MelanomaPhase 2/3NCT02962947
MELABLOCK: A Clinical Trial on the Efficacy and Safety of Propranolol 80 mg in Melanoma Patients
A Phase 2/3 study testing Propranolol in people with Melanoma, run by Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze.
Trial summary
The effectiveness of propranolol in infantile hemangiomas, the apparent better response to propranolol in breast cancer and the use of propranolol in a proportion of patients who did not develop melanoma recurrence suggested to use this unselective β---blocker to test the study hypothesis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Melanoma
- What is being tested?
- Propranolol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 546 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jun 2017to Jun 2022
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Stage: Ib (T1b, T2a), IIa (T2b, T3a), IIb (T3b T4a) and IIc (T4b), N0, M0; IIIA (N1a, N1b)
- Signed Informed Consent;
- Performance Status of 0---1 (ECOG);
- Hematopoietic functionality at the entry of the study: leukocytes, platelets, hemoglobin and neutrophils within the normal limits of laboratory references;
- Hepatic and renal functionality at the entry of the study: LDH, bilirubin, AST, ALT, alkalinephosphatase, BUN and serum creatinine within the normal range of each laboratory;
Who cannot join
- Primary not cutaneous melanoma;
- Clinical/radiological evidence or laboratory/pathology report of not completely resectedmelanoma;
- History of cancer
- Current use or past use in the last two years of any b---blockers for any other medical condition
- Current use of verapamil, diltiazem or similar calcium channel blocker
- Current use of centrally acting antihypertensive drugs as α---methyldopa, clonidine
Show all 27Show fewer
- Hypersensitivity to propranolol or to any of the excipients;
- Acute heart failure or during episodes of heart failure decompensation requiring i.v.
- inotropic therapy;
- Cardiogenic shock;
- Sinoatrial block ;
- Second or third degree atrio---ventricular block;
- Marked bradycardia (less than 60 beats/min) ;
- Extreme hypotension (systolic blood pressure <100mmHg) ;
- Severe asthma or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ;
- Sick sinus syndrome;
- Severe forms of peripheral arterial occlusive disease and Raynaud's syndrome;
- Metabolic acidosis
- Asthma
- Diabetes
- Heart failure
- History of psoriasis
- Pregnancy or breast feeding or planning on becoming pregnant during the 3 years of treatment (for major details see the Section "Pregnancy in the Study", below);
- Any medical condition that in the physician's opinion would potentially interfere with the patient ability to adhere to protocol and treatment;
- Any logistic condition that do not allow follow---up of the disease of the patient.
- Hypersensitivity to propranolol, child bearing or breastfeeding.
- Pheocromocytoma 27. Prinzmetal's Angina 28. Fasting -
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Melablock: A Multicentre Randomized, Double---blinded and Placebo---controlled Clinical Trial on the Efficacy and Safety of Once Daily Propranolol 80 mg Retard for the Prevention of Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma Recurrence
The effectiveness of propranolol in infantile hemangiomas, the apparent better response to propranolol in breast cancer and the use of propranolol in a proportion of patients who did not develop melanoma recurrence suggested to use this unselective β---blocker to test the study hypothesis. The investigators propose a randomized double---blind placebo---controlled clinical trial (RTC) to evaluate whether the treatment with propranolol 80 mgR/die reduce the risk of CMM recurrence and mortality. Patients with resected stage II/IIIA CMM will be recruited in various Centers in Italy. Participants will be randomly assigned to propranolol treatment or placebo (1:1 ratio), treated for at least 1 year and followed for 2 years. Recruitment will proceed simultaneously at the different Centers, and will be completed in 2 years. The primary outcome of the entire trial will be, however, estimated by assessing a reduction in overall mortality at five years. The investigators will also evaluate general CMM recurrence and CMM specific mortality.
Read the detailed description
Cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) represents a major public health problem.Although melanoma accounts for only 4% of all dermatologic cancers, it is responsible for 80% of deaths from skin cancer; only 14% of patients with metastatic melanoma survive for five years . The probability of survival for melanoma stage II/IIIA at 15 years is around 50%.
