AzTrials
AzTrials

Intracranial AneurysmNCT02948504

Chinese Small Intracranial Aneurysm Study (CSIAS)

An observational study of Intracranial Aneurysm and Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm, run by RenJi Hospital.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Intracranial aneurysms are common in the general population. The overall prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is estimated of 2.3-3.2% in the population without specific risk factors for SAH. As noninvasive imaging modalities are more commonly used than before, UIAs are increasingly being detected. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
What is being tested?
Coiling or Clipping
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
500 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Dec 2016to Dec 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Five hundred patients with unruptured aneurysms will registered in this study during the 3 years.

Who may be able to join

  • Intracranial unruptured aneurysms confirmed by digital subtraction angiography DSA, CT angiography or MR angiography (MRA);
  • The maximum size of unruptured aneurysm ≤5mm;
  • Informed consent

Who cannot join

  • 1.Patients with severe systemic disorders and expected life span less than one year; 2.Pregnant or lactating women.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

About this study

Official title: Treatment of Small Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Based on Clinical Characteristics, Morphology and Hemodynamic Features

Intracranial aneurysms are common in the general population. The overall prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is estimated of 2.3-3.2% in the population without specific risk factors for SAH. As noninvasive imaging modalities are more commonly used than before, UIAs are increasingly being detected. Most patients with small aneurysms (less than 5mm) are incidentally found in clinical practice. Some studies indicate that the majority of patients with UIAs, particularly with small aneurysms (<7mm), have a low risk of rupture, and others have found that small ruptured aneurysms have a high proportion in patients with SAH. Therefore, there is a lot of controversy regarding which small aneurysms can be left untreated, or which aneurysms are needed to be treated with clipping or coiling.

The prevalence varies widely among different detection methods, race/ethnicity or patients with other inherited diseases. Although a wealth of data is available for the natural history of UIAs, the true natural history remains unknown because case selection bias occur in almost all studies. However, data on Chinese UIA is unknown. Using the MR angiography (MRA) to detect aneurysms, the prevalence is 7% of selected adult population in China. Therefore, small UIAs are very common and are increasingly being detected in clinical practice. Conservative treatment, surgical clipping and endovascular coiling are the three treatment options for UIAs. The optimal treatment remains controversial, particularly for small aneurysms (less than 7mm). To date, no clinical trials have compared the safety and efficacy between conservative treatment and surgical clipping or endovascular coiling for UIAs. It may be impossible to conduct the randomized controlled study considering aneurysm ruptured as a devastating event. However, surgical clipping or endovascular treatment itself carries a risk of immediate morbidity or mortality. Therefore, a substantial variability widely exists in treatment decision-making for UIAs, and this may lead to a great variability in clinical recommendations.

Our study is a prospective observational study to identify the incidence of rupture of small aneurysms in the first year after the diagnosis of the aneurysm which is left untreated. Meanwhile, we determine the differences of outcomes, procedural complications, and rates of retreatment between surgical clipping and endovascular coiling for small UIAs in China.

Read the detailed description
  1. Background: There is a lot of controversy regarding which aneurysms can be left untreated, or which aneurysms are needed to be treated with clipping or coiling. To date, no clinical trials have compared the safety and efficacy between conservative treatment and surgical clipping or endovascular coiling for small UIAs.
  2. Study design: A multicenter prospective observation registry study. This study is undertaken to conform to the study protocol. Patients will be recruited between December 2016 and December 2018. Patients are eligible for the study if they meet the inclusion criteria and they are not eligible if any of the following exclusion criteria are met.
  3. Procedures: All patients were interviewed by a multidisciplinary team that consisted of vascular neurosurgeons, interventional neuroradiologists and anesthetists. If patients meet all of the inclusion criteria: an unruptured aneurysms ≤5mm are enrolled and then followed up at 6 and12 months. Clinical observation, surgical clipping and endovascular coiling are the three treatment options for UIAs. In general, when an UIA is detected, it should be needed to quit smoking, to aggressively manage hypertension, and to control alcohol use. When an aggressive treatment is considered, treatment risks should be balanced against the risk of rupture.
Being tested
Coiling or Clipping
Keywords
Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm, Small aneurysms, Risk of rupture, Natural history, Endovascular Coiling, Surgical clipping
Medical subject headings
Intracranial Aneurysm

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Coiling or ClippingProcedure or surgery

    All patients are treated under general anesthesia and systemic heparinization. A bolus of 50-75 IU/kg of heparin is given after femoral sheath placement, and intermittent boluses of 1250 IU per hour are given during the procedure. Activated clotting time is maintained at 2-3 times baseline level. Balloon-assisted coiling or stent-assisted coiling are considered in aneurysms with an unfavorable morphology (aneurysm neck≥ 4.0 mm or dome/neck ≤2.0). All anterior circulation aneurysms are clipped through a standard pterional or frontal temporal approach. The posterior circulation aneurysms are treated using far lateral approach depending on the aneurysm location.

