InfluenzaPhase 2NCT02962908
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase IIb Trial to Test FLU-v Vaccine
A Phase 2 study testing FLU-v, adjuvanted FLU-v and Saline in people with Influenza, run by PepTcell Limited at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
FLU-v is a vaccine that aims to protect against a wide range of flu viruses. The purpose of this study is to measure the immune responses induced by FLU-v vaccine. This study will look at how safe FLU-v is when administered and how successful it is in preventing flu or reducing the severity of the flu symptoms. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Influenza
- What is being tested?
- FLU-v, adjuvanted FLU-v and Saline
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 175 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- Aug 2016to 18 Jul 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy males or healthy non-pregnant females (as indicated by a negative blood pregnancy test done during the screening visit) between the ages of 18 and 60 years, inclusive;
- Women of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or postmenopausal for greater than or equal to one year) and men must agree to practice appropriate contraception (a combination of barrier and hormonal methods for women and a condom for men) from screening and until at least 30 days (up to Study Day 51 for females) and 90 days (up to Study Day 111 for males), after the last vaccination.
- A subject is in good health, as determined by a comprehensive clinical assessment {vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, oral temperature)}, blood chemistry test (electrolytes, renal/kidney function, liver function, C-reactive protein, complete blood count), medical history, general physical examination, self-reported illness} and the clinical judgment of the investigator;
- Able to understand and comply with planned study procedures;
- Provides signed informed consent form
Who cannot join
- Has a known allergy to any of the components of the vaccine.
- Has a history of severe reaction following immunization.
- Persons with immune deficiency/disorder, whether due to genetic defect, immunodeficiency disease, or immunosuppressive therapy.
- Women who have a positive pregnancy test during the screening visit or who are breastfeeding.
- Has a history of any of the following (reported by subjects):
- Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM);
Show all 28Show fewer
- Neoplastic disease - current or previous;
- Asthma or severe allergic disease;
- Bleeding disorders
- Chronic Hepatitis B and/or C infection;
- Chronic liver disease;
- Diabetes mellitus;
- Guillain-Barré syndrome;
- HIV;
- Rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune diseases;
- Severe renal disease;
- Transplant recipients;
- Unstable or progressive neurological disorders.
- Receipt of medicines/treatments that may affect evaluation of immunogenicity such as:
- Oral or parenteral steroids, high-dose inhaled steroids (greater than 800 micrograms/day of beclomethasone dipropionate or equivalent) or other immunosuppressive or cytotoxic drugs (azathioprine (Imuran), cyclosporine (Neoral, Sandimmune, SangCya); monoclonal antibodies such as basiliximab (Simulect), daclizumab (Zinbryta), infliximab (Remicade), rituximab (MabThera), alemtuzumab (Campath and Lemtrada), omalizumab (Xolair), abatacept (Orencia), adalimumab (Humira and Exemptia) and etanercept (Enbrel)basiliximab (Simulect), daclizumab (Zenapax), and muromonab (Orthoclone OKT3); corticosteroids such as prednisone (Deltasone, Orasone); tacrolimus (Prograf, Advagraf, Protopic); Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone); Mycopehnolate (Cellcept); Sirolimus (Rapamune); (within 6 months of vaccination in this study)
- Immunoglobulin or other blood products (plasma, blood cells, coagulation factors, haemoglobin)(within 3 months of vaccination in this study);
- An experimental agent (vaccine, drug, biologic, device, blood product, or medication) within 1 month of vaccination in this study, or expects to receive an experimental agent (during the study period).
- Influenza antiviral medication (Amantadine (Symmetrel); Rimantadine (Flumadine); Zanamivir (Relenza), Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) (within 4 weeks of vaccination in this study).
- Has received any influenza vaccine within 6 months of vaccination in this study.
- Has influenza-like illness (a sudden onset of symptoms and at least one of the four systemic symptoms-fever or feverishness, malaise, headache, myalgia and at least one of the three respiratory symptoms-cough, sore throat, shortness of breath) or acute respiratory infection (a sudden onset of symptoms and at least one of the four respiratory symptoms-cough, sore throat, shortness of breath, coryza (Rhinitis) and a clinician's judgement that the illness is due to an infection) within 6 months prior to vaccination in this study. These symptoms must have stopped the subject from carrying out their normal daily activities such as attending work or school for a period of at least 3 days.
- Has an acute illness, including an oral temperature greater than 38 degrees Celsius, within 1 week of vaccination.
- Has a history of alcohol or drug abuse within the last 2 years deemed unsuitable for inclusion by the investigator.