Treatment with dacarbazine, fotemustine, temozolomide, interferon---α and interleukin---2 has been proposed in metastatic melanoma, but these drugs exert poor efficacy. More recently, ipilimumab, which blocks cytotoxic T---lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 to potentiate an antitumor T---cell response has been approved for the treatment of HLA---A*0201-positive patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma . This treatment has been found to delay mortality by about 4 months, although, in clinical trials a fraction of patients lived much longer . However, the drug caused severe or fatal side effects in almost 13% of patients, prompting the FDA to qualify its approval with a mitigation strategy. There were 14 deaths related to the study drugs (2.1%), and 7 were associated with immune---related adverse events. These findings do not suggest the use of ipilimumab in non metastatic patients. After surgical resection no specific pharmacotherapy is recommended for patients with stage II/IIIA CMM until metastases are found.
β---adrenoceptor antagonists (β---blockers) belong to one of the most widely used classes of drugs in clinical practice. Their use is mainly directed to the chronic management of hypertension , although they are also prescribed for ischemic heart disease, heart failure, anxiety, tremor, migraine and glaucoma , Initial pharmacoepidemiological evidence shows that β---blockers may reduce cancer risk. Indeed, β--- blockers have been reported to exert a certain degree of protection against prostate cancer . More recently, β---blocker treatment for concomitant diseases has been found to significantly reduce distant metastases, cancer recurrence, and cancer---specific mortality in breast cancer patients .
Infantile hemangiomas are the most common benign tumor of infancy. Over the last few years, propranolol has become a popular and successful treatment for infantile hemangiomas. The ability of ß---adrenoceptors to increase the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the subsequent angionenetic pathway has contributed to the identification of this mechanism as a primary target of ß---blockers to limit cancer progression and to treat hemangiomas. The recent observation that propranolol treated successfully a case of infantile lymphangiomatosis and simulatneously reduced VEGF levels further strengthens this hypothesis. Preclinical studies have proposed that activation of β--- adrenoceptors play a detrimental role in melanoma, as in vitro studies showed that melanoma tissues expressed both β1--- and β2---adrenoceptors and that isoproterenol is a potent inducer of VEGF, IL---8 and IL---6 gene expression in human melanoma cells supporting the role of β--- adrenoceptors in this pathway. Thus, the role of ß---adrenoceptors to promote angiogenesis, supported by both basic and clinical evidence, represents the most robust working hypothesis explaining the beneficial effect of ß-blockers indifferent models of cancers,including melanoma.
In a prospective cohort of 121 consecutive patients with thick melanoma (Breslow >1), the investigators recently found that the use of β---blockers for concomitant diseases for 1 year or more is associated with a reduced risk of CMM recurrence. After a median follow---up time of 2.5 years, tumor progression was observed in 3.3% of the treated (n=30) subgroup and in 34.1% of the untreated (n=91) subgroup . Cox model on progression indicated a 36% (95%CI: 11%---54%; P=.002) risk reduction for each year of β---blocker use. No death was observed in the treated group, whereas in the untreated group 24 patients died. This study suggested for the first time that exposure to β---blockers is associated with a reduced risk of progression of thick CMM. In a larger group of 741 patients with thick and thin CMM the invetigators have recently confirmed the association between β---blocker prescription (79 patients) and the reduction in the risk of CMM recurrence and death.
The investigators hypothesize that treatment with propranolol reduces the risk of recurrence of CMM and decrease overall mortality.
Study Design The investigators propose a randomized double---blind placebo---controlled clinical trial (RTC) to evaluate whether the treatment with propranolol 80 mgR/die reduce the risk of CMM recurrence and mortality. Patients with resected stage II/IIIA CMM will be recruited in various Centers in Italy. Participants will be randomly assigned to propranolol treatment or placebo (1:1 ratio), treated for at least 1 year and followed for 2 years. Recruitment will proceed simultaneously at the different Centers, and will be completed in 2 years. Complete physical examination, measure of study compliance will be performed at baseline, as well as at the interim visits, every 4 months. The primary outcome of the entire trial will be, however, estimated by assessing a reduction in overall mortality at five years. The invetigators will also evaluate general CMM recurrence and CMM specific mortality.
Study population/Study Sites The proposed RCT will be conducted across Dermatology and Plastic Surgery centers primarily in Tuscany and also in other sites in Italy and if necessary in additional European countries. The end of follow-up is determined by recurrence, death, or last day of the follow-up.
Recruitment, Randomization and Treatment Assignment Potential study participants will be recruited among patients treated at Dermatology and Plastic Surgery centers in Tuscany/Italy. All screened subjects at each center will be assigned an ID number irrespective of whether or not they are randomized to receive study treatment. Randomization will be performed using a web---based procedure. Randomization patient numbers for each participant will be generated by computer for each of the two treatment assignments.
