AzTrials
AzTrials

Professional-Patient RelationsBUPHERNCT02963792

Burnout Preventions, Professionalism Heightening, and Enhancing Resiliency (BUPHER)

A study testing Preventing Professionals burnout in people with Professional-Patient Relations and Burnout, Professional, run by michal roll.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Due to their difficult and stressful work surgeons are under continuous physical and mental stress exposing them to increased risk for burnout and lack of professionalism. The present intervention focuses on providing time and a safe space to debrief and explore personal and group experiences and dilemmas, as well as… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Preventing Professionals burnout
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,000 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Nov 2016to Sep 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All physicians (residents and experts) of the Surgical Division at Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center.
  • All medical students studying at the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, and attending a surgery round at the Surgical Division at Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center.
  • Patients (and/or family members) in the Surgical Division at Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center following their surgery.

Who cannot join

  • The research will not include children and/or judgment-impaired patients;
  • population not met by inclusion criteria;
  • non-Hebrew speaking patients;
  • ventilated patients;
  • patients in surgical intensive care;
  • patients medically defined as suffering from clouding of conscious or delirium;
  • subjects who decided to stop their participation in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Orit Karnieli-Miller, PhD contact

+972502060619

oritkm@gmail.com

Nathaniel Laor, MD; PhD contact

+972546441354

nlaor@me.com

About this study

Official title: Values and Virtues in Medical Practice: Quasi-Experimental Intervention for Burnout Preventions, Professionalism Heightening, and Enhancing Resiliency (BUPHER) in a Hospital Surgical Division

Due to their difficult and stressful work surgeons are under continuous physical and mental stress exposing them to increased risk for burnout and lack of professionalism. The present intervention focuses on providing time and a safe space to debrief and explore personal and group experiences and dilemmas, as well as acquire coping skills related to burnout, communication and professionalism.

Being tested
Preventing Professionals burnout
Keywords
Professionalism, Burnout prevention, Resiliency, Student education
Medical subject headings
Burnout, Professional

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Preventing Professionals burnoutOther

    Also called Enhancing professional professional conduct

Study groups in NCT02963792
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Structured group interventionExperimentalExperimental: Structured group intervention a 'structured' intervention, leaning mostly on tools designed to prevent burnout and promote resilience, including predetermined exercises and topics as discussion goals in each meeting. Fidelity will be checked and monitored at the end of each meeting, when facilitators fill out a form that summarizes the content, topics and coping skills acquired in each session.
Receives: Other: Preventing Professionals burnout
Semi-Structured group interventionExperimentalExperimental: Semi-Structured group intervention a 'semi-structured' intervention, based on tools for developing an emotional discourse, building a supporting team and self reflection. The 'semi-structured' intervention offers predetermined contents that are discussed through the stories and needs presented by group members. Fidelity will be checked and monitored at the end of each meeting, when facilitators fill out a form that summarizes the content, topics and coping skills acquired in each session.
Receives: Other: Preventing Professionals burnout

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Professionalism Culture Scale

    12 item scale developed by the American Board of Internal Medicine, by (DeLisa, Foye, Jain, Kirshblum, \& Christodoulou, 2001

    Measured: Change (increase) from baseline to short and long term measurements (after one year, 3 years, respectively)

  2. Abbreviated Burnout Scale

    Nine item scale focused on 3 burnout factors (Iverson, Olekalns \& Erwin, 1998)

    Measured: Change (decrease) from baseline to short and long term measurements (after one year, 3 years, respectively)

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Adapted Professionalism Mini-Evaluation Scale Exercise scale

    originally included 24 items developed by Cruess, McIlroy, Cruess, Ginsburg, and Steinert (2006). Translated and adapted by the research team, and now include 31 items.

    Measured: Change (increase) from baseline to short and long term measurements (after one year, 3 years, respectively)

  2. Cynicism in Medicine Questionnaire (CMQ)

    14 item questionnaire developed by Teserman, Morton, Loo, Worthle \& Lamberton, 1996

    Measured: Change (decrease) from baseline to short and long term measurements (after one year, 3 years, respectively)

  3. Moral & Cognitive Courage Scale

    A newly developed questionnaire focused on self efficacy to intervene when a physician acts immorally and actual experience with acting in such cases.

