AzTrials
AzTrials

Back Pain Lower Back ChronicNCT02960269

Interprofessional Management of Chronic Back Pain in Rural and Remote Setting: Use of Telehealth vs. Secure Laptop-based Videoconferencing

A study testing interprofessional back pain assessment in people with Back Pain Lower Back Chronic, run by University of Saskatchewan at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This pilot study will evaluate the impact and overall experience of an interprofessional chronic low back pain patient care approach for people in rural and remote areas using Telehealth technology compared to secure laptop based videoconferencing (Vidyo). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Back Pain Lower Back Chronic
What is being tested?
interprofessional back pain assessment
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
12 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Nov 2016to Dec 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • chronic low back pain localized below costal margins and above gluteal folds and/or related leg pain, which is bad enough to limit their usual activities or daily routine and has been present for at least 3 months

Who cannot join

  • People with: third party payer insurance (i.e.worker's compensation board) for their back related complaints, with primarily neck or thoracic pain, and/ or with language, reading or comprehension barriers that would limit their ability to adequately complete the required study paperwork will be excluded from participating in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • University of Saskatchewan

    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W3

Other trials in Canada

About this study

This pilot study will evaluate the impact and overall experience of an interprofessional chronic low back pain patient care approach for people in rural and remote areas using Telehealth technology compared to secure laptop based videoconferencing (Vidyo).

Read the detailed description

People with chronic low back pain will be recruited to participate in a team assessment with a local rural nurse practitioner and an-urban based physiotherapist linking through telehealth. The assessment will include a detailed history, physical examination and jointly-delivered education and recommendations for further community-based management. Pre and post measures of self-reported pain, back-specific function, quality of life, and satisfaction will be completed 2-4 weeks after the assessment. Comparison of short-term outcomes will be made with a group of participants from another study using the a different telehealth technology (secure laptop based videoconferencing) same inclusion criteria, measures and health care providers (Clin Trials.gov NCT02225535). The health care providers will be interviewed to get feedback on their preference and experience using the different type of telehealth technology.

Being tested
interprofessional back pain assessment
Keywords
rural health, telehealth, physiotherapy, interprofessional

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • interprofessional back pain assessmentOther

    team assessment and education with urban physical therapist and rural nurse practitioner via telehealth

Study groups in NCT02960269
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Telehealth team assessmentExperimentalTeam assessment for back pain with nurse practitioner and physical therapist via telehealth
Receives: Other: interprofessional back pain assessment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient experience with telehealth

    Measured: 2-4 weeks after assessment

  2. Pain

    Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    Measured: 2-4 weeks after assessment

  3. Back-specific function

    Modified Oswestry Disability Index

    Measured: 2-4 weeks after assessment

  4. Participant satisfaction

    Modified VSQ-9

    Measured: 2-4 weeks after assessment

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Health care provider experience

    experience with telehealth technology

    Measured: within 2 weeks of completion of all assessments

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Nov 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2016
  3. Primary completionMar 2017
  4. Study completionDec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
12 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02960269
Sponsor's protocol ID
Bio16-49
Status last verified
Oct 2018
First submitted
7 Nov 2016
Last updated
11 Oct 2018
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing interprofessional back pain assessment in people with Back Pain Lower Back Chronic, run by University of Saskatchewan at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient experience with telehealth (time frame: 2-4 weeks after assessment). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Oct 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in