Esophageal NeoplasmPhase 2NCT02969473
Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin Versus 5-fluorouracil Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
A Phase 2 study testing Docetaxel and Fluorouracil in people with Esophageal Neoplasm and Chemoradiation, run by Zhu Yujia at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
In this phase II study, the investigators aim to evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with docetaxel plus cisplatin (DP regimen) versus 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin (PF regimen) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Neoplasm, Chemoradiation
- What is being tested?
- Docetaxel and Fluorouracil
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Oct 2010to May 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus
- stage II-IVA disease, including metastatic celiac or cervical nodes, according to the sixth edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for esophageal cancer
- aged between 18 and 70 years
- Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score ≥ 70
- adequate bone marrow function (leukocyte count ≥ 4000/uL, platelet count ≥ 100,000/uL), adequate liver function (serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level and serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level < twice the upper limit of normal, and serum bilirubin level of <1.5 mg/dL), and adequate renal function (creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min)
- no other serious medical conditions
- life expectancy ≥ 3 months
- written informed consent
Who cannot join
- detection of distant metastasis (excluding metastatic celiac or cervical nodes) before treatment before treatment
- known allergy to CDDP, 5-FU, or docetaxel
- pregnancy or breast feeding
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin Versus 5-fluorouracil Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial
In this phase II study, the investigators aim to evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with docetaxel plus cisplatin (DP regimen) versus 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin (PF regimen) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
Read the detailed description
Esophageal cancer is one of the most fatal malignancies worldwide. Radical surgery has been the primary treatment for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. For medically unfit patients or medically fit patients who decline surgery, definitive radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy has been established as a standard treatment. Since the 1980' s, the most widely used chemotherapeutic regimen in combination with radiotherapy for esophageal cancer was cisplatin (CDDP) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (the PF regimen). However, locoregionally persistent or recurrent diseases were still quite common and survival remained poor. Several previous studies conducted by the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) explored the efficacy of radiation dose escalation, but all results turned out disappointing. And studies incorporating intensified PF regimen or new-generation cytotoxic agents such as paclitaxel and oxaliplatin did not show any advantage over the standard-dosage PF regimen either. In this phase II study, the investigators aim to evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with docetaxel plus cisplatin (DP regimen) versus 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin (PF regimen) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
- Conditions
- Esophageal Neoplasm, Chemoradiation
- Being tested
- Docetaxel, Fluorouracil
- Keywords
- esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms, Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DocetaxelDrug
Also called cisplatin
Radiotherapy: All patients underwent conventional radiotherapy, 1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction and 5 fractions per week. The prescribed dose was 60-64 Gy to PTV1 and 50 Gy to PTV2. Patients received either three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). 3D-CRT treatment plans were calculated by Pinnacle planning system and IMRT treatment plans were calculated by Monacle planning system. All patients were treated with a 6-MV or 8-MV linear accelerator.
Chemotherapy: All patients received two cycles of chemotherapy concurrently with radiotherapy. Patients assigned to the DP group received two cycles of DP regimen (docetaxel 60 mg/m2 delivered on day 1 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 delivered on day 1) at a 3-week interval. In cases of grade 4 hematologic toxicity or severe non-hematologic toxicities, dose adjustment was performed in the subsequent chemotherapy cycle.
FluorouracilDrug
Also called cisplatin
Radiotherapy: All patients underwent conventional radiotherapy, 1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction and 5 fractions per week. The prescribed dose was 60-64 Gy to PTV1 and 50 Gy to PTV2. Patients received either three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). 3D-CRT treatment plans were calculated by Pinnacle planning system and IMRT treatment plans were calculated by Monacle planning system. All patients were treated with a 6-MV or 8-MV linear accelerator.
Chemotherapy: All patients received two cycles of chemotherapy concurrently with radiotherapy. Patients assigned to the PF group received two cycles of PF regimen (cisplatin 80 mg/m2 delivered on day 1 and 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 24 hours daily on days 1-4) at a 3-week interval. In cases of grade 4 hematologic toxicity or severe non-hematologic toxicities, dose adjustment was performed in the subsequent chemotherapy cycle.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PF group | Active comparator | This is the active comparator group. All patients in this group will receive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with PF regimen (5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin). Receives: Drug: Fluorouracil |
| DP group | Experimental | This is the experimental group. All patients in this group will receive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with DP regimen (docetaxel plus cisplatin). Receives: Drug: Docetaxel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall survival (OS)
Measured: From the date of randomization until the date of death, up to 5 years.
