Edentulous JawNCT02952274
Ball Vs Locator Attachment in Overdenture Retained by Single Mandibular Implant
A study testing mandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using locator attachment and mandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using ball attachment in people with Edentulous Jaw, run by Cairo University.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to compare the ball attachment to the locator attachment regarding the OHRQoL (oral health related quality of life) for completely edentulous patients retaining a mandibular overdenture with a midline placed implant Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Edentulous Jaw
- What is being tested?
- mandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using locator attachment and mandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using ball attachment
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 22 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Dec 2016to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Completely edentulous patient
- Patients having enough bone for an implant length of at least 10 mm
- No apparent bony mal-relation.
- No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology
- No uncontrolled systematic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes and immunodeficiency.
Who cannot join
- Drug or alcohol abuse,
- A health condition precluding surgery,
- Physical reasons that could affect follow-up,
- Psychiatric problems,
- Disorders to the implant area related to a history of radiation therapy to the head and neck, neoplasia, or bone augmentation to the implant site.
- Smokers
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
Ahmed Sayed contact
About this study
Official title: Comparison Between Ball and Locator Attachments in Patients Receiving Complete Mandibular Overdenture Retained by Single Midline Implant
The aim of this study is to compare the ball attachment to the locator attachment regarding the OHRQoL (oral health related quality of life) for completely edentulous patients retaining a mandibular overdenture with a midline placed implant
Read the detailed description
The selected patients will be informed of the nature of the research work and informed consent will be obtained for each one of them. Only motivated patients who showed co-operation will participate in the study. Patients will be randomly divided into 2 groups.
Conventional upper and lower complete dentures will be constructed before installing the implant where the lower denture will be duplicated into a radiographic stent. CBCT (cone beam computerized tomography) with lower radiographic stent in place stabilized with the upper denture using a rubber base index, will be taken to know the available bone height \&width to determine the optimum implant size.
Patients will receive single implant in symphyseal region of mandible. The surgical procedure is carried out under local anaesthesia, following premedication with 2 g amoxicillin (or 600mg of clindamycin) and 1 g paracetamol. After two rinses with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate, each lasting 1 min, the labial and lingual mucosa of the anterior mandible is locally infiltrated with 2.2 ml of mepivacaine 2% with 1 : 100,000 adrenalin. The surgical guide made from the duplicated mandibular complete denture is used to mark the implant site.
A crestal incision will be performed and a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap is raised to expose the anterior mandible. Deep dissection of this flap lingually exposes the cortical plate of the mandible and any lingual concavities. Sequential drilling \& implant placement will be the next step. The implant position is adjusted to the midline of the mandible and optimum labiolingual positioning and bone levelling is performed as necessary.
A healing abutment is selected to be 2mm above the mucosa. The mucosa is adjusted and sutured with interrupted sutures (3-0 silk). Postoperatively, the patient should rinse with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash for 2 weeks. Immediately following implant surgery, generous relief of the existing mandibular complete denture is carried out and a tissue conditioner is applied to the undersurface of the denture. The patient leaves after the surgical operation wearing both the complete maxillary denture opposed by the tissue-conditioned mandibular complete denture. A period of 8 weeks will be allowed for healing and osseointegration.
Then, patients will be recalled for implant loading. The interventional group will receive locator and the control group will receive a standard Ball attachment.
Locator attachment and a ball and socket attachment were randomly assigned to each patient using a computer generated randomization table.
In (Group I) The healing abutment was first removed and the gingival collar irrigated with 0.12% chlorhexidine. The locator attachment was inserted into the implant fixture and torqued to 30 N cm, leaving the attachment base protruding at least 2 mm above the tissue surface. The denture surface of the denture was further relieved to increase the spaces surrounding the attachment assembly and to accommodate the self-curing denture base resin. The denture was inserted after the relief space was filled with resin, and the patient was guided to occlude at centric occlusion. The denture was removed after the resin was cured and adjusted accordingly to assure a comfortable fit.
In (Group2) Patients will receive a standard ball abutment instead of the locator abutment, however the procedures are the same.
Sample Size If there is truly no difference between two groups then 22 patients are required to be 80% sure that the limit of a two sided 90% confidence interval will exclude a difference in means more than 10.
The sample size was done by Sealed Envelope Ltd. 2012
Recruitment
- Fresh Patient attending in the outpatient clinic in faculty of oral and dental medicine Cairo University will be enrolled in the study
- Patient from last year records in the outpatient clinic in faculty of oral and dental medicine Cairo University will be contacted by phone and recalled.
