Mitral Valve RegurgitationMERITNCT02948231
MERIT Study - Mistral Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair FIM Study
A study testing Mistral implantation in people with Mitral Valve Regurgitation, run by Mitralix at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
The Mistral is an investigational device intended for percutaneous trans-catheter repair in high risk for surgery individuals suffering from functional Mitral Regurgitation. The device system is to be used only in accordance with the approved Investigational Plan on subjects who have signed an informed consent form. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Mitral Valve Regurgitation
- What is being tested?
- Mistral implantation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 4 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 25 Jun 2016to Feb 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject is willing and able to comply with all required follow-up evaluations
- Genders eligible for the study: Both genders
- Subject has functional MR of grade 3+ or more
- Subject has left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >20 % and < 40%.
- No contraindications to trans-septal puncture
- Subject is of functional class 3 or more (NYHA)
Show all 10Show fewer
- The subject is high risk to undergo MV surgery.
- Subject is excluded from other standard of care procedures as determined by center heart team.
- Patients with femoral veins enabling catheterization with 12Fr catheters
- Life expectancy ≥ 1 year
Who cannot join
- Mitral Stenosis ≥ moderate
- Aortic Stenosis/Insufficiency > moderate
- Subvalvular calcification or calcification of the chordae.
- Subject has a prosthesis valve in the mitral position
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) within 30 days prior to subject registration
- Subject has a history of a cerebral vascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the past 3 months.
Show all 25Show fewer
- Subject has a history of a myocardial infarction (MI) in the past 3 months
- Subject refuses blood transfusion or surgical valve replacement.
- Subject has had a percutaneous interventional or other invasive cardiac or peripheral procedure ≤ 7 days of the index procedure
- Subject has a history of, or has active endocarditis
- Subject has echocardiographic evidence of intra-cardiac mass, thrombus, vegetation or soft-mobile deposits
- Subject is in acute pulmonary edema.
- Subject has hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic or mechanical support.
- Subject has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication
- Subject has renal insufficiency as evidenced by a serum Creatinine > 3.0mg/dL.
- Subject has ongoing infection or sepsis
- Subject has blood dyscrasias (leukopenia, acute anemia, thrombocytopenia, history of bleeding diathesis, or coagulopathy)
- Subject has an active peptic ulcer or has had gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within the past 3 months prior to the index procedure
- Subject requires emergency surgery for any reason
- Subject has a known allergy to Nitinol alloys, 316L\304 stainless steel.
- Pregnant or lactating women.
- Patients being dependent upon the sponsor or upon the investigator or upon the investigational site.
- Subject has a known contrast media allergy
- Presence of high degree atrio-ventricular block (2nd or 3rd degree A-V block), or the presence of tri-fascicular block
- According to investigator on site the patient is suffering from a severe end stage disease (e.g. malignancy, severe pulmonary disease, liver disease, renal failure) and has a life expectancy of less than 1 year.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The Mistral is an investigational device intended for percutaneous trans-catheter repair in high risk for surgery individuals suffering from functional Mitral Regurgitation.
The device system is to be used only in accordance with the approved Investigational Plan on subjects who have signed an informed consent form. Device use is limited to the approved study investigators.
Read the detailed description
The study is designed to clinically demonstrate device acute safety (Primary Endpoint) along with longer FU device safety and effectiveness evaluation (Secondary Endpoint).
The main objectives of the study are :
- Evaluate the Acute safety of the implanted Mistral device post procedure and at 30 day follow up period.
- Evaluate the long term Safety of the device (3 and 6 months follow up).
- Demonstrate effectiveness of the Mistral device in improving MR.
Primary endpoints:
- Safety: Acute safety. Rate of device related SAE including device related mortality, stroke, MI, cardiac tamponade, surgery for failed percutaneous repair and non-elective cardiovascular surgery to treat an adverse event. At discharge and 30 days.
Secondary endpoints:
- • Safety: Safety at 3 and 6 months. Rate of SAEs and device related SAEs at 3, 6 and 12months.
