Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseasePhase 4MUSICNCT02972476
Microbiome Use to Stratify Use of Inhaled Corticosteroids: MUSIC Trial
A Phase 4 study testing Budesonide & formoterol fumarate and Aclidinium bromide, Fluticasone 500 & salmeterol and Aclidinium bromide and Fluticasone 250 & salmeterol and Aclidinium bromide in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by University of Dundee at 6 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
A randomised controlled trial to test the hypothesis that inhaled therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have differential effects on the upper airway microbiome. COPD is the third leading cause of death worldwide. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- What is being tested?
- Budesonide & formoterol fumarate and Aclidinium bromide, Fluticasone 500 & salmeterol and Aclidinium bromide and Fluticasone 250 & salmeterol and Aclidinium bromide
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 158 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Dec 2016to 22 Jul 2019
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male and female patients aged greater than or equal to 40 years
- Current or ex smokers having at least a 10 pack year smoking history
- A clinical diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) made by a physician with a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1)/ forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio at screening of <70%
- Severe COPD according to consensus guidelines consisting of a post-bronchodilator FEV1 <50% predicted at screening and/or a history of 2 or more exacerbations in the previous year OR one hospital admission for an exacerbation of COPD in the previous year (equivalent to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2011 grade C and D)
- Able to perform all study procedures including spirometry and questionnaires with minimal assistance.
Who cannot join
- Inability to give informed consent
- Asthma (defined according to Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network)
- A primary diagnosis of bronchiectasis confirmed on high-resolution computed tomography.(it is not necessary to perform a computerised tomography (CT) scan to exclude this if the patient has not previously had one. Only known bronchiectasis with a previous CT scan should be excluded).
- • Antibiotics within the past 28 days, apart from oral macrolides which are permitted if they have been used for at least 3 months prior to randomization
- Oral/ nasal corticosteroids of any kind in the 28 days prior to screening visit
- Current use of the following: roflumilast, ritonavir, itraconazole, telithromycin, or ketoconazole (or other CYP3A4 inhibitors).
Show all 26Show fewer
- Active, or within 28 days of screening visit, oral candidiasis, actively receiving dental treatment for oral infection or poor dentition.
- Immunosuppression including current oral corticosteroids at a dose >5mg for >28 days.
- Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 30ml/min/1.73meter squared or requiring dialysis. Last known eGFR result will be used .
- Use of any investigational drugs within five times of the elimination half-life after the last study dose or within 30 days, whichever is longer.
- Known allergy, intolerance or contraindication to any of the study drugs
- Galactose intolerance
- Unstable co-morbidities (cardiovascular disease, active malignancy) which in the opinion of the Investigator would make the patient unsuitable to be enrolled in the study. This includes any abnormality identified on screening bloods or screening electrocardiograph which in the opinion of the Investigator would make the patient unsuitable for the study.
- An exacerbation of COPD occurring during the screening to randomisation period. If this occurs the patient should be withdrawn from the study and may be rescreened once they have been free from corticosteroid and antibiotic treatment for 28 days. In these cases patients would receive the current Participant Information Sheet and be consented prior to starting the study from Visit 1.
- Documented that the patient has never received pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination
- Receipt of Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (e.g PCV-13)
- Pregnancy or breast feeding
- Women of child bearing potential (WOCBP) who are not practicing an acceptable method of contraception (see below)
- Acceptable forms of contraception:
- combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation: oral, intravaginal, transdermal
- progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation: oral, injectable, implantable
- intrauterine device (IUD)
- intrauterine hormone-releasing system ( IUS)
- bilateral tubal occlusion
- vasectomised partner
- sexual abstinence
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom6 sites
Blackpool Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Blackpool, FY3 8NR
NHS Tayside
Dundee, Tayside, DD1 9SY
NHS Lothian
Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Glasgow
NHS Fife
Kirkcaldy, KY2 5AH
NHS Lanarkshire
Wishaw, ML2 0DP
About this study
Official title: Investigating the Mechanism of Inhaled Corticosteroids Associated Pneumonia by Longitudinal Characterisation of the Airway Microbiome in Patients With Severe COPD
A randomised controlled trial to test the hypothesis that inhaled therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have differential effects on the upper airway microbiome.
