AzTrials
AzTrials

Anesthesia, PediatricNCT02963532

Extubation in Pediatric Patients: An Observational Study

An observational study of Anesthesia, Pediatric, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The timing of extubation following surgery and anesthesia in young children is a complex decision frequently guided by the experience of the clinician. The clinician frequently must make a decision based on assimilating multiple cues that may or may not demonstrate that the patient is ready for extubation such as eye… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 month to 7 years
Conditions the study is for
Anesthesia, Pediatric
What is being tested?
We are observing criteria present at extubation
How many people
600 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Dec 2016to 4 Dec 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 month to 7 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: Pediatric Patients < 7 years of age.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients less than 7 years of age scheduled for surgery and anesthesia in which an endotracheal tube is placed for airway management and potent inhalational agents are used for anesthetic maintenance for which a trained study observer can be present for extubation will be included.

Who cannot join

  • Patients using an LMA or other supralaryngeal device for airway management during an elective procedure.
  • Patients with a tracheostomy in place.
  • Any case in which total intravenous anesthesia is used.
  • Patient in which a mask alone is used for airway management.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Direct Comparison of Predictors for Extubation in Children Less Than 7 Years Old Undergoing Anesthesia: A Prospective Observational Study

The timing of extubation following surgery and anesthesia in young children is a complex decision frequently guided by the experience of the clinician. The clinician frequently must make a decision based on assimilating multiple cues that may or may not demonstrate that the patient is ready for extubation such as eye opening, conjugate gaze, spontaneous ventilation, and end tidal agent concentration. At this time there is no published data on the predictive ability of individual extubation criteria for young patients undergoing anesthesia for surgery so most practice is based solely on experience and anecdotal teaching. In some cases if the timing is misjudged and the patient is extubated too early negative airway reflexes such as breath holding and laryngospasm may take over creating a critical situation in which the patient forgoes gas exchange and rapidly desaturates with the potential for bradycardia and further cardiovascular collapse.

Routine criteria used to determine fitness for extubation have been primarily described in the intensive care unit literature and may be less relevant in the operating room in the setting of routine general anesthetics. Most predictors including adequate tidal volume, presence of conjugate gaze, eye opening, patient movement purposeful or otherwise, low end tidal anesthetic agent concentration, response to physical or verbal stimulation and the laryngeal stimulation test have not previously been evaluated to determine their individual predictive value in deciding if the presently anesthetized patient now emerging is ready to be extubated.

Read more

In order to perform a laryngeal stimulation test the patient must be breathing spontaneously and practitioner will gently move the endotracheal tube up and down stimulating the larynx. In patients in stage 2 of anesthesia, the clinician will typically observe a cough or series of coughs followed by a respiratory pause of greater than 5 seconds. In this situation the patient has not adequately passed through stage 2 and remains at increased risk for apnea, breath holding, or laryngospasm. If the patient is in stage 1 of anesthesia the clinician will observe a cough followed by a brief pause (less than 5 seconds) or almost immediate return to spontaneous ventilation.

In conclusion, their exist no quantitative data on the predictive value of these various criteria for extubation and the goal of our study is determine the indivdual predictive value of different criteria in determing fitness for extubaion in young pediatric patients by recording the presence or absence of various criteria in pediatric patients at the time of extubation during routine anesthetic care.

Read the detailed description

Objectives

The objective of this study is to prospectively observe the frequency and predictive value of specific signs and criteria and correlate those with successful extubation in young children to determine which are present with the greatest frequency and which signs are most predictive of successful extubation.

Methods and Measures

Design

A trained observer will prospectively observe emergence and extubation in pediatric patients between the ages of less than 7 years of age in which potent inhalational agents were used for anesthetic maintenance. They will record the presence or absence of certain accepted signs that a young child is ready for extubation such as eye opening, postive larygneal stimulation test, purposeful movement, end tidal agent concentration, and several others (see Appendix 1 for complete list). We will also record the use of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs, use and presence of train of four monitoring, and end tidal carbon dioxide concentration at the time of extubation. Timing of extubation will be at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist caring for the patient according to their usual practice. Following extubation we will observe the patient and a second checklist will be filled out detailing any events such as the need for continuous positive pressure with 100% oxygen, reintubation. The quality of extubation will be scored as either "successful," "moderately successful," or "failed," according to predefined criteria; see appendix 1.The investigators will record the oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and presence or absence of additional oxygen supplementation such as "blow by," "mask oxygen" or "nasal cannula" on arrival to the Post anesthesia care unit, at 5, 10, and 30 minutes after arrival in the post anesthesia care unit. The investigators will also record the post anesthesia care unit length of stay as defined as the time at arrival until the time the nurse deems that the patient has recovered sufficiently to leave the post anesthesia care unit either for home or for their inhouse bed.

