Acute Coronary SyndromeNCT02967588
An Intervention to Support Medication Adherence Following Acute Coronary Syndrome
A study testing Intervention group in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome, run by King's College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Background Medication adherence following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is often sub-optimal and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Non-adherence can be considered intentional or unintentional. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Coronary Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Intervention group
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 6 Mar 2017to 31 May 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinical diagnosis of ACS
- ACS primary reason for hospitalization
- Patients to be prescribed medications for secondary prevention (i.e. antiplatelet drugs, statins, ACEi, ARBs, β-blockers)
- Sufficient spoken English to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Developed ACS as a secondary condition (i.e. perioperative MI)
- Not prescribed medications for secondary prevention (i.e. antiplatelet drugs, statins, ACEi, ARBs, β-blockers)
- Non-English speaking
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
London, SE1 7EH
About this study
Official title: Development and Feasibility of a Brief Hospital-Based Intervention to Support Medication Adherence Following Acute Coronary Syndrome
Background Medication adherence following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is often sub-optimal and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Non-adherence can be considered intentional or unintentional. Findings ways to improve adherence is an important area of research with widespread clinical implications, however, previous interventions have generally been ineffective. The investigators propose an intervention that challenges both intentional and unintentional non-adherence in patients hospitalised following ACS.
Objectives The objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of a hospital-based intervention aimed at supporting medication adherence in patients following an ACS.
Read more
Methods Patients admitted to hospital with an ACS will be recruited for this study. The study will target both intentional and unintentional non-adherence over two sessions through challenging treatment beliefs and formulating specific action plans to encourage habit formation. Patients will be asked to provide in-depth feedback around the acceptability of the intervention. As this is a feasibility study, outcomes (i.e. medication adherence) will not be collected.
Dissemination If this study seems to be practical to deliver and acceptable to patients then it will inform the design of a future randomized-controlled pilot study to test the effectiveness of the intervention delivered by hospital pharmacists on a study outcome (i.e. medication adherence).
Read the detailed description
Intervention details
- All stages of the intervention will take place during hospitalization.
- Firstly, patients will complete a questionnaire based on the Beliefs about Medication Questionnaire-Specific (BMQ-S) (Horne \& Weinmen, 1999).
- Patients responses to this questionnaire will form the basis of Session 1 where beliefs about medicines will be discussed. The aim is to identify any negative or erroneous beliefs patients have that may prevent them from taking their medicines after they leave the hospital.
- Session 2 will focus on developing specific action plans for taking medication at home. Patients will be asked to formulate an if-then plan ('If it is time X in place Y and I am doing Z, then I will take my pill dose'. The aim is to make taking their medicines as much a part of their daily routine as possible.
- Prior to discharge, patients will complete the beliefs questionnaire again to see if there has been any shift in their beliefs about medications.
- Patients will also be asked to provide detailed feedback about the study. The investigators want to know whether the intervention setting (i.e. hospital-based), timing (i.e. straight after an ACS), content (i.e. targeting both intentional and unintentional non-adherence) and interventionist (i.e. PhD candidate) seem to be acceptable to patients.
- Feedback will be gathered after completion of the intervention and also during a follow up phone call 2-3 weeks after discharge.
- Conditions
- Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Being tested
- Intervention group
- Keywords
- Medication adherence, Behavioural intervention, Acute coronary syndrome, Medication beliefs, Implementation intentions
- Medical subject headings
- Acute Coronary Syndrome, Medication Adherence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intervention groupBehavioural
All stages of the intervention will take place during hospitalization. Patients will complete a questionnaire about their personal beliefs about medicines. Patients responses to this questionnaire will form the basis of Session 1 where beliefs about medicines will be discussed. Any negative beliefs or concerns will be discussed and beliefs about drug necessity will be encouraged.
Session 2 will focus on developing specific action plans for taking medication at home. Patients will be asked to formulate an if-then plan ('If it is time X in place Y and I am doing Z, then I will take my pill dose').
Prior to discharge, patients will complete the beliefs questionnaire again to see if there has been any shift in their beliefs about medications. Patients will also be asked to provide detailed feedback about the study. The investigators want to know whether the intervention setting, timing, content and delivery method seem to be acceptable to patients.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Intervention group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Treatment beliefs
Beliefs about medications will be compared pre-post intervention using responses from the BMQ-S, Separate necessity and concerns scores will be calculated (5-items each, total scores ranging 5-25) along with the BMQ differential (necessity score - concerns score) (Gujral et al., 2014).
Measured: During index hospitalisation, within two days of admission.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Initial patient study feedback
Patients will complete a study feedback questionnaire which will determine its acceptability to patients (setting, timing, content, delivery method).
Measured: During index hospitalisation, within two days of admission.
Detailed patient study feedback
Detailed patient feedback will be gathered 2-3 weeks after discharge via a phone call. A brief semi-structured interview will be undertaken and study acceptability will be assessed (setting, timing, content, delivery method). The follow up call will be audio recorded, transcribed and used to evaluate the intervention.
