AzTrials
AzTrials

Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO)Phase 4ZIPANGUNCT02953938

Study to Show a Superior Benefit in Terms of Reduction of Ranibizumab Injections in Patients Receiving Ranibizumab Plus Laser Photocoagulation Combination Therapy Without Loss of Efficacy and Safety

A Phase 4 study testing Ranibizumab and Grid&Direct short pulse laser photocoagulation in people with Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO), run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 7 sites in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a Phase IV, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, 2-arm, multicenter study. The primary objective was assessed by the difference in the mean number of ranibizumab injections applied up to Month 11 between the 2 treatment arms. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 1 of the 2 treatment arms; i.e. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
What is being tested?
Ranibizumab and Grid&Direct short pulse laser photocoagulation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
59 participants
Where
7 sitesJapan
Study dates
15 Dec 2016to 28 Dec 2018
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of visual impairment exclusively due to ME secondary to BRVO
  • Best-corrected visual acuity score at Screening and Baseline (Day 1) between 0.5 and 0.05 decimal (i.e., between 73 and 19 letters in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) testing) with Landolt C charts inclusively (i.e., approximate logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units of 0.3 to 1.30).
  • At Baseline (Day1), a maximum BCVA gain of 0.2 units logMAR conversion inclusively from screening is allowed as long as the BCVA score does not exceed the upper limit of 0.3 units logMAR.
  • Increased central subfoveal thickness (> 300 µm at Baseline (Day 1) when measured by SD-OCT)
  • Duration of vision deterioration ≤6 months (determined by self-report) at screening

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women
  • Stroke or myocardial infarction less than 3 months before Screening
  • Uncontrolled blood pressure defined as systolic value of >160 mm Hg or diastolic value of >100 mm Hg at Screening or Baseline (Day 1) Antihypertensive treatment can be initiated and must be taken for at least 30 days after which the patient can be assessed for study eligibility a second time
  • Any active periocular or ocular infection or inflammation (e.g., blepharitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, uveitis, endophthalmitis) at the time of Screening or Baseline (Day 1) in either eye
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma (intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥30 mm Hg on medication or according to investigator's judgment) at the time of Screening or Baseline (Day 1) or diagnosed within 6 months before Baseline (Day 1) in either eye
  • Neovascularization of the iris or neovascular glaucoma in the study eye
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Use of any systemic anti-VEGF drugs within 6 months before Baseline (Day1) (e.g., sorafenib (Nexavar®), sunitinib (Sutent®), bevacizumab (Avastin®), ziv-aflibercept (ZALTRAP®))
  • Treatment (or anticipated treatment in the fellow eye for non-RVO indications during the study) with any anti-angiogenic drugs (including any anti-VEGF agents) within 3 months before Baseline (Day1) in fellow eye or before Baseline (Day 1) in the study eye (e.g., pegaptanib (Macugen®), ranibizumab (Lucentis®), bevacizumab (Avastin®), and aflibercept (EYLEA®))
  • Panretinal laser photocoagulation within 1 month before Baseline (Day1) or anticipated or scheduled within the next 12 months (Study periods) following Baseline (Day1) in the study eye
  • Any giving of focal or grid laser photocoagulation before Baseline (Day1) in the study eye
  • Use of intra- or periocular corticosteroids (including sub-Tenon) within 3 months before Screening in the study eye.
  • Any use of intraocular corticosteroid implants (e.g., dexamethasone (Ozurdex®), fluocinolone acetonide (Iluvien®)) in the study eye

Trial locations and contacts

7 sites in 1 country.

7 sites in 1 country

Japan7 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 812-8582

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hokkaido, 078-8510

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kita-gun, Kagawa-ken, 761-0793

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nagakute, Aichi-ken, 480-1195

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tsu, Mie-ken, 514-8507

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: A 12-month, Phase IV, Open-label, Randomized, Active Controlled, 2-arm, Multicenter Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Ranibizumab Combined With Grid&Direct Short Pulse Laser Photocoagulation Versus a PRN Ranibizumab Monotherapy in Japanese Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO)

This is a Phase IV, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, 2-arm, multicenter study. The primary objective was assessed by the difference in the mean number of ranibizumab injections applied up to Month 11 between the 2 treatment arms. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 1 of the 2 treatment arms; i.e. Arm 1 ranibizumab monotherapy, Arm 2 ranibizumab with Grid\&Direct short pulse laser photocoagulation combination therapy. There were 3 periods in this study: Screening Period (visit 1), Treatment Period (visit 2 to Visit 13) and Follow-up Period (visit 14). In addition to screening and Baseline (visit 2), there were monthly visits from Month 1 to Month 12. This study included male and female patients (≥20 years old) diagnosed with visual impairment due to ME secondary to BRVO.