- Any abnormal haematology values and/or serum chemistries judged by the Investigator as clinically significant.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Single-centre Phase IIb Trial as Part of the EU-funded UNISEC Project to Assess the Immunogenicity and Safety of Different Formulations and Dosing Regimens of FLU-v Vaccine in Healthy Adults
FLU-v is a vaccine that aims to protect against a wide range of flu viruses. The purpose of this study is to measure the immune responses induced by FLU-v vaccine. This study will look at how safe FLU-v is when administered and how successful it is in preventing flu or reducing the severity of the flu symptoms.
The study requires 222 healthy volunteers 18-60 years old. Participation in the study will take a maximum of 7 months and consists of 5 visits. During visit 1, subjects will be examined by a doctor to make sure they are eligible to enter the study. A 15ml blood sample (a tablespoon) will be taken to check general health followed by a general physical exam. Medical history and some personal information will be collected. Subjects that have received the traditional flu vaccine in the past 6 months, and those females who are pregnant or breastfeeding will not be allowed in the study. Subjects of childbearing age must agree to use effective contraceptive methods.
Read more
At visit 2, subjects will be randomly allocated to one of the four treatment groups summarised below:
- Treatment 1: FLU-v (test vaccine) at the start of the study (Day 0) and then again 21 days later
- Treatment 2: FLU-v (test vaccine) with an additional substance added [known as Montanide ISA 51] which improves the effect of the test vaccine. Injection will be given on Day 0 and then Placebo (no test vaccine) alone 21 days later
- Treatment 3: Placebo (no test vaccine) injection on Day 0 and then 21 days later
- Treatment 4: Placebo (no test vaccine) with an additional substance added [known as Montanide ISA 51] on Day 0 and then Placebo (no test vaccine) alone 21 days later Treatment will be injected under the skin in the upper arm on day 0 (visit 2) and 21 days later (visit 3). Blood samples will be taken before treatment (day 0), and on days 42 (visit 4) and 180 (visit 5) to the immune responses induced by the vaccine.
Subjects will be asked to complete a diary card to write down any side effects that they may experience after vaccination. Subjects will also be asked to complete another diary card to document any flu-like symptoms experienced between December 2016 and March 2017, this time is officially considered as the flu season. During this period, if the subject experiences flu-like symptoms, a collection of a nose and tonsil swab will be arranged by the study site to confirm whether they have the flu or not.
Read the detailed description
Rationale: Current seasonal influenza vaccines mainly induce immune responses against viral membrane glycoproteins. These proteins, however, undergo continuous mutations by a process called antigenic drift. To prevent immune escape, annual vaccination with the latest predicted viral strains is adopted. Such vaccination strategy not only poses inconvenience and cost-inefficiency, but also results in poor protective effectiveness when the vaccinated strains are mismatched with the actual circulating strains. The latter point is especially of concern during a pandemic outbreak, when a large geographical area is affected and the general population is naïve to the newly re-assorted viral strain due to antigenic shift.
Objective: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the influenza vaccine (FLU-v, as a suspension or adjuvanted as emulsion) targeting conserved immunogenic regions of influenza A and B viruses in healthy adults, in particular to show that the TH1 cytokine response at 42 and 180 days after the first injection is greater in the adjuvanted FLU-v and unadjuvanted FLU-v than in the placebo.
Study design: A total of 222 study participants will be recruited. The study follows a factorial design where the two factors are treatment (FLU-v / placebo) and formulation (unadjuvanted / suspension, adjuvanted / emulsion). Subjects will be randomised in two strata (age 18 to 40, age 41 to 60) to one of the following treatment regimens:
- Group 1 (n=74): FLU-v (unadjuvanted) as a suspension in pH neutral HCl/NaOH (0.5mL) on Day 0 and Day 21
- Group 2 (n=74): (0.5mL) ISA-51-adjuvanted FLU-v emulsified in water for injection (WFI) on Day 0, saline (0.5mL) on Day 21
- Group 3 (n=37): saline solution (0.5mL ) on Day 0 and Day 21
- Group 4 (n=37): WFI and ISA-51 emulsion (0.5mL) on Day 0, saline (0.5mL) on Day 21
Each administration will be given subcutaneously. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) will be collected by AE questionnaire/diary card until day 42. Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) will be collected for the entire study period. The treatments will be administered starting in third quarter of 2016 in order to provide protection for the subsequent influenza season starting in December 2016. Blood samples will be taken from all subjects on day 0 (before FLU-v vaccination), 42 (21 days after the second dosing) and 180 (159 days after the second dosing) for the evaluation of FLU-v-specific cellular and humoral immune responses. Clinical symptom scores to ascertain severity and the incidence of RT-PCR-confirmed influenza A and/or B infection will be recorded during the subsequent influenza season (December 2016 to March 2017) to decide clinical efficacy of the tested vaccines.
Study population: Healthy volunteers aged 18-60 years. Intervention: FLU-v investigational influenza vaccine lyophilised product containing 500 micrograms of total peptides reconstituted in either 0.01M HCl (0.25ml) and 0.01M NaOH (0.25ml) to achieve a volume of 0.5ml, or emulsified in WFI (water for injection, 0.25ml) and ISA-51 (0.25ml) to achieve a volume of 0.5ml.