Measured: Within three weeks post-discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study start6 Mar 2017
- Primary completion31 May 2017
- Study completion31 May 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Coronary SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by King's College LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- King's College London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, San Francisco
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02967588
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- v1 06-09-16
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 11 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 2 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Development and Feasibility of a Brief Hospital-Based Intervention to Support Medication Adherence Following Acute Coronary Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02967588
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- v1 06-09-16
- Conditions
- Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Keywords
- Medication adherence, Behavioural intervention, Acute coronary syndrome, Medication beliefs, Implementation intentions
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- King's College LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, San Francisco
- Study start
- 6 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background Medication adherence following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is often sub-optimal and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Non-adherence can be considered intentional or unintentional. Findings ways to improve adherence is an important area of research with widespread clinical implications, however, previous interventions have generally been ineffective. The investigators propose an intervention that challenges both intentional and unintentional non-adherence in patients hospitalised following ACS.
Objectives The objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of a hospital-based intervention aimed at supporting medication adherence in patients following an ACS.
Methods Patients admitted to hospital with an ACS will be recruited for this study. The study will target both intentional and unintentional non-adherence over two sessions through challenging treatment beliefs and formulating specific action plans to encourage habit formation. Patients will be asked to provide in-depth feedback around the acceptability of the intervention. As this is a feasibility study, outcomes (i.e. medication adherence) will not be collected.
Dissemination If this study seems to be practical to deliver and acceptable to patients then it will inform the design of a future randomized-controlled pilot study to test the effectiveness of the intervention delivered by hospital pharmacists on a study outcome (i.e. medication adherence).
Detailed description
Intervention details
- All stages of the intervention will take place during hospitalization.
- Firstly, patients will complete a questionnaire based on the Beliefs about Medication Questionnaire-Specific (BMQ-S) (Horne \& Weinmen, 1999).
- Patients responses to this questionnaire will form the basis of Session 1 where beliefs about medicines will be discussed. The aim is to identify any negative or erroneous beliefs patients have that may prevent them from taking their medicines after they leave the hospital.
- Session 2 will focus on developing specific action plans for taking medication at home. Patients will be asked to formulate an if-then plan ('If it is time X in place Y and I am doing Z, then I will take my pill dose'. The aim is to make taking their medicines as much a part of their daily routine as possible.
- Prior to discharge, patients will complete the beliefs questionnaire again to see if there has been any shift in their beliefs about medications.
- Patients will also be asked to provide detailed feedback about the study. The investigators want to know whether the intervention setting (i.e. hospital-based), timing (i.e. straight after an ACS), content (i.e. targeting both intentional and unintentional non-adherence) and interventionist (i.e. PhD candidate) seem to be acceptable to patients.
- Feedback will be gathered after completion of the intervention and also during a follow up phone call 2-3 weeks after discharge.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Intervention group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Clinical diagnosis of ACS
- ACS primary reason for hospitalization
- Patients to be prescribed medications for secondary prevention (i.e. antiplatelet drugs, statins, ACEi, ARBs, β-blockers)
- Sufficient spoken English to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Developed ACS as a secondary condition (i.e. perioperative MI)
- Not prescribed medications for secondary prevention (i.e. antiplatelet drugs, statins, ACEi, ARBs, β-blockers)
- Non-English speaking
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention groupAll stages of the intervention will take place during hospitalization. Patients will complete a questionnaire about their personal beliefs about medicines. Patients responses to this questionnaire will form the basis of Session 1 where beliefs about medicines will be discussed. Any negative beliefs or concerns will be discussed and beliefs about drug necessity will be encouraged. Session 2 will focus on developing specific action plans for taking medication at home. Patients will be asked to formulate an if-then plan ('If it is time X in place Y and I am doing Z, then I will take my pill dose'). Prior to discharge, patients will complete the beliefs questionnaire again to see if there has been any shift in their beliefs about medications. Patients will also be asked to provide detailed feedback about the study. The investigators want to know whether the intervention setting, timing, content and delivery method seem to be acceptable to patients. | Behavioural | Intervention |
Primary outcome
Treatment beliefs
Time frame: During index hospitalisation, within two days of admission.
Beliefs about medications will be compared pre-post intervention using responses from the BMQ-S, Separate necessity and concerns scores will be calculated (5-items each, total scores ranging 5-25) along with the BMQ differential (necessity score - concerns score) (Gujral et al., 2014).
2 secondary outcomes
Initial patient study feedback
Time frame: During index hospitalisation, within two days of admission.
Detailed patient study feedback
Time frame: Within three weeks post-discharge
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jul 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Coronary Syndrome
Recruiting
CT Stress Myocardial Perfusion, Fractional Flow Reserve and Angiography in Patients With Stable Chest Pain Syndromes
Coronary Artery Disease, Chest Syndrome
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
RecruitingPhase 4
Early Single Antiplatelet Therapy After IVUS-Guided PCI in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes, STEMI
Recruiting
AI-Assisted Interpretation of Cardiac CT in the Emergency Department
Chest Pain, Acute Coronary Syndrome
Enrolling by invitation
Optical Coherence Tomography in Acute Vessel Evaluation
Ischemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Coronary Artery Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intervention group in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome, run by King's College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Treatment beliefs (time frame: During index hospitalisation, within two days of admission.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2017.