Obesity, MorbidPhase 2NCT02970877
Stool Transplantation for Treatment of Insulin Resistance in Morbidly Obese Patients
A Phase 2 study testing Fecal filtrate from 150 g stool from healthy lean donors and Fecal filtrate from 150 g of the recipient's own stool in people with Obesity, Morbid and Insulin Resistance, run by Johane Allard at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
More and more people in Canada and around the world are severely (morbidly) obese, and this is associated with a high risk for poor blood sugar control (insulin resistance, IR) and diabetes. Weight loss is often very hard to achieve for morbidly obese patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Obesity, Morbid, Insulin Resistance
- What is being tested?
- Fecal filtrate from 150 g stool from healthy lean donors and Fecal filtrate from 150 g of the recipient's own stool
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 29 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2017to 30 Nov 2022
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men and women
- age 18 years or older
- morbidly obese (BMI >40 kg/m² or BMI >35-40 kg/m² with other severe weight loss responsive comorbidities)
- referred to the Bariatric Clinic at the Toronto Western Hospital for weight loss surgery, but declining or deferring the surgery
- insulin resistance (HOMA-IR value >2.73)
Who cannot join
- In the 3 months prior to study entry, regular intake of:
- non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs;
- iron supplements;
- prebiotics or probiotics from other than food sources;
- antibiotics; or
- any experimental drug
Show all 11Show fewer
- Type 1 or type 2 diabetes
- chronic gastrointestinal diseases
- previous gastrointestinal surgery modifying the anatomy
- smoking
- pregnancy or breastfeeding
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Fecal Microbiota Transplant From Healthy Lean Donors to Morbidly Obese Individuals: Effect on Insulin Resistance and Other Obesity-related Parameters. A Randomized Controlled Trial.
More and more people in Canada and around the world are severely (morbidly) obese, and this is associated with a high risk for poor blood sugar control (insulin resistance, IR) and diabetes. Weight loss is often very hard to achieve for morbidly obese patients. Bariatric surgery is a very effective treatment, but it has some risks and is not available to all patients. Therefore, alternative treatments are needed.
The gut bacteria (intestinal microbiome) might play a role for the development of obesity and IR. Several studies in animals have shown that transferring stool from lean mice or humans into obese animals could lead to weight loss and improve IR. One human study has confirmed this. The investigators are therefore examining, whether transfer of stool from healthy lean people into morbidly obese patients with IR will improve blood sugar control, weight, and other obesity related parameters. This will be done in a randomized controlled trial. Effects on mental health and the bacterial in the mouth related to gum disease will also be assessed.
If successful, fecal transfer could be a new alternative treatment approach for morbidly obese patients or those with IR who do not have access to or do not want to undergo bariatric surgery.
Read the detailed description
The coupled disorders of morbid obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are a major and growing public health problem in Canada. The Public Health Agency of Canada 2011 report, Obesity in Canada, showed that 5.1% and 2.7% of Canadians had obesity class II (body mass index (BMI) 35.0-39.9) and III (BMI >40 kg/m2), respectively. Morbid obesity is associated with not only T2D (up to 42% of morbidly obese patients), but also cardiovascular complications, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and sleep apnea, and the prevalence of psychiatric disorders, particularly depression and anxiety, is high in this population. As morbid obesity is very difficult to treat, drastic measures are required, and bariatric surgery is often the only viable treatment option. Bariatric surgery is nowadays a frequently performed procedure (about 400 surgeries/year at the University Health Network (UHN)), and there are different techniques, including gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy, and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Of these procedures, the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery has become the gold standard, and it is highly effective in inducing long-term weight loss and improving or even resolving all of the obesity associated comorbidities. However, bariatric surgery is invasive, costly, has a risk of complications, and requires life-long commitment to a restricted diet. Therefore, a significant proportion of patients with morbid obesity is not willing to undergo the procedure, and a small proportion is excluded from the procedure due to other physical or mental health problems.In addition, depending on the health care system, bariatric surgery might not be available to a large proportion of patients. Regarding the growing rates of obesity and morbid obesity world-wide, less expensive and less invasive alternatives to bariatric surgery are urgently needed.
