Influenza, HumanRapid-LTCFNCT02964871
Rapid Assessment of and Prophylaxis for Influenza in Dwellers of Long-term Care Facilities
A study testing Sofia Fluorescent Immunoassay Analyzer Influenza A+B in people with Influenza, Human and Pneumonia, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Trial summary
RAPID-LTCF is a stratified, block-randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a simple ARI case definition, rapid influenza diagnostic test (RIDT) with wireless transmission of results, and provision of infection control guidance when influenza is detected. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Influenza, Human, Pneumonia
- What is being tested?
- Sofia Fluorescent Immunoassay Analyzer Influenza A+B
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Nov 2016to 31 Oct 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Any resident of one of the 10 LTCF intervention facilities with two acute respiratory infection symptoms (rhinorrhea/runny nose, nasal congestion, sore throat, cough or fever).
Who cannot join
- None
About this study
RAPID-LTCF is a stratified, block-randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a simple ARI case definition, rapid influenza diagnostic test (RIDT) with wireless transmission of results, and provision of infection control guidance when influenza is detected. Because of the nature of the intervention, blinding is not possible. Sites will be initially recruited for a study of "respiratory infections within LTCFs." After acceptance into the study, sites will be matched in terms of bed capacity, location, and other features prior to randomization.
Read the detailed description
Project Overview: The primary goal of RAPID-LTCF is to conduct a randomized, controlled clinical trial (RCT) to assess the effect of on-site, rapid influenza detection at long-term care facilities (LTCFs) on influenza-related hospitalizations, deaths, and healthcare-associated costs.
The basic research question in PICO format is:
Population: for residents of LTCFs across Wisconsin
Intervention: does early detection of influenza coupled with infection control guidance
Comparator: compared to usual care
Outcomes: result in:
- increase early detection and reporting of influenza outbreaks?
- increased early antiviral treatment of influenza?
- increased use of antiviral prophylaxis for other at-risk residents?
- fewer hospitalizations during the influenza season?
- reduced mortality during the influenza season?
- lower healthcare associated costs during the influenza season?
Building on two highly successful pilot QI projects-undertaken during the last two influenza seasons-that confirmed the feasibility and desirability of this approach, existing, CLIA-waived, low-complexity rapid influenza diagnostic test (RIDT) with high sensitivity and high specificity in this population as the diagnostic platform will be used. RIDT analyzers will be configured for wireless transmission of anonymous test results to a cloud-based server for real-time access by public health. Detection of influenza at a LTCF and its transmission to public health in real time will trigger communication and advice on appropriate infection control measures to reduce in-facility transmission. This approach has high potential for limiting influenza's effect at LTCFs.
Residents of LTCFs are at high risk for influenza infection due to reduced efficacy of influenza vaccines in elders, close quartering, presence of co-morbid medical conditions, and delayed response times. Consequently, outbreaks of influenza and other significant respiratory viruses easily spread within LTCFs and cause substantial morbidity and mortality in these populations. Results from this RCT will provide highly generalizable approaches using low-cost, low-complexity and easily-adapted tools and protocols for extremely early influenza detection and response. It is anticipated that early outbreak recognition and control in LTCFs will substantially reduce morbidity, mortality and healthcare associated costs in this vulnerable population.
Background: At present, 1.8 million individuals live in this nation's 16,000 nursing homes and an additional 900,000 live in assisted living facilities. Significant healthcare disparities exist for these individuals; a recent study found that the largest for-profit nursing homes delivered significantly lower quality of care. Part of this disparity is reflected in the fate of those infected with influenza. Influenza and pneumonia combine to form the 8th leading cause of death in the United States. Outbreaks of influenza and other respiratory viruses are common in LTCFs and result in significant morbidity and mortality among residents. This increased morbidity and mortality is due to a combination of close quartering, residents with co-morbid medical conditions, and delays in medical response. Because of this high risk, influenza vaccination has long been recommended for all residents and health care workers in these settings. Influenza vaccines, however, can have very low efficacy in older individuals; vaccine efficacy for protection from the predominant influenza strain in 2014-2015 was estimated to be only 14% for individuals aged 50 years and older. Accordingly, elders (aged 65+) accounted for 72.4% of Wisconsin's influenza-related hospitalizations during the 2014-2015 influenza season and 63% of influenza-related ICU admissions. Moreover, across the country, the rate of attributable influenza hospitalization was 313 per 100,000 for individuals aged 65 year and older.