Study groups in NCT02948504
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ObservationAneurysms are left untreated based on patients and family's wishes. These patients will be included in the observation group.
Coiling or ClippingPatients are included in the coiling group if they undergo endovascular coiling, such as single coiling, stent-assisted coiling and balloon-assisted coiling. Or Patients are included in the clipping group if they undergo surgical coiling, such as aneurysm neck clipping, aneurysm isolation or trapping.
Receives: Procedure: Coiling or Clipping

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rupture of an unruptured aneurysm

    These aneurysms are left untreated.

    Measured: One year of follow-up

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Regrowth of an unruptured aneurysm

    Measured: 9 and 12 months of imaging follow-up

  2. Recurrence and retreatment after coiling or clipping

    Measured: one year of follow-up

  3. Poor outcome after coiling or clipping

    Poor outcome is defined as a mRS 3-6

    Measured: 6 and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Oct 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2016
  3. Primary completionDec 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
500 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02948504
Sponsor's protocol ID
RJ2016144K1.0
Status last verified
Nov 2016
First submitted
26 Oct 2016
Last updated
15 Nov 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Sonobe M, Yamazaki T, Yonekura M, Kikuchi H. Small unruptured intracranial aneurysm verification study: SUAVe study, Japan. Stroke. 2010 Sep;41(9):1969-77. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.585059. Epub 2010 Jul 29.

    PubMed 20671254
  • Rahman M, Smietana J, Hauck E, Hoh B, Hopkins N, Siddiqui A, Levy EI, Meng H, Mocco J. Size ratio correlates with intracranial aneurysm rupture status: a prospective study. Stroke. 2010 May;41(5):916-20. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.574244. Epub 2010 Apr 8.

    PubMed 20378866
  • Greving JP, Wermer MJ, Brown RD Jr, Morita A, Juvela S, Yonekura M, Ishibashi T, Torner JC, Nakayama T, Rinkel GJ, Algra A. Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jan;13(1):59-66. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70263-1. Epub 2013 Nov 27.

    PubMed 24290159
  • Brown RD Jr, Broderick JP. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: epidemiology, natural history, management options, and familial screening. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Apr;13(4):393-404. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70015-8.

    PubMed 24646873
  • Juvela S, Poussa K, Lehto H, Porras M. Natural history of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a long-term follow-up study. Stroke. 2013 Sep;44(9):2414-21. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001838. Epub 2013 Jul 18.

    PubMed 23868274
  • Guresir E, Vatter H, Schuss P, Platz J, Konczalla J, de Rochement Rdu M, Berkefeld J, Seifert V. Natural history of small unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms: a prospective cohort study. Stroke. 2013 Nov;44(11):3027-31. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001107. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

    PubMed 24003049
  • UCAS Japan Investigators; Morita A, Kirino T, Hashi K, Aoki N, Fukuhara S, Hashimoto N, Nakayama T, Sakai M, Teramoto A, Tominari S, Yoshimoto T. The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 28;366(26):2474-82. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113260.

    PubMed 22738097
  • Tominari S, Morita A, Ishibashi T, Yamazaki T, Takao H, Murayama Y, Sonobe M, Yonekura M, Saito N, Shiokawa Y, Date I, Tominaga T, Nozaki K, Houkin K, Miyamoto S, Kirino T, Hashi K, Nakayama T; Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm Study Japan Investigators. Prediction model for 3-year rupture risk of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in Japanese patients. Ann Neurol. 2015 Jun;77(6):1050-9. doi: 10.1002/ana.24400. Epub 2015 Apr 22.

    PubMed 25753954
  • Murayama Y, Takao H, Ishibashi T, Saguchi T, Ebara M, Yuki I, Arakawa H, Irie K, Urashima M, Molyneux AJ. Risk Analysis of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Prospective 10-Year Cohort Study. Stroke. 2016 Feb;47(2):365-71. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010698. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

    PubMed 26742803

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Intracranial Aneurysm and Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm, run by RenJi Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Bing Zhao (08613601696475, drzhaobing@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rupture of an unruptured aneurysm (time frame: One year of follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02948504, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in