Another eligibility examination will be made the researcher and Research will be discussed with all patients and only motivated patient will join the research
- Sequence generation Is done by computer on the internet by random.org which gives true random numbers
- Implementation:
Randomized: Computer generated allocation sequence, enrollment and assignment of the participants
Blinding Outcome assessor will be blinded as well as the data analysts for the primary outcome.
It would not be possible to blind the participant or the care provider or the assessor for the second outcome.
Data collection and management:
Data for the primary and secondary outcome will be collected at the day of the surgery and after 3 months on loading of implant and after 6 and 9 months. All data will be saved digitally twice on two separate computers by researcher and the house officer and revised by the supervisor at the end of the data collection.
Participant files are to be stored in numerical order and stored in computer of the removable prosthodontic department
Statistical methods:
Data will be analyzed using IBM (International Business Machines) SPSS advanced statistics (statistical package for social sciences), version 21 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Numerical data will be described as mean and standard deviation or median and range. Categorical data will be described as numbers and percentages. Data will be explored for normality using kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Shapiro Wilk test. Comparison between two groups for normally distributed numeric variables will be done using the student's t-test while for non normally distributed numeric variables will be done by Mann-Whitney test. Comparisons between categorical variables will be performed using the chi square test. A p-value less than or equal to 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All tests will be two tailed.
Data Monitoring: data monitoring committee is independent from the sponsor \& competing interest. None of the supervisors or the researcher has any conflict of interest with Locator producing companies and is a member of the speaker panel of any company.
Harm: Any complication with implant placement will be reported \& managed in the usual way. There is minimal risk of harm associated with the trial.
Auditing: will be independent from the investigator, with every time the data is collected
- Conditions
- Edentulous Jaw
- Being tested
- mandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using locator attachment, mandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using ball attachment
- Medical subject headings
- Jaw, Edentulous
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
mandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using locator attachmentDevice
mandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using ball attachmentDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| locater attachment | Active comparator | mandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using locator attachment Receives: Device: mandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using locator attachment |
| ball attachment | Active comparator | mandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using ball attachment Receives: Device: mandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using ball attachment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
OHRQoL (oral health related quality of life)
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Peri-implant Plaque index
Measured: 6 months
Peri-implant Probing Depth
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2016
- Primary completionDec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Edentulous JawStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ahmed Mohamed Hussein El-Baz, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02952274
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1980
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 31 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 2 Nov 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Nov 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison Between Ball and Locator Attachments in Patients Receiving Complete Mandibular Overdenture Retained by Single Midline Implant
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02952274
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1980
- Conditions
- Edentulous Jaw
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2016
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to compare the ball attachment to the locator attachment regarding the OHRQoL (oral health related quality of life) for completely edentulous patients retaining a mandibular overdenture with a midline placed implant
Detailed description
The selected patients will be informed of the nature of the research work and informed consent will be obtained for each one of them. Only motivated patients who showed co-operation will participate in the study. Patients will be randomly divided into 2 groups.
Conventional upper and lower complete dentures will be constructed before installing the implant where the lower denture will be duplicated into a radiographic stent. CBCT (cone beam computerized tomography) with lower radiographic stent in place stabilized with the upper denture using a rubber base index, will be taken to know the available bone height \&width to determine the optimum implant size.
Patients will receive single implant in symphyseal region of mandible. The surgical procedure is carried out under local anaesthesia, following premedication with 2 g amoxicillin (or 600mg of clindamycin) and 1 g paracetamol. After two rinses with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate, each lasting 1 min, the labial and lingual mucosa of the anterior mandible is locally infiltrated with 2.2 ml of mepivacaine 2% with 1 : 100,000 adrenalin. The surgical guide made from the duplicated mandibular complete denture is used to mark the implant site.
A crestal incision will be performed and a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap is raised to expose the anterior mandible. Deep dissection of this flap lingually exposes the cortical plate of the mandible and any lingual concavities. Sequential drilling \& implant placement will be the next step. The implant position is adjusted to the midline of the mandible and optimum labiolingual positioning and bone levelling is performed as necessary.
A healing abutment is selected to be 2mm above the mucosa. The mucosa is adjusted and sutured with interrupted sutures (3-0 silk). Postoperatively, the patient should rinse with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash for 2 weeks. Immediately following implant surgery, generous relief of the existing mandibular complete denture is carried out and a tissue conditioner is applied to the undersurface of the denture. The patient leaves after the surgical operation wearing both the complete maxillary denture opposed by the tissue-conditioned mandibular complete denture. A period of 8 weeks will be allowed for healing and osseointegration.
Then, patients will be recalled for implant loading. The interventional group will receive locator and the control group will receive a standard Ball attachment.
Locator attachment and a ball and socket attachment were randomly assigned to each patient using a computer generated randomization table.