Primary study parameters/endpoints: For immunogenicity: To compare the change from baseline (Day 0) between treatments in cellular immune responses, specifically TH1 cytokines, in all groups 42 and 180 days following FLU-v vaccination. For safety: (1) To evaluate the solicited AEs in all subjects until 21 days after the last dosing of the study vaccine (FLU-v); (2) To evaluate the unsolicited AEs and SAEs in all subjects for the entire study period after the first dosing of FLU-v.
Secondary study parameters/endpoints: To evaluate the humoral immune responses specific to FLU-v and TH2 cytokines from baseline in all groups 42 and 180 days following FLU-v vaccination.
Exploratory study parameters/endpoints: For immunogenicity: To evaluate the change from baseline in cellular immune responses based on additional CMI assays such as ELISPOT (Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot) in all groups at 42 and 180 days following FLU-v vaccination, in a subset of subjects chosen at random.
Clinical efficacy: (1) To evaluate the efficacy of FLU-v vaccine in reducing the incidence of RT-PCR confirmed influenza A and/or B infections in all subjects during the influenza season 2016-2017. (2) To evaluate the efficacy of FLU-v vaccine in the reduction of symptom score among RT-PCR confirmed influenza A and/or B infection cases during the influenza season 2016-2017. The relationship between efficacy and cellular and humoral response will be explored if possible.
The effect of previous influenza vaccination on the immunogenicity of FLU-v will be assessed in a post-hoc exploratory analysis after stratification of the data based on exposure to the influenza vaccine in the previous 24 months or over.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:
The intended application of the IMP is as a prophylactic vaccine to prevent influenza virus infection by inducing an enhanced influenza-specific immune response. The FLU-v vaccine is designed to be delivered either as a naturally particulate suspension (i.e. no adjuvant) or emulsified in adjuvant. Particulate and emulsified protein preparations are preferentially taken up by phagocytic cells (e.g. dendritic cells) responsible for inducing primary immune responses.
Treatment with FLU-v of up to four doses of 263 μg/occasion or up to two doses of 553 μg/occasion, with or without adjuvant, was well tolerated in animals with no signs of systemic toxicity. In pre-clinical studies, subcutaneous administration of ISA 51 resulted in no systemic toxicity. At the injection sites and occasionally in adjacent tissue the injected material remained surrounded by a mild chronic inflammatory response. As the IMP is provided in one presentation (500 μg of the combined peptide) in lyophilized form for suspension in a sealed single-use vial, overdose is highly unlikely.
In a single centre, randomised, double blind phase I study of the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of FLU-v no safety or tolerability concerns were identified at the doses administered (250 μg and 500 μg FLU-v) to the subjects in this clinical study and no safety or tolerability concerns were identified following administration of the adjuvant to the subjects (1). FLU-v vaccine candidate was demonstrated to be immunogenic in humans, as measured by ex vivo γ-interferon production (1).
Clinical experience with Montanide ISA 51 dates back to the 1990s and most trials were related to cancer and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Currently, cancer trials in melanoma, colorectal, prostate, cervical, brain cancer and leukemia are ongoing. Frequency of vaccination is often between 2 and 4 weeks, and the number of injections can reach up to 40. Route of immunization is most often subcutaneous and volume of injection can reach up to 3mL. Most common local reactions are local pain, tenderness, erythema and granuloma at the injection site. Less frequently, mild to moderate transient indurations and swelling are described. General reactions are mainly 'flu-like symptoms such as chills, fever and headaches. Lethargy and nausea are also observed. The intensity is usually mild or moderate. No biological changes are generally observed. As the Placebo vaccine is provided in a sealed single-use vial, overdose is highly unlikely (Influenza virus (FLU-v) vaccine Investigator's Brochure, Edition 2.0, 07 September 2015).