The current practice for identifying and responding to influenza outbreaks in LTCFs is reactive and delayed. Of 41 known influenza outbreaks in LTCFs during the 2010-2011 season in New York, most were identified retrospectively through reporting of influenza hospitalizations and well before the LTCFs submitted reports to the Department of Health. The availability of CLIA-waived, low-complexity, sensitive and specific rapid influenza detection tests (RIDTs) can facilitate on-site diagnosis and early detection of an outbreak. Coupling RIDTs with wireless transmission of anonymous results directly to public health officials provides the means for extremely early and proactive outbreak recognition and intervention.
Program Goal: A randomized, controlled clinical trial to assess the effect of on-site RIDTs at LTCFs on subsequent influenza-related hospitalizations, deaths, and healthcare-associated costs is proposed. LTCF nursing staff will use RIDT technology to screen residents with acute respiratory infections (ARI). The proposed RIDT is a CLIA-waved, low-complexity test that uses a benign nasal swab specimen. It is configured to send test results via wireless transmission to a cloud platform. From there, data can be accessed in real-time by public health partners.
Methods: Starting in January 2013, extensive experience with the Quidel SOFIA Influenza A+B system at 20 clinical sites and 7 LCTFs where the testing platform transmits influenza test results immediately to a cloud-based system with public health access has been acquired. True "real-time" availability of surveillance results are achievable. Since initiation, this highly innovative system has been working flawlessly. A plan to conduct RAPID-LTCF over three sequential influenza seasons to adapt to the uncertainties of influenza epidemiology has been proposed. Twenty LTCFs across Wisconsin will be recruited for participation and randomized, following stratification, to intervention (RIDT) or control (usual care) arms. Waived consent for on-site specimen collection from residents at the RIDT sites with acute respiratory infections has been approved by the IRB. Nasal swabs will be tested by nursing personnel at each intervention site using SOFIA. Anonymous results will be sent, via wireless transmission, for daily review by the study team and public health personnel. A positive influenza detection will trigger direct communication with LTCF personnel with advice on antiviral treatment, antiviral prophylaxis, and appropriate infection control practices. Data will be collected from each site regarding the number of courses of influenza antiviral medication provided for influenza treatment and for influenza prophylaxis, number of hospitalizations, number of deaths, and associated healthcare costs during annual, dynamic, 4-month risk windows, based on Wisconsin surveillance of influenza patterns. An independent data monitoring and safety board will continuously review outcomes and halt the study should significant differences between the two arms emerge. Outcomes will be assessed using standard statistical methods.
Significance: This program reflects the full intent of the Wisconsin Partnership Program and the Wisconsin Idea by identifying high-risk populations, and combining research, education and public health practice to reduce the disparities of care experienced by these populations. The application of cutting-edge, inexpensive, high-performing and reliable technology into a population of traditionally under-served, high-risk individuals would provide a translatable model for very early and proactive detection of, and response to influenza in LTCFs, thus allowing for appropriate medical (antiviral) and public health (in-room quarantining, enhanced personal protection equipment, prophylaxis of other residents) interventions.
- Conditions
- Influenza, Human, Pneumonia
- Being tested
- Sofia Fluorescent Immunoassay Analyzer Influenza A+B, Usual care
- Keywords
- Long-term care facility, Elderly
- Medical subject headings
- Influenza, Human, Pneumonia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sofia Fluorescent Immunoassay Analyzer Influenza A+BDevice
The Sofia Influenza A+B Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA) uses advanced immunofluorescence-based lateral-flow technology to detect influenza A and influenza B viral nucleoprotein antigens.
