HIV InfectionsNCT02969915
Strategies to Improve the HIV Care Continuum Among Key Populations in India
A study testing Incentives and Integrated Care Centers in people with HIV Infections, run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in India.
Trial summary
This clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of integrated care centers vs. integrated care centers plus HIV patient treatment incentives for achieving HIV treatment targets among people who inject drugs and men who have sex with men in India. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections
- What is being tested?
- Incentives and Integrated Care Centers
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,314 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndia
- Study dates
- 30 Oct 2017to 30 May 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Speaks Hindi, English, or local language
- HIV-positive
- Antiretroviral therapy (ART) naive or has used ART less than 12 months
- Registered client at the local integrated care center (ICC), which serves either people who inject drugs (PWID) or men who have sex with men (MSM).
Who cannot join
- Not competent to provide informed consent or participate in the study.
- Receives HIV care in the private sector
- Plans to migrate in next 12 months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
India1 site
YR Gaitonde Center for AIDS Research and Education
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600010
About this study
This clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of integrated care centers vs. integrated care centers plus HIV patient treatment incentives for achieving HIV treatment targets among people who inject drugs and men who have sex with men in India. The investigators will also assess cost-effectiveness and barriers and facilitators to implementation through targeted mixed-methods approaches. This study is a model for improving HIV treatment outcomes in key populations in low to middle-income countries.
Read the detailed description
The trajectory of the HIV epidemic in coming decades will be determined by the degree to which we can identify infected persons and engage them in care - a point implicit in the ambitious UNAIDS "90-90-90" target, which sets 90% goals for HIV diagnosis, linkage of infected persons to sustained antiretroviral therapy (ART), and viral suppression in those treated. Meeting this target requires successful engagement of difficult to reach populations, such as people who inject drugs (PWID) and men who have sex with men (MSM), who bear a disproportionate share of the epidemic, particularly in low to middle income countries. Our team is nearing completion of a multi-site cluster-randomized trial in India to assess the effectiveness of integrated care centers (ICCs) for PWID and MSM compared to usual care. ICC process measures from the first year show robust uptake of HIV counseling and testing, the primary outcome for that trial, but slower than anticipated ART uptake. Demand-side interventions in public health (such as treatment incentives) can be particularly effective when paired with optimized treatment accessibility (i.e., supply). Consequently, the investigators propose to examine whether provision of HIV care and treatment incentives to ICC clients will improve overall utilization of the clinics and downstream HIV care continuum outcomes.
The investigators propose a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design. This will include a 16-site, pair-matched cluster randomized trial to compare the effectiveness of adding of HIV care incentives to ICCs (ICC+) versus standard ICCs on HIV care continuum outcomes, including ART initiation, adherence and viral suppression. Effectiveness will be compared at the ICC level (from a cohort of HIV-infected ART-eligible clients followed in each ICC and process measures deriving from all ICC clients) and at the community-level through a cross-sectional sample accrued via respondent-driven sampling (RDS) 2 years after initiation of the intervention. Because PWID and MSM will be sampled independently from the ICCs in the RDS, it provides an opportunity to characterize outcomes like community viral load and HIV incidence, reflecting impact within the broader PWID/MSM communities. As an exploratory sub-aim, we will use a rigorous scientific design to assess the effects of withdrawing (vs. continuing) incentives beyond the initial intervention phase. Additionally, the investigators will determine the cost-effectiveness of the ICC+ intervention.
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Being tested
- Incentives, Integrated Care Centers
- Keywords
- people who inject drugs, men who have sex with men, HIV, India
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections, Homosexuality
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IncentivesBehavioural
Also called ICC+
Treatment incentives are offered to HIV-positive participants for reaching treatment targets, including retention to medical follow-up, initiating antiretroviral therapy, and maintaining high adherence with antiretroviral therapy.