- Conditions
- Influenza
- Being tested
- FLU-v, adjuvanted FLU-v, Saline, Adjuvanted placebo
- Keywords
- broad, universal, vaccine, influenza, peptide, Tcell, UNISEC
- Medical subject headings
- Influenza, Human
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FLU-vBiological
Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 500 ug of FLU-v as 0.5ml suspension in 0.01M HCl and 0.01M NaOH
adjuvanted FLU-vBiological
Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 500ug of FLU-v emulsified in 0.25ml of Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant (Seppic, France) and 0.25ml of water for injection
SalineBiological
Also called NaCl
Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 0.5ml of saline
Adjuvanted placeboBiological
Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with an emulsion made with 0.25ml of Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant (Seppic, France) and 0.25ml of water for injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | (n=74): FLU-v on Day 0 and Day 21 Receives: Biological: FLU-v |
| Group 2 | Experimental | (n=74): adjuvanted FLU-v on Day 0, saline (0.5mL) on Day 21 Receives: Biological: adjuvanted FLU-v; Biological: Saline |
| Group 3 | Placebo comparator | (n=37): saline solution (0.5ml) on Day 0 and Day 21 Receives: Biological: Saline |
| Group 4 | Placebo comparator | (n=37): Adjuvanted placebo on Day 0, saline (0.5mL) on Day 21 Receives: Biological: Saline; Biological: Adjuvanted placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
CD4+ and CD8+ Th1 Cellular Immunogenicity on Day 42
Comparison of the TH1 response in the treatment arms compared to placebo from baseline to day 42 following vaccination, calculated as the median fold change in the number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells positive for IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL-2 and CD107a. Fold change is calculated as the number of cells on day 42 divided by number of cells on day 0.
Measured: day 0 to day 42
CD4+ and CD8+ Th1 Cellular Immunogenicity on Day 180
Comparison of the TH1 response in the treatment arms compared to placebo from baseline to day 180 following vaccination, calculated as the median fold change in the number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells positive for IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL-2 and CD107a. Fold change is calculated as the number of cells on day 180 divided by number of cells on day 0.
Measured: Day 0 to day 180
Percentage of TH1 Cytokine Responders (Responders Defined as Those With >2 Fold Median Increase From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells Positive for Particular Cytokine)
To compare the number of subjects that showed at least a two-fold increase on day 42 and day 180 following vaccination in the number of CD4+and CD8+ T-cells secreting TH1 cytokines in all groups.
Measured: prevaccination, day 42 (21 days after last vaccination) and day 180.
Percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ TH1 Cytokine Responders Determined by Mixture Models for Single-cell Assays (MIMOSA)
To compare the number of subjects identified as responders for cytokine markers as determined by MIMOSA analysis (Responders based on a false discovery rate derived P-value <0.05).
Measured: day 0 to day 42 and day 180
IFN-gamma Responses Measured by ELISA
Median fold change in IFN-gamma secretion from PBMCs stimulated in vitro with FLU-v antigens. IFN-gamma secretion was measured by ELISA.Fold change was measured as secretion on day 42 divided by secretion on day 0, and secretion on day 180 divided by secretion on day 0.
Measured: day 0 to day 42, day 0 to day 180
Percentage of Responders on Day 42 and Day 180 for IFNgamma Secretion by PBMCs
Responders were defined as subjects having at least a two-fold increase in the amount of IFNg secreted on day 42 and day 180 compared the amount secreted on day 0. IFNg was measured by ELISA
Measured: prevaccination (day 0) to postvaccination (day 42 and day 180)
Solicited AEs
To evaluate the solicited AEs in all subjects
Measured: until 21 days after the last dosing of the study vaccine
Secondary outcomes (2)
Antibody Responses to FLU-v
To evaluate the IgG levels as a measure of antibody responses to FLU-v on day 0 (baseline) and on days 42 and 180 following FLU-v vaccination. IgG antibodies were measured by ELISA. The geometric mean for each treatment group was provided.
Measured: prevaccination, day 42 (21 days after last vaccination) and day 180.
Th2 Cytokine Responses (IL-4)
To evaluate the level of TH2 cytokines (IL-4) from baseline in all groups 42 and 180 days following FLU-v vaccination.
Measured: prevaccination, day 42 (21 days after last vaccination) and day 180.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2016
- Primary completion18 Jul 2017
- Study completion18 Jul 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for InfluenzaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 175 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- PepTcell Limited
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Seventh Framework Programme, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Robert Koch Institut, Norwegian Institute of Public Health
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Paul Groeneveld, PhD, Principal investigator, Isala
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02962908
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FLU-v 003
- Other IDs
- 2015-001932-38, 2015
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 7 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 16 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Pleguezuelos O, Robinson S, Fernandez A, Stoloff GA, Caparros-Wanderley W. Meta-Analysis and Potential Role of Preexisting Heterosubtypic Cellular Immunity Based on Variations in Disease Severity Outcomes for Influenza Live Viral Challenges in Humans. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015 Aug;22(8):949-56. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00101-15. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
PubMed 26084515Pleguezuelos O, Robinson S, Fernandez A, Stoloff GA, Mann A, Gilbert A, Balaratnam G, Wilkinson T, Lambkin-Williams R, Oxford J, Caparros-Wanderley W. A Synthetic Influenza Virus Vaccine Induces a Cellular Immune Response That Correlates with Reduction in Symptomatology and Virus Shedding in a Randomized Phase Ib Live-Virus Challenge in Humans. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015 Jul;22(7):828-35. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00098-15. Epub 2015 May 20.