Usual careOther
Our team will discuss our interest in monitoring influenza antiviral treatment and prophylaxis courses, antibiotic courses, clinician and emergency room visits, respiratory infection-related hospitalizations, all-cause hospitalizations, and deaths during the anticipated 4-month influenza season over 3 years.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| LTCF with RIDT | Active comparator | Nasal swabs will be tested by nursing personnel at each intervention site using SOFIA Fluorescent Immunoassay Analyzer Influenza A+B (LTCF with RIDT). Anonymous results will be sent, via wireless transmission, for daily review by the study team and public health personnel. A positive influenza detection will trigger direct communication with LTCF personnel with advice on antiviral treatment, antiviral prophylaxis, and appropriate infection control practices. We will collect data from each site regarding the prescribing of influenza antivirals for treatment and prophylaxis, number of hospitalizations, number of deaths, and associated healthcare costs during annual, dynamic, 4-month risk windows, based on Wisconsin surveillance of influenza patterns. Receives: Device: Sofia Fluorescent Immunoassay Analyzer Influenza A+B |
| LTCF Control | Placebo comparator | Usual care.
Data will be collected from each site regarding the prescribing of influenza antivirals for treatment and prophylaxis, number of hospitalizations, number of deaths, and associated healthcare costs during annual, dynamic, 4-month risk windows, based on Wisconsin surveillance of influenza patterns. Receives: Other: Usual care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of influenza antiviral treatment courses provided during the 4-month influenza seasons in RAPID-LTCF vs. control LTCF
Oseltamivir is the most commonly used antiviral for influenza treatment. The usual dose is 75 mg twice a day for 5 days.
Measured: 4 months
Number of influenza antiviral prophylaxis courses provided during the 4-month influenza season in RAPID-LTCF vs. control LTCF
Oseltamivir is the most commonly used antiviral for influenza prophylaxis. The usual dose is 75 mg daily for the duration of likely exposure
Measured: 4 months
Number of respiratory infection-related hospitalizations in RAPID-LTCF vs control LTCF during the 4-month influenza season
These will include all hospitalizations that include a discharge diagnosis for any respiratory infection.
Measured: 4 months
Number of all-cause hospitalizations in RAPID-LTCF vs. control LTCF during the 4-month influenza season
All transfers of patients to the hospital will be assessed.
Measured: 4 months
Deaths during the 4-month influenza season in RAPID-LTCF vs. control LTCF
Measured: 4 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2016
- Primary completion8 Jun 2019
- Study completion31 Oct 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Influenza, HumanStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Wisconsin, MadisonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, Madison
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jon Temte, MD PhD, Principal investigator, University of Wisconsin, Madison
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02964871
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016-1160
- Other IDs
- A532000, SMPH\FAMILY MEDICINE
- Acronym
- Rapid-LTCF
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 7 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 16 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Rapid Assessment of and Prophylaxis for Influenza in Dwellers of Long-term Care Facilities
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02964871
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Rapid-LTCF / 2016-1160
- Conditions
- Influenza, Human, Pneumonia
- Keywords
- Long-term care facility, Elderly
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, MadisonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RAPID-LTCF is a stratified, block-randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a simple ARI case definition, rapid influenza diagnostic test (RIDT) with wireless transmission of results, and provision of infection control guidance when influenza is detected. Because of the nature of the intervention, blinding is not possible. Sites will be initially recruited for a study of "respiratory infections within LTCFs." After acceptance into the study, sites will be matched in terms of bed capacity, location, and other features prior to randomization.
Detailed description
Project Overview: The primary goal of RAPID-LTCF is to conduct a randomized, controlled clinical trial (RCT) to assess the effect of on-site, rapid influenza detection at long-term care facilities (LTCFs) on influenza-related hospitalizations, deaths, and healthcare-associated costs.
The basic research question in PICO format is:
Population: for residents of LTCFs across Wisconsin
Intervention: does early detection of influenza coupled with infection control guidance
Comparator: compared to usual care
Outcomes: result in:
- increase early detection and reporting of influenza outbreaks?
- increased early antiviral treatment of influenza?
- increased use of antiviral prophylaxis for other at-risk residents?
- fewer hospitalizations during the influenza season?
- reduced mortality during the influenza season?
- lower healthcare associated costs during the influenza season?
Building on two highly successful pilot QI projects-undertaken during the last two influenza seasons-that confirmed the feasibility and desirability of this approach, existing, CLIA-waived, low-complexity rapid influenza diagnostic test (RIDT) with high sensitivity and high specificity in this population as the diagnostic platform will be used. RIDT analyzers will be configured for wireless transmission of anonymous test results to a cloud-based server for real-time access by public health. Detection of influenza at a LTCF and its transmission to public health in real time will trigger communication and advice on appropriate infection control measures to reduce in-facility transmission. This approach has high potential for limiting influenza's effect at LTCFs.
