AzTrials
AzTrials

AnxietyCCWVNCT02950961

Collaborative Care for Women Veterans

A study testing Collaborative Care for Women Veterans in people with Anxiety and Depression, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Implementation of Tailored Collaborative Care for Women Veterans (CCWV) was designed to enhance primary care-mental health integration for women Veterans by tailoring services to women Veterans' and providers' needs and providing an evidence-based intervention, Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management, to address… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
What is being tested?
Collaborative Care for Women Veterans
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
153 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
30 Jun 2017to 8 Mar 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient Participants:
  • Women VA patients with possible or confirmed anxiety and/or depression and/or PTSD
  • Provider Participants:
  • VA staff in a primary care and/or mental health clinic
  • Note: gender based inclusion criteria did not apply to provider participants

Who cannot join

  • Patient Participants:
  • Male gender
  • Cognitive impairment that would preclude completion of informed consent
  • Provider Participants:
  • None

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA

    San Diego, California, 92161

  • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA

    West Los Angeles, California, 90073

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Implementation of Tailored Collaborative Care For Women Veterans (CCWV) (QUE 15-272)

Implementation of Tailored Collaborative Care for Women Veterans (CCWV) was designed to enhance primary care-mental health integration for women Veterans by tailoring services to women Veterans' and providers' needs and providing an evidence-based intervention, Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management, to address anxiety and depression in a patient-centered approach. CCWV was implemented in two of the Women's Health Practice-Based Research Network sites, with careful attention to local tailoring and adaptation to enhance the fit of the care model in varied local contexts.

Read the detailed description

Background: Women Veterans are the fastest growing segment of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) users. This dramatic growth has created challenges for VHA. Gender disparities persist in cardiovascular (CV) and diabetes risk factor control, and rates of depression, anxiety, and mental health comorbidity are disproportionately high among women Veterans. Furthermore, a high rate of women Veterans' attrition from VA care, along with organizational barriers to care, substantiate that organizational changes are needed in order to engage and retain women Veteran VHA users in evidence-based, patient-centered care.

Objectives: The Enhancing Mental and Physical health of Women through Engagement and Retention (EMPOWER) QUERI addresses VHA Blueprint for Excellence Strategy 6, by advancing "personalized, proactive, patient-centered" care models, and Transformational Strategy 7.2.g by implementation of innovative care models in women Veterans' health care." The EMPOWER QUERI Program was designed to improve women Veterans' engagement and retention in evidence-based care for three high priority health conditions, i.e., prediabetes, cardiovascular, and mental health. To achieve this impact goal, the investigators proposed a cohesive portfolio of projects with the following aims: (1) To use an evidence-based implementation strategy that emphasizes local tailoring of care models, multilevel stakeholder engagement, and systematic evaluation of complex implementation processes in order to enrich organizational capacity for innovations in women Veterans' VHA health care; (2) To implement personalized, proactive, patient-centered innovations in VHA women's health that are acceptable, feasible, satisfactory, relevant, and effective for both providers and patients, thereby encouraging women Veterans' engagement and retention and sustainability of the innovations; and, (3) To generate implementation "playbooks" for the investigators' partners that are scalable and serve as guidance for future implementation of a broader array of evidence-based women's health programs and policy.

Methods: Three projects were conducted by an experienced multidisciplinary team. This trial pertains to "Implementation of Tailored Collaborative Care for Women Veterans," which evaluated implementation of an evidence-based collaborative care model tailored to enhance provider- and system-level capabilities to address women Veterans' anxiety and depression treatment needs, thereby improving organizational primary care-mental health integration (PC-MHI) effectiveness and women Veterans' engagement and retention in PC-MHI. This implementation research study used mixed methods implementation evaluation to investigate primary implementation outcomes of adoption, acceptability, feasibility, and reach. Multilevel stakeholder engagement was prioritized. Program-wide organizational-, provider-, and patient-level data was utilized to enhance synergy, productivity, and impact. Several implementation outcomes were assessed using qualitative methods and will be reported elsewhere (e.g. final report, manuscripts).These include Adoption of Care Model, Acceptability of Care Model, Feasibility of Care Model, and Satisfaction With Care Model.

As a coherent program of women's health implementation research and quality improvement, the EMPOWER QUERI constituted a major milestone in achieving Blueprint for Excellence (BPE) strategies and realizing women Veterans' engagement and, ultimately, empowerment in the VHA system.