Even though obesity largely results from an imbalance between energy intake and energy expenditure, it has been shown that several factors, including the genetic background can render individuals susceptible to obesity. Most recently, the role of the intestinal microbiome has been under investigation. It has been shown that obese people have an intestinal microbiome and metagenome that is significantly different from lean controls, and this is even true in identical twins discordant for obesity. In addition, patients with T2D have a different intestinal microbiome than controls. Work done in rodents showed that fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) from lean to obese animals (and vice versa) can affect fat mass and parameters of the metabolic syndrome. It is thus possible that FMT may benefit human obesity with related metabolic abnormalities. FMT is becoming standard therapy for patients with refractory Clostridium difficile colitis and may become a treatment option in other gastrointestinal disorders. Only one human study (n=9) investigated FMT from lean subjects to obese patients (~BMI 35 kg/m2) with metabolic syndrome and showed improvement in insulin sensitivity. Taken altogether, these very exciting results led us to hypothesize that that FMT from healthy lean donors could effectively induce metabolic improvement (i.e. insulin resistance (IR)) and weight loss) by distinct microbe-specific mediated mechanisms. The investigators will examine this in a single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled parallel-group trial (RCT).
Furthermore, emerging evidence shows that the intestinal microbiome, through the gut-brain axis, can influence mood disorders. First animal studies suggest that FMT can transfer depression and anxiety and therefore, FMT from healthy individuals may provide some benefits. Therefore, the investigators will also assess, whether FMT influences depression and anxiety, which are highly prevalent in obese patients. Finally, our Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) Team Grant, which supports this RCT, is also studying the potential relationship between obesity, T2D and the oral microbiome (OM). Considering that microbes present in the saliva are swallowed in significant numbers-about 10^12 oral bacteria per day-and that this may influence the composition of the intestinal microbiome, the investigators are also exploring the potential relationship between oral and intestinal microbiome and their associations with obesity and T2D. Having a FMT protocol gives us the unique opportunity to further assess this potential relationship and determine if FMT may change OM by improving obesity and metabolic parameters. This has not been previously studied in animals or humans.
The aims of this RCT are to assess whether FMT from healthy lean individuals into morbidly obese patients with IR who decline bariatric surgery, leads to 1) improvement in metabolic parameters: IR, BMI, and other obesity related parameters; 2) improvement in mood disorders: depression and anxiety scores; 3) changes in the intestinal microbiome and metabolome. 4) In addition, by assessing the OM through the FMT protocol and by combining these results with the results of our other protocols in a similar patient population going through bariatric surgery, the investigators will explore the relationship between oral/intestinal microbiome and obesity/metabolic parameters. 5) Furthermore, as planned in our CIHR Team Grant, the investigators will use the FMT from the lean donors and transfer into obese mice to assess the effect of FMT on mechanisms related to glucose metabolism. These additional experiments are not part of this protocol but are mentioned briefly, as stool samples and data from the patients and donors participating in the FMT trial will be used for the other studies in our CIHR Team Grant.
Significance. The number of obese patients is growing world-wide. The investigators are examining here a'medical bypass' solutions to treat the 40-50% of obese patients that meet the criteria set by the National Institutes for Health (NIH) for bariatric surgery (12, 36) but decline (13), or the much larger population of obese patients (BMI 30-40 kg/m2) who may not be considered for surgical treatment.
- Conditions
- Obesity, Morbid, Insulin Resistance
- Being tested
- Fecal filtrate from 150 g stool from healthy lean donors, Fecal filtrate from 150 g of the recipient's own stool
- Keywords
- Fecal microbiota transplant, Intestinal microbiome, Mucosa associated microbiome, Appetite, Metabolome, Depression, Anxiety
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity, Morbid, Insulin Resistance, Depression, Anxiety Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fecal filtrate from 150 g stool from healthy lean donorsBiological
Also called Intestinal microbiota from healthy lean donors
150 g stool from healthy lean donors will be diluted in 0.9% normal saline to a total volume of 450 mL. Preparation from frozen stool.
Fecal filtrate from 150 g of the recipient's own stoolBiological
Also called Autologous intestinal microbiota
150 g stool from the recipient will be diluted in 0.9% normal saline to a total volume of 450 mL. Preparation from frozen stool.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Allogenic treatment group | Experimental | Fecal filtrate from 150 g stool from healthy lean donors Receives: Biological: Fecal filtrate from 150 g stool from healthy lean donors |
| Autologous control group | Placebo comparator | Fecal filtrate from 150 g of the recipient's own stool Receives: Biological: Fecal filtrate from 150 g of the recipient's own stool |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Insulin Resistance Compared to Baseline
Looking at the change in Homeostasis model of assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). HOMA-IR > 2.73 is considered as insulin resistance. The higher HOMA-IR, the worse the insulin resistance. For this measure, we looked at the change in HOMA-IR. Those with more reduction in HOMA-IR experience more improvement in their insulin resistance.
