StrokeNCT02952677
"Remind-to-move" for Promoting Upper Extremity Recovery in Patients With Stroke After Subacute Discharge
A study testing Remind-to-move in people with Stroke and Upper Extremity Hemiplegia, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
Trial summary
This is a multi-centered randomized controlled trial to investigate the effects of "Remind-to-Move" (RTM) using wearable devices at home for promoting upper extremity recovery in stroke patients after discharge from subacute hospitals. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Upper Extremity Hemiplegia
- What is being tested?
- Remind-to-move
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Nov 2013to Jun 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Frst-time ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging or X-ray computed tomography
- Unilateral hemispherical involvement
- Aged 18 or above
- Time since onset less than 6 months
- Functional Test for Hemiplegic Upper Extremity Hong Kong version (FTHUE-HK) ≥ 3 (maximum 7)
- Able to understand verbal instruction and follow one-step commands
Show all 10Show fewer
- Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ≤ 2
- Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 19
- No complaint of excessive pain or swelling over hemiplegic arm
- Sensation on the affected wrist intact or with mild impairment only (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale=0 or 1).
Who cannot join
- Participating in any experimental or drug study
- Unable to give consent to participate
- Of inadequate balance as indicated by the inability to stand for at least 2 minutes with or without arm support
- Having history of botulinum toxin injection in 3 months.
About this study
Official title: "Remind-to-move" Using Wearable Devices in Home-based Treatment for Promoting Upper Extremity Recovery in Patients With Stroke After Subacute Discharge
This is a multi-centered randomized controlled trial to investigate the effects of "Remind-to-Move" (RTM) using wearable devices at home for promoting upper extremity recovery in stroke patients after discharge from subacute hospitals.
Read the detailed description
This is a proof-of-principle study to investigate the effects of "Remind-to-Move" (RTM) using wearable devices at home for promoting upper extremity recovery in stroke patients after discharge from subacute hospitals.
A multi-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment was carried out in four hospitals. Eighty-four eligible participants who had suffered from stroke with less than 6 months and could slightly move their arms were randomly allocated to either an experimental, sham, or control group stratified by hemiplegic arm functional levels. Patients in the experimental group were treated by RTM using wearable devices, 3 consecutive hours daily, for 4 weeks. The sham group used sham devices. The control group received the usual care. A masked assessor evaluated the participants at 0, 4th, 8th and 12th weeks. Outcome measures included arm function tests, motor activity log, movement amount and percentage recorded by wearable devices. All patients allocated to treatment were included in intention-to-treat analysis.
- Conditions
- Stroke, Upper Extremity Hemiplegia
- Being tested
- Remind-to-move, Sham, Control
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Remind-to-moveBehavioural
Also called Sensory cueing
Participants were required to wear sensory cueing wristwatch devices with vibration emitted on the affected arm for 3 consecutive hours daily, for a total of 4 weeks, at any time during the day, and received usual care as well.
ShamBehavioural
Participants were required to wear sensory cueing wristwatch devices without vibration emitted on the affected arm for 3 consecutive hours daily, for a total of 4 weeks, at any time during the day, and received usual care as well.
ControlOther
Participants received usual care
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Experimental | Participants receive "Remind-to-move" by means of vibration emitted through sensory cueing wristwatch devices, 3 consecutive hours daily, for 4 weeks, as well as usual care during the intervention period.They are also encouraged to use their arms as much as possible and the accelerometer built-in the device record the arm movement during daily activities. Receives: Behavioral: Remind-to-move; Other: Control |
| Sham treatment | Sham comparator | Participants wear sham wristwatch devices but without vibration cueing, 3 consecutive hours daily, for 4 weeks, as well as usual care during the intervention period. They are also encouraged to use their arms as much as possible and the accelerometer built-in the device record the arm movement during daily activities. Receives: Behavioral: Sham; Other: Control |
| Control | Other | Participants receive usual care only during the intervention period. Receives: Other: Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Score
Hemiplegic arm motor impairment scale
Measured: Change from Baseline to 4-week, plus follow-ups at 8-week and 12-week
Secondary outcomes (5)
Functional Independence Measure
Self-care performance scale
Measured: Change from Baseline to 4-week, plus follow-ups at 8-week and 12-week
Motor Activity Log
Daily activity log
Measured: Change from 4-week to follow-ups at 8-week and 12-week
Accelerometry in wristwatch devices
Kinematic data recorded by the built-in accelerometers
Measured: Change from Baseline to 4-week
Box and Block Test
Hemiplegic arm laboratory dexterity test
Measured: Change from Baseline to 4-week, plus follow-ups at 8-week and 12-week
Action Research Arm Test
Hemiplegic arm laboratory functional test
Measured: Change from Baseline to 4-week, and follow-ups at 8-week and 12-week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2013
- Primary completionMay 2016
- Study completionJun 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Tuen Mun Hospital, Kowloon Hospital, Hong Kong, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kenneth NK Fong, PhD, Principal investigator, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02952677
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GRF/5608/12M
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 31 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 2 Nov 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Fong KN, Lo PC, Yu YS, Cheuk CK, Tsang TH, Po AS, Chan CC. Effects of sensory cueing on voluntary arm use for patients with chronic stroke: a preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Jan;92(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.014.