Secondary outcomes (3)
Treatment response rate
Measured: From the date of randomization until six weeks after treatment completion.
Progress Free Survival (PFS)
Measured: From the date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 5 years.
Acute treatment-related toxicities
Measured: From the date of randomization until six months after treatment completion.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2010
- Primary completionMay 2016
- Study completionMay 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophageal NeoplasmStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zhu Yujia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Zhu Yujia, Sun Yat-sen University
- Investigators
- Yonghong Hu, MD, Principal investigator, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02969473
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- YP2010138
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 11 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 21 Nov 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Ruppert BN, Watkins JM, Shirai K, Wahlquist AE, Garrett-Mayer E, Aguero EG, Sherman CA, Reed CE, Sharma AK. Cisplatin/Irinotecan versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as definitive chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug;33(4):346-52. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181aaca26.
PubMed 19841574Minsky BD, Pajak TF, Ginsberg RJ, Pisansky TM, Martenson J, Komaki R, Okawara G, Rosenthal SA, Kelsen DP. INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Mar 1;20(5):1167-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1167.
PubMed 11870157Cooper JS, Guo MD, Herskovic A, Macdonald JS, Martenson JA Jr, Al-Sarraf M, Byhardt R, Russell AH, Beitler JJ, Spencer S, Asbell SO, Graham MV, Leichman LL. Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-01). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. JAMA. 1999 May 5;281(17):1623-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.17.1623.
PubMed 10235156Herskovic A, Martz K, al-Sarraf M, Leichman L, Brindle J, Vaitkevicius V, Cooper J, Byhardt R, Davis L, Emami B. Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 1992 Jun 11;326(24):1593-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199206113262403.
PubMed 1584260al-Sarraf M, Martz K, Herskovic A, Leichman L, Brindle JS, Vaitkevicius VK, Cooper J, Byhardt R, Davis L, Emami B. Progress report of combined chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with esophageal cancer: an intergroup study. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jan;15(1):277-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.1.277.
PubMed 8996153Gaspar LE, Winter K, Kocha WI, Coia LR, Herskovic A, Graham M. A phase I/II study of external beam radiation, brachytherapy, and concurrent chemotherapy for patients with localized carcinoma of the esophagus (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 9207): final report. Cancer. 2000 Mar 1;88(5):988-95.
PubMed 10699886Minsky BD, Neuberg D, Kelsen DP, Pisansky TM, Ginsberg R, Benson A 3rd. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy and high-dose radiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a preliminary analysis of the phase II intergroup trial 0122. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Jan;14(1):149-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.1.149.
PubMed 8558190Ajani JA, Winter K, Komaki R, Kelsen DP, Minsky BD, Liao Z, Bradley J, Fromm M, Hornback D, Willett CG. Phase II randomized trial of two nonoperative regimens of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation in patients with localized carcinoma of the esophagus: RTOG 0113. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Oct 1;26(28):4551-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6918. Epub 2008 Jun 23.
PubMed 18574157Mason KA, Hunter NR, Milas M, Abbruzzese JL, Milas L. Docetaxel enhances tumor radioresponse in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 1997 Dec;3(12 Pt 1):2431-8.
PubMed 9815644Hennequin C, Giocanti N, Favaudon V. Interaction of ionizing radiation with paclitaxel (Taxol) and docetaxel (Taxotere) in HeLa and SQ20B cells. Cancer Res. 1996 Apr 15;56(8):1842-50.
PubMed 8620502Li QQ, Liu MZ, Hu YH, Liu H, He ZY, Lin HX. Definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin in squamous esophageal carcinoma. Dis Esophagus. 2010 Apr;23(3):253-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.01003.x. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
PubMed 19732130Einzig AI, Neuberg D, Remick SC, Karp DD, O'Dwyer PJ, Stewart JA, Benson AB 3rd. Phase II trial of docetaxel (Taxotere) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the upper gastrointestinal tract previously untreated with cytotoxic chemotherapy: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) results of protocol E1293. Med Oncol. 1996 Jun;13(2):87-93. doi: 10.1007/BF02993858.
PubMed 9013471Ohtsu A, Boku N, Muro K, Chin K, Muto M, Yoshida S, Satake M, Ishikura S, Ogino T, Miyata Y, Seki S, Kaneko K, Nakamura A. Definitive chemoradiotherapy for T4 and/or M1 lymph node squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Sep;17(9):2915-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.9.2915.