Integrated Care CentersBehavioural
Also called ICC
ICCs offer key-population-oriented, vertically-integrated harm reduction, HIV testing, and HIV treatment services
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated care centers | Active comparator | Participants in the active comparator arm have access to integrated care centers (ICCs) Receives: Behavioral: Integrated Care Centers |
| ICC + incentives | Experimental | Participants in the experimental arm have access to the ICC intervention and the incentive intervention Receives: Behavioral: Incentives; Behavioral: Integrated Care Centers |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of Participants Surviving With Viral Suppression
Viral Suppression defined as HIV RNA <150 copies/mL
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
Proportion of Participants Surviving With Viral Suppression
Viral suppression defined as HIV RNA <150 copies/mL
Measured: 6 months
Proportion of Participants Surviving With Viral Suppression
Viral suppression defined as HIV RNA <150 copies/mL
Measured: 18 months
Proportion of Participants Surviving With Viral Suppression
Viral suppression defined as HIV RNA <150 copies/mL
Measured: 24 months
Proportion of Participants With Viral Suppression at One or More Follow-up Visits
Proportion with viral suppression (HIV RNA <150 copies/mL) at one or more follow-up visits
Measured: 24 months
Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Initiation
Rate of ART initiation among those naive to ART at baseline. This is reported as the proportion of participants who initiated ART.
Measured: 12 months
Retention to HIV Care
Proportion of participants who attended one or more visits to a government ART clinic in both the 0 to 6 month period and the 6 to 12 month period.
Measured: 12 months
ART Adherence
Proportion of participants who had a medication possession ratio of 0.9 or higher after starting ART
Measured: 12 months
Mortality
All-cause mortality
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study start30 Oct 2017
- Primary completion23 Mar 2020
- Study completion30 May 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Johns Hopkins UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Matched-pair cluster-randomized trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,314 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), YR Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education, Elton John AIDS Foundation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Shruti H Mehta, PhD, Principal investigator, Johns Hopkins UniversityGregory M Lucas, MD, Principal investigator, Johns Hopkins University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02969915
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00082575
- Other IDs
- R01DA041034, K24DA035684
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 18 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 15 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The investigators will require prospective collaborators to submit concept sheets to the study PIs that include a brief summary of the proposed hypothesis, summary of research methods, specific data or specimens that are being requested, and plans for analysis. Reasonable requests that address relevant scientific questions will be welcomed and supported to the extent possible.
Publications
Solomon SS, McFall AM, Srikrishnan AK, Verma V, Anand S, Khan RT, Kushwaha BS, Vasudevan C, Saravanan S, Paneerselvam N, Kumar MS, Das C, Celentano DD, Mehta SH, Lucas GM. Voucher incentives to improve viral suppression among HIV-positive people who inject drugs and men who have sex with men in India: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet HIV. 2024 May;11(5):e309-e320. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00005-5. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
PubMed 38583461Hamill MM, Gunaratne MP, McFall AM, Iqbal HS, Vasudevan CK, Anand S, Solomon SS, Mehta SH, Krishnan AK, Celentano DD, Lucas GM. Increasing Syphilis Prevalence Among MSM Across India Despite Improvements in the HIV Care Continuum. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2026 Jun 1;101(6):633-642. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003860.
PubMed 41995596
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Strategies to Improve the HIV Care Continuum Among Key Populations in India
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02969915
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00082575
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Keywords
- people who inject drugs, men who have sex with men, HIV, India
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,314 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), YR Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education, Elton John AIDS Foundation
- Study start
- 30 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Dec 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of integrated care centers vs. integrated care centers plus HIV patient treatment incentives for achieving HIV treatment targets among people who inject drugs and men who have sex with men in India. The investigators will also assess cost-effectiveness and barriers and facilitators to implementation through targeted mixed-methods approaches. This study is a model for improving HIV treatment outcomes in key populations in low to middle-income countries.
Detailed description
The trajectory of the HIV epidemic in coming decades will be determined by the degree to which we can identify infected persons and engage them in care - a point implicit in the ambitious UNAIDS "90-90-90" target, which sets 90% goals for HIV diagnosis, linkage of infected persons to sustained antiretroviral therapy (ART), and viral suppression in those treated. Meeting this target requires successful engagement of difficult to reach populations, such as people who inject drugs (PWID) and men who have sex with men (MSM), who bear a disproportionate share of the epidemic, particularly in low to middle income countries. Our team is nearing completion of a multi-site cluster-randomized trial in India to assess the effectiveness of integrated care centers (ICCs) for PWID and MSM compared to usual care. ICC process measures from the first year show robust uptake of HIV counseling and testing, the primary outcome for that trial, but slower than anticipated ART uptake. Demand-side interventions in public health (such as treatment incentives) can be particularly effective when paired with optimized treatment accessibility (i.e., supply). Consequently, the investigators propose to examine whether provision of HIV care and treatment incentives to ICC clients will improve overall utilization of the clinics and downstream HIV care continuum outcomes.