    Measured: Change (increase) from baseline to short and long term measurements (after one year, 3 years, respectively)

  4. Jefferson Health Professionals Empathy Scale

    20 items questionnaire developed by Hojat, Mangione, Nasca, Cohen, Gonnella, Erdmann \& Magee, 2001

    Measured: Change (increase) from baseline to short and long term measurements (after one year, 3 years, respectively)

  5. The Areas of Work life Scale (AWS)

    29 items questionnaire developed by Leiter \& Maslach, 2004 to measure 6 factors related to work load, control, appreciation, community, fairness and values

    Measured: Change (increase in balance) from baseline to short and long term measurements (after one year, 3 years, respectively)

  6. Professionals Self Care Practices questionnaire

    43 items comprised from two questionnaires focused on different aspects of self care (Teng, Yen \& Fetzer \& Shananfelt et al., 2005). the combination of these two questionnaires was assessed by Karnieli-Miller \& Michael.

    Measured: Change (increase) from baseline to short and long term measurements (after one year, 3 years, respectively)

  7. Life satisfaction questionnaire

    3 item questionnaire focused on general life satisfaction.

    Measured: Change (increase) from baseline to short and long term measurements (after one year, 3 years, respectively)

  8. Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)

    10 item scale focused on perceived stress in the clinics (4 items validated in Ben-Zur \& Michael) and 6 items developed by the research team to assess concern and fear from medical mistakes and hierarchy.

    Measured: Change (decrease) from baseline to short and long term measurements (after one year, 3 years, respectively)

  9. Work-Life Balance

    6 item questionnaire developed by Greenhaus \& Powell, 2006)

    Measured: Change (increase) from baseline to short and long term measurements (after one year, 3 years, respectively)

  10. Resilient Coping Questionnaire (RCQ)

    24 items questionnaire developed by Wolmer, Hamiel \& Laor (2105)

    Measured: Change (increase) from baseline to short and long term measurements (after one year, 3 years, respectively)

  11. Specific Life Satisfaction Questionnaire

    12 items questionnaire developed by Karnieli-Miller \& Michael to measure satisfaction with different life domains (e.g., relationships, financial etc).

    Measured: Change (increase) from baseline to short and long term measurements (after one year, 3 years, respectively)

  12. Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)

    6 item questionnaire developed by Smith et al., 2008

    Measured: Change (increase) from baseline to short and long term measurements (after one year, 3 years, respectively)

  13. Patient Satisfaction questionnaire

    23 items questionnaire focused on patient-physician communication skills and satisfaction from care.

    Measured: Change (increase) from baseline to short and long term measurements (after one year, 3 years, respectively)

  14. Physician Transcendence Scale (PTS)

    A 16 items newly developed questionnaire focused on the physicians' transcendence. Laor, Wolmer \& Hamiel

    Measured: Baseline

  15. Demographic information questions

    questions concerning gender, age, seniority, specialty, country of birth,

    Measured: Baseline

  16. Life Events Scale

    Assessing life events the individual experienced, such as divorce, a death of a loved one, etc.

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Nov 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2016
  3. Primary completionSep 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,000 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02963792
Sponsor's protocol ID
TASMC-16-GL-0426-CTIL
Acronym
BUPHER
Status last verified
Nov 2016
First submitted
4 Sep 2016
Last updated
15 Nov 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The participants data will be shared with the research team from the Department of Medical Education, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University and Cohen-Harris Resilience Center

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Preventing Professionals burnout in people with Professional-Patient Relations and Burnout, Professional, run by michal roll.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Orit Karnieli-Miller, PhD (+972502060619, oritkm@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Professionalism Culture Scale (time frame: Change (increase) from baseline to short and long term measurements (after one year, 3 years, respectively)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in