Unblinding will be provided once recruitment, data collection, laboratory analyses and whole follow up are completed. Protection of confidentiality will be achieved by limited access to the databases. At baseline the invetigators will also measure anthropometric variables such as weight, height. Arterial blood pressure, pulse rate and ECG will be recorded. Subjects enrolled will be asked about: hormone therapies, statin use; medical conditions such as xeroderma pigmentosum, basal cell nevus syndrome, lupus erythematosus, organ transplantation and immunosuppressive therapy; history of psoriasis; history of depression; all concomitant medications.
The participants will be asked to return to the recruitment clinic for 13 follow---up visits at months 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60. At alternate visits they will receive the next 8 months supply of medication for the study participants. The physician will perform a complete physical examination, including measurement of body weight, blood pressure and pulse rate, to assess the general health of the study participant. We will collect up---dated information about health status and signs of recurrence of melanoma.
Dosage and Administration Study participants will be randomized to 80 mgR propranolol once daily or placebo.
Concomitant medications Patients will be discouraged from taking unspecified medications. However all medications, vitamin and mineral supplements and herbs taken by the participant should be documented on the Case Report Form (CRF) and will include: start and stop date, dose and route of administration, and indication for use.
Methods to monitor adherence The following methods of adherence monitoring will be used: blisters evaluation and subject self--- reporting, in keeping with the current practice of investigators to rely heavily on such tools.
Withdrawal criteria Study Participants will be able to withdraw from the study at any time. Reason for subject discontinuation may include: recurrence, adverse event that compromises the patient's ability to participate in the study, such as serious acute emergencies (i.e., heart attack, stroke or acute abdomen surgery). Subjects who discontinue treatment will be encouraged to participate in the follow---up examinations to maintain an intention---to---treat analysis.
After 3 years of treatment patients will terminate the intervention period and will be followed on an annual basis for 2 years unless the early termination of the study. After 546 patients have been randomized, the accrual will be closed. When the last randomized subject has concluded the 3 years of treatment and 2 years of follow---up, the study will be considered closed. The Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB), the Ethics Committee and regulatory authorities can make the decision to terminate the study earlier. This decision could be based on factors such as unacceptable adverse events, poor accrual or compliance on interim analyses.
Staffing and Scheduling Coordinating Centre for Field Activities: the study will have a study coordination center at the Department of Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacology of the University of Florence, which will coordinate all the different aspects of the study field conduction. Prof. Alessandro Mugelli expert in cardiopharmacology, Prof. Niccolò Marchionni, expert in clinical cardiology and Dr. Sara Gandini, expert in data management and biostatistics will assist Dr. Vincenzo De Giorgi and Prof. Pierangelo Geppetti in the coordination of the study. The clinical investigators led by the PI, Dr. Vincenzo De Giorgi, will be responsible for study recruitment, clinical examination of patients and assessing patient safety. Study set-up will take approximately 6 months and will occur at the beginning of the funding period. After 6 months of study set---up period and 9 years of active data collection period (i.e., time between the first person entering the trial up to the last person completing the final 24 month follow-up visit), the last 6 months will be for study close---out activities. These activities will include final data entry and cleaning, final data analysis, and report writing. The entire study from beginning of study set-up to end of study close-out will take 7 years to be completed (two years of accrual, 3 years of treatment, 2 years of follow-up).
Sample size calculations Results of the previous prospective study on of 741 melanoma patients showed that, after a median follow---up time of 4 years, Cox-regression model on overall mortality indicated a 38% (95%CI: 10%---57%;P=.02) risk reduction for each year of β--blocker use. Cautiously, we considered an hazard ratio of about 0.6 for the randomized placebo-controlled phase-II trial. A total sample size of 546 (split equally between the two groups) will give us 90% of power for estimating a improvement in OS at five years achieves 90% power to detect an improvement given a survival at five years of 0.70 and an increase to 0.82 in the treatment groups)at a significance level (alpha) of 0.05 using a two---sided log rank test. These results assume that 3 sequential tests are made using the O'Brien-Fleming spending function to determine the test boundaries and that the hazards are proportional.
