EndometriomaPhase 2NCT02947724
Surgicel Reduces Ovarian Endometriomas Recurrence
A Phase 2 study testing SURGICEL® in people with Endometrioma, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Two hundred women aged from 20 to 35 years undergoing conservative laparoscopic treatment of ovarian endometriomas (either by drainage or cyst wall excision) were included. Participants were randomized into 4 groups; group A (drainage only) in which 50 patients underwent laparoscopic fenestration and electrocautery of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 35 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Endometrioma
- What is being tested?
- SURGICEL®
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- Jan 2016to Jan 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 35 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Endometriosis-related clinical manifestations (infertility, pelvic pain or pelvic mass)
- Unilateral \& unilocular endometrioma (≥5 cm),
- Rapidly growing endometrioma
- Good ovarian reserve (antimullerian hormone {AMH} > 1 ng/ml \& antral follicular count {AFC} > 4).
Who cannot join
- Recurrent \& bilateral cases
- Patients who were unfit for surgery, suffered chronic diseases (e.g. cardiac disease or diabetes)
- PATIENTS had any contraindication for laparoscopic surgery (excessive anterior abdominal wall scarring) .
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Use of Surgicel in Preventing Recurrence of Ovarian Endometriomas During Laparoscopic Surgery
Two hundred women aged from 20 to 35 years undergoing conservative laparoscopic treatment of ovarian endometriomas (either by drainage or cyst wall excision) were included. Participants were randomized into 4 groups; group A (drainage only) in which 50 patients underwent laparoscopic fenestration and electrocautery of the endometrioma cyst wall, group B (cystectomy only) in which 50 patients underwent laparoscopic excision of the endometrioma cyst wall, group C (drainage \& Surgicel) in which 50 patients underwent laparoscopic fenestration of the endometrioma cyst wall followed by insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the cyst cavity, group D (cystectomy \& Surgicel) in which 50 patients underwent laparoscopic excision of the endometrioma cyst wall followed by insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the remaining ovarian tissues.All patients were followed up every 3 months for 2 years following the laparoscopic surgery. The primary outcome was the recurrence of endometriomas in the ipsilateral ovary (recurrence was defined as the presence of ovarian cysts with the characteristic sonographic features of endometriomas (≥1 cm). The ovarian reserve was reassessed (AMH \& day 2 AFC) as a secondary outcome 6 months following the laparoscopy.
Read the detailed description
Two hundred women aged from 20 to 35 years undergoing conservative laparoscopic treatment of ovarian endometriomas (either by drainage or cyst wall excision) were included. Participants were randomized into 4 groups; group A (drainage only) in which 50 patients underwent laparoscopic fenestration and electrocautery of the endometrioma cyst wall, group B (cystectomy only) in which 50 patients underwent laparoscopic excision of the endometrioma cyst wall, group C (drainage \& Surgicel) in which 50 patients underwent laparoscopic fenestration of the endometrioma cyst wall followed by insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the cyst cavity, group D (cystectomy \& Surgicel) in which 50 patients underwent laparoscopic excision of the endometrioma cyst wall followed by insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the remaining ovarian tissues. Randomization was done using computer generated random numbers.
Inclusion criteria included endometriosis-related clinical manifestations (infertility, pelvic pain or pelvic mass), unilateral \& unilocular endometrioma (≥5 cm), rapidly growing endometrioma \& good ovarian reserve (antimullerian hormone {AMH} > 1 ng/ml \& antral follicular count {AFC} > 4). Recurrent \& bilateral cases were excluded. In addition, patients who were unfit for surgery, suffered chronic diseases (e.g. cardiac disease or diabetes) or had any contraindication for laparoscopic surgery (excessive anterior abdominal wall scarring) were also excluded.
