AzTrials
AzTrials

Liver MassNCT02967198

Pre-procedure Planning for Liver Biopsy or Radiofrequency Ablation Using CT or MR/US Fusing Imaging

A study testing CT/US fusion and ultrasound shear wave elastography in people with Liver Mass and Liver Fibroses, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether fusion technique of preradiofrequency ablation (RFA) or percutaneous liver biopsy cross-sectional imaging (CT or MR) and real-time ultrasonography would improve feasibility of RFA or liver biopsy in patients with liver tumor in comparison with ultrasonography guidance… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Liver Mass, Liver Fibroses
What is being tested?
CT/US fusion and ultrasound shear wave elastography
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
185 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Nov 2015to Nov 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • all conditions should be satisfied for inclusion.
  • referred to Radiology in our institution for liver tumor RFA or percutaneous liver biopsy
  • available pre-procedure liver CT or liver MR imaging within 6 weeks

Who cannot join

  • any contraindication of liver RFA or percutaneous liver biopsy • any patients who received treatment between pre-RFA imaging and planned RFA.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Pre-procedure Planning for Liver Biopsy or Radiofrequency Ablation Using the Automatic Fusion Images of the Registrated 3D CT or MR-US Scans

The purpose of this study is to determine whether fusion technique of preradiofrequency ablation (RFA) or percutaneous liver biopsy cross-sectional imaging (CT or MR) and real-time ultrasonography would improve feasibility of RFA or liver biopsy in patients with liver tumor in comparison with ultrasonography guidance alone. And assessment of a new point shear-wave elastography method (pSWE, S-shear wave) and compare its accuracy in assessing liver stiffness (LS) with another pSWE technique (ARFI).

Read the detailed description

RFA is one of commonly used local therapies for primary or secondary liver tumors. And percutaneous liver biopsy is very important technique to confirm the diagnosis of focal hepatic lesion whether benign or malignancy.

For successful and safe procedure, safe access route and lesion visibility are essential , and the conditions are usually evaluated on pre-procedure planning ultrasonography (USG). However, these procedure is sometimes aborted due to limited sonic window of various cause and challenging identification of small isoechoic tumors or hepatocellular carcinomas among dysplastic nodules . Therefore, precise targeting and assuring safe route would be of clinical importance. In this preliminary study, investigators attempted to determine US and CT/MR fusion technique would be able to improve RFA or liver biopsy feasibility in patients with liver tumors in comparison with conventional US alone technique.

In addition, to assess intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of a new point shear-wave elastography method (pSWE, S-shear wave) and compare its accuracy in assessing liver stiffness (LS) with another pSWE technique (ARFI).

Being tested
CT/US fusion, ultrasound shear wave elastography
Keywords
Fusion, Ablation, Percutaneous biopsy, Shear wave elastography
Medical subject headings
Liver Cirrhosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CT/US fusionDevice

    Fusion of pre-procedure cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI) and real-time USG using registration function of USG device.

  • ultrasound shear wave elastographyDevice

    Also called S-shear wave

    ultrasound shear wave elastography is performed in S-shear wave scanner according to guidelines of ultrasound elastography.

Study groups in NCT02967198
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CT/US fusionExperimentalpatients undergo routine conventional feasibility planning ultrasound, and clinical decision of percutaneous liver biopsy or RFA feasibility is made based on conventional planning ultrasound. Then additional planning ultrasound using CT/US fusion technique is immediately performed by the same operator, and clinical decision is made based on fusion imaging.
Receives: Device: CT/US fusion; Device: ultrasound shear wave elastography

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. RFA or biopsy feasibility rates on planning USG with/without fusion CT/MR and US

    comparison of rates of RFA feasibility on conventional planning USG and on fusion planning USG

    Measured: 10 minutes after finishing planning USG

  2. Assessment of a new point shear-wave elastography method (pSWE, S-shear wave)

    To assess intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of a new point shear-wave elastography method (pSWE, S-shear wave) and compare its accuracy in assessing liver stiffness (LS) with another pSWE technique (ARFI).

    Measured: 10 minutes after finishing planning USG

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Rate of tumor visibility on planning USG with/without fusion technique

    comparison of tumor visibility (or detection) rates on planning USG on conventional planning USG and fusion planning USG

    Measured: 10 minutes after finishing planning USG

  2. Number of patients with safety access route on planning USG with/without fusion technique

    comparison of number of patients with presence/absence of safety access route, and the on two planning USGs

    Measured: 10 minutes after finishing planning USG

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Nov 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2015
  3. Primary completionSep 2016
  4. Study completionNov 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
185 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02967198
Sponsor's protocol ID
1508-099-695
Status last verified
Nov 2016
First submitted
16 Nov 2016
Last updated
18 Nov 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CT/US fusion and ultrasound shear wave elastography in people with Liver Mass and Liver Fibroses, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

RFA or biopsy feasibility rates on planning USG with/without fusion CT/MR and US (time frame: 10 minutes after finishing planning USG). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in