COPD is the third leading cause of death worldwide. Exacerbations drive disease progression and worsening quality of life and therefore prevention of exacerbations has been a major goal of treatment.
Read more
Patients with COPD are frequently prescribed inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) which have been shown to reduce exacerbations in combination with long acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists (LABA). In recent years, all ICS preparations have been associated with a significant increased risk of pneumonia in either randomised trials or observational studies leading to warnings from national regulatory authorities and leading experts. This has led to a re-evaluation of the role of ICS in COPD treatments. It is likely that the risk of pneumonia is not equal across all ICS doses and molecules.
There is a compelling rationale for ICS having a strong effect on the upper airway microbiome, and that this may be one mechanism of increased pneumonia risk with these drugs. The existing literature regarding ICS and pneumonia risk are lacking; 1) there are no head to head trials comparing different ICS preparations and 2) the comparator in these studies to date have been long acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists alone, whereas the most appropriate comparator in current management would be combined LABA and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA).
The MUSIC TRIAL is a multi-centre randomised open label controlled parallel group study with four treatment arms and a total of 120 participants. Severe COPD patients currently treated with inhaled corticosteroid therapy will be randomised to treatment with one of three preparations of ICS in combination with LABA or the control arm of dual bronchodilator therapy following a four week washout period. Participants will return monthly to determine if there are changes in the microbiome in their upper airway.
This study will establish one potential mechanism for the increased susceptibility to pneumonia in ICS users and assess intraclass differences in ICS molecules and the effect of ICS dose on the microbiome. Demonstrating that different COPD treatments can have different effects on the lung microbiome is an important step in understanding clinical differences in the safety and effectiveness of different treatments for severe COPD.
Read the detailed description
Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are commonly prescribed for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but their role in the management of COPD is currently being re-evaluated in light of new evidence and the emergence of alternative treatments. Studies have shown that the use of ICS and particularly ICS combined with long acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists (LABA) in individuals with COPD reduces the frequency of COPD exacerbations and improves health status and lung function compared to LABA alone or placebo. The current National Institute for Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for COPD recommend ICS for patients with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second below 50% predicted, or for patients with higher lung function who have persisting symptoms or exacerbations despite treatment with long acting bronchodilators. Data suggests that up to 75% of patients with COPD in the United Kingdom (UK) are subsequently prescribed ICS.
The daily dose of ICS utilised in COPD treatments are much higher than those used in asthma treatments, with licensed daily doses being 1000 mcg fluticasone propionate (2000 mcg beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) equivalents) or 800 mcg budesonide (800 mcg BDP equivalents).
Recent concerns have been expressed about the safety of ICS in COPD following several randomised controlled trials of fluticasone propionate and fluticasone furoate, among others, demonstrating an increase in rates of pneumonia as an adverse event. Several systematic reviews and observational studies confirm an association between ICS use and risk of pneumonia.
All ICS preparations have been associated with an increased risk of pneumonia in either randomised trials or observational studies leading to warnings from national regulatory authorities and leading experts.
It is likely however, that the risk of pneumonia is not equal across all ICS doses and molecules. Research into this area is greatly limited by the lack of head to head comparisons between different ICS preparations in COPD.
It is hypothesised that the anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of ICS lead to increase susceptibility to colonisation of the upper respiratory tract with pathogenic bacteria associated with pneumonia such as S. pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae. This study will establish one potential mechanism for the increased susceptibility to pneumonia in ICS users and assess intraclass differences in ICS molecules used in COPD and the effect of ICS dose. It is known that changes in the microbiome in COPD are associated with disease severity and with lung inflammation. Demonstrating that different COPD treatments can have different effects on the lung microbiome is an important step in understanding clinical differences in the safety and effectiveness of different treatments for severe COPD. The longer term clinical objective of this study is therefore to determine whether a proportion of patients with COPD might be more safely managed with either lower dose, pharmacologically different ICS preparations or with LABA/LAMA therapies to reduce the risk of pneumonia.
Hypothesis Fluticasone propionate will facilitate a higher level of bacterial airway colonisation by pathogens associated with pneumonia compared to budesonide or treatment exclusively with bronchodilators, therefore providing a mechanistic explanation for increased pneumonia risk associated with ICS.