Residents of LTCFs are at high risk for influenza infection due to reduced efficacy of influenza vaccines in elders, close quartering, presence of co-morbid medical conditions, and delayed response times. Consequently, outbreaks of influenza and other significant respiratory viruses easily spread within LTCFs and cause substantial morbidity and mortality in these populations. Results from this RCT will provide highly generalizable approaches using low-cost, low-complexity and easily-adapted tools and protocols for extremely early influenza detection and response. It is anticipated that early outbreak recognition and control in LTCFs will substantially reduce morbidity, mortality and healthcare associated costs in this vulnerable population.
Background: At present, 1.8 million individuals live in this nation's 16,000 nursing homes and an additional 900,000 live in assisted living facilities. Significant healthcare disparities exist for these individuals; a recent study found that the largest for-profit nursing homes delivered significantly lower quality of care. Part of this disparity is reflected in the fate of those infected with influenza. Influenza and pneumonia combine to form the 8th leading cause of death in the United States. Outbreaks of influenza and other respiratory viruses are common in LTCFs and result in significant morbidity and mortality among residents. This increased morbidity and mortality is due to a combination of close quartering, residents with co-morbid medical conditions, and delays in medical response. Because of this high risk, influenza vaccination has long been recommended for all residents and health care workers in these settings. Influenza vaccines, however, can have very low efficacy in older individuals; vaccine efficacy for protection from the predominant influenza strain in 2014-2015 was estimated to be only 14% for individuals aged 50 years and older. Accordingly, elders (aged 65+) accounted for 72.4% of Wisconsin's influenza-related hospitalizations during the 2014-2015 influenza season and 63% of influenza-related ICU admissions. Moreover, across the country, the rate of attributable influenza hospitalization was 313 per 100,000 for individuals aged 65 year and older.
The current practice for identifying and responding to influenza outbreaks in LTCFs is reactive and delayed. Of 41 known influenza outbreaks in LTCFs during the 2010-2011 season in New York, most were identified retrospectively through reporting of influenza hospitalizations and well before the LTCFs submitted reports to the Department of Health. The availability of CLIA-waived, low-complexity, sensitive and specific rapid influenza detection tests (RIDTs) can facilitate on-site diagnosis and early detection of an outbreak. Coupling RIDTs with wireless transmission of anonymous results directly to public health officials provides the means for extremely early and proactive outbreak recognition and intervention.
Program Goal: A randomized, controlled clinical trial to assess the effect of on-site RIDTs at LTCFs on subsequent influenza-related hospitalizations, deaths, and healthcare-associated costs is proposed. LTCF nursing staff will use RIDT technology to screen residents with acute respiratory infections (ARI). The proposed RIDT is a CLIA-waved, low-complexity test that uses a benign nasal swab specimen. It is configured to send test results via wireless transmission to a cloud platform. From there, data can be accessed in real-time by public health partners.
Methods: Starting in January 2013, extensive experience with the Quidel SOFIA Influenza A+B system at 20 clinical sites and 7 LCTFs where the testing platform transmits influenza test results immediately to a cloud-based system with public health access has been acquired. True "real-time" availability of surveillance results are achievable. Since initiation, this highly innovative system has been working flawlessly. A plan to conduct RAPID-LTCF over three sequential influenza seasons to adapt to the uncertainties of influenza epidemiology has been proposed. Twenty LTCFs across Wisconsin will be recruited for participation and randomized, following stratification, to intervention (RIDT) or control (usual care) arms. Waived consent for on-site specimen collection from residents at the RIDT sites with acute respiratory infections has been approved by the IRB. Nasal swabs will be tested by nursing personnel at each intervention site using SOFIA. Anonymous results will be sent, via wireless transmission, for daily review by the study team and public health personnel. A positive influenza detection will trigger direct communication with LTCF personnel with advice on antiviral treatment, antiviral prophylaxis, and appropriate infection control practices. Data will be collected from each site regarding the number of courses of influenza antiviral medication provided for influenza treatment and for influenza prophylaxis, number of hospitalizations, number of deaths, and associated healthcare costs during annual, dynamic, 4-month risk windows, based on Wisconsin surveillance of influenza patterns. An independent data monitoring and safety board will continuously review outcomes and halt the study should significant differences between the two arms emerge. Outcomes will be assessed using standard statistical methods.