Being tested
Collaborative Care for Women Veterans
Keywords
Anxiety [F01.470.132], Depression [F01.145.126.350], Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic [F03.950.750.500], Primary Health Care [N04.590.233.727], Mental Health [F02.418], Patient Satisfaction [N05.300.150.600.630], Patient Preference [N05.300.150.600.630.500], Physicians, Primary Care [M01.526.485.810.800], Physicians, Women [M01.526.485.810.820], Health Behavior [F01.145.488]
Medical subject headings
Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Combat Disorders, Stress Disorders, Traumatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Collaborative Care for Women VeteransBehavioural

    Also called Gender-Tailored Primary Care-Mental Health Integration

    This is a collaborative care model that focuses on identifying need for depression and/or anxiety care. Patients with possible anxiety and/or depression are referred to a care manager in primary care-mental health integration. The care manager then conducts a thorough assessment, offers the patient a variety of appropriate treatment options, and works with the patient to determine a care plan. One of the key options the investigators offered in this study is the Calm Tools for Living (CALM) intervention, which is focused on anxiety and which is rooted in patient preferences. Patients can choose web-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and/or pharmacologic treatment. In this study the investigators trained appropriate MH providers in CALM and studied the ways in which the intervention needs to be tailored to women Veterans.

Study groups in NCT02950961
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1: Mixed Methods Implementation EvaluationOtherThe investigators used mixed methods to evaluate the implementation in two VA Women's Practice Based Research Network (PBRN) sites, describing services and patterns of care utilized by patients prior to seeing a care manager, and then 30, 60, 180, and 365 days post initiation of care with the care manager. Investigators also evaluated facilitators and barriers to implementation of this collaborative care model.
Receives: Behavioral: Collaborative Care for Women Veterans

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Utilization of Services (30 Days)

    Change in utilization of services comparing utilization 30 days prior to 30 days post initiation of care with the care manager.

    Measured: 30 days

  2. Change in Utilization of Services (60 Days)

    Change in utilization of services comparing utilization 60 days prior to 60 days post initiation of care with the care manager.

    Measured: 60 days

  3. Change in Utilization of Services (180 Days)

    Change in utilization of services 180 days prior to 180 days post initiation of care with the care manager.

    Measured: 180 days

  4. Change in Utilization of Services (365 Days)

    Change in utilization of services comparing utilization 365 days prior to 365 days post initiation of care with the care manager.

    Measured: 365 days

  5. Change in Referrals

    Using the nonrandomized stepped wedge design, we will compare referrals to PC-MHI at baseline at each site, and compare to referrals throughout the 18-month implementation phase.

    Measured: baseline, 18 months (implementation phase)

  6. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

    brief measure of global health: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS)

    brief measure of anxiety: Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS)

    Measured: 6 months

  8. Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression and Anxiety (PHQ-4)

    brief measure of depression: Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression and Anxiety (PHQ-4)

    Measured: 6 months

  9. WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) Out Of Role Days Items

    brief measure of impact of disability on role functioning: WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) Out Of Role Days items

    Measured: 6 months

  10. Global Rating of Satisfaction/Quality of Care

    brief measure of satisfaction and quality that we have used in several surveys of women Veteran VA patients

    Measured: 6 months

  11. Altarum Consumer Engagement

    brief measure of patient engagement in care

    Measured: 6 months

  12. Health Literacy (Chew et al. 2004)

    brief measure of health literacy: (Chew et al. 2004)

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Nov 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start30 Jun 2017
  3. Primary completion8 Mar 2021
  4. Study completion8 Mar 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
153 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02950961
Sponsor's protocol ID
QUX 16-008
Acronym
CCWV
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
21 Oct 2016
Last updated
18 Mar 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Finley EP, Huynh AK, Farmer MM, Bean-Mayberry B, Moin T, Oishi SM, Moreau JL, Dyer KE, Lanham HJ, Leykum L, Hamilton AB. Periodic reflections: a method of guided discussions for documenting implementation phenomena. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 27;18(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0610-y.

    PubMed 30482159
  • Hamilton AB, Farmer MM, Moin T, Finley EP, Lang AJ, Oishi SM, Huynh AK, Zuchowski J, Haskell SG, Bean-Mayberry B. Enhancing Mental and Physical Health of Women through Engagement and Retention (EMPOWER): a protocol for a program of research. Implement Sci. 2017 Nov 7;12(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0658-9.

    PubMed 29116022

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Collaborative Care for Women Veterans in people with Anxiety and Depression, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Mar 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Utilization of Services (30 Days) (time frame: 30 days). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02950961, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in