STUDY OBJECTIVES To determine a potential mechanism of inhaled corticosteroid associated pneumonia in COPD by demonstrating ICS effects on the upper (throat and nasal swabs) and lower airway (sputum) microbiome.
To determine the mechanism of observed differences in pneumonia risk between fluticasone propionate, and budesonide by demonstrating differential effects on the airway microbiome.
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Being tested
- Budesonide & formoterol fumarate and Aclidinium bromide, Fluticasone 500 & salmeterol and Aclidinium bromide, Fluticasone 250 & salmeterol and Aclidinium bromide, Aclidinium bromide & formoterol fumarate
- Keywords
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Budesonide & formoterol fumarate and Aclidinium bromideDrug
Also called Symbicort Turbohaler and Eklira Genuair
Fluticasone 500 & salmeterol and Aclidinium bromideDrug
Also called Seretide Accuhaler 500/50 and Eklira Genuair
Fluticasone 250 & salmeterol and Aclidinium bromideDrug
Also called Seretide Accuhaler 250/50 and Eklira Genuair
Aclidinium bromide & formoterol fumarateDrug
Also called Duaklir Genuair
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1: Symbicort 400/12 & Eklira Genuair | Active comparator | Budesonide 400mcg \& formoterol fumarate 12mcg: 1 inhalation twice daily, inhalation powder and Aclidinium bromide 322mcg: 1 inhalation twice daily, inhalation powder for 3 months Receives: Drug: Budesonide & formoterol fumarate and Aclidinium bromide |
| 2: Seretide 500/50 & Eklira Genuair | Active comparator | Fluticasone propionate 500mcg \& salmeterol 50mcg: 1 inhalation twice daily, inhalation powder and Aclidinium bromide 322mcg: 1 inhalation twice daily, inhalation powder for 3 months Receives: Drug: Fluticasone 500 & salmeterol and Aclidinium bromide |
| 3: Seretide 250/50 & Eklira Genuair | Active comparator | Fluticasone propionate 250mcg \& salmeterol 50mcg: 1 inhalation twice daily, inhalation powder and Aclidinium bromide 322mcg: 1 inhalation twice daily, inhalation powder for 3 months Receives: Drug: Fluticasone 250 & salmeterol and Aclidinium bromide |
| 4: Duaklir Genuair | Active comparator | Aclidinium bromide 340mcg \& formoterol fumarate 12mcg: 1 inhalation twice daily, inhalation powder for 3 months Receives: Drug: Aclidinium bromide & formoterol fumarate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in bacterial load of total respiratory pathogens determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction
To determine the effects of the inhaled corticosteroids fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 500/50 mcg vs budesonide/formoterol 400/12 mcg on upper airway bacterial load from oropharyngeal swabs.
Measured: Baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months
Secondary outcomes (13)
Change in bacterial load of total respiratory pathogens determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
To determine the effects of the inhaled corticosteroids fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 500/50 mcg vs budesonide/formoterol 400/12 mcg on lower airway bacterial load and microbiome from sputum and on upper airway in nasophyarengeal swab.
Measured: Baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months
Change in bacterial load of total respiratory pathogens determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
To compare the effects of fluticasone/salmeterol 250/50mcg vs budesonide/formoterol 400/12 mcg on upper and lower airway microbiome in oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal and sputum samples.
Measured: Baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months
Microbiota diversity using the Shannon-Wiener diversity index determined by 16S microbiome sequencing
To determine the effects of the inhaled corticosteroids fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 500/50 mcg vs budesonide/formoterol 400/12 mcg on lower airway microbiome from sputum and on upper airway in nasopharyngeal swab. To compare the effects of fluticasone/salmeterol 250/50mcg vs budesonide/formoterol 400/12 mcg on upper and lower airway microbiome in oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal and sputum samples.
Measured: Baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months
Microbiota diversity using the Shannon-Wiener diversity index determined by 16S microbiome sequencing
To compare the effects of fluticasone/salmeterol 250/50mcg vs budesonide/formoterol 400/12 mcg on upper and lower airway microbiome in oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal and sputum samples.
