HepatoCellular CarcinomaPhase 3NCT02973685
HAIC Versus TACE for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staged BCLC A/B.
A Phase 3 study testing Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, Transarterial chemoembolization and Folfox Protocol in people with HepatoCellular Carcinoma, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 3 sites in China.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) compared with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma staged BCLC A/B. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- HepatoCellular Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, Transarterial chemoembolization and Folfox Protocol
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 315 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2016to 28 Nov 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age range from 18-75 years;
- KPS≥70;
- The diagnosis of HCC was based on the diagnostic criteria for HCC used by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), simultaneously staged as BCLC A or BCLC B based on Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system.
- Patients must have at least one tumor lesion that can be accurately measured;
- The sum of diameters of all lesions longer than 10 cm with the maximum lesion longer than 7 cm.
- Diagnosed as unresectable with consensus by the panel of liver surgery experts;
Show all 11Show fewer
- Re commanded treated by TAI or TACE with consensus by the panel of liver MDT;
- No past history of TACE, TAI, chemotherapy or molecule-targeted treatment;
- No Cirrhosis or cirrhotic status of Child-Pugh class A only
- Meet the following laboratory parameters:(a) Platelet count ≥ 75,000/μL;(b)Hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL;(c) Total bilirubin ≤ 30mmol/L;(d) Serum albumin ≥ 32 g/L;(e) ASL and AST ≤ 6 x upper limit of normal;(f) Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal;(g) INR > 2.3 or PT/APTT within normal limits;(h) Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >1,500/mm3;
- Ability to understand the protocol and to agree to and sign a written informed consent document.
Who cannot join
- Patients with clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry.
- Known of serious heart disease which can nor endure the treatment such as cardiac ventricular arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy
- Evidence of hepatic decompensation including ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding or hepatic encephalopathy
- Known history of HIV
- History of organ allograft
- Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agents or any agent given in association with this trial.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Evidence of bleeding diathesis.
- Any other hemorrhage/bleeding event > CTCAE Grade 3 within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug
- Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture
- Known central nervous system tumors including metastatic brain disease
- Poor compliance that can not comply with the course of treatment and follow up.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
China3 sites
The First People's Hospital of Foshan
Foshan, Guangdong, 510060
Cancer Center Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060
Guangzhou Twelfth People's Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510620
About this study
Official title: The Efficacy and Safety of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Compared With Transarterial Chemoembolization as Initial Treatment in Patients With Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staged BCLC A/B.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) compared with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma staged BCLC A/B.
Read the detailed description
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the most widely used palliative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. While a number of studies demonstrate poor effect of TACE for patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma staged BCLC A/B especially for those with tumor larger than 10 cm. Our previous prospective study also revealed similar results of large HCC patients treated with TACE. Recently, the results of our preliminary pilot study suggested that, compared with TACE, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) may improve the survivals for HCC with large HCC. Thus, the investigators carried out this prospective randomized control to demonstrate the superiority of HAIC over TACE.
- Conditions
- HepatoCellular Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, Transarterial chemoembolization, Folfox Protocol, TACE Drug Protocol
- Keywords
- Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, Transarterial Chemoembolization, BCLC A/B
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapyProcedure or surgery
A standard hepatic artery catheter was introduced via the femoral artery percutaneously. Selective catheterization of the proper hepatic artery was performed using standard diagnostic catheters and fluoroscopic guidance. In the event of multiple arterial supply(including superior-mesenteric artery), the proportion of the liver supplied by each artery was estimated by the arteriogram. After optimal positioning of the catheter in dominant supplying artery to ensure minimal reflux, the catheter was fixed and connected with infusion tube. In the condition of multiple tumors on both left and right lobe, the gastroduodenal artery was embolized and the catheter was positioned in the hepatic proper artery for infusion. Folfox Protocol were infused through the fixed catheter sequentially.
Transarterial chemoembolizationProcedure or surgery
Previous procedure was same with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. After optimal positioning of the catheter, TACE Drug Protocol were injected.
Folfox ProtocolDrug
Also called Folfox for TAI
oxaliplatin,leucovorin and 5-FU
TACE Drug ProtocolDrug
Also called Drugs for transarterial chemotherapy and embolization
lipiodol mixed with chemotherapy drugs(EADM , lobaplatin, with or without MMC) followed by polyvinyl alcohol particles (PVA)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy | Experimental | Procedure/Surgery: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy Drug: Folfox Protocol. Hepatic intra-arterial infusion via the tumor feeding arteries of Oxaliplatin , fluorouracil, and leucovorin Receives: Procedure: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy; Drug: Folfox Protocol