, for the experimental group, CRYOFOS will be applied on the ankle at the end of each of the 8 sessions (in accordance to the protocol established).
Descriptive statistics will be used for all outcome measures at each measurement time to summarise results. Baseline demographic data will be compared (independent t-test and Chi-squared tests) to establish the comparability of groups. All data will be tested to check the distributional assumptions for the inferential statistical analyses. An intention-to-treat analysis will be used in which all participants will be analysed in the group to which they were originally assigned. All dropouts and the reason for dropping out of the study will be reported. Any harm or unintended effects during the programs will be recorded. A 2-way ANOVA (2 cryotherapy [CRYOFOS or Ice] x 5 Time [baseline, day 7, week 2, week 4, week 6]) will be used to analyse the effects of CRYOFOS on primary outcome (LEFS) and secondary outcomes (SPSS 22, proc GENLIN [Generalized Estimating Equations for repeated measures]).
- Conditions
- Ankle Sprain
- Being tested
- Neurocryostimulation, Ice
- Keywords
- cryotherapy, physical therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Ankle Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NeurocryostimulationDevice
Also called Hyperbaric gazeous cryotherapy, Cryostimulation
CRYOFOS will be applied on the ankle at the end of each of the 8 sessions (in accordance to the protocol established). The treatment time with the CRYOFOS will take between 1 and 2 minutes, and will be pain-free.
Both groups will also receive the same conventional program consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing.
IceOther
Also called Conventional program with ice
The control group will receive the same conventional program (as the experimental group) consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing. Ice will be applied to the ankle for 15 minutes at the end of each of the 8 sessions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Neurocryostimulation | Experimental | CRYOFOS will be applied on the ankle at the end of each of the 8 sessions (in accordance to the protocol established). The treatment time with the CRYOFOS will take between 1 and 2 minutes, and will be pain-free.
Both groups will also receive the same conventional program consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing. Receives: Device: Neurocryostimulation |
| Conventional program with ice | Active comparator | The control group will receive the same conventional program (as the experimental group) consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing. Ice will be applied to the ankle for 15 minutes at the end of each of the 8 sessions. Receives: Other: Ice |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from Baseline in lower limb functional level at 6 weeks
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), an auto-administered questionnaire of functional capacity
Measured: Baseline-6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (12)
Change from Baseline in pain level at 6 weeks
Visual analog scale for pain
Measured: Baseline-6 weeks
Change from Baseline in pain level at 1 week
Visual analog scale for pain
Measured: Baseline-1 week
Change from Baseline in pain level at 2 weeks
Visual analog scale for pain
Measured: Baseline-2 weeks
Change from Baseline in pain level at 4 weeks
Visual analog scale for pain
Measured: Baseline-4 weeks
Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 6 weeks
Figure-of-eight for ankle oedema
Measured: Baseline-6 weeks
Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 4 weeks
Figure-of-eight for ankle oedema
Measured: Baseline-4 weeks
Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 2 weeks
Figure-of-eight for ankle oedema
Measured: Baseline-2 weeks
Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 1 week
Figure-of-eight for ankle oedema
Measured: Baseline-1 week
Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 6 weeks
Hallux-to-wall distance for dorsiflexion range of motion
Measured: Baseline-6 weeks
Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 1 week
Hallux-to-wall distance for dorsiflexion range of motion
Measured: Baseline-1 week
Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 2 weeks
Hallux-to-wall distance for dorsiflexion range of motion
Measured: Baseline-2 weeks
Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 4 weeks
Hallux-to-wall distance for dorsiflexion range of motion
Measured: Baseline-4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2015
- Primary completionSep 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ankle SprainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Laval University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jean-Sébastien Roy, Laval University
- Investigators
- Jean-Sebastien Roy, PhD, Principal investigator, Universite Laval
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02945618
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Cryofos
- Status last verified
- Aug 2017
- First submitted
- 23 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 30 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Tittley J, Hebert LJ, Roy JS. Should ice application be replaced with neurocryostimulation for the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains? A randomized clinical trial. J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Dec 1;13(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00436-6.