The investigators propose a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design. This will include a 16-site, pair-matched cluster randomized trial to compare the effectiveness of adding of HIV care incentives to ICCs (ICC+) versus standard ICCs on HIV care continuum outcomes, including ART initiation, adherence and viral suppression. Effectiveness will be compared at the ICC level (from a cohort of HIV-infected ART-eligible clients followed in each ICC and process measures deriving from all ICC clients) and at the community-level through a cross-sectional sample accrued via respondent-driven sampling (RDS) 2 years after initiation of the intervention. Because PWID and MSM will be sampled independently from the ICCs in the RDS, it provides an opportunity to characterize outcomes like community viral load and HIV incidence, reflecting impact within the broader PWID/MSM communities. As an exploratory sub-aim, we will use a rigorous scientific design to assess the effects of withdrawing (vs. continuing) incentives beyond the initial intervention phase. Additionally, the investigators will determine the cost-effectiveness of the ICC+ intervention.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Matched-pair cluster-randomized trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated care centers | Active comparator | Behavioral: Integrated Care CentersParticipants in the active comparator arm have access to integrated care centers (ICCs) |
| ICC + incentives | Experimental | Behavioral: Incentives, Behavioral: Integrated Care CentersParticipants in the experimental arm have access to the ICC intervention and the incentive intervention |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Speaks Hindi, English, or local language
- HIV-positive
- Antiretroviral therapy (ART) naive or has used ART less than 12 months
- Registered client at the local integrated care center (ICC), which serves either people who inject drugs (PWID) or men who have sex with men (MSM).
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Not competent to provide informed consent or participate in the study.
- Receives HIV care in the private sector
- Plans to migrate in next 12 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IncentivesAlso: ICC+Treatment incentives are offered to HIV-positive participants for reaching treatment targets, including retention to medical follow-up, initiating antiretroviral therapy, and maintaining high adherence with antiretroviral therapy. | Behavioural | ICC + incentives |
| Integrated Care CentersAlso: ICCICCs offer key-population-oriented, vertically-integrated harm reduction, HIV testing, and HIV treatment services | Behavioural | ICC + incentives, Integrated care centers |
Primary outcome
Proportion of Participants Surviving With Viral Suppression
Time frame: 12 months
Viral Suppression defined as HIV RNA <150 copies/mL
8 secondary outcomes
Proportion of Participants Surviving With Viral Suppression
Time frame: 6 months
Proportion of Participants Surviving With Viral Suppression
Time frame: 18 months
Proportion of Participants Surviving With Viral Suppression
Time frame: 24 months
Proportion of Participants With Viral Suppression at One or More Follow-up Visits
Time frame: 24 months
Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Initiation
Time frame: 12 months
Retention to HIV Care
Time frame: 12 months
ART Adherence
Time frame: 12 months
Mortality
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Dec 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 38583461Solomon SS, McFall AM, Srikrishnan AK, Verma V, Anand S, Khan RT, Kushwaha BS, Vasudevan C, Saravanan S, Paneerselvam N, Kumar MS, Das C, Celentano DD, Mehta SH, Lucas GM. Voucher incentives to improve viral suppression among HIV-positive people who inject drugs and men who have sex with men in India: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet HIV. 2024 May;11(5):e309-e320. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00005-5. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41995596Hamill MM, Gunaratne MP, McFall AM, Iqbal HS, Vasudevan CK, Anand S, Solomon SS, Mehta SH, Krishnan AK, Celentano DD, Lucas GM. Increasing Syphilis Prevalence Among MSM Across India Despite Improvements in the HIV Care Continuum. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2026 Jun 1;101(6):633-642. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003860.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The investigators will require prospective collaborators to submit concept sheets to the study PIs that include a brief summary of the proposed hypothesis, summary of research methods, specific data or specimens that are being requested, and plans for analysis. Reasonable requests that address relevant scientific questions will be welcomed and supported to the extent possible.
Related trials for HIV Infections
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Shruti H Mehta, PhD principal investigator
Johns Hopkins University
Gregory M Lucas, MD principal investigator
Johns Hopkins University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Incentives and Integrated Care Centers in people with HIV Infections, run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Dec 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of Participants Surviving With Viral Suppression (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02969915, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Dec 2025.