PubMed 25994549Pleguezuelos O, Robinson S, Stoloff GA, Caparros-Wanderley W. Synthetic Influenza vaccine (FLU-v) stimulates cell mediated immunity in a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled Phase I trial. Vaccine. 2012 Jun 29;30(31):4655-60. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.089. Epub 2012 May 8.
PubMed 22575166Stoloff GA, Caparros-Wanderley W. Synthetic multi-epitope peptides identified in silico induce protective immunity against multiple influenza serotypes. Eur J Immunol. 2007 Sep;37(9):2441-9. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737254.
PubMed 17668898van Doorn E, Pleguezuelos O, Liu H, Fernandez A, Bannister R, Stoloff G, Oftung F, Norley S, Huckriede A, Frijlink HW, Hak E. Evaluation of the immunogenicity and safety of different doses and formulations of a broad spectrum influenza vaccine (FLU-v) developed by SEEK: study protocol for a single-center, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical phase IIb trial. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 4;17(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2341-9.
PubMed 28376743Pleguezuelos O, Dille J, de Groen S, Oftung F, Niesters HGM, Islam MA, Naess LM, Hungnes O, Aldarij N, Idema DL, Perez AF, James E, Frijlink HW, Stoloff G, Groeneveld P, Hak E. Immunogenicity, Safety, and Efficacy of a Standalone Universal Influenza Vaccine, FLU-v, in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Apr 7;172(7):453-462. doi: 10.7326/M19-0735. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
PubMed 32150750
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Single-centre Phase IIb Trial as Part of the EU-funded UNISEC Project to Assess the Immunogenicity and Safety of Different Formulations and Dosing Regimens of FLU-v Vaccine in Healthy Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02962908
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FLU-v 003
- Conditions
- Influenza
- Keywords
- broad, universal, vaccine, influenza, peptide, Tcell, UNISEC
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 175 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PepTcell LimitedIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Seventh Framework Programme, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Robert Koch Institut, Norwegian Institute of Public Health
- Study start
- Aug 2016
- Primary completion
- 18 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Jul 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Apr 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
FLU-v is a vaccine that aims to protect against a wide range of flu viruses. The purpose of this study is to measure the immune responses induced by FLU-v vaccine. This study will look at how safe FLU-v is when administered and how successful it is in preventing flu or reducing the severity of the flu symptoms.
The study requires 222 healthy volunteers 18-60 years old. Participation in the study will take a maximum of 7 months and consists of 5 visits. During visit 1, subjects will be examined by a doctor to make sure they are eligible to enter the study. A 15ml blood sample (a tablespoon) will be taken to check general health followed by a general physical exam. Medical history and some personal information will be collected. Subjects that have received the traditional flu vaccine in the past 6 months, and those females who are pregnant or breastfeeding will not be allowed in the study. Subjects of childbearing age must agree to use effective contraceptive methods.
At visit 2, subjects will be randomly allocated to one of the four treatment groups summarised below:
- Treatment 1: FLU-v (test vaccine) at the start of the study (Day 0) and then again 21 days later
- Treatment 2: FLU-v (test vaccine) with an additional substance added [known as Montanide ISA 51] which improves the effect of the test vaccine. Injection will be given on Day 0 and then Placebo (no test vaccine) alone 21 days later
- Treatment 3: Placebo (no test vaccine) injection on Day 0 and then 21 days later
- Treatment 4: Placebo (no test vaccine) with an additional substance added [known as Montanide ISA 51] on Day 0 and then Placebo (no test vaccine) alone 21 days later Treatment will be injected under the skin in the upper arm on day 0 (visit 2) and 21 days later (visit 3). Blood samples will be taken before treatment (day 0), and on days 42 (visit 4) and 180 (visit 5) to the immune responses induced by the vaccine.
Subjects will be asked to complete a diary card to write down any side effects that they may experience after vaccination. Subjects will also be asked to complete another diary card to document any flu-like symptoms experienced between December 2016 and March 2017, this time is officially considered as the flu season. During this period, if the subject experiences flu-like symptoms, a collection of a nose and tonsil swab will be arranged by the study site to confirm whether they have the flu or not.
Detailed description
Rationale: Current seasonal influenza vaccines mainly induce immune responses against viral membrane glycoproteins. These proteins, however, undergo continuous mutations by a process called antigenic drift. To prevent immune escape, annual vaccination with the latest predicted viral strains is adopted. Such vaccination strategy not only poses inconvenience and cost-inefficiency, but also results in poor protective effectiveness when the vaccinated strains are mismatched with the actual circulating strains. The latter point is especially of concern during a pandemic outbreak, when a large geographical area is affected and the general population is naïve to the newly re-assorted viral strain due to antigenic shift.