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Being tested
- Propranolol, Placebo
- Keywords
- Melanoma, Propanolol, Betablockers
- Medical subject headings
- Melanoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PropranololDrug
80 mgR propranolol once daily
PlaceboDrug
placebo once daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PLACEBO | Placebo comparator | Placebo will be taken daily during the study period Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| PROPRANOLOL | Active comparator | Study participants in the treated group will take 80 mgR propranolol once daily . Receives: Drug: Propranolol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Effect of Propranolol on overall survival for melanoma patients in stage II/IIIA (T2, N0 or N1, M0)
To assess the effect of treatment with propranolol 80 mg retard (R) on overall survival for cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) patients in stage II/IIIA (T2, N0 or N1, M0) at five years of follow---up,after at least one year of treatment. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests will be used to analyze the associations between the categorical variables. Logistic regression adjusting for confounding factors will be also performed. Wilcoxon tests will be used to compare continuous variables. Overall survival and Disease Free Survival curves will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test will be used to compare survival time between groups and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the effect of β-blockers treatment and duration of treatment on melanoma recurrence and mortality, considering stratification factors.
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (3)
Effect of Propranolol on disease free survival for melanoma patients in stage II/IIIA
To evaluate the effect of treatment on disease free survival (DFS) at five years for CMM patients in stage II/IIIA. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests will be used to analyze the associations between the categorical variables. Logistic regression adjusting for confounding factors will be also performed. Wilcoxon tests will be used to compare continuous variables. Overall survival and Disease Free Survival curves will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test will be used to compare survival time between groups and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the effect of β-blockers treatment and duration of treatment on melanoma recurrence and mortality, considering stratification factors.
Measured: 5 years
Effect of propranolol on specific mortality for melanoma patients in stage II/IIIA
To evaluate the effect of treatment on specific mortality for CMM patients in stage II/IIIA. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests will be used to analyze the associations between the categorical variables. Logistic regression adjusting for confounding factors will be also performed. Wilcoxon tests will be used to compare continuous variables. Overall survival and Disease Free Survival curves will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test will be used to compare survival time between groups and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the effect of β-blockers treatment and duration of treatment on melanoma recurrence and mortality, considering stratification factors.
Measured: 5 years
Effect of propranolol treatment on the long-term safety on melanoma patients in stage II/IIIA
To evaluate the long---term safety of treatment on CMM patients in stage II/IIIA.This study will use the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse events version 3.0, for toxicity and adverse event reporting. The CTCAE provides descriptive terminology and a grading scale for each adverse event listed. A copy of the CTCAE can be found at http://ctep.cancer.gov. AEs will be assessed according to the CTCAE grade associated with the AE term. AEs that do not have a corresponding CTCAE term will be assessed according to their impact on the participant's ability to perform daily activities
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2017
- Primary completionJun 2019 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MelanomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 546 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, VINCENZO DE GIORGI, MD, Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02962947
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EudraCT 2014---003970---18
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 19 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 15 Nov 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Aronow WS. Current role of beta-blockers in the treatment of hypertension. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010 Nov;11(16):2599-607. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2010.482561. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
PubMed 20426702Barron TI, Connolly RM, Sharp L, Bennett K, Visvanathan K. Beta blockers and breast cancer mortality: a population- based study. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jul 1;29(19):2635-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.5422. Epub 2011 May 31.
PubMed 21632503Bielecka-Dabrowa A, Aronow WS, Rysz J, Banach M. Current place of beta-blockers in the treatment of hypertension. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2010 Nov;8(6):733-41. doi: 10.2174/157016110793563861.
PubMed 20626337Chen JM, Heran BS, Perez MI, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of beta-blockers as second-line therapy for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD007185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007185.pub2.
PubMed 20091622Cruickshank JM. Are we misunderstanding beta-blockers. Int J Cardiol. 2007 Aug 9;120(1):10-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.01.069. Epub 2007 Apr 12.
PubMed 17433471De Giorgi V, Gandini S, Grazzini M, Benemei S, Marchionni N, Geppetti P. Effect of beta-blockers and other antihypertensive drugs on the risk of melanoma recurrence and death. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Nov;88(11):1196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.09.001.
PubMed 24182700De Giorgi V, Grazzini M, Gandini S, Benemei S, Lotti T, Marchionni N, Geppetti P. Treatment with beta-blockers and reduced disease progression in patients with thick melanoma. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Apr 25;171(8):779-81. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.131.
