AzTrials
AzTrials

Allergic RhinitisNCT02965612

Specific Immunotherapy for Allergic Child

A study testing Injex and SCIT in people with Allergic Rhinitis and Allergic Asthma, run by Mariella Enoc at 1 site in Italy.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The recent interest that the Specific Immunotherapy (ITS) has aroused is due to the positive potential role that could be played, in particular in the forms of allergic asthma, because this method constitute the only intervention (unlike that pharmacologic) able to act on the same causes of the disease, altering the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Allergic Rhinitis, Allergic Asthma, Grass Allergy
What is being tested?
Injex and SCIT
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
May 2015to May 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Written informed consent from both parents / legal guardian;
  • Of both sexes;
  • Between the ages of 5 to 18 sensitized to grasses Awareness for grasses will be established with prick test;
  • Rhinitis established according to the ARIA (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma) guidelines and / or stage 1 or 2 Asthma according to GINA classification (Global Initiative for Asthma)
  • It may, or not, be going on ITS with s.c. administration

Who cannot join

  • Children under age 5 and age> 18 years;
  • Autoimmune diseases and immunodeficiencies;
  • Neoplasms;
  • Severe psychological problems;
  • Treatment with β-blockers;
  • Poor compliance, including language training;
  • Severe asthma uncontrolled by medication or irreversible airway obstruction (FEV1 less than 70% of the predicted value);
  • Severe cardiovascular diseases in which may be hazardous in the administration of adrenaline

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Operating unit of Allergology

    Rome

    Alessandro Fiocchi, 0039 06.6859. ext. 4777-3570, agiovanni.fiocchi@opbg.net

    Carmelo Pantaleo, +39 06 6859 ext. 3899, carmelo.pantaleo@opbg.net

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Tolerability and Side Effects for a New Device in Specific Immunotherapy for Allergic Child

The recent interest that the Specific Immunotherapy (ITS) has aroused is due to the positive potential role that could be played, in particular in the forms of allergic asthma, because this method constitute the only intervention (unlike that pharmacologic) able to act on the same causes of the disease, altering the natural history. To achieve this the investigator has tried to use the specific subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), to which there are studies that, with scientific rigor, have demonstrated the benefits.

Read the detailed description

The Investigator proposes to compare, in children with allergic rhinitis and / or allergic asthma to grasses, the pain caused by the administration of the Specific Immunotherapy (ITS) via epicutaneous with autoinjector (INJEX) pressure without needle vs. the traditional subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT).

Being tested
Injex, SCIT
Keywords
Grass Allergy, Allergic Rhinitis, Allergic Asthma, Paediatric
Medical subject headings
Rhinitis, Allergic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • InjexDevice

    administration of Specific Immunotherapy (ITS) with car pressure injector without a needle

  • SCITProcedure or surgery

    administration of Specific Immunotherapy (ITS) via traditional subcutaneous

Study groups in NCT02965612
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ITS with InjexExperimentalFor Each patient, at each monthly vaccination session and randomly in alternate mode, will be administered two vaccine doses of 0.25 ml each at 20 minutes from one another in the two arms, in an alternating manner via Injex and via subcutaneous.
Receives: Device: Injex
SCIT: ITS via subcutaneousActive comparatorFor Each patient, at each monthly vaccination session and randomly in alternate mode, will be administered two vaccine doses of 0.25 ml each at 20 minutes from one another in the two arms, in an alternating manner via Injex and via subcutaneous.
Receives: Procedure: SCIT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. prevalence of pain

    questionnaire of the pain scale monthly at each seat vaccination soon after every administration : the Wong-Baker scale for children aged 3 to 8 years and the classical analogue scale from 8 years and 1 day to 18 years.

    Measured: monthly for 6 month

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. prevalence of pain

    questionnaire of the pain scale monthly at each seat vaccination: the Wong-Baker scale for children aged 3 to 8 years and the classical analogue scale from 8 years and 1 day to 18 years.

    Measured: 20 minutes after every administration

  2. Incidence of procedure adverse events

    adverse events related to the different procedure used for the administration of the specific immunotherapy

    Measured: within 24-48 hours after every administration

  3. Incidence of procedure adverse events

    adverse event related to the different procedure used for the administration of the specific immunotherapy recorded by the patient on a special diary

    Measured: 6 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Nov 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2015
  3. Primary completionDec 2016 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
36 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02965612
Sponsor's protocol ID
947_OPBG_2014
Status last verified
Nov 2016
First submitted
8 Nov 2016
Last updated
17 Nov 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Injex and SCIT in people with Allergic Rhinitis and Allergic Asthma, run by Mariella Enoc at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Alessandro Fiocchi (0039 06.6859. ext. 4777-3570, agiovanni.fiocchi@opbg.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

prevalence of pain (time frame: monthly for 6 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2016.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in