In (Group I) The healing abutment was first removed and the gingival collar irrigated with 0.12% chlorhexidine. The locator attachment was inserted into the implant fixture and torqued to 30 N cm, leaving the attachment base protruding at least 2 mm above the tissue surface. The denture surface of the denture was further relieved to increase the spaces surrounding the attachment assembly and to accommodate the self-curing denture base resin. The denture was inserted after the relief space was filled with resin, and the patient was guided to occlude at centric occlusion. The denture was removed after the resin was cured and adjusted accordingly to assure a comfortable fit.
In (Group2) Patients will receive a standard ball abutment instead of the locator abutment, however the procedures are the same.
Sample Size If there is truly no difference between two groups then 22 patients are required to be 80% sure that the limit of a two sided 90% confidence interval will exclude a difference in means more than 10.
The sample size was done by Sealed Envelope Ltd. 2012
Recruitment
- Fresh Patient attending in the outpatient clinic in faculty of oral and dental medicine Cairo University will be enrolled in the study
- Patient from last year records in the outpatient clinic in faculty of oral and dental medicine Cairo University will be contacted by phone and recalled.
Another eligibility examination will be made the researcher and Research will be discussed with all patients and only motivated patient will join the research
- Sequence generation Is done by computer on the internet by random.org which gives true random numbers
- Implementation:
Randomized: Computer generated allocation sequence, enrollment and assignment of the participants
Blinding Outcome assessor will be blinded as well as the data analysts for the primary outcome.
It would not be possible to blind the participant or the care provider or the assessor for the second outcome.
Data collection and management:
Data for the primary and secondary outcome will be collected at the day of the surgery and after 3 months on loading of implant and after 6 and 9 months. All data will be saved digitally twice on two separate computers by researcher and the house officer and revised by the supervisor at the end of the data collection.
Participant files are to be stored in numerical order and stored in computer of the removable prosthodontic department
Statistical methods:
Data will be analyzed using IBM (International Business Machines) SPSS advanced statistics (statistical package for social sciences), version 21 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Numerical data will be described as mean and standard deviation or median and range. Categorical data will be described as numbers and percentages. Data will be explored for normality using kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Shapiro Wilk test. Comparison between two groups for normally distributed numeric variables will be done using the student's t-test while for non normally distributed numeric variables will be done by Mann-Whitney test. Comparisons between categorical variables will be performed using the chi square test. A p-value less than or equal to 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All tests will be two tailed.
Data Monitoring: data monitoring committee is independent from the sponsor \& competing interest. None of the supervisors or the researcher has any conflict of interest with Locator producing companies and is a member of the speaker panel of any company.
Harm: Any complication with implant placement will be reported \& managed in the usual way. There is minimal risk of harm associated with the trial.
Auditing: will be independent from the investigator, with every time the data is collected
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| locater attachment | Active comparator | Device: mandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using locator attachmentmandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using locator attachment |
| ball attachment | Active comparator | Device: mandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using ball attachmentmandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using ball attachment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Completely edentulous patient
- Patients having enough bone for an implant length of at least 10 mm
- No apparent bony mal-relation.
- No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology
- No uncontrolled systematic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes and immunodeficiency.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Drug or alcohol abuse,
- A health condition precluding surgery,
- Physical reasons that could affect follow-up,
- Psychiatric problems,
- Disorders to the implant area related to a history of radiation therapy to the head and neck, neoplasia, or bone augmentation to the implant site.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| mandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using locator attachment | Device | locater attachment |
| mandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using ball attachment | Device | ball attachment |
Primary outcome
OHRQoL (oral health related quality of life)
Time frame: 6 months
2 secondary outcomes
Peri-implant Plaque index
Time frame: 6 months
Peri-implant Probing Depth
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Nov 2016.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Edentulous Jaw
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Digital and Conventional Clasp-retained Partial Dentures (DIGICLASP)
Partial Edentulism
Recruiting
Dynamic vs. Static Jaw Relations in Implant-Supported Prostheses: Chewing Efficiency
Chewing Efficiency in Completely Edentulous Patients Rehabilitated With Implant-Supported Full-Arch Prostheses
Active, not recruiting
Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Clinical Outcome of PrimeTaper EV Implant in Single Tooth Restorations
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
Recruiting
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of UV-Treated Dental Implants With or Without Melatonin in the Upper Posterior Jaw
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Bone Resorption
Active, not recruiting
A Clinical Study on Acuris™ - Conometric Concept for Single Tooth Restoration
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ahmed Sayed contact
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing mandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using locator attachment and mandibular overdenture retained with single midline implant using ball attachment in people with Edentulous Jaw, run by Cairo University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ahmed El-Baz (01011168773 ext. +2, ahmedbaz88@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
OHRQoL (oral health related quality of life) (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Nov 2016.