PubMed 10561371Minsky BD, Neuberg D, Kelsen DP, Pisansky TM, Ginsberg RJ, Pajak T, Salter M, Benson AB 3rd. Final report of Intergroup Trial 0122 (ECOG PE-289, RTOG 90-12): Phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy and high-dose radiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Feb 1;43(3):517-23. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00463-5.
PubMed 10078631Chandra A, Guerrero TM, Liu HH, Tucker SL, Liao Z, Wang X, Murshed H, Bonnen MD, Garg AK, Stevens CW, Chang JY, Jeter MD, Mohan R, Cox JD, Komaki R. Feasibility of using intensity-modulated radiotherapy to improve lung sparing in treatment planning for distal esophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2005 Dec;77(3):247-53. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.10.017. Epub 2005 Nov 17.
PubMed 16298001
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Nov 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin Versus 5-fluorouracil Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02969473
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- YP2010138
- Conditions
- Esophageal Neoplasm, Chemoradiation
- Keywords
- esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Zhu YujiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2010
- Primary completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this phase II study, the investigators aim to evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with docetaxel plus cisplatin (DP regimen) versus 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin (PF regimen) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
Detailed description
Esophageal cancer is one of the most fatal malignancies worldwide. Radical surgery has been the primary treatment for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. For medically unfit patients or medically fit patients who decline surgery, definitive radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy has been established as a standard treatment. Since the 1980' s, the most widely used chemotherapeutic regimen in combination with radiotherapy for esophageal cancer was cisplatin (CDDP) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (the PF regimen). However, locoregionally persistent or recurrent diseases were still quite common and survival remained poor. Several previous studies conducted by the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) explored the efficacy of radiation dose escalation, but all results turned out disappointing. And studies incorporating intensified PF regimen or new-generation cytotoxic agents such as paclitaxel and oxaliplatin did not show any advantage over the standard-dosage PF regimen either. In this phase II study, the investigators aim to evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with docetaxel plus cisplatin (DP regimen) versus 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin (PF regimen) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PF group | Active comparator | Drug: FluorouracilThis is the active comparator group. All patients in this group will receive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with PF regimen (5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin). |
| DP group | Experimental | Drug: DocetaxelThis is the experimental group. All patients in this group will receive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with DP regimen (docetaxel plus cisplatin). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus
- stage II-IVA disease, including metastatic celiac or cervical nodes, according to the sixth edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for esophageal cancer
- aged between 18 and 70 years
- Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score ≥ 70
- adequate bone marrow function (leukocyte count ≥ 4000/uL, platelet count ≥ 100,000/uL), adequate liver function (serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level and serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level < twice the upper limit of normal, and serum bilirubin level of <1.5 mg/dL), and adequate renal function (creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- detection of distant metastasis (excluding metastatic celiac or cervical nodes) before treatment before treatment
- known allergy to CDDP, 5-FU, or docetaxel
- pregnancy or breast feeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DocetaxelAlso: cisplatinRadiotherapy: All patients underwent conventional radiotherapy, 1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction and 5 fractions per week. The prescribed dose was 60-64 Gy to PTV1 and 50 Gy to PTV2. Patients received either three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). 3D-CRT treatment plans were calculated by Pinnacle planning system and IMRT treatment plans were calculated by Monacle planning system. All patients were treated with a 6-MV or 8-MV linear accelerator. Chemotherapy: All patients received two cycles of chemotherapy concurrently with radiotherapy. Patients assigned to the DP group received two cycles of DP regimen (docetaxel 60 mg/m2 delivered on day 1 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 delivered on day 1) at a 3-week interval. In cases of grade 4 hematologic toxicity or severe non-hematologic toxicities, dose adjustment was performed in the subsequent chemotherapy cycle. | Drug | DP group |
| FluorouracilAlso: cisplatinRadiotherapy: All patients underwent conventional radiotherapy, 1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction and 5 fractions per week. The prescribed dose was 60-64 Gy to PTV1 and 50 Gy to PTV2. Patients received either three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). 3D-CRT treatment plans were calculated by Pinnacle planning system and IMRT treatment plans were calculated by Monacle planning system. All patients were treated with a 6-MV or 8-MV linear accelerator. Chemotherapy: All patients received two cycles of chemotherapy concurrently with radiotherapy. Patients assigned to the PF group received two cycles of PF regimen (cisplatin 80 mg/m2 delivered on day 1 and 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 24 hours daily on days 1-4) at a 3-week interval. In cases of grade 4 hematologic toxicity or severe non-hematologic toxicities, dose adjustment was performed in the subsequent chemotherapy cycle. | Drug | PF group |
Primary outcome
Overall survival (OS)
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of death, up to 5 years.