For all patients, full history was taken followed by complete physical examination \& laboratory investigations (AMH \& routine preoperative investigations). Day 2 transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) was done using a 7.5 MHz vaginal probe of the General Electric Voluson E8 ultrasound unit (GE Healthcare Austria GmbH, Seoul, Korea) to confirm the presence and assess the size and side of the endometrioma (ovarian cyst with homogeneous low-level ground glass echogenicity of the cystic fluid) \& to assess the AFC (Number of visible follicles from 2 to 10 mm) in both the affected and healthy ovary.
Cystectomy or drainage was done by one of the investigators. In cystectomy groups (B\&D), a small window (2cm) was done in the cyst wall using diathermy followed by aspiration of the chocolate material from the cyst then stripping the cyst wall from ovarian tissue using 2 non-traumatic graspers (by traction-counter traction technique) and finally irrigating the remaining ovarian tissues with normal saline. In drainage groups (A \& C), a small window (2cm) was done in the cyst wall using diathermy followed by aspiration of the chocolate material from the cyst \& then irrigation of the cyst cavity with normal saline. In non-Surgicel groups (A\&B), haemostasis \& destruction of the remaining endometriotic cyst wall was done by bipolar electrocautery. In Surgicel groups (C\&D), each SURGICEL® (oxidized regenerated cellulose - Ethicon US, LLC.) knitted fabric (5 x 10 cm) was divided into four equal pieces inserted inside the cavity of the cyst (group C) or the remaining ovarian tissues (group D). If the ovarian edges were gaped, approximation was done using 1-3 interrupted sutures of 4/0 polydioxanone (PDS® Suture - Ethicon US, LLC.). All patients were followed up every 3 months for 2 years following the laparoscopic surgery. The primary outcome was the recurrence of endometriomas in the ipsilateral ovary (recurrence was defined as the presence of ovarian cysts with the characteristic sonographic features of endometriomas (≥1 cm). The ovarian reserve was reassessed (AMH \& day 2 AFC) as a secondary outcome 6 months following the laparoscopy.
- Conditions
- Endometrioma
- Being tested
- SURGICEL®
- Keywords
- chocolate cyst, laparoscopy, surgicel
- Medical subject headings
- Endometriosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SURGICEL®Drug
Insertion of 4 pieces of SURGICEL® inside the cyst cavity. Insertion of 4 pieces of SURGICEL® inside the remaining ovarian tissues.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| drainage only | No intervention | 50 patients underwent laparoscopic fenestration and electrocautery of the endometrioma cyst wall |
| cystectomy only | No intervention | 50 patients underwent laparoscopic excision of the endometrioma cyst wall |
| drainage & Surgicel | Active comparator | 50 patients underwent laparoscopic fenestration of the endometrioma cyst wall. Insertion of 4 pieces of SURGICEL® inside the cyst cavity Receives: Drug: SURGICEL® |
| cystectomy & Surgicel | Active comparator | 50 patients underwent laparoscopic excision of the endometrioma cyst wall. Insertion of 4 pieces of SURGICEL® inside the remaining ovarian tissues. Receives: Drug: SURGICEL® |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
recurrence of endometriomas in the ipsilateral ovary
recurrence was defined as the presence of ovarian cysts with the characteristic sonographic features of endometriomas (≥1 cm)
Measured: 2 YEARS
Secondary outcomes (2)
biochemical ovarian reserve
serum antimullerian hormone measuremnt
Measured: 6 months after laparoscopy
ultrasonographic ovarian reserve
antral follicle count on day 2 using transvaginal ultrasound
Measured: 6 months following the operation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2016
- Primary completionJan 2019
- Study completionJan 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for EndometriomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Moutaz Sherbini, Cairo University
- Investigators
- moutaz elsherbini, MD, Principal investigator, Assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology - Cairo university
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02947724
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 111949
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 21 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 16 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Shaltout MF, Elsheikhah A, Maged AM, Elsherbini MM, Zaki SS, Dahab S, Elkomy RO. A randomized controlled trial of a new technique for laparoscopic management of ovarian endometriosis preventing recurrence and keeping ovarian reserve. J Ovarian Res. 2019 Jul 20;12(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13048-019-0542-0.