Measured: Baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months
Microbiota diversity using the Shannon-Wiener diversity index determined by 16S microbiome sequencing
To compare the effects on the upper and lower airway microbiome in oropharyngeal, nasopharyngeal swabs and sputum of individual inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) fluticasone propionate and budesonide (pooled ICS group) compared to a dual bronchodilator based regime without ICS
Measured: Baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months
Change in number of Operational Taxonomic Units of protocol defined respiratory pathogens.
To determine the effects of the inhaled corticosteroids fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 500/50 mcg vs budesonide/formoterol 400/12 mcg on lower airway microbiome from sputum and on upper airway in nasopharyngeal swab
Measured: Baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months
Change in number of Operational Taxonomic Units of protocol defined respiratory pathogens.
To compare the effects of fluticasone/salmeterol 250/50mcg vs budesonide/formoterol 400/12 mcg on upper and lower airway microbiome in oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal and sputum samples.
Measured: Baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months
Change in number of Operational Taxonomic Units of protocol defined respiratory pathogens.
To compare the effects on the upper and lower airway microbiome in oropharyngeal, nasopharyngeal swabs and sputum of individual inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) fluticasone propionate and budesonide (pooled ICS) compared to a dual bronchodilator based regime without ICS
Measured: Baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months
Change in airway microbiota bacterial species diversity measured using the Shannon Wiener diversity indexand beta diversity indices.
To compare the effects of fluticasone/salmeterol 250/50mcg vs budesonide/formoterol 400/12 mcg on upper and lower airway microbiome in oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal and sputum samples.
Measured: Baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months
Change in bacterial load of respiratory pathogens determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction Microbiome characterisation
To compare the impact of high and low dose inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate on the upper and lower airway microbiome in oropharyngeal, nasopharyngeal swabs and sputum
Measured: Baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months
Change in bacterial load of respiratory pathogens determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction
To compare the impact of high and low dose inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate on the upper and lower airway microbiome in oropharyngeal, nasopharyngeal swabs and sputum
Measured: Baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months
Changes in inflammatory markers in the sputum.
To evaluate the impact of inhaled corticosteroids on airway inflammation. Comparing inhaled corticosteroids to dual bronchodilator regimes alone. Measured with neutrophil elastase, myeloperoxidase, IL-8, IL-1beta.
Measured: Baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months
Changes in inflammatory markers in the blood.
To evaluate the impact of inhaled corticosteroids on airway and systemic inflammation. Comparing inhaled corticosteroids to dual bronchodilator regimes alone. Measued with eosinophils \& neutrophils, C-reactive protein, serum resistin, specific IgG antibody to bacterial pathogens.
Measured: Baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2016
- Primary completion22 Jul 2019
- Study completion22 Jul 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 158 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Dundee
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AstraZeneca, NHS Tayside
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- James Chalmers, MBChB, MRCP, Principal investigator, University of Dundee
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02972476
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2014RC07
- Other IDs
- 2016-000734-21, 2016
- Acronym
- MUSIC
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 18 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 20 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigating the Mechanism of Inhaled Corticosteroids Associated Pneumonia by Longitudinal Characterisation of the Airway Microbiome in Patients With Severe COPD
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02972476
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MUSIC / 2014RC07
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Keywords
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 158 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of DundeeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AstraZeneca, NHS Tayside
- Study start
- Dec 2016
- Primary completion
- 22 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A randomised controlled trial to test the hypothesis that inhaled therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have differential effects on the upper airway microbiome.
COPD is the third leading cause of death worldwide. Exacerbations drive disease progression and worsening quality of life and therefore prevention of exacerbations has been a major goal of treatment.
Patients with COPD are frequently prescribed inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) which have been shown to reduce exacerbations in combination with long acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists (LABA). In recent years, all ICS preparations have been associated with a significant increased risk of pneumonia in either randomised trials or observational studies leading to warnings from national regulatory authorities and leading experts. This has led to a re-evaluation of the role of ICS in COPD treatments. It is likely that the risk of pneumonia is not equal across all ICS doses and molecules.
There is a compelling rationale for ICS having a strong effect on the upper airway microbiome, and that this may be one mechanism of increased pneumonia risk with these drugs. The existing literature regarding ICS and pneumonia risk are lacking; 1) there are no head to head trials comparing different ICS preparations and 2) the comparator in these studies to date have been long acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists alone, whereas the most appropriate comparator in current management would be combined LABA and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA).