Objective: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the influenza vaccine (FLU-v, as a suspension or adjuvanted as emulsion) targeting conserved immunogenic regions of influenza A and B viruses in healthy adults, in particular to show that the TH1 cytokine response at 42 and 180 days after the first injection is greater in the adjuvanted FLU-v and unadjuvanted FLU-v than in the placebo.
Study design: A total of 222 study participants will be recruited. The study follows a factorial design where the two factors are treatment (FLU-v / placebo) and formulation (unadjuvanted / suspension, adjuvanted / emulsion). Subjects will be randomised in two strata (age 18 to 40, age 41 to 60) to one of the following treatment regimens:
- Group 1 (n=74): FLU-v (unadjuvanted) as a suspension in pH neutral HCl/NaOH (0.5mL) on Day 0 and Day 21
- Group 2 (n=74): (0.5mL) ISA-51-adjuvanted FLU-v emulsified in water for injection (WFI) on Day 0, saline (0.5mL) on Day 21
- Group 3 (n=37): saline solution (0.5mL ) on Day 0 and Day 21
- Group 4 (n=37): WFI and ISA-51 emulsion (0.5mL) on Day 0, saline (0.5mL) on Day 21
Each administration will be given subcutaneously. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) will be collected by AE questionnaire/diary card until day 42. Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) will be collected for the entire study period. The treatments will be administered starting in third quarter of 2016 in order to provide protection for the subsequent influenza season starting in December 2016. Blood samples will be taken from all subjects on day 0 (before FLU-v vaccination), 42 (21 days after the second dosing) and 180 (159 days after the second dosing) for the evaluation of FLU-v-specific cellular and humoral immune responses. Clinical symptom scores to ascertain severity and the incidence of RT-PCR-confirmed influenza A and/or B infection will be recorded during the subsequent influenza season (December 2016 to March 2017) to decide clinical efficacy of the tested vaccines.
Study population: Healthy volunteers aged 18-60 years. Intervention: FLU-v investigational influenza vaccine lyophilised product containing 500 micrograms of total peptides reconstituted in either 0.01M HCl (0.25ml) and 0.01M NaOH (0.25ml) to achieve a volume of 0.5ml, or emulsified in WFI (water for injection, 0.25ml) and ISA-51 (0.25ml) to achieve a volume of 0.5ml.
Primary study parameters/endpoints: For immunogenicity: To compare the change from baseline (Day 0) between treatments in cellular immune responses, specifically TH1 cytokines, in all groups 42 and 180 days following FLU-v vaccination. For safety: (1) To evaluate the solicited AEs in all subjects until 21 days after the last dosing of the study vaccine (FLU-v); (2) To evaluate the unsolicited AEs and SAEs in all subjects for the entire study period after the first dosing of FLU-v.
Secondary study parameters/endpoints: To evaluate the humoral immune responses specific to FLU-v and TH2 cytokines from baseline in all groups 42 and 180 days following FLU-v vaccination.
Exploratory study parameters/endpoints: For immunogenicity: To evaluate the change from baseline in cellular immune responses based on additional CMI assays such as ELISPOT (Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot) in all groups at 42 and 180 days following FLU-v vaccination, in a subset of subjects chosen at random.
Clinical efficacy: (1) To evaluate the efficacy of FLU-v vaccine in reducing the incidence of RT-PCR confirmed influenza A and/or B infections in all subjects during the influenza season 2016-2017. (2) To evaluate the efficacy of FLU-v vaccine in the reduction of symptom score among RT-PCR confirmed influenza A and/or B infection cases during the influenza season 2016-2017. The relationship between efficacy and cellular and humoral response will be explored if possible.
The effect of previous influenza vaccination on the immunogenicity of FLU-v will be assessed in a post-hoc exploratory analysis after stratification of the data based on exposure to the influenza vaccine in the previous 24 months or over.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:
The intended application of the IMP is as a prophylactic vaccine to prevent influenza virus infection by inducing an enhanced influenza-specific immune response. The FLU-v vaccine is designed to be delivered either as a naturally particulate suspension (i.e. no adjuvant) or emulsified in adjuvant. Particulate and emulsified protein preparations are preferentially taken up by phagocytic cells (e.g. dendritic cells) responsible for inducing primary immune responses.
Treatment with FLU-v of up to four doses of 263 μg/occasion or up to two doses of 553 μg/occasion, with or without adjuvant, was well tolerated in animals with no signs of systemic toxicity. In pre-clinical studies, subcutaneous administration of ISA 51 resulted in no systemic toxicity. At the injection sites and occasionally in adjacent tissue the injected material remained surrounded by a mild chronic inflammatory response. As the IMP is provided in one presentation (500 μg of the combined peptide) in lyophilized form for suspension in a sealed single-use vial, overdose is highly unlikely.