PubMed 21518948Lamy S, Lachambre MP, Lord-Dufour S, Beliveau R. Propranolol suppresses angiogenesis in vitro: inhibition of proliferation, migration, and differentiation of endothelial cells. Vascul Pharmacol. 2010 Nov-Dec;53(5-6):200-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2010.08.002. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
PubMed 20732454Leaute-Labreze C, Dumas de la Roque E, Hubiche T, Boralevi F, Thambo JB, Taieb A. Propranolol for severe hemangiomas of infancy. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2649-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0708819. No abstract available.
PubMed 18550886Lemeshow S, Sorensen HT, Phillips G, Yang EV, Antonsen S, Riis AH, Lesinski GB, Jackson R, Glaser R. beta-Blockers and survival among Danish patients with malignant melanoma: a population-based cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Oct;20(10):2273-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0249. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
PubMed 21933972Lyons KE, Pahwa R. Pharmacotherapy of essential tremor : an overview of existing and upcoming agents. CNS Drugs. 2008;22(12):1037-45. doi: 10.2165/0023210-200822120-00006.
PubMed 18998741Miller AJ, Mihm MC Jr. Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 6;355(1):51-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052166. No abstract available.
PubMed 16822996Ozeki M, Fukao T, Kondo N. Propranolol for intractable diffuse lymphangiomatosis. N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 7;364(14):1380-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1013217. No abstract available.
PubMed 21470038Perron L, Bairati I, Harel F, Meyer F. Antihypertensive drug use and the risk of prostate cancer (Canada). Cancer Causes Control. 2004 Aug;15(6):535-41. doi: 10.1023/B:CACO.0000036152.58271.5e.
PubMed 15280632Tsao H, Atkins MB, Sober AJ. Management of cutaneous melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 2;351(10):998-1012. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra041245. No abstract available.
PubMed 15342808
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Nov 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Melablock: A Multicentre Randomized, Double---blinded and Placebo---controlled Clinical Trial on the Efficacy and Safety of Once Daily Propranolol 80 mg Retard for the Prevention of Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma Recurrence
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02962947
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EudraCT 2014---003970---18
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Keywords
- Melanoma, Propanolol, Betablockers
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 546 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Sanitaria di FirenzeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2017
- Primary completion
- Jun 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The effectiveness of propranolol in infantile hemangiomas, the apparent better response to propranolol in breast cancer and the use of propranolol in a proportion of patients who did not develop melanoma recurrence suggested to use this unselective β---blocker to test the study hypothesis. The investigators propose a randomized double---blind placebo---controlled clinical trial (RTC) to evaluate whether the treatment with propranolol 80 mgR/die reduce the risk of CMM recurrence and mortality. Patients with resected stage II/IIIA CMM will be recruited in various Centers in Italy. Participants will be randomly assigned to propranolol treatment or placebo (1:1 ratio), treated for at least 1 year and followed for 2 years. Recruitment will proceed simultaneously at the different Centers, and will be completed in 2 years. The primary outcome of the entire trial will be, however, estimated by assessing a reduction in overall mortality at five years. The investigators will also evaluate general CMM recurrence and CMM specific mortality.
Detailed description
Cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) represents a major public health problem.Although melanoma accounts for only 4% of all dermatologic cancers, it is responsible for 80% of deaths from skin cancer; only 14% of patients with metastatic melanoma survive for five years . The probability of survival for melanoma stage II/IIIA at 15 years is around 50%.
Treatment with dacarbazine, fotemustine, temozolomide, interferon---α and interleukin---2 has been proposed in metastatic melanoma, but these drugs exert poor efficacy. More recently, ipilimumab, which blocks cytotoxic T---lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 to potentiate an antitumor T---cell response has been approved for the treatment of HLA---A*0201-positive patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma . This treatment has been found to delay mortality by about 4 months, although, in clinical trials a fraction of patients lived much longer . However, the drug caused severe or fatal side effects in almost 13% of patients, prompting the FDA to qualify its approval with a mitigation strategy. There were 14 deaths related to the study drugs (2.1%), and 7 were associated with immune---related adverse events. These findings do not suggest the use of ipilimumab in non metastatic patients. After surgical resection no specific pharmacotherapy is recommended for patients with stage II/IIIA CMM until metastases are found.
β---adrenoceptor antagonists (β---blockers) belong to one of the most widely used classes of drugs in clinical practice. Their use is mainly directed to the chronic management of hypertension , although they are also prescribed for ischemic heart disease, heart failure, anxiety, tremor, migraine and glaucoma , Initial pharmacoepidemiological evidence shows that β---blockers may reduce cancer risk. Indeed, β--- blockers have been reported to exert a certain degree of protection against prostate cancer . More recently, β---blocker treatment for concomitant diseases has been found to significantly reduce distant metastases, cancer recurrence, and cancer---specific mortality in breast cancer patients .