The MUSIC TRIAL is a multi-centre randomised open label controlled parallel group study with four treatment arms and a total of 120 participants. Severe COPD patients currently treated with inhaled corticosteroid therapy will be randomised to treatment with one of three preparations of ICS in combination with LABA or the control arm of dual bronchodilator therapy following a four week washout period. Participants will return monthly to determine if there are changes in the microbiome in their upper airway.
This study will establish one potential mechanism for the increased susceptibility to pneumonia in ICS users and assess intraclass differences in ICS molecules and the effect of ICS dose on the microbiome. Demonstrating that different COPD treatments can have different effects on the lung microbiome is an important step in understanding clinical differences in the safety and effectiveness of different treatments for severe COPD.
Detailed description
Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are commonly prescribed for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but their role in the management of COPD is currently being re-evaluated in light of new evidence and the emergence of alternative treatments. Studies have shown that the use of ICS and particularly ICS combined with long acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists (LABA) in individuals with COPD reduces the frequency of COPD exacerbations and improves health status and lung function compared to LABA alone or placebo. The current National Institute for Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for COPD recommend ICS for patients with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second below 50% predicted, or for patients with higher lung function who have persisting symptoms or exacerbations despite treatment with long acting bronchodilators. Data suggests that up to 75% of patients with COPD in the United Kingdom (UK) are subsequently prescribed ICS.
The daily dose of ICS utilised in COPD treatments are much higher than those used in asthma treatments, with licensed daily doses being 1000 mcg fluticasone propionate (2000 mcg beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) equivalents) or 800 mcg budesonide (800 mcg BDP equivalents).
Recent concerns have been expressed about the safety of ICS in COPD following several randomised controlled trials of fluticasone propionate and fluticasone furoate, among others, demonstrating an increase in rates of pneumonia as an adverse event. Several systematic reviews and observational studies confirm an association between ICS use and risk of pneumonia.
All ICS preparations have been associated with an increased risk of pneumonia in either randomised trials or observational studies leading to warnings from national regulatory authorities and leading experts.
It is likely however, that the risk of pneumonia is not equal across all ICS doses and molecules. Research into this area is greatly limited by the lack of head to head comparisons between different ICS preparations in COPD.
It is hypothesised that the anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of ICS lead to increase susceptibility to colonisation of the upper respiratory tract with pathogenic bacteria associated with pneumonia such as S. pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae. This study will establish one potential mechanism for the increased susceptibility to pneumonia in ICS users and assess intraclass differences in ICS molecules used in COPD and the effect of ICS dose. It is known that changes in the microbiome in COPD are associated with disease severity and with lung inflammation. Demonstrating that different COPD treatments can have different effects on the lung microbiome is an important step in understanding clinical differences in the safety and effectiveness of different treatments for severe COPD. The longer term clinical objective of this study is therefore to determine whether a proportion of patients with COPD might be more safely managed with either lower dose, pharmacologically different ICS preparations or with LABA/LAMA therapies to reduce the risk of pneumonia.
Hypothesis Fluticasone propionate will facilitate a higher level of bacterial airway colonisation by pathogens associated with pneumonia compared to budesonide or treatment exclusively with bronchodilators, therefore providing a mechanistic explanation for increased pneumonia risk associated with ICS.
STUDY OBJECTIVES To determine a potential mechanism of inhaled corticosteroid associated pneumonia in COPD by demonstrating ICS effects on the upper (throat and nasal swabs) and lower airway (sputum) microbiome.