Measured: 1 month, 3 month
Secondary outcomes (6)
Weight
Body weight (kg)
Measured: Baseline, 1 mo, 3 mo
Body Mass Index
Weight (kg)/ height (m^2)
Measured: Baseline, 1 mo, 3 mo
Appetite Score
Appetite score according to visual analog scale. Scores range from 0 to 10. In hunger, zero means not hungry at all. In prospective consumption, 0 means "don't think they can eat anything at all" and lower score is better. In sweet craving, zero means "they very much would like to eat something sweet", thus, higher score is better.
Measured: Baseline, 1 mo, 3 mo
Quality of Life Questionnaire
RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 (SF-36). It is a 36-item questionnaire that asks questions about physical functioning, bodily pain, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health perceptions, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems. The lowest score is 0 and the highest score is 100. Higher score shows better overall quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, 3 mo
Depression Score
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is used in assessing severity od depressive episode. The score for each question is combined for the total score which ranges from 0 to 60. Zero means no depressive episode and 60 means severe depression.
Measured: Baseline, 3 mo
Anxiety Score
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (Ham-A) is a questionnaire that assesses anxiety. The scale is 0 to 30. 0 means no anxiety present and 30 means severe anxiety.
Measured: Baseline, 3 mo
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study start1 Mar 2017
- Primary completion30 Jun 2022
- Study completion30 Nov 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Obesity, MorbidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johane Allard
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL, University of Toronto
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Johane Allard, University Health Network, Toronto
- Investigators
- Johane P Allard, MD, Principal investigator, University Health Network, University of Toronto
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02970877
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 16-5475
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 17 Jun 2016
- Last updated
- 24 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The current data sharing plans for the current study are unknown and will be made available at a later date
Publications
Vrieze A, Van Nood E, Holleman F, Salojarvi J, Kootte RS, Bartelsman JF, Dallinga-Thie GM, Ackermans MT, Serlie MJ, Oozeer R, Derrien M, Druesne A, Van Hylckama Vlieg JE, Bloks VW, Groen AK, Heilig HG, Zoetendal EG, Stroes ES, de Vos WM, Hoekstra JB, Nieuwdorp M. Transfer of intestinal microbiota from lean donors increases insulin sensitivity in individuals with metabolic syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2012 Oct;143(4):913-6.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.06.031. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
PubMed 22728514Kelly CR, Kahn S, Kashyap P, Laine L, Rubin D, Atreja A, Moore T, Wu G. Update on Fecal Microbiota Transplantation 2015: Indications, Methodologies, Mechanisms, and Outlook. Gastroenterology. 2015 Jul;149(1):223-37. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 May 15.
PubMed 25982290Hamilton MJ, Weingarden AR, Unno T, Khoruts A, Sadowsky MJ. High-throughput DNA sequence analysis reveals stable engraftment of gut microbiota following transplantation of previously frozen fecal bacteria. Gut Microbes. 2013 Mar-Apr;4(2):125-35. doi: 10.4161/gmic.23571. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
PubMed 23333862
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Fecal Microbiota Transplant From Healthy Lean Donors to Morbidly Obese Individuals: Effect on Insulin Resistance and Other Obesity-related Parameters. A Randomized Controlled Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02970877
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 16-5475
- Conditions
- Obesity, Morbid, Insulin Resistance
- Keywords
- Fecal microbiota transplant, Intestinal microbiome, Mucosa associated microbiome, Appetite, Metabolome, Depression, Anxiety
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Johane AllardUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL, University of Toronto
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Apr 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
More and more people in Canada and around the world are severely (morbidly) obese, and this is associated with a high risk for poor blood sugar control (insulin resistance, IR) and diabetes. Weight loss is often very hard to achieve for morbidly obese patients. Bariatric surgery is a very effective treatment, but it has some risks and is not available to all patients. Therefore, alternative treatments are needed.
The gut bacteria (intestinal microbiome) might play a role for the development of obesity and IR. Several studies in animals have shown that transferring stool from lean mice or humans into obese animals could lead to weight loss and improve IR. One human study has confirmed this. The investigators are therefore examining, whether transfer of stool from healthy lean people into morbidly obese patients with IR will improve blood sugar control, weight, and other obesity related parameters. This will be done in a randomized controlled trial. Effects on mental health and the bacterial in the mouth related to gum disease will also be assessed.
If successful, fecal transfer could be a new alternative treatment approach for morbidly obese patients or those with IR who do not have access to or do not want to undergo bariatric surgery.