- Effectiveness: MR reduction post-procedure, at discharge and 30 days, 3 and 6 and 12 months. Improved NYHA class and 6MWT distance at 30 days, 3 and 6 and 12 months.
- Conditions
- Mitral Valve Regurgitation
- Being tested
- Mistral implantation
- Medical subject headings
- Mitral Valve Insufficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mistral implantationDevice
Mistral Implant is implanted in the Mitral valve
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mistral | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Mistral implantation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety: Acute safety. Rate of device related SAE including device related mortality, stroke, MI, cardiac tamponade, surgery for failed percutaneous repair and non-elective cardiovascular surgery to treat an adverse event.
Measured: Until hospital discharge - up to 5 days post procedure day
Safety: Acute safety. Rate of device related SAE including device related mortality, stroke, MI, cardiac tamponade, surgery for failed percutaneous repair and non-elective cardiovascular surgery to treat an adverse event.
Measured: at 30 days post-procedure
Secondary outcomes (21)
Safety: Rate of device related SAE
Measured: at 3 months post procedure
Safety: Rate of device related SAE
Measured: at 6 months post procedure
Safety: Rate of device related SAE
Measured: at 12 months post procedure
Effectiveness: MR Grade reduction.
Measured: Post procedure (1 hour after implant device has been implanted)
Effectiveness: MR Grade reduction.
Measured: Until hospital discharge - up to 5 days post procedure day
Effectiveness: MR Grade reduction.
Measured: at 30 days post procedure
Effectiveness: MR Grade reduction.
Measured: at 3 months post procedure
Effectiveness: MR Grade reduction.
Measured: at 6 months post procedure
Effectiveness: MR Grade reduction.
Measured: at 12 months post procedure
Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent).
Measured: Post procedure (1 hour after implant device has been implanted)
Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)
Measured: Until hospital discharge - up to 5 days post procedure day
Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)
Measured: at 30 days post procedure
Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)
Measured: at 3 months post procedure
Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)
Measured: at 6 months post procedure
Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)
Measured: at 12 months post procedure
Effectiveness: 6MWT distance.
Measured: Post procedure (1 hour after implant device has been implanted)
Effectiveness: 6MWT distance.
Measured: Until hospital discharge - up to 5 days post procedure day
Effectiveness: 6MWT distance.
Measured: at 30 days post procedure
Effectiveness: 6MWT distance.
Measured: at 3 months post procedure
Effectiveness: 6MWT distance.
Measured: at 6 months post procedure
Effectiveness: 6MWT distance.
Measured: at 12 months post procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Study start25 Jun 2016
- Primary completionJan 2021
- Study completionFeb 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Mitral Valve RegurgitationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 4 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mitralix
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02948231
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CL-133
- Acronym
- MERIT
- Status last verified
- Feb 2022
- First submitted
- 21 Jun 2016
- Last updated
- 7 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- MERIT Study - Mistral Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair FIM Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02948231
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MERIT / CL-133
- Conditions
- Mitral Valve Regurgitation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 4 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- MitralixIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 25 Jun 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Mistral is an investigational device intended for percutaneous trans-catheter repair in high risk for surgery individuals suffering from functional Mitral Regurgitation.
The device system is to be used only in accordance with the approved Investigational Plan on subjects who have signed an informed consent form. Device use is limited to the approved study investigators.
Detailed description
The study is designed to clinically demonstrate device acute safety (Primary Endpoint) along with longer FU device safety and effectiveness evaluation (Secondary Endpoint).
The main objectives of the study are :
- Evaluate the Acute safety of the implanted Mistral device post procedure and at 30 day follow up period.
- Evaluate the long term Safety of the device (3 and 6 months follow up).
- Demonstrate effectiveness of the Mistral device in improving MR.
Primary endpoints:
- Safety: Acute safety. Rate of device related SAE including device related mortality, stroke, MI, cardiac tamponade, surgery for failed percutaneous repair and non-elective cardiovascular surgery to treat an adverse event. At discharge and 30 days.
Secondary endpoints:
- • Safety: Safety at 3 and 6 months. Rate of SAEs and device related SAEs at 3, 6 and 12months.