To determine the mechanism of observed differences in pneumonia risk between fluticasone propionate, and budesonide by demonstrating differential effects on the airway microbiome.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1: Symbicort 400/12 & Eklira Genuair | Active comparator | Drug: Budesonide & formoterol fumarate and Aclidinium bromideBudesonide 400mcg \& formoterol fumarate 12mcg: 1 inhalation twice daily, inhalation powder and Aclidinium bromide 322mcg: 1 inhalation twice daily, inhalation powder for 3 months |
| 2: Seretide 500/50 & Eklira Genuair | Active comparator | Drug: Fluticasone 500 & salmeterol and Aclidinium bromideFluticasone propionate 500mcg \& salmeterol 50mcg: 1 inhalation twice daily, inhalation powder and Aclidinium bromide 322mcg: 1 inhalation twice daily, inhalation powder for 3 months |
| 3: Seretide 250/50 & Eklira Genuair | Active comparator | Drug: Fluticasone 250 & salmeterol and Aclidinium bromideFluticasone propionate 250mcg \& salmeterol 50mcg: 1 inhalation twice daily, inhalation powder and Aclidinium bromide 322mcg: 1 inhalation twice daily, inhalation powder for 3 months |
| 4: Duaklir Genuair | Active comparator | Drug: Aclidinium bromide & formoterol fumarateAclidinium bromide 340mcg \& formoterol fumarate 12mcg: 1 inhalation twice daily, inhalation powder for 3 months |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Male and female patients aged greater than or equal to 40 years
- Current or ex smokers having at least a 10 pack year smoking history
- A clinical diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) made by a physician with a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1)/ forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio at screening of <70%
- Severe COPD according to consensus guidelines consisting of a post-bronchodilator FEV1 <50% predicted at screening and/or a history of 2 or more exacerbations in the previous year OR one hospital admission for an exacerbation of COPD in the previous year (equivalent to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2011 grade C and D)
- Able to perform all study procedures including spirometry and questionnaires with minimal assistance.
Key exclusion criteria (26 listed)
- Inability to give informed consent
- Asthma (defined according to Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network)
- A primary diagnosis of bronchiectasis confirmed on high-resolution computed tomography.(it is not necessary to perform a computerised tomography (CT) scan to exclude this if the patient has not previously had one. Only known bronchiectasis with a previous CT scan should be excluded).
- • Antibiotics within the past 28 days, apart from oral macrolides which are permitted if they have been used for at least 3 months prior to randomization
- Oral/ nasal corticosteroids of any kind in the 28 days prior to screening visit
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Budesonide & formoterol fumarate and Aclidinium bromideAlso: Symbicort Turbohaler and Eklira Genuair | Drug | 1: Symbicort 400/12 & Eklira Genuair |
| Fluticasone 500 & salmeterol and Aclidinium bromideAlso: Seretide Accuhaler 500/50 and Eklira Genuair | Drug | 2: Seretide 500/50 & Eklira Genuair |
| Fluticasone 250 & salmeterol and Aclidinium bromideAlso: Seretide Accuhaler 250/50 and Eklira Genuair | Drug | 3: Seretide 250/50 & Eklira Genuair |
| Aclidinium bromide & formoterol fumarateAlso: Duaklir Genuair | Drug | 4: Duaklir Genuair |
Primary outcome
Change in bacterial load of total respiratory pathogens determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months
To determine the effects of the inhaled corticosteroids fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 500/50 mcg vs budesonide/formoterol 400/12 mcg on upper airway bacterial load from oropharyngeal swabs.
13 secondary outcomes
Change in bacterial load of total respiratory pathogens determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months
Change in bacterial load of total respiratory pathogens determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months
Microbiota diversity using the Shannon-Wiener diversity index determined by 16S microbiome sequencing
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months
Microbiota diversity using the Shannon-Wiener diversity index determined by 16S microbiome sequencing
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months
Microbiota diversity using the Shannon-Wiener diversity index determined by 16S microbiome sequencing
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months
Change in number of Operational Taxonomic Units of protocol defined respiratory pathogens.
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months
Change in number of Operational Taxonomic Units of protocol defined respiratory pathogens.
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months
Change in number of Operational Taxonomic Units of protocol defined respiratory pathogens.
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months
Change in airway microbiota bacterial species diversity measured using the Shannon Wiener diversity indexand beta diversity indices.
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months
Change in bacterial load of respiratory pathogens determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction Microbiome characterisation
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months
Change in bacterial load of respiratory pathogens determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months
Changes in inflammatory markers in the sputum.
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months
Changes in inflammatory markers in the blood.
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jul 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
James Chalmers, MBChB, MRCP principal investigator
University of Dundee
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Budesonide & formoterol fumarate and Aclidinium bromide, Fluticasone 500 & salmeterol and Aclidinium bromide and Fluticasone 250 & salmeterol and Aclidinium bromide in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by University of Dundee at 6 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 26 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in bacterial load of total respiratory pathogens determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (time frame: Baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2020.