PubMed 31325962
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Use of Surgicel in Preventing Recurrence of Ovarian Endometriomas During Laparoscopic Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02947724
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 111949
- Conditions
- Endometrioma
- Keywords
- chocolate cyst, laparoscopy, surgicel
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Two hundred women aged from 20 to 35 years undergoing conservative laparoscopic treatment of ovarian endometriomas (either by drainage or cyst wall excision) were included. Participants were randomized into 4 groups; group A (drainage only) in which 50 patients underwent laparoscopic fenestration and electrocautery of the endometrioma cyst wall, group B (cystectomy only) in which 50 patients underwent laparoscopic excision of the endometrioma cyst wall, group C (drainage \& Surgicel) in which 50 patients underwent laparoscopic fenestration of the endometrioma cyst wall followed by insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the cyst cavity, group D (cystectomy \& Surgicel) in which 50 patients underwent laparoscopic excision of the endometrioma cyst wall followed by insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the remaining ovarian tissues.All patients were followed up every 3 months for 2 years following the laparoscopic surgery. The primary outcome was the recurrence of endometriomas in the ipsilateral ovary (recurrence was defined as the presence of ovarian cysts with the characteristic sonographic features of endometriomas (≥1 cm). The ovarian reserve was reassessed (AMH \& day 2 AFC) as a secondary outcome 6 months following the laparoscopy.
Detailed description
Two hundred women aged from 20 to 35 years undergoing conservative laparoscopic treatment of ovarian endometriomas (either by drainage or cyst wall excision) were included. Participants were randomized into 4 groups; group A (drainage only) in which 50 patients underwent laparoscopic fenestration and electrocautery of the endometrioma cyst wall, group B (cystectomy only) in which 50 patients underwent laparoscopic excision of the endometrioma cyst wall, group C (drainage \& Surgicel) in which 50 patients underwent laparoscopic fenestration of the endometrioma cyst wall followed by insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the cyst cavity, group D (cystectomy \& Surgicel) in which 50 patients underwent laparoscopic excision of the endometrioma cyst wall followed by insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the remaining ovarian tissues. Randomization was done using computer generated random numbers.
Inclusion criteria included endometriosis-related clinical manifestations (infertility, pelvic pain or pelvic mass), unilateral \& unilocular endometrioma (≥5 cm), rapidly growing endometrioma \& good ovarian reserve (antimullerian hormone {AMH} > 1 ng/ml \& antral follicular count {AFC} > 4). Recurrent \& bilateral cases were excluded. In addition, patients who were unfit for surgery, suffered chronic diseases (e.g. cardiac disease or diabetes) or had any contraindication for laparoscopic surgery (excessive anterior abdominal wall scarring) were also excluded.
For all patients, full history was taken followed by complete physical examination \& laboratory investigations (AMH \& routine preoperative investigations). Day 2 transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) was done using a 7.5 MHz vaginal probe of the General Electric Voluson E8 ultrasound unit (GE Healthcare Austria GmbH, Seoul, Korea) to confirm the presence and assess the size and side of the endometrioma (ovarian cyst with homogeneous low-level ground glass echogenicity of the cystic fluid) \& to assess the AFC (Number of visible follicles from 2 to 10 mm) in both the affected and healthy ovary.