3 secondary outcomes
Treatment response rate
Time frame: From the date of randomization until six weeks after treatment completion.
Progress Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 5 years.
Acute treatment-related toxicities
Time frame: From the date of randomization until six months after treatment completion.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Nov 2016.
- Background: PubMed 19841574Ruppert BN, Watkins JM, Shirai K, Wahlquist AE, Garrett-Mayer E, Aguero EG, Sherman CA, Reed CE, Sharma AK. Cisplatin/Irinotecan versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as definitive chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug;33(4):346-52. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181aaca26.
- Background: PubMed 11870157Minsky BD, Pajak TF, Ginsberg RJ, Pisansky TM, Martenson J, Komaki R, Okawara G, Rosenthal SA, Kelsen DP. INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Mar 1;20(5):1167-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1167.
- Background: PubMed 10235156Cooper JS, Guo MD, Herskovic A, Macdonald JS, Martenson JA Jr, Al-Sarraf M, Byhardt R, Russell AH, Beitler JJ, Spencer S, Asbell SO, Graham MV, Leichman LL. Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-01). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. JAMA. 1999 May 5;281(17):1623-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.17.1623.
- Background: PubMed 1584260Herskovic A, Martz K, al-Sarraf M, Leichman L, Brindle J, Vaitkevicius V, Cooper J, Byhardt R, Davis L, Emami B. Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 1992 Jun 11;326(24):1593-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199206113262403.
- Background: PubMed 8996153al-Sarraf M, Martz K, Herskovic A, Leichman L, Brindle JS, Vaitkevicius VK, Cooper J, Byhardt R, Davis L, Emami B. Progress report of combined chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with esophageal cancer: an intergroup study. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jan;15(1):277-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.1.277.
- Background: PubMed 10699886Gaspar LE, Winter K, Kocha WI, Coia LR, Herskovic A, Graham M. A phase I/II study of external beam radiation, brachytherapy, and concurrent chemotherapy for patients with localized carcinoma of the esophagus (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 9207): final report. Cancer. 2000 Mar 1;88(5):988-95.
- Background: PubMed 8558190Minsky BD, Neuberg D, Kelsen DP, Pisansky TM, Ginsberg R, Benson A 3rd. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy and high-dose radiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a preliminary analysis of the phase II intergroup trial 0122. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Jan;14(1):149-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.1.149.
- Background: PubMed 18574157Ajani JA, Winter K, Komaki R, Kelsen DP, Minsky BD, Liao Z, Bradley J, Fromm M, Hornback D, Willett CG. Phase II randomized trial of two nonoperative regimens of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation in patients with localized carcinoma of the esophagus: RTOG 0113. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Oct 1;26(28):4551-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6918. Epub 2008 Jun 23.
- Background: PubMed 9815644Mason KA, Hunter NR, Milas M, Abbruzzese JL, Milas L. Docetaxel enhances tumor radioresponse in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 1997 Dec;3(12 Pt 1):2431-8.
- Background: PubMed 8620502Hennequin C, Giocanti N, Favaudon V. Interaction of ionizing radiation with paclitaxel (Taxol) and docetaxel (Taxotere) in HeLa and SQ20B cells. Cancer Res. 1996 Apr 15;56(8):1842-50.
- Background: PubMed 19732130Li QQ, Liu MZ, Hu YH, Liu H, He ZY, Lin HX. Definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin in squamous esophageal carcinoma. Dis Esophagus. 2010 Apr;23(3):253-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.01003.x. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
- Background: PubMed 9013471Einzig AI, Neuberg D, Remick SC, Karp DD, O'Dwyer PJ, Stewart JA, Benson AB 3rd. Phase II trial of docetaxel (Taxotere) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the upper gastrointestinal tract previously untreated with cytotoxic chemotherapy: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) results of protocol E1293. Med Oncol. 1996 Jun;13(2):87-93. doi: 10.1007/BF02993858.
Related trials for Esophageal Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yonghong Hu, MD principal investigator
Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Docetaxel and Fluorouracil in people with Esophageal Neoplasm and Chemoradiation, run by Zhu Yujia at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall survival (OS) (time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of death, up to 5 years.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02969473, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Nov 2016.