Detailed description
The coupled disorders of morbid obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are a major and growing public health problem in Canada. The Public Health Agency of Canada 2011 report, Obesity in Canada, showed that 5.1% and 2.7% of Canadians had obesity class II (body mass index (BMI) 35.0-39.9) and III (BMI >40 kg/m2), respectively. Morbid obesity is associated with not only T2D (up to 42% of morbidly obese patients), but also cardiovascular complications, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and sleep apnea, and the prevalence of psychiatric disorders, particularly depression and anxiety, is high in this population. As morbid obesity is very difficult to treat, drastic measures are required, and bariatric surgery is often the only viable treatment option. Bariatric surgery is nowadays a frequently performed procedure (about 400 surgeries/year at the University Health Network (UHN)), and there are different techniques, including gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy, and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Of these procedures, the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery has become the gold standard, and it is highly effective in inducing long-term weight loss and improving or even resolving all of the obesity associated comorbidities. However, bariatric surgery is invasive, costly, has a risk of complications, and requires life-long commitment to a restricted diet. Therefore, a significant proportion of patients with morbid obesity is not willing to undergo the procedure, and a small proportion is excluded from the procedure due to other physical or mental health problems.In addition, depending on the health care system, bariatric surgery might not be available to a large proportion of patients. Regarding the growing rates of obesity and morbid obesity world-wide, less expensive and less invasive alternatives to bariatric surgery are urgently needed.
Even though obesity largely results from an imbalance between energy intake and energy expenditure, it has been shown that several factors, including the genetic background can render individuals susceptible to obesity. Most recently, the role of the intestinal microbiome has been under investigation. It has been shown that obese people have an intestinal microbiome and metagenome that is significantly different from lean controls, and this is even true in identical twins discordant for obesity. In addition, patients with T2D have a different intestinal microbiome than controls. Work done in rodents showed that fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) from lean to obese animals (and vice versa) can affect fat mass and parameters of the metabolic syndrome. It is thus possible that FMT may benefit human obesity with related metabolic abnormalities. FMT is becoming standard therapy for patients with refractory Clostridium difficile colitis and may become a treatment option in other gastrointestinal disorders. Only one human study (n=9) investigated FMT from lean subjects to obese patients (~BMI 35 kg/m2) with metabolic syndrome and showed improvement in insulin sensitivity. Taken altogether, these very exciting results led us to hypothesize that that FMT from healthy lean donors could effectively induce metabolic improvement (i.e. insulin resistance (IR)) and weight loss) by distinct microbe-specific mediated mechanisms. The investigators will examine this in a single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled parallel-group trial (RCT).
Furthermore, emerging evidence shows that the intestinal microbiome, through the gut-brain axis, can influence mood disorders. First animal studies suggest that FMT can transfer depression and anxiety and therefore, FMT from healthy individuals may provide some benefits. Therefore, the investigators will also assess, whether FMT influences depression and anxiety, which are highly prevalent in obese patients. Finally, our Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) Team Grant, which supports this RCT, is also studying the potential relationship between obesity, T2D and the oral microbiome (OM). Considering that microbes present in the saliva are swallowed in significant numbers-about 10^12 oral bacteria per day-and that this may influence the composition of the intestinal microbiome, the investigators are also exploring the potential relationship between oral and intestinal microbiome and their associations with obesity and T2D. Having a FMT protocol gives us the unique opportunity to further assess this potential relationship and determine if FMT may change OM by improving obesity and metabolic parameters. This has not been previously studied in animals or humans.
The aims of this RCT are to assess whether FMT from healthy lean individuals into morbidly obese patients with IR who decline bariatric surgery, leads to 1) improvement in metabolic parameters: IR, BMI, and other obesity related parameters; 2) improvement in mood disorders: depression and anxiety scores; 3) changes in the intestinal microbiome and metabolome. 4) In addition, by assessing the OM through the FMT protocol and by combining these results with the results of our other protocols in a similar patient population going through bariatric surgery, the investigators will explore the relationship between oral/intestinal microbiome and obesity/metabolic parameters. 5) Furthermore, as planned in our CIHR Team Grant, the investigators will use the FMT from the lean donors and transfer into obese mice to assess the effect of FMT on mechanisms related to glucose metabolism. These additional experiments are not part of this protocol but are mentioned briefly, as stool samples and data from the patients and donors participating in the FMT trial will be used for the other studies in our CIHR Team Grant.