In a single centre, randomised, double blind phase I study of the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of FLU-v no safety or tolerability concerns were identified at the doses administered (250 μg and 500 μg FLU-v) to the subjects in this clinical study and no safety or tolerability concerns were identified following administration of the adjuvant to the subjects (1). FLU-v vaccine candidate was demonstrated to be immunogenic in humans, as measured by ex vivo γ-interferon production (1).
Clinical experience with Montanide ISA 51 dates back to the 1990s and most trials were related to cancer and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Currently, cancer trials in melanoma, colorectal, prostate, cervical, brain cancer and leukemia are ongoing. Frequency of vaccination is often between 2 and 4 weeks, and the number of injections can reach up to 40. Route of immunization is most often subcutaneous and volume of injection can reach up to 3mL. Most common local reactions are local pain, tenderness, erythema and granuloma at the injection site. Less frequently, mild to moderate transient indurations and swelling are described. General reactions are mainly 'flu-like symptoms such as chills, fever and headaches. Lethargy and nausea are also observed. The intensity is usually mild or moderate. No biological changes are generally observed. As the Placebo vaccine is provided in a sealed single-use vial, overdose is highly unlikely (Influenza virus (FLU-v) vaccine Investigator's Brochure, Edition 2.0, 07 September 2015).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | Biological: FLU-v(n=74): FLU-v on Day 0 and Day 21 |
| Group 2 | Experimental | Biological: adjuvanted FLU-v, Biological: Saline(n=74): adjuvanted FLU-v on Day 0, saline (0.5mL) on Day 21 |
| Group 3 | Placebo comparator | Biological: Saline(n=37): saline solution (0.5ml) on Day 0 and Day 21 |
| Group 4 | Placebo comparator | Biological: Saline, Biological: Adjuvanted placebo(n=37): Adjuvanted placebo on Day 0, saline (0.5mL) on Day 21 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Healthy males or healthy non-pregnant females (as indicated by a negative blood pregnancy test done during the screening visit) between the ages of 18 and 60 years, inclusive;
- Women of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or postmenopausal for greater than or equal to one year) and men must agree to practice appropriate contraception (a combination of barrier and hormonal methods for women and a condom for men) from screening and until at least 30 days (up to Study Day 51 for females) and 90 days (up to Study Day 111 for males), after the last vaccination.
- A subject is in good health, as determined by a comprehensive clinical assessment {vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, oral temperature)}, blood chemistry test (electrolytes, renal/kidney function, liver function, C-reactive protein, complete blood count), medical history, general physical examination, self-reported illness} and the clinical judgment of the investigator;
- Able to understand and comply with planned study procedures;
- Provides signed informed consent form
Key exclusion criteria (28 listed)
- Has a known allergy to any of the components of the vaccine.
- Has a history of severe reaction following immunization.
- Persons with immune deficiency/disorder, whether due to genetic defect, immunodeficiency disease, or immunosuppressive therapy.
- Women who have a positive pregnancy test during the screening visit or who are breastfeeding.
- Has a history of any of the following (reported by subjects):
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FLU-vSubcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 500 ug of FLU-v as 0.5ml suspension in 0.01M HCl and 0.01M NaOH | Biological | Group 1 |
| adjuvanted FLU-vSubcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 500ug of FLU-v emulsified in 0.25ml of Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant (Seppic, France) and 0.25ml of water for injection | Biological | Group 2 |
| SalineAlso: NaClSubcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 0.5ml of saline | Biological | Group 2, Group 3, Group 4 |
| Adjuvanted placeboSubcutaneous injection in the upper arm with an emulsion made with 0.25ml of Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant (Seppic, France) and 0.25ml of water for injection | Biological | Group 4 |
Primary outcome
CD4+ and CD8+ Th1 Cellular Immunogenicity on Day 42
Time frame: day 0 to day 42
Comparison of the TH1 response in the treatment arms compared to placebo from baseline to day 42 following vaccination, calculated as the median fold change in the number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells positive for IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL-2 and CD107a. Fold change is calculated as the number of cells on day 42 divided by number of cells on day 0.
CD4+ and CD8+ Th1 Cellular Immunogenicity on Day 180
Time frame: Day 0 to day 180
Comparison of the TH1 response in the treatment arms compared to placebo from baseline to day 180 following vaccination, calculated as the median fold change in the number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells positive for IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL-2 and CD107a. Fold change is calculated as the number of cells on day 180 divided by number of cells on day 0.
Percentage of TH1 Cytokine Responders (Responders Defined as Those With >2 Fold Median Increase From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells Positive for Particular Cytokine)
Time frame: prevaccination, day 42 (21 days after last vaccination) and day 180.
To compare the number of subjects that showed at least a two-fold increase on day 42 and day 180 following vaccination in the number of CD4+and CD8+ T-cells secreting TH1 cytokines in all groups.
Percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ TH1 Cytokine Responders Determined by Mixture Models for Single-cell Assays (MIMOSA)
Time frame: day 0 to day 42 and day 180
To compare the number of subjects identified as responders for cytokine markers as determined by MIMOSA analysis (Responders based on a false discovery rate derived P-value <0.05).
IFN-gamma Responses Measured by ELISA
Time frame: day 0 to day 42, day 0 to day 180
Median fold change in IFN-gamma secretion from PBMCs stimulated in vitro with FLU-v antigens. IFN-gamma secretion was measured by ELISA.Fold change was measured as secretion on day 42 divided by secretion on day 0, and secretion on day 180 divided by secretion on day 0.
Percentage of Responders on Day 42 and Day 180 for IFNgamma Secretion by PBMCs
Time frame: prevaccination (day 0) to postvaccination (day 42 and day 180)
Responders were defined as subjects having at least a two-fold increase in the amount of IFNg secreted on day 42 and day 180 compared the amount secreted on day 0. IFNg was measured by ELISA
Solicited AEs
Time frame: until 21 days after the last dosing of the study vaccine
To evaluate the solicited AEs in all subjects
2 secondary outcomes
Antibody Responses to FLU-v
Time frame: prevaccination, day 42 (21 days after last vaccination) and day 180.
Th2 Cytokine Responses (IL-4)
Time frame: prevaccination, day 42 (21 days after last vaccination) and day 180.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Sep 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 26084515Pleguezuelos O, Robinson S, Fernandez A, Stoloff GA, Caparros-Wanderley W. Meta-Analysis and Potential Role of Preexisting Heterosubtypic Cellular Immunity Based on Variations in Disease Severity Outcomes for Influenza Live Viral Challenges in Humans. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015 Aug;22(8):949-56. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00101-15. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
- Background: PubMed 25994549Pleguezuelos O, Robinson S, Fernandez A, Stoloff GA, Mann A, Gilbert A, Balaratnam G, Wilkinson T, Lambkin-Williams R, Oxford J, Caparros-Wanderley W. A Synthetic Influenza Virus Vaccine Induces a Cellular Immune Response That Correlates with Reduction in Symptomatology and Virus Shedding in a Randomized Phase Ib Live-Virus Challenge in Humans. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015 Jul;22(7):828-35. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00098-15. Epub 2015 May 20.
- Background: PubMed 22575166Pleguezuelos O, Robinson S, Stoloff GA, Caparros-Wanderley W. Synthetic Influenza vaccine (FLU-v) stimulates cell mediated immunity in a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled Phase I trial. Vaccine. 2012 Jun 29;30(31):4655-60. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.089. Epub 2012 May 8.
- Background: PubMed 17668898Stoloff GA, Caparros-Wanderley W. Synthetic multi-epitope peptides identified in silico induce protective immunity against multiple influenza serotypes. Eur J Immunol. 2007 Sep;37(9):2441-9. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737254.
- Background: PubMed 28376743van Doorn E, Pleguezuelos O, Liu H, Fernandez A, Bannister R, Stoloff G, Oftung F, Norley S, Huckriede A, Frijlink HW, Hak E. Evaluation of the immunogenicity and safety of different doses and formulations of a broad spectrum influenza vaccine (FLU-v) developed by SEEK: study protocol for a single-center, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical phase IIb trial. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 4;17(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2341-9.
- Results publication: PubMed 32150750Pleguezuelos O, Dille J, de Groen S, Oftung F, Niesters HGM, Islam MA, Naess LM, Hungnes O, Aldarij N, Idema DL, Perez AF, James E, Frijlink HW, Stoloff G, Groeneveld P, Hak E. Immunogenicity, Safety, and Efficacy of a Standalone Universal Influenza Vaccine, FLU-v, in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Apr 7;172(7):453-462. doi: 10.7326/M19-0735. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
- End of project reporting for the UNISEC ConsortiumLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Influenza
RecruitingPhase 2
BPL-1357 Against H1N1 Influenza Virus Challenge
Influenza, Human
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Immunogenicity of Chimeric Hemagglutinin mRNA Vaccine Candidates
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Tozorakimab in Patients Hospitalised for Viral Lung Infection Requiring Supplemental Oxygen
Viral Lung Infection and Acute Respiratory Failure
RecruitingObservational study
Screening for LID Clinical Studies Unit Healthy Volunteer Protocols
Zika, Influenza
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Long-term Observation of Hemagglutinin and Neuraminidase Inhibition Antibody Titers After Influenza Challenge
Post Influenza
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Paul Groeneveld, PhD principal investigator
Isala
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing FLU-v, adjuvanted FLU-v and Saline in people with Influenza, run by PepTcell Limited at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 28 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
CD4+ and CD8+ Th1 Cellular Immunogenicity on Day 42 (time frame: day 0 to day 42). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02962908, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2020.