- Effectiveness: MR reduction post-procedure, at discharge and 30 days, 3 and 6 and 12 months. Improved NYHA class and 6MWT distance at 30 days, 3 and 6 and 12 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mistral | Experimental | Device: Mistral implantation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Subject is willing and able to comply with all required follow-up evaluations
- Genders eligible for the study: Both genders
- Subject has functional MR of grade 3+ or more
- Subject has left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >20 % and < 40%.
- No contraindications to trans-septal puncture
Key exclusion criteria (25 listed)
- Mitral Stenosis ≥ moderate
- Aortic Stenosis/Insufficiency > moderate
- Subvalvular calcification or calcification of the chordae.
- Subject has a prosthesis valve in the mitral position
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) within 30 days prior to subject registration
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mistral implantationMistral Implant is implanted in the Mitral valve | Device | Mistral |
Primary outcome
Safety: Acute safety. Rate of device related SAE including device related mortality, stroke, MI, cardiac tamponade, surgery for failed percutaneous repair and non-elective cardiovascular surgery to treat an adverse event.
Time frame: Until hospital discharge - up to 5 days post procedure day
Safety: Acute safety. Rate of device related SAE including device related mortality, stroke, MI, cardiac tamponade, surgery for failed percutaneous repair and non-elective cardiovascular surgery to treat an adverse event.
Time frame: at 30 days post-procedure
21 secondary outcomes
Safety: Rate of device related SAE
Time frame: at 3 months post procedure
Safety: Rate of device related SAE
Time frame: at 6 months post procedure
Safety: Rate of device related SAE
Time frame: at 12 months post procedure
Effectiveness: MR Grade reduction.
Time frame: Post procedure (1 hour after implant device has been implanted)
Effectiveness: MR Grade reduction.
Time frame: Until hospital discharge - up to 5 days post procedure day
Effectiveness: MR Grade reduction.
Time frame: at 30 days post procedure
Effectiveness: MR Grade reduction.
Time frame: at 3 months post procedure
Effectiveness: MR Grade reduction.
Time frame: at 6 months post procedure
Effectiveness: MR Grade reduction.
Time frame: at 12 months post procedure
Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent).
Time frame: Post procedure (1 hour after implant device has been implanted)
Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)
Time frame: Until hospital discharge - up to 5 days post procedure day
Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)
Time frame: at 30 days post procedure
Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)
Time frame: at 3 months post procedure
Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)
Time frame: at 6 months post procedure
Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)
Time frame: at 12 months post procedure
Effectiveness: 6MWT distance.
Time frame: Post procedure (1 hour after implant device has been implanted)
Effectiveness: 6MWT distance.
Time frame: Until hospital discharge - up to 5 days post procedure day
Effectiveness: 6MWT distance.
Time frame: at 30 days post procedure
Effectiveness: 6MWT distance.
Time frame: at 3 months post procedure
Effectiveness: 6MWT distance.
Time frame: at 6 months post procedure
Effectiveness: 6MWT distance.
Time frame: at 12 months post procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Apr 2022.
Related trials for Mitral Valve Regurgitation
RecruitingObservational study
Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique With Zoom System for Stroke
Ischemic Stroke, Acute Stroke
Recruiting
LEFT ATRIAL MONITORING IN PATIENTS BEFORE AND AFTER MITRAL SURGERY - LAMBDA STUDY
Mitral Regurgitation, Mitral Valve Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Multi-center Study of Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography in Patients With Secondary Mitral Regurgitation
Mitral Valve Insufficiency
Recruiting
Mitral Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair in Patients With Exercise-Induced Severe Mitral Regurgitation
Heart Failure - NYHA II - IV, Mitral Regurgitation Functional
Not yet recruiting
Early Feasibility Study of the Capstan Medical TMVR System
Mitral Regurgitation (MR)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mistral implantation in people with Mitral Valve Regurgitation, run by Mitralix at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety: Acute safety. Rate of device related SAE including device related mortality, stroke, MI, cardiac tamponade, surgery for failed percutaneous repair and non-elective cardiovascular surgery to treat an adverse event. (time frame: Until hospital discharge - up to 5 days post procedure day). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2022.