Cystectomy or drainage was done by one of the investigators. In cystectomy groups (B\&D), a small window (2cm) was done in the cyst wall using diathermy followed by aspiration of the chocolate material from the cyst then stripping the cyst wall from ovarian tissue using 2 non-traumatic graspers (by traction-counter traction technique) and finally irrigating the remaining ovarian tissues with normal saline. In drainage groups (A \& C), a small window (2cm) was done in the cyst wall using diathermy followed by aspiration of the chocolate material from the cyst \& then irrigation of the cyst cavity with normal saline. In non-Surgicel groups (A\&B), haemostasis \& destruction of the remaining endometriotic cyst wall was done by bipolar electrocautery. In Surgicel groups (C\&D), each SURGICEL® (oxidized regenerated cellulose - Ethicon US, LLC.) knitted fabric (5 x 10 cm) was divided into four equal pieces inserted inside the cavity of the cyst (group C) or the remaining ovarian tissues (group D). If the ovarian edges were gaped, approximation was done using 1-3 interrupted sutures of 4/0 polydioxanone (PDS® Suture - Ethicon US, LLC.). All patients were followed up every 3 months for 2 years following the laparoscopic surgery. The primary outcome was the recurrence of endometriomas in the ipsilateral ovary (recurrence was defined as the presence of ovarian cysts with the characteristic sonographic features of endometriomas (≥1 cm). The ovarian reserve was reassessed (AMH \& day 2 AFC) as a secondary outcome 6 months following the laparoscopy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| drainage only | No intervention | –50 patients underwent laparoscopic fenestration and electrocautery of the endometrioma cyst wall |
| cystectomy only | No intervention | –50 patients underwent laparoscopic excision of the endometrioma cyst wall |
| drainage & Surgicel | Active comparator | Drug: SURGICEL®50 patients underwent laparoscopic fenestration of the endometrioma cyst wall. Insertion of 4 pieces of SURGICEL® inside the cyst cavity |
| cystectomy & Surgicel | Active comparator | Drug: SURGICEL®50 patients underwent laparoscopic excision of the endometrioma cyst wall. Insertion of 4 pieces of SURGICEL® inside the remaining ovarian tissues. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 35 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Endometriosis-related clinical manifestations (infertility, pelvic pain or pelvic mass)
- Unilateral \& unilocular endometrioma (≥5 cm),
- Rapidly growing endometrioma
- Good ovarian reserve (antimullerian hormone {AMH} > 1 ng/ml \& antral follicular count {AFC} > 4).
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Recurrent \& bilateral cases
- Patients who were unfit for surgery, suffered chronic diseases (e.g. cardiac disease or diabetes)
- PATIENTS had any contraindication for laparoscopic surgery (excessive anterior abdominal wall scarring) .
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SURGICEL®Insertion of 4 pieces of SURGICEL® inside the cyst cavity. Insertion of 4 pieces of SURGICEL® inside the remaining ovarian tissues. | Drug | cystectomy & Surgicel, drainage & Surgicel |
Primary outcome
recurrence of endometriomas in the ipsilateral ovary
Time frame: 2 YEARS
recurrence was defined as the presence of ovarian cysts with the characteristic sonographic features of endometriomas (≥1 cm)
2 secondary outcomes
biochemical ovarian reserve
Time frame: 6 months after laparoscopy
ultrasonographic ovarian reserve
Time frame: 6 months following the operation
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Apr 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31325962Shaltout MF, Elsheikhah A, Maged AM, Elsherbini MM, Zaki SS, Dahab S, Elkomy RO. A randomized controlled trial of a new technique for laparoscopic management of ovarian endometriosis preventing recurrence and keeping ovarian reserve. J Ovarian Res. 2019 Jul 20;12(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13048-019-0542-0.
Related trials for Endometrioma
RecruitingPhase 4
Estetrol/Drospirenone to Reduce the Average Size of Endometriomas
Ovarian Endometrioma, Endometrioma
Recruiting
Effect of Alcohol Sclerotherapy on Pelvic Pain and Quality of Life in Women With Ovarian Endometriosis
Endometrioma, Ultrasound Therapy; Complications
Recruiting
Argon Plasma Treatment for Ovarian Endometrioma Compared to Standard Cystectomy
Endometriosis
RecruitingObservational study
Study on the Ultrasound and Biological Characteristics of Atypical Endometriosis.
Endometriosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Laparoscopic Sclerotherapy for the Management of Ovarian Endometriomas
Endometriosis, Endometrioma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
moutaz elsherbini, MD principal investigator
Assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology - Cairo university
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing SURGICEL® in people with Endometrioma, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
recurrence of endometriomas in the ipsilateral ovary (time frame: 2 YEARS). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02947724, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2019.