Infantile hemangiomas are the most common benign tumor of infancy. Over the last few years, propranolol has become a popular and successful treatment for infantile hemangiomas. The ability of ß---adrenoceptors to increase the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the subsequent angionenetic pathway has contributed to the identification of this mechanism as a primary target of ß---blockers to limit cancer progression and to treat hemangiomas. The recent observation that propranolol treated successfully a case of infantile lymphangiomatosis and simulatneously reduced VEGF levels further strengthens this hypothesis. Preclinical studies have proposed that activation of β--- adrenoceptors play a detrimental role in melanoma, as in vitro studies showed that melanoma tissues expressed both β1--- and β2---adrenoceptors and that isoproterenol is a potent inducer of VEGF, IL---8 and IL---6 gene expression in human melanoma cells supporting the role of β--- adrenoceptors in this pathway. Thus, the role of ß---adrenoceptors to promote angiogenesis, supported by both basic and clinical evidence, represents the most robust working hypothesis explaining the beneficial effect of ß-blockers indifferent models of cancers,including melanoma.
In a prospective cohort of 121 consecutive patients with thick melanoma (Breslow >1), the investigators recently found that the use of β---blockers for concomitant diseases for 1 year or more is associated with a reduced risk of CMM recurrence. After a median follow---up time of 2.5 years, tumor progression was observed in 3.3% of the treated (n=30) subgroup and in 34.1% of the untreated (n=91) subgroup . Cox model on progression indicated a 36% (95%CI: 11%---54%; P=.002) risk reduction for each year of β---blocker use. No death was observed in the treated group, whereas in the untreated group 24 patients died. This study suggested for the first time that exposure to β---blockers is associated with a reduced risk of progression of thick CMM. In a larger group of 741 patients with thick and thin CMM the invetigators have recently confirmed the association between β---blocker prescription (79 patients) and the reduction in the risk of CMM recurrence and death.
The investigators hypothesize that treatment with propranolol reduces the risk of recurrence of CMM and decrease overall mortality.
Study Design The investigators propose a randomized double---blind placebo---controlled clinical trial (RTC) to evaluate whether the treatment with propranolol 80 mgR/die reduce the risk of CMM recurrence and mortality. Patients with resected stage II/IIIA CMM will be recruited in various Centers in Italy. Participants will be randomly assigned to propranolol treatment or placebo (1:1 ratio), treated for at least 1 year and followed for 2 years. Recruitment will proceed simultaneously at the different Centers, and will be completed in 2 years. Complete physical examination, measure of study compliance will be performed at baseline, as well as at the interim visits, every 4 months. The primary outcome of the entire trial will be, however, estimated by assessing a reduction in overall mortality at five years. The invetigators will also evaluate general CMM recurrence and CMM specific mortality.
Study population/Study Sites The proposed RCT will be conducted across Dermatology and Plastic Surgery centers primarily in Tuscany and also in other sites in Italy and if necessary in additional European countries. The end of follow-up is determined by recurrence, death, or last day of the follow-up.
Recruitment, Randomization and Treatment Assignment Potential study participants will be recruited among patients treated at Dermatology and Plastic Surgery centers in Tuscany/Italy. All screened subjects at each center will be assigned an ID number irrespective of whether or not they are randomized to receive study treatment. Randomization will be performed using a web---based procedure. Randomization patient numbers for each participant will be generated by computer for each of the two treatment assignments.
Unblinding will be provided once recruitment, data collection, laboratory analyses and whole follow up are completed. Protection of confidentiality will be achieved by limited access to the databases. At baseline the invetigators will also measure anthropometric variables such as weight, height. Arterial blood pressure, pulse rate and ECG will be recorded. Subjects enrolled will be asked about: hormone therapies, statin use; medical conditions such as xeroderma pigmentosum, basal cell nevus syndrome, lupus erythematosus, organ transplantation and immunosuppressive therapy; history of psoriasis; history of depression; all concomitant medications.
The participants will be asked to return to the recruitment clinic for 13 follow---up visits at months 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60. At alternate visits they will receive the next 8 months supply of medication for the study participants. The physician will perform a complete physical examination, including measurement of body weight, blood pressure and pulse rate, to assess the general health of the study participant. We will collect up---dated information about health status and signs of recurrence of melanoma.
