AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetes MellitusNCT02950142

Evidence-based Laboratory Test Order Sets in Primary Care

A study testing CPOE with order sets for lab testing and CPOE without order sets for lab testing in people with Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate what the effect is of evidence-based order sets aimed at five indications on the appropriateness of laboratory test ordering in primary care. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
CPOE with order sets for lab testing and CPOE without order sets for lab testing
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
288 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
1 Dec 2017to 1 Aug 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Primary care practices will be considered eligible if all the physicians active in the practice agree to be involved in the study
  • All family physicians will be considered eligible if they:
  • Collaborate with either MCH, Anacura or AML for their laboratory test orders
  • Agree to use the online CPOE for their laboratory test orders
  • Use a computerized EHR for patient care
  • Agree to the terms in the informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Primary care practices where one or more physicians refuse to be enrolled will be excluded

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Academic Centre for General Practice

    Leuven, B-3000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Evidence-based Order Sets Within a CPOE System on the Quantity and Quality of Laboratory Test Ordering in Family Practice: a Cluster Randomised Trial

Cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate what the effect is of evidence-based order sets aimed at five indications on the appropriateness of laboratory test ordering in primary care.

Read the detailed description

Cluster randomised controlled trial in Belgian primary care practices. Participants will be primary care physicians working in primary care practices affiliated to one of three collaborating laboratories in the Leuven, Ghent or Antwerp regions.

Primary care practices will be allocated and randomized to either the intervention or control group. Physicians in PCPs randomized to the intervention will be offered order sets based on indication when using the CPOE for ordering laboratory tests. The effect of order sets will be analyzed for 17 common indications for ordering laboratory tests in Belgian primary care: diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, general check-up, unexplained fatigue, anemia, liver pathology, medication monitoring, gout, chronic kidney disease, lung embolism, acute coronary syndrome, diarrhea, thyroid disease, sexually transmitted disease, rheumatoid arthritis and obesity.

Being tested
CPOE with order sets for lab testing, CPOE without order sets for lab testing
Keywords
order sets, decision support, laboratory test, primary care
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Cardiovascular Diseases, Fatigue, Anemia, Liver Diseases, Gout, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CPOE with order sets for lab testingOther

    Also called CPOE with order sets for laboratory testing

    CPOE including series of recommended tests ordered per indication

  • CPOE without order sets for lab testingOther

    Also called CPOE without order sets for laboratory testing

    CPOE only

Study groups in NCT02950142
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CPOE with order setsExperimentalPhysicians who use CPOE including order sets for large range of indications.
Receives: Other: CPOE with order sets for lab testing
CPOE without order setsActive comparatorPhysicians who use CPOE without order sets.
Receives: Other: CPOE without order sets for lab testing

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Appropriateness

    number of appropriate tests for 17 study indications

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Missed or delayed diagnoses

    Incidence of missed or delayed diagnoses after laboratory test

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Laboratory test volume

    Total volume of ordered laboratory tests

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Oct 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Dec 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2018
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
288 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02950142
Sponsor's protocol ID
S59472
Other IDs
CB1611
Status last verified
Jan 2020
First submitted
25 Oct 2016
Last updated
23 Jan 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: IPD sharing plan not yet decided. Decision will be made upon start of trial.

Publications

  • Delvaux N, De Sutter A, Van de Velde S, Ramaekers D, Fieuws S, Aertgeerts B. Electronic Laboratory Medicine ordering with evidence-based Order sets in primary care (ELMO study): protocol for a cluster randomised trial. Implement Sci. 2017 Dec 6;12(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0685-6.

    PubMed 29212546
  • Piessens V, Delvaux N, Heytens S, Aertgeerts B, De Sutter A. Downstream activities after laboratory testing in primary care: an exploratory outcome of the ELMO cluster randomised trial (Electronic Laboratory Medicine Ordering with evidence-based order sets in primary care). BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 4;12(4):e059261. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059261.

    PubMed 35379642
  • Delvaux N, Piessens V, Burghgraeve T, Mamouris P, Vaes B, Stichele RV, Cloetens H, Thomas J, Ramaekers D, Sutter A, Aertgeerts B. Clinical decision support improves the appropriateness of laboratory test ordering in primary care without increasing diagnostic error: the ELMO cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2020 Nov 4;15(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01059-y.

    PubMed 33148311

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CPOE with order sets for lab testing and CPOE without order sets for lab testing in people with Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Appropriateness (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02950142, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jan 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT02950142 | AzTrials