PubMed 33261633
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Neurocryostimulation for the Treatment of Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain : a Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02945618
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Cryofos
- Conditions
- Ankle Sprain
- Keywords
- cryotherapy, physical therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Laval UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2015
- Primary completion
- Sep 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this exploratory randomized control trial is to compare, in participants with acute lateral ankle sprain (LAS) , the reduction of symptoms and functional limitations between two groups of subjects who undergo a conventional rehabilitation program with (experimental group) or without CRYOFOS (comparison group). The hypothesis is that CRYOFOS will lead to a faster reduction of symptoms and functional limitations, and a faster return to daily living activities.Thirty-six participants of 18 years of age and older with acute LAS (sustained a LAS three days or less before the first evaluation session) will be recruited and randomly assigned to either a group receiving conventional rehabilitation program with the addition of CRYOFOS (experimental group; n=18), or to a group only receiving the conventional rehabilitation program (comparison group; n=18). This single-blind (evaluator), parallel-group RCT will include five evaluation sessions over 6 weeks (baseline, day 7, week 2, week 4 and week 6) and 8 treatment sessions (1st and 2nd weeks: 3 sessions/week; 3rd and 4th weeks: 1 session/week) during a 4-week period. The primary outcome will be the functional limitations, evaluated using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS).
Detailed description
Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) is one of the most common reasons for primary care office and emergency department visits, with an overall incidence of 2.15 per 1,000 person-years in the United States.In its acute phase, LAS is associated with swelling, haematoma and pain over the anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments, as well as ligamentous laxity of these ligaments. Interventions following acute LAS are based upon the three stages of biological ligament healing: inflammatory phase, proliferation phase (6 weeks to 3 months after trauma) and remodelling or maturation phase (until 1 year after trauma). The initial treatment during inflammatory phase is directed towards avoiding or diminishing excess swelling and ongoing injury, thus optimizing the healing process. Therefore, RICE (Rest, Ice [cryotherapy], Compression, Elevation) is the treatment of choice for the first 7 to 10 days to reduce pain and swelling. Cryotherapy has been used for a long time in rehabilitation; mainly using ice, cool packs or cold water. Lately, a new device, the CRYOFOS, has been developed to provide more performing ways to use cryotherapy. CRYOFOS uses a fluid (hyperbaric CO²) that is sprayed in the form of dry ice on the body region to be treated. It leads to a so-called thermal shock, which sees the skin temperature cooled from 32 ˚C to 2-4 ˚C in 30 sec.While CRYOFOS seems, theoretically, better than other cooling procedures, its superiority has never been determined following acute injuries such as LAS. Considering the extensive use of cold in the management of acute LAS, it would be even more relevant to examine the impact of cryotherapy on both the reduction of symptoms and the functional limitations of subjects who sustained a LAS.
The objective of this exploratory randomized control trial is to compare, in participants with acute lateral ankle sprain (LAS) , the reduction of symptoms and functional limitations between two groups of subjects who undergo a conventional rehabilitation program with (experimental group) or without CRYOFOS (comparison group). The hypothesis is that CRYOFOS will lead to a faster reduction of symptoms and functional limitations, and a faster return to daily living activities.Thirty-six participants of 18 years of age and older with acute LAS (sustained a LAS three days or less before the first evaluation session) will be recruited and randomly assigned to either a group receiving conventional rehabilitation program with the addition of CRYOFOS (experimental group; n=18), or to a group only receiving the conventional rehabilitation program (comparison group; n=18). This single-blind (evaluator), parallel-group RCT will include five evaluation sessions over 6 weeks (baseline, day 7, week 2, week 4 and week 6) and 8 treatment sessions (1st and 2nd weeks: 3 sessions/week; 3rd and 4th weeks: 1 session/week) during a 4-week period. The primary outcome will be the functional limitations, evaluated using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). Secondary outcomes will include the level of ankle pain, evaluated using Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NPRS), weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (also called Bent Knee DorsiFlexion test), assessed with the maximal advancement of the tibia over the talus in a weight-bearing position, and joint swelling, using the Figure-of-Eight method.
Both groups will receive the same conventional program consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing. However, for the experimental group, CRYOFOS will be applied on the ankle at the end of each of the 8 sessions (in accordance to the protocol established).