Dosage and Administration Study participants will be randomized to 80 mgR propranolol once daily or placebo.
Concomitant medications Patients will be discouraged from taking unspecified medications. However all medications, vitamin and mineral supplements and herbs taken by the participant should be documented on the Case Report Form (CRF) and will include: start and stop date, dose and route of administration, and indication for use.
Methods to monitor adherence The following methods of adherence monitoring will be used: blisters evaluation and subject self--- reporting, in keeping with the current practice of investigators to rely heavily on such tools.
Withdrawal criteria Study Participants will be able to withdraw from the study at any time. Reason for subject discontinuation may include: recurrence, adverse event that compromises the patient's ability to participate in the study, such as serious acute emergencies (i.e., heart attack, stroke or acute abdomen surgery). Subjects who discontinue treatment will be encouraged to participate in the follow---up examinations to maintain an intention---to---treat analysis.
After 3 years of treatment patients will terminate the intervention period and will be followed on an annual basis for 2 years unless the early termination of the study. After 546 patients have been randomized, the accrual will be closed. When the last randomized subject has concluded the 3 years of treatment and 2 years of follow---up, the study will be considered closed. The Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB), the Ethics Committee and regulatory authorities can make the decision to terminate the study earlier. This decision could be based on factors such as unacceptable adverse events, poor accrual or compliance on interim analyses.
Staffing and Scheduling Coordinating Centre for Field Activities: the study will have a study coordination center at the Department of Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacology of the University of Florence, which will coordinate all the different aspects of the study field conduction. Prof. Alessandro Mugelli expert in cardiopharmacology, Prof. Niccolò Marchionni, expert in clinical cardiology and Dr. Sara Gandini, expert in data management and biostatistics will assist Dr. Vincenzo De Giorgi and Prof. Pierangelo Geppetti in the coordination of the study. The clinical investigators led by the PI, Dr. Vincenzo De Giorgi, will be responsible for study recruitment, clinical examination of patients and assessing patient safety. Study set-up will take approximately 6 months and will occur at the beginning of the funding period. After 6 months of study set---up period and 9 years of active data collection period (i.e., time between the first person entering the trial up to the last person completing the final 24 month follow-up visit), the last 6 months will be for study close---out activities. These activities will include final data entry and cleaning, final data analysis, and report writing. The entire study from beginning of study set-up to end of study close-out will take 7 years to be completed (two years of accrual, 3 years of treatment, 2 years of follow-up).
Sample size calculations Results of the previous prospective study on of 741 melanoma patients showed that, after a median follow---up time of 4 years, Cox-regression model on overall mortality indicated a 38% (95%CI: 10%---57%;P=.02) risk reduction for each year of β--blocker use. Cautiously, we considered an hazard ratio of about 0.6 for the randomized placebo-controlled phase-II trial. A total sample size of 546 (split equally between the two groups) will give us 90% of power for estimating a improvement in OS at five years achieves 90% power to detect an improvement given a survival at five years of 0.70 and an increase to 0.82 in the treatment groups)at a significance level (alpha) of 0.05 using a two---sided log rank test. These results assume that 3 sequential tests are made using the O'Brien-Fleming spending function to determine the test boundaries and that the hazards are proportional.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PLACEBO | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo will be taken daily during the study period |
| PROPRANOLOL | Active comparator | Drug: PropranololStudy participants in the treated group will take 80 mgR propranolol once daily . |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Stage: Ib (T1b, T2a), IIa (T2b, T3a), IIb (T3b T4a) and IIc (T4b), N0, M0; IIIA (N1a, N1b)
- Signed Informed Consent;
- Performance Status of 0---1 (ECOG);
- Hematopoietic functionality at the entry of the study: leukocytes, platelets, hemoglobin and neutrophils within the normal limits of laboratory references;
- Hepatic and renal functionality at the entry of the study: LDH, bilirubin, AST, ALT, alkalinephosphatase, BUN and serum creatinine within the normal range of each laboratory;
Key exclusion criteria (27 listed)
- Primary not cutaneous melanoma;
- Clinical/radiological evidence or laboratory/pathology report of not completely resectedmelanoma;
- History of cancer
- Current use or past use in the last two years of any b---blockers for any other medical condition
- Current use of verapamil, diltiazem or similar calcium channel blocker
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Propranolol80 mgR propranolol once daily | Drug | PROPRANOLOL |
| Placeboplacebo once daily | Drug | PLACEBO |
Primary outcome
Effect of Propranolol on overall survival for melanoma patients in stage II/IIIA (T2, N0 or N1, M0)
Time frame: 5 years
To assess the effect of treatment with propranolol 80 mg retard (R) on overall survival for cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) patients in stage II/IIIA (T2, N0 or N1, M0) at five years of follow---up,after at least one year of treatment. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests will be used to analyze the associations between the categorical variables. Logistic regression adjusting for confounding factors will be also performed. Wilcoxon tests will be used to compare continuous variables. Overall survival and Disease Free Survival curves will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test will be used to compare survival time between groups and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the effect of β-blockers treatment and duration of treatment on melanoma recurrence and mortality, considering stratification factors.