Being tested
Ranibizumab, Grid&Direct short pulse laser photocoagulation
Keywords
Ranibizumab, Grid&Direct short pulse laser photocoagulation, Macular edema, Branch retinal vein occlusion, BRVO, BCVA, CSFT, pro re nata
Medical subject headings
Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RanibizumabBiological

    Also called RFB002E

    Ranibizumab is a biologic and known anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) medication approved for treatment of ME (Macular Edema) due to RVO (Retinal Vein occlusion)

    0.5 mg ranibizumab applied one + PRN as intravitreal injection of 0.05 mL, with or without laser treatment

  • Grid&Direct short pulse laser photocoagulationRadiation

    Grid\&Direct short pulse laser photocoagulation is a kind of laser treatment to retina within vascular arcades and used to suppress macular edema

Study groups in NCT02953938
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
mono therapyActive comparatorranibizumab alone
Receives: Biological: Ranibizumab
combination therapyExperimentalranibizumab with Grid\&Direct short pulse laser photocoagulation
Receives: Biological: Ranibizumab; Radiation: Grid&Direct short pulse laser photocoagulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Difference in Mean Number of Ranibizumab Injections

    Number of ranibizumab treatments from Day 1 to Month 11 using full analysis set (observed) based on a stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test. Stratification was done based on categories of baseline decimal VA (<0.3, or =>0.3). Difference of mean number of injections, 95% confidence interval (CI) of difference and one-sided p-value of the CMH test was reported. Analysis was conducted within the FAS with observed data.

    Stratification was based on baseline visual acuity on logMAR scale (<0.52, >=0.52). Test was one-sided.

    Measured: Month 1 through Month 12

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. The Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using Decimal Chart and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Compared to Baseline

    Summary of BCVA (letters) absolute value and change from Baseline at Month 12 in the study eye - full analysis set (LOCF) was based on an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with treatment group, and stratification factors. Stratification was done based on categories of baseline decimal VA (<0.3, or =>0.3). The analyses was conducted within the FAS using the LOCF approach

    Stratification was based on baseline visual acuity on logMAR scale (<0.52, >=0.52). Test was one-sided.

    Measured: Month 1 through Month 12 (for ETDRS: Month 6 and Month 12)

  2. The Mean Change in BCVA From Month 1 Through Month 12 Compared to Baseline (Day 1) by the Treatment Arms

    Summary of BCVA (logMAR) absolute value and change from Baseline at Month 12 in the study eye - full analysis set (LOCF) was based on an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with treatment group, and stratification factors. Stratification was based on baseline visual acuity (< 0.52, >= 0.52). The analyses was conducted within the FAS using the LOCF approach

    Measured: Month 1 through Month 12

  3. BCVA (Letters) Number and Proportion of Patients With a BCVA Improvement vs. Baseline, Loss Less Than 15 Letters, or Attainment of Greater Than or Equal to 85 Letters at Month 6 and at Month 12 in the Study Eye

    Endpoints related to the number and proportion of patients with BCVA letter gain or loss from Baseline (Day1) was analyzed via stratified CMH test with stratification factors as described in primary model. The mean (SD) average (per patient) BCVA (logMAR) change from Baseline through Month 12

    Summary of BCVA (logMAR) mean average change from Baseline from Month 1 through Month 12 in the study eye

    Measured: Month 6 and Month 12

  4. The Mean Change in Change in Central Subfield Foveal Thickness (CSFT) From Month 1 Through Month 12 Compared to Baseline (Day1) by the Treatment Arms

    The mean change in investigator-assessed CSFT from Month 1 through Month 12 was compared to Baseline (Day1) by the treatment arms. The analyses at each visit was based on an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model as analogous to BCVA. The analyses was conducted within the FAS using the Last-Observation-Carried-Forward (LOCF) approach

    Measured: Month 1 through Month 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Nov 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start15 Dec 2016
  3. Primary completion28 Dec 2018
  4. Study completion28 Dec 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Phase IV, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, 2-arm, multicenter study
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
59 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02953938
Sponsor's protocol ID
CRFB002EJP09
Acronym
ZIPANGU
Status last verified
Feb 2020
First submitted
1 Nov 2016
Last updated
25 Feb 2020
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Novartis is committed to sharing access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies with qualified external researchers. Requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to protect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Ranibizumab and Grid&Direct short pulse laser photocoagulation in people with Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO), run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 7 sites in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 7 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Feb 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Difference in Mean Number of Ranibizumab Injections (time frame: Month 1 through Month 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Feb 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in