AzTrials
AzTrials

Staphylococcal InfectionsStaphTypeNCT02971657

Bacterial Phenotype of Staphylococcus Aureus Has no Effect on Patients' Clinical Outcome in Orthopedic Device Related Bone Infections

An observational study of Staphylococcal Infections, run by BG Unfallklinik Murnau.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This was a prospective study performed between November 2011 and September 2013. Patients with a confirmed S. aureus infection after fracture fixation or prosthetic joint infection were included. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Staphylococcal Infections
How many people
126 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Nov 2011to Mar 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Orthopaedic device related infection involving longbones of the upper and lower extremities

Who may be able to join

  • Infections after fracture fixation or prosthetic joint surgery
  • Affected bone or joint: Long bones of the lower and upper extremity
  • Bacterial growth of S. aureus at the site of interest
  • Written consent
  • Age: 18 and older

Who cannot join

  • no prove of bacterial growth at site of interest
  • missing consent
  • infections involving external fixation pins, infections without any implanted hardware.

About this study

This was a prospective study performed between November 2011 and September 2013. Patients with a confirmed S. aureus infection after fracture fixation or prosthetic joint infection were included. Exclusion criteria included infections involving external fixation pins, infections without any implanted hardware and culture positive patients not displaying any clinical sign of infection. The following surgical parameters were documented: affected bone or joint; type of implant; time between implantation of the device and onset of symptoms. Personal characteristics and patients'health status were also documented. Any revision surgeries involving the site of interest and all isolated pathogens were recorded throughout the course of treatment and follow-up.

A follow up examination was performed an average of 23 months after discharge. Primary outcome at follow up was cure. Cure was defined by the authors as: missing local (at site of interest) or systemic signs of infection, terminated surgical and systemic therapy and restoration of joint or limb function.

At the first surgical procedure after enrolment, at least four deep bone biopsies were taken from the interface between implant and affected bone. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing of all growth was performed. Multi-drug-resistance (MDR) was defined according to the definitions of the European Committee of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Biofilm formation was analysed and quantified in microtitre plate assays according to protocol of Stepanovic et al.(see references).

Read the detailed description

This was a prospective study performed between November 2011 and September 2013. All patients provided informed written consent prior to inclusion in the study. Inclusion criteria were deep S. aureus infections after fracture fixation or prosthetic joint surgery. Fracture fixation infections includes fractures involving the long bones as well as the pelvis and the spine. Bacterial growth at the site of interest in combination with either pseudarthrosis, implant-loosening/failure or local and systemic signs of surgical site infection were required for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included infections involving external fixation pins, infections without any implanted hardware and culture positive patients not displaying any clinical sign of infection.

Upon entry into the study, the following surgical parameters were documented: affected bone or joint; type of implant; time between implantation of the device and onset of symptoms. Personal characteristics were also documented and included: gender; age; body mass index (BMI); smoker/non-smoker; overall medical condition (Charlson comorbidity index); and chronic immunosuppressive conditions (Diabetes mellitus, chronic alcoholism, Child's class C cirrhosis, neoplasia, transplantation, AIDS and steroid medication). Any revision surgeries involving the site of interest and all isolated pathogens were recorded throughout the course of treatment and follow-up.

A follow up examination was performed an average of 23 months after discharge. Primary outcome at follow up was cure. Cure was defined by the authors as: missing local (at site of interest) or systemic signs of infection and terminated surgical and systemic therapy.

At the first surgical procedure after enrolment, at least four deep bone biopsies were taken from the interface between implant and affected bone. The tissue samples were placed in a sterile container with thioglycollate liquid medium (bioMérieux, Hazelwood, MO, USA). The samples were cultured for ten days at 37°C and examined each day macroscopically. Any growth was inoculated onto a blood agar plate (bioMérieux, Hazelwood, MO, USA) for further growth and subsequent identification. In all cases, additional swabs and soft tissue samples may have been taken as per clinical routine, however, only samples adjacent to the implant were used for diagnosis in this study.

Identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing of all growth was performed using a Vitek2 (bioMerieux Vitek Inc, Hazelwood, MO, USA). Multi-drug-resistance (MDR) was defined according to the definitions of the European Committee of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Oxacillin resistance was used as an indicator for methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA).

Biofilm formation was analysed and quantified in microtitre plate assays according to the well-established protocol of Stepanovic et al.(see references).

The key variables with regards to bacterial phenotype were: biofilm formation; methicillin resistance;multidrug resistance;staphyloxanthin production and hemolysis. The primary outcome measure was whether the infection was "cured" or not. Primary outcome parameters were calculated as a function of all patients for whom data was complete. Statistical comparison was restricted to the lower extremity cohort since the other patients are not scored for many of the functional outcome measures and as such incomplete.

Univariate logistic regression models were used to determine the influence of each prognostic factor (obesity, smoking, diabetes mellitus, chronic immune suppression, open fracture (initially), early onset infection, biofilm formation, methicillin resistance, MDR and Charlson comorbidity index) on cure. P-values <0.05 were considered significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (Version 9.2; Cary, NC, USA).

Keywords
Staphylococcus aureus phenotypic characterization, Antibiotic resistance, Orthopedic device related infections, Phenotypic characterization
Medical subject headings
Staphylococcal Infections

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cure

    Cure was defined by the authors as: missing local (at site of interest) or systemic signs of infection and terminated surgical and systemic antibiotic therapy. All Parameters had to be positive to fulfill the outcome parameter "cure".If one of the mentioned parameters was negative, outcome was defined as "not cured". Local signs of infection were defined as the appearance of: redness, tenderness, swelling or persisting wound drainage.

    Measured: 23 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Nov 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2011
  3. Primary completionFeb 2015
  4. Study completionMar 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
126 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02971657
Sponsor's protocol ID
2011-02
Acronym
StaphType
Status last verified
Nov 2016
First submitted
21 Nov 2016
Last updated
25 Nov 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Stepanovic S, Vukovic D, Hola V, Di Bonaventura G, Djukic S, Cirkovic I, Ruzicka F. Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci. APMIS. 2007 Aug;115(8):891-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_630.x.

    PubMed 17696944
  • Post V, Wahl P, Uckay I, Ochsner P, Zimmerli W, Corvec S, Loiez C, Richards RG, Moriarty TF. Phenotypic and genotypic characterisation of Staphylococcus aureus causing musculoskeletal infections. Int J Med Microbiol. 2014 Jul;304(5-6):565-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Apr 3.

    PubMed 24768432

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Staphylococcal Infections, run by BG Unfallklinik Murnau.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cure (time frame: 23 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02971657, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Nov 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in