Significance. The number of obese patients is growing world-wide. The investigators are examining here a'medical bypass' solutions to treat the 40-50% of obese patients that meet the criteria set by the National Institutes for Health (NIH) for bariatric surgery (12, 36) but decline (13), or the much larger population of obese patients (BMI 30-40 kg/m2) who may not be considered for surgical treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Allogenic treatment group | Experimental | Biological: Fecal filtrate from 150 g stool from healthy lean donorsFecal filtrate from 150 g stool from healthy lean donors |
| Autologous control group | Placebo comparator | Biological: Fecal filtrate from 150 g of the recipient's own stoolFecal filtrate from 150 g of the recipient's own stool |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Men and women
- age 18 years or older
- morbidly obese (BMI >40 kg/m² or BMI >35-40 kg/m² with other severe weight loss responsive comorbidities)
- referred to the Bariatric Clinic at the Toronto Western Hospital for weight loss surgery, but declining or deferring the surgery
- insulin resistance (HOMA-IR value >2.73)
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- In the 3 months prior to study entry, regular intake of:
- Type 1 or type 2 diabetes
- chronic gastrointestinal diseases
- previous gastrointestinal surgery modifying the anatomy
- smoking
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fecal filtrate from 150 g stool from healthy lean donorsAlso: Intestinal microbiota from healthy lean donors150 g stool from healthy lean donors will be diluted in 0.9% normal saline to a total volume of 450 mL. Preparation from frozen stool. | Biological | Allogenic treatment group |
| Fecal filtrate from 150 g of the recipient's own stoolAlso: Autologous intestinal microbiota150 g stool from the recipient will be diluted in 0.9% normal saline to a total volume of 450 mL. Preparation from frozen stool. | Biological | Autologous control group |
Primary outcome
Change in Insulin Resistance Compared to Baseline
Time frame: 1 month, 3 month
Looking at the change in Homeostasis model of assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). HOMA-IR > 2.73 is considered as insulin resistance. The higher HOMA-IR, the worse the insulin resistance. For this measure, we looked at the change in HOMA-IR. Those with more reduction in HOMA-IR experience more improvement in their insulin resistance.
6 secondary outcomes
Weight
Time frame: Baseline, 1 mo, 3 mo
Body Mass Index
Time frame: Baseline, 1 mo, 3 mo
Appetite Score
Time frame: Baseline, 1 mo, 3 mo
Quality of Life Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, 3 mo
Depression Score
Time frame: Baseline, 3 mo
Anxiety Score
Time frame: Baseline, 3 mo
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Apr 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 22728514Vrieze A, Van Nood E, Holleman F, Salojarvi J, Kootte RS, Bartelsman JF, Dallinga-Thie GM, Ackermans MT, Serlie MJ, Oozeer R, Derrien M, Druesne A, Van Hylckama Vlieg JE, Bloks VW, Groen AK, Heilig HG, Zoetendal EG, Stroes ES, de Vos WM, Hoekstra JB, Nieuwdorp M. Transfer of intestinal microbiota from lean donors increases insulin sensitivity in individuals with metabolic syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2012 Oct;143(4):913-6.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.06.031. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
- Background: PubMed 25982290Kelly CR, Kahn S, Kashyap P, Laine L, Rubin D, Atreja A, Moore T, Wu G. Update on Fecal Microbiota Transplantation 2015: Indications, Methodologies, Mechanisms, and Outlook. Gastroenterology. 2015 Jul;149(1):223-37. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 May 15.
- Background: PubMed 23333862Hamilton MJ, Weingarden AR, Unno T, Khoruts A, Sadowsky MJ. High-throughput DNA sequence analysis reveals stable engraftment of gut microbiota following transplantation of previously frozen fecal bacteria. Gut Microbes. 2013 Mar-Apr;4(2):125-35. doi: 10.4161/gmic.23571. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The current data sharing plans for the current study are unknown and will be made available at a later date
Related trials for Obesity, Morbid
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pilot Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of OPTILENE® SILVER MESH ELASTIC in Prevention of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) and Incisional Hernia (IH)
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Morbid Obesity
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Evaluating Metabolic Health in Individuals With Extreme Obesity
BMI>40
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Bariatric Surgery Registry
Obesity, Morbid
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Serum Estradiol and Endometrial Thickness After Bariatric Surgery in Postmenopausal Women With Obesity
Obesity, Morbid, Postmenopause
Active, not recruiting
Mindfulness Based Eating Awareness Training for Bariatric Surgery Patients
Obesity, Morbid, Eating Disorder Symptom
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Johane P Allard, MD principal investigator
University Health Network, University of Toronto
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Fecal filtrate from 150 g stool from healthy lean donors and Fecal filtrate from 150 g of the recipient's own stool in people with Obesity, Morbid and Insulin Resistance, run by Johane Allard at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Apr 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Insulin Resistance Compared to Baseline (time frame: 1 month, 3 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02970877, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2025.