Descriptive statistics will be used for all outcome measures at each measurement time to summarise results. Baseline demographic data will be compared (independent t-test and Chi-squared tests) to establish the comparability of groups. All data will be tested to check the distributional assumptions for the inferential statistical analyses. An intention-to-treat analysis will be used in which all participants will be analysed in the group to which they were originally assigned. All dropouts and the reason for dropping out of the study will be reported. Any harm or unintended effects during the programs will be recorded. A 2-way ANOVA (2 cryotherapy [CRYOFOS or Ice] x 5 Time [baseline, day 7, week 2, week 4, week 6]) will be used to analyse the effects of CRYOFOS on primary outcome (LEFS) and secondary outcomes (SPSS 22, proc GENLIN [Generalized Estimating Equations for repeated measures]).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Neurocryostimulation | Experimental | Device: NeurocryostimulationCRYOFOS will be applied on the ankle at the end of each of the 8 sessions (in accordance to the protocol established). The treatment time with the CRYOFOS will take between 1 and 2 minutes, and will be pain-free. Both groups will also receive the same conventional program consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing. |
| Conventional program with ice | Active comparator | Other: IceThe control group will receive the same conventional program (as the experimental group) consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing. Ice will be applied to the ankle for 15 minutes at the end of each of the 8 sessions. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- LAS three days or less before the first evaluation session
- presence of a lateral hematoma and swelling
- tenderness at the anterior lateral ligament without or with anterior drawer instability
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- present a bony ankle injury (indicated by Ottawa ankle rules)
- had sustained a similar injury of the same joint within the last 6 months
- require bed rest, hospitalisation, casting or surgery
- had a previous fracture of the same ankle
- signs or symptoms of a previous injury at any of the other joints of the lower limbs or trunk
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NeurocryostimulationAlso: Hyperbaric gazeous cryotherapy, CryostimulationCRYOFOS will be applied on the ankle at the end of each of the 8 sessions (in accordance to the protocol established). The treatment time with the CRYOFOS will take between 1 and 2 minutes, and will be pain-free. Both groups will also receive the same conventional program consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing. | Device | Neurocryostimulation |
| IceAlso: Conventional program with iceThe control group will receive the same conventional program (as the experimental group) consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing. Ice will be applied to the ankle for 15 minutes at the end of each of the 8 sessions. | Other | Conventional program with ice |
Primary outcome
Change from Baseline in lower limb functional level at 6 weeks
Time frame: Baseline-6 weeks
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), an auto-administered questionnaire of functional capacity
12 secondary outcomes
Change from Baseline in pain level at 6 weeks
Time frame: Baseline-6 weeks
Change from Baseline in pain level at 1 week
Time frame: Baseline-1 week
Change from Baseline in pain level at 2 weeks
Time frame: Baseline-2 weeks
Change from Baseline in pain level at 4 weeks
Time frame: Baseline-4 weeks
Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 6 weeks
Time frame: Baseline-6 weeks
Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 4 weeks
Time frame: Baseline-4 weeks
Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 2 weeks
Time frame: Baseline-2 weeks
Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 1 week
Time frame: Baseline-1 week
Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 6 weeks
Time frame: Baseline-6 weeks
Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 1 week
Time frame: Baseline-1 week
Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 2 weeks
Time frame: Baseline-2 weeks
Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 4 weeks
Time frame: Baseline-4 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Aug 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33261633Tittley J, Hebert LJ, Roy JS. Should ice application be replaced with neurocryostimulation for the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains? A randomized clinical trial. J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Dec 1;13(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00436-6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Ankle Sprain
Recruiting
The Effects of Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Exercises Added to Postural Stabilization Training in Amateur Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability
Ankle Sprain, Ankle Sprain Strain
Recruiting
The Effects of Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Exercises Added to Postural Stabilization Training in Chronic Ankle Instability
Ankle Sprains, Ankle Sprain Strain
Not yet recruiting
Collagen Scaffold Bioaugmentation for ATFL Repair in Chronic Ankle Instability
Chronic Ankle Instability, Ankle Sprain
Recruiting
Comparison of the Effects of Hip and Ankle Focused Progressive Exercise Training on Lower Extremity Function in Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability
Ankle Sprains
RecruitingObservational study
Computed Tomography With Stress Maneuvers for Evaluation of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Instability (CTMETS)
Ankle Sprain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jean-Sebastien Roy, PhD principal investigator
Universite Laval
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Neurocryostimulation and Ice in people with Ankle Sprain, run by Laval University at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jean-Sebastien Roy, PT, PhD (1-418-529-9141 ext. 6005, jean-sebastien.roy@rea.ulaval.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from Baseline in lower limb functional level at 6 weeks (time frame: Baseline-6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02945618, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Aug 2017.