AzTrials
AzTrials

Neck PainECA_TMINCT02953236

INSTRUMENTED-MANUAL PHYSIOTHERAPY VERSUS NONINSTRUMENTED

A study testing Instrumented massage and Manual massage in people with Neck Pain, run by University of Malaga at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aimed to verify the mechanical and clinical effects of instrumented massage on myofascial trigger points of trapezius muscle in adult subjects. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Neck Pain
What is being tested?
Instrumented massage and Manual massage
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
Jan 2016to Mar 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • • To be of legal age.
  • To understand correctly Spanish.
  • To show their approval by signing the informed consent.
  • Suffering from mechanical neck pain

Who cannot join

  • -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Antonio Cuesta-Vargas

    Málaga, Malaga, 29010

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: THE INMEDIATE EFFECTS OF RICHELLI'S PAINRELIEVER ON UPPER TRAPEZIUS MYOFASCIAL TRIGGER POINT IN PATIENTS SUFFERING FROM NECK PAIN: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

This study aimed to verify the mechanical and clinical effects of instrumented massage on myofascial trigger points of trapezius muscle in adult subjects.

Read the detailed description

Background: There are several therapies currently used to treat myofascial trigger points, including conservative and invasive techniques. It has been shown that conservative techniques including therapeutic massage, stretching, transcutaneal electrical nerve stimulation, spray and stretch, cold laser treatment, and ultrasound are the most applied treatments for myofascial pain syndrome, but no single strategy has proved to be universally successful. Instrumented massage has shown clinical effectiveness on shoulder pain, low back pain, and only one study (case report) on myofascial trigger points. This study aimed to verify the mechanical and clinical effects of instrumented massage on myofascial trigger points of trapezius muscle in adult subjects.

Methods/Design: The study includes 31 volunteers with myofascial trigger points on right trapezius muscle. Clinical and patient data were obtained from questionnaires, VAS, algometry, sono-myoelastography and myotonometry. Also, physiotherapist grip strength was measured. Subjects were randomly allocated into one of two groups: Instrumented massage or Manual massage. The intervention consisted in a single 20 minutes session of massage on the back and neck by the same therapist, depending of the group, massage was applied manually or instrumented.

Conditions
Neck Pain
Being tested
Instrumented massage, Manual massage
Medical subject headings
Neck Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Instrumented massageProcedure or surgery

    The first group will receive a 20 min session of instrumented massage on back and neck areas. Subjects will be in prone position and physical therapist will applied instrumental massage in a protocolised way from low back until neck muscles, both in left and right side of the body.

  • Manual massageProcedure or surgery

    The second group will receive a 20 min session of manual massage on back and neck areas. Subjects will be in prone position and physical therapist will applied manual massage in a protocolised way from low back until neck muscles, both in left and right side of the body.

Study groups in NCT02953236
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Instrumented massageExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: Instrumented massage
Manual massageActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Manual massage

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. • Pain as measured by VAS

    The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was designed to allow a subjective assessment of pain. A VAS is usually a horizontal line of 10 cm. with perpendicular lines at the ends, which are defined as the extreme limits of the painful experience. Previous studies have shown that the VAS has adequate psychometric properties, including test-retest reliability (r = 0.78) and convergent validity with other measures of pain such as the McGill Pain Questionnaire (r = 0.49 to 0.65) (Sriwatanakul K ., 1983).

    Measured: 10 minutes

  2. • Stiffness of the right upper trapezius myofascial trigger point measured by MyoptronPRO.

    Stiffness characteristics will be measured using a handheld MyotonPRO device (MyotonPRO, Myoton Ltd, Estonia). MyotonPRO has shown high levels of reliability in a session or between sessions both by the same operator (intra-rater) and between different operators (inter-rater), both in young subjects and elderly (Aird et al., 2012) (Mullix et al., 2012). Stiffness (N/m) will be calculated by software of MyotonPRO (Vain, 1994, 1995). Stiffness is the ability of tissue to restore it shape after removing of external force acting on the muscle.

    Measured: 10 minutes

  3. • Stiffness (Hz) of the right upper trapezius myofascial trigger point measured by sono-myoelastography.

    Sono-myoelastography uses an external vibration source with a frequency less than 1000 Hz in conjunction with Doppler techniques to identify localized regions of increased tissue stiffness (Muro-Culebras, 2013). In this study vibrations will be produced in the right upper trapezius muscle using an external massage vibrator (Model NC70209, North Coast Medical, Gilroy, CA, USA) modified with a flat and elongated applicator (with an application area of 1 x 4 cm). This vibration source will be placed approximately 2-3 cm away from each of the points marked as ''positive'' in the clinical examination and induce vibrations of about 92 Hz. By use of the power Doppler technique, the sono-myoelastography images will be collected while applying vibrations.

    Measured: 10 minutes

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. pain threshold pressure PPT

    Measured: 10 minutes

  2. • Grip strength as measured by a Dynamometer

    This instrument will be used to measure grip strength of both physiotherapist upper limbs. The dynamometer has proven to be the safest [ICC = 0.98] and most valid [ICC = 0.99] method to measure grip strength of the hand. (Bellace JV, 2000).

    Measured: 10 minutes

  3. •PRO Spine Functional Index SFI-Sp

    For this study we will use the Spanish version (SFI-Sp), since it has proven to be a valid and reliable measure of the spinal region result. This regional tool reflects the status and any change in the kinetic chain of the spine. This questionnaire has demonstrated high internal consistency (α = 0.85) and reliability (r = 0.96) (AI Cuesta-Vargas, 2014).

    Measured: 10 minutes

  4. •PRO Neck Disability Index-Sp

    Neck Disability Index is the most widely used neck pain scale in the largest number of populations and has been validated most often against multiple measurements of function, pain, and clinical signs and symptoms. (Cleland et al., 2006). For this study we will use the Spanish version (NDI-Sp), since it has proven to be reliable (r = 0.98), valid, and sensitive to change. (Andrade et al., 2010).

    Measured: 10 minutes

  5. • Blood flow of the right upper trapezius myofascial trigger point measured by sono-myoelastography.

    Circulation will be studied using the Doppler technique, since it has been shown for other studies (Sikdar et al., 2009). The resistive index (RI) is determined in the ascending branch of the transverse cervical artery and in other arteries or arterioles that will be in the vicinity of points marked as ''positive'' in the clinical examination. The waveform of blood flow, based on Doppler flow, will be scored on a scale of 0-2 (Sikdar et al. 2009).

    Measured: 10 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Nov 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2016
  3. Primary completionJan 2016
  4. Study completionMar 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02953236
Sponsor's protocol ID
103-2015-H
Acronym
ECA_TMI
Status last verified
Mar 2017
First submitted
31 Oct 2016
Last updated
31 Mar 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Instrumented massage and Manual massage in people with Neck Pain, run by University of Malaga at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

• Pain as measured by VAS (time frame: 10 minutes). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Mar 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in