Investigators will record age, height, weight, gender, American society of anesthesiologist status, type of surgery, and presence or absence of any upper respiratory infection symptoms in the previous 2 weeks, and any premedication, type of inhalational agent used.

Investigators will observe patients less than 7 years old based on the operating room schedule.

The study will be performed at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center a tertiary academic medical center.

Subjects selection criteria

Pediatric patients under the age of 7 scheduled for surgery and anesthesia with an endotracheal tube will be observed at the time of extubation.

  • Inclusion Criteria

Patients less than 7 years of age scheduled for surgery and anesthesia in which an endotracheal tube is placed for airway management and potent inhalational agents are used for anesthetic maintenance for which a trained study observer can be present for extubation will be included.

  • Exclusion Criteria

Patients using a laryngeal mask airway or other supralaryngeal device for airway management during an elective procedure.

Patients with a tracheostomy in place. Any case in which total intravenous anesthesia is used. Patient in which a mask alone is used for airway management.

  • Sample Size

Using an a priori sample size calculator for multiple regression analysis based on effect size f2 of 0.05 in a model with 7 predictors, a probablility level of 0.05, and a statistical power of 80% we estimate a sample size of 293 patients. The calculator can be found at the following internet address: http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/calculator.aspx?id=1 Given the number of 293 patients we will observe 300 extubations.

Interventions and Interactions:

Interventions and interactions for the patient should be minimal since this is an observational study. Study personnel will monitor the pediatric operating room schedule during the day to look for cases where an endotracheal tube is being used for airway management in children less than 7 years of age. Study personnel will consult with the responsible anesthesia team and will prospectively record data at the time of emergence and extubation. They will also intermittently observe the patient in the post anesthesia care unit but may delegate the recording of respiratory data in the post anesthesia care unit at arrival, 5, 10, and 30 minutes. They will also record post anesthesia care unit length of stay.

Outcome Measure(s)

Outcome measures will be successful, moderately successful or failed extubation and the correlation, frequency, and predictive value of individual subjective and objective criteria for extubation.

Analytical Plan

Results will be analyzed initially using descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the predictive value of different criteria for successful extubation and further to determine if one criteria is more predictive than another.

Human Subjects Protection

Subject Recruitment Methods

Study participants will be identified by looking at the pediatric operating room schedule and consulting with the anesthesia team responsible for the patient to determine if they used an endotracheal tube for airway management and then further if they plan to extubate the patient at the end of the procedure. If the aforementioned is acceptable and the patient meets the age inclusion criteria and a member of the study is available they will observe the emergence and record data based on what is occurring during the emergence and extubation.

Informed Consent

Informed consent will not be sought as this is an observational study designed to observe criteria used in the routine practice of pediatric anesthesia to determine the timing of extubation. All clinical care will be administered at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist according to their routine standard practice.

Being tested
We are observing criteria present at extubation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • We are observing criteria present at extubationOther

    We will not be performing any intervention. We will only be observing what clinical data is present at the time of extubation and how predictive are different pieces of clinical data.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quality of Extubation. Defined as: Successful, Moderately Successful, or Failed.

    Successful is defined as oxygen saturation >92% and requires continuous positive airway pressure with 100% oxygen < 1 minute. Moderately successful:continuous positive airway pressure for >1 minute with 100% oxygen, inspiratory stridor without sequelae, oxygen saturation <92% for > than 30 seconds, failed: patient required reintubation, laryngospasm, breath holding > 10 seconds, requires continuous positive airway pressure > 2 minutes with 100% oxygen.

    Measured: This will be observed at the time of extubation.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Nov 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2016
  3. Primary completion4 Dec 2017
  4. Study completion4 Dec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
600 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02963532
Sponsor's protocol ID
00039203
Status last verified
Jan 2017
First submitted
8 Nov 2016
Last updated
8 Jan 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Anesthesia, Pediatric, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quality of Extubation. Defined as: Successful, Moderately Successful, or Failed. (time frame: This will be observed at the time of extubation.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in