Significance: This program reflects the full intent of the Wisconsin Partnership Program and the Wisconsin Idea by identifying high-risk populations, and combining research, education and public health practice to reduce the disparities of care experienced by these populations. The application of cutting-edge, inexpensive, high-performing and reliable technology into a population of traditionally under-served, high-risk individuals would provide a translatable model for very early and proactive detection of, and response to influenza in LTCFs, thus allowing for appropriate medical (antiviral) and public health (in-room quarantining, enhanced personal protection equipment, prophylaxis of other residents) interventions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| LTCF with RIDT | Active comparator | Device: Sofia Fluorescent Immunoassay Analyzer Influenza A+BNasal swabs will be tested by nursing personnel at each intervention site using SOFIA Fluorescent Immunoassay Analyzer Influenza A+B (LTCF with RIDT). Anonymous results will be sent, via wireless transmission, for daily review by the study team and public health personnel. A positive influenza detection will trigger direct communication with LTCF personnel with advice on antiviral treatment, antiviral prophylaxis, and appropriate infection control practices. We will collect data from each site regarding the prescribing of influenza antivirals for treatment and prophylaxis, number of hospitalizations, number of deaths, and associated healthcare costs during annual, dynamic, 4-month risk windows, based on Wisconsin surveillance of influenza patterns. |
| LTCF Control | Placebo comparator | Other: Usual careUsual care. Data will be collected from each site regarding the prescribing of influenza antivirals for treatment and prophylaxis, number of hospitalizations, number of deaths, and associated healthcare costs during annual, dynamic, 4-month risk windows, based on Wisconsin surveillance of influenza patterns. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Any resident of one of the 10 LTCF intervention facilities with two acute respiratory infection symptoms (rhinorrhea/runny nose, nasal congestion, sore throat, cough or fever).
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sofia Fluorescent Immunoassay Analyzer Influenza A+BThe Sofia Influenza A+B Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA) uses advanced immunofluorescence-based lateral-flow technology to detect influenza A and influenza B viral nucleoprotein antigens. | Device | LTCF with RIDT |
| Usual careOur team will discuss our interest in monitoring influenza antiviral treatment and prophylaxis courses, antibiotic courses, clinician and emergency room visits, respiratory infection-related hospitalizations, all-cause hospitalizations, and deaths during the anticipated 4-month influenza season over 3 years. | Other | LTCF Control |
Primary outcome
Number of influenza antiviral treatment courses provided during the 4-month influenza seasons in RAPID-LTCF vs. control LTCF
Time frame: 4 months
Oseltamivir is the most commonly used antiviral for influenza treatment. The usual dose is 75 mg twice a day for 5 days.
Number of influenza antiviral prophylaxis courses provided during the 4-month influenza season in RAPID-LTCF vs. control LTCF
Time frame: 4 months
Oseltamivir is the most commonly used antiviral for influenza prophylaxis. The usual dose is 75 mg daily for the duration of likely exposure
Number of respiratory infection-related hospitalizations in RAPID-LTCF vs control LTCF during the 4-month influenza season
Time frame: 4 months
These will include all hospitalizations that include a discharge diagnosis for any respiratory infection.
Number of all-cause hospitalizations in RAPID-LTCF vs. control LTCF during the 4-month influenza season
Time frame: 4 months
All transfers of patients to the hospital will be assessed.
Deaths during the 4-month influenza season in RAPID-LTCF vs. control LTCF
Time frame: 4 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jun 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Influenza, Human
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
RecruitingPhase 2
BPL-1357 Against H1N1 Influenza Virus Challenge
Influenza, Human
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Immunogenicity of Chimeric Hemagglutinin mRNA Vaccine Candidates
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 1
pH1N1 Blinded Challenge Study
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-1406/CD388 for Prevention of Influenza (MK-1406-005/CD388.SQ.3.06)
Influenza
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jon Temte, MD PhD principal investigator
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Sofia Fluorescent Immunoassay Analyzer Influenza A+B in people with Influenza, Human and Pneumonia, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of influenza antiviral treatment courses provided during the 4-month influenza seasons in RAPID-LTCF vs. control LTCF (time frame: 4 months). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jun 2020.