3 secondary outcomes
Effect of Propranolol on disease free survival for melanoma patients in stage II/IIIA
Time frame: 5 years
Effect of propranolol on specific mortality for melanoma patients in stage II/IIIA
Time frame: 5 years
Effect of propranolol treatment on the long-term safety on melanoma patients in stage II/IIIA
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Nov 2016.
- Background: PubMed 20426702Aronow WS. Current role of beta-blockers in the treatment of hypertension. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010 Nov;11(16):2599-607. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2010.482561. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
- Background: PubMed 21632503Barron TI, Connolly RM, Sharp L, Bennett K, Visvanathan K. Beta blockers and breast cancer mortality: a population- based study. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jul 1;29(19):2635-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.5422. Epub 2011 May 31.
- Background: PubMed 20626337Bielecka-Dabrowa A, Aronow WS, Rysz J, Banach M. Current place of beta-blockers in the treatment of hypertension. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2010 Nov;8(6):733-41. doi: 10.2174/157016110793563861.
- Background: PubMed 20091622Chen JM, Heran BS, Perez MI, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of beta-blockers as second-line therapy for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD007185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007185.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 17433471Cruickshank JM. Are we misunderstanding beta-blockers. Int J Cardiol. 2007 Aug 9;120(1):10-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.01.069. Epub 2007 Apr 12.
- Background: PubMed 24182700De Giorgi V, Gandini S, Grazzini M, Benemei S, Marchionni N, Geppetti P. Effect of beta-blockers and other antihypertensive drugs on the risk of melanoma recurrence and death. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Nov;88(11):1196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.09.001.
- Background: PubMed 21518948De Giorgi V, Grazzini M, Gandini S, Benemei S, Lotti T, Marchionni N, Geppetti P. Treatment with beta-blockers and reduced disease progression in patients with thick melanoma. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Apr 25;171(8):779-81. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.131.
- Background: PubMed 20732454Lamy S, Lachambre MP, Lord-Dufour S, Beliveau R. Propranolol suppresses angiogenesis in vitro: inhibition of proliferation, migration, and differentiation of endothelial cells. Vascul Pharmacol. 2010 Nov-Dec;53(5-6):200-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2010.08.002. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
- Background: PubMed 18550886Leaute-Labreze C, Dumas de la Roque E, Hubiche T, Boralevi F, Thambo JB, Taieb A. Propranolol for severe hemangiomas of infancy. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2649-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0708819. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 21933972Lemeshow S, Sorensen HT, Phillips G, Yang EV, Antonsen S, Riis AH, Lesinski GB, Jackson R, Glaser R. beta-Blockers and survival among Danish patients with malignant melanoma: a population-based cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Oct;20(10):2273-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0249. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
- Background: PubMed 18998741Lyons KE, Pahwa R. Pharmacotherapy of essential tremor : an overview of existing and upcoming agents. CNS Drugs. 2008;22(12):1037-45. doi: 10.2165/0023210-200822120-00006.
- Background: PubMed 16822996Miller AJ, Mihm MC Jr. Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 6;355(1):51-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052166. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Feasibility Study Utilizing Immune Recall to Increase Response to Checkpoint Therapy
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Dapansutrile Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With PD-1 Refractory Advanced Melanoma
Melanoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Propranolol in people with Melanoma, run by Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 27 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact VINCENZO DE GIORGI, MD (+393356249012, vincenzo.degiorgi@unifi.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Effect of Propranolol on overall survival for melanoma patients in stage II/IIIA (T2, N0 or N1, M0) (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02962947, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2016.