PubMed 21187201Fong KN, Yang NY, Chan MK, Chan DY, Lau AF, Chan DY, Cheung JT, Cheung HK, Chung RC, Chan CC. Combined effects of sensory cueing and limb activation on unilateral neglect in subacute left hemiplegic stroke patients: a randomized controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2013 Jul;27(7):628-37. doi: 10.1177/0269215512471959. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
PubMed 23405025
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Nov 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- "Remind-to-move" Using Wearable Devices in Home-based Treatment for Promoting Upper Extremity Recovery in Patients With Stroke After Subacute Discharge
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02952677
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GRF/5608/12M
- Conditions
- Stroke, Upper Extremity Hemiplegia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Tuen Mun Hospital, Kowloon Hospital, Hong Kong, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital
- Study start
- Nov 2013
- Primary completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a multi-centered randomized controlled trial to investigate the effects of "Remind-to-Move" (RTM) using wearable devices at home for promoting upper extremity recovery in stroke patients after discharge from subacute hospitals.
Detailed description
This is a proof-of-principle study to investigate the effects of "Remind-to-Move" (RTM) using wearable devices at home for promoting upper extremity recovery in stroke patients after discharge from subacute hospitals.
A multi-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment was carried out in four hospitals. Eighty-four eligible participants who had suffered from stroke with less than 6 months and could slightly move their arms were randomly allocated to either an experimental, sham, or control group stratified by hemiplegic arm functional levels. Patients in the experimental group were treated by RTM using wearable devices, 3 consecutive hours daily, for 4 weeks. The sham group used sham devices. The control group received the usual care. A masked assessor evaluated the participants at 0, 4th, 8th and 12th weeks. Outcome measures included arm function tests, motor activity log, movement amount and percentage recorded by wearable devices. All patients allocated to treatment were included in intention-to-treat analysis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Experimental | Behavioral: Remind-to-move, Other: ControlParticipants receive "Remind-to-move" by means of vibration emitted through sensory cueing wristwatch devices, 3 consecutive hours daily, for 4 weeks, as well as usual care during the intervention period.They are also encouraged to use their arms as much as possible and the accelerometer built-in the device record the arm movement during daily activities. |
| Sham treatment | Sham comparator | Behavioral: Sham, Other: ControlParticipants wear sham wristwatch devices but without vibration cueing, 3 consecutive hours daily, for 4 weeks, as well as usual care during the intervention period. They are also encouraged to use their arms as much as possible and the accelerometer built-in the device record the arm movement during daily activities. |
| Control | Other | Other: ControlParticipants receive usual care only during the intervention period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Frst-time ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging or X-ray computed tomography
- Unilateral hemispherical involvement
- Aged 18 or above
- Time since onset less than 6 months
- Functional Test for Hemiplegic Upper Extremity Hong Kong version (FTHUE-HK) ≥ 3 (maximum 7)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Participating in any experimental or drug study
- Unable to give consent to participate
- Of inadequate balance as indicated by the inability to stand for at least 2 minutes with or without arm support
- Having history of botulinum toxin injection in 3 months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Remind-to-moveAlso: Sensory cueingParticipants were required to wear sensory cueing wristwatch devices with vibration emitted on the affected arm for 3 consecutive hours daily, for a total of 4 weeks, at any time during the day, and received usual care as well. | Behavioural | Experimental |
| ShamParticipants were required to wear sensory cueing wristwatch devices without vibration emitted on the affected arm for 3 consecutive hours daily, for a total of 4 weeks, at any time during the day, and received usual care as well. | Behavioural | Sham treatment |
| ControlParticipants received usual care | Other | Control, Experimental, Sham treatment |
Primary outcome
Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Score
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 4-week, plus follow-ups at 8-week and 12-week
Hemiplegic arm motor impairment scale
5 secondary outcomes
Functional Independence Measure
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 4-week, plus follow-ups at 8-week and 12-week
Motor Activity Log
Time frame: Change from 4-week to follow-ups at 8-week and 12-week
Accelerometry in wristwatch devices
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 4-week
Box and Block Test
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 4-week, plus follow-ups at 8-week and 12-week
Action Research Arm Test
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 4-week, and follow-ups at 8-week and 12-week
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Nov 2016.
- Background: PubMed 21187201Fong KN, Lo PC, Yu YS, Cheuk CK, Tsang TH, Po AS, Chan CC. Effects of sensory cueing on voluntary arm use for patients with chronic stroke: a preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Jan;92(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.014.
- Background: PubMed 23405025Fong KN, Yang NY, Chan MK, Chan DY, Lau AF, Chan DY, Cheung JT, Cheung HK, Chung RC, Chan CC. Combined effects of sensory cueing and limb activation on unilateral neglect in subacute left hemiplegic stroke patients: a randomized controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2013 Jul;27(7):628-37. doi: 10.1177/0269215512471959. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kenneth NK Fong, PhD principal investigator
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Remind-to-move in people with Stroke and Upper Extremity Hemiplegia, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Score (time frame: Change from Baseline to 4-week, plus follow-ups at 8-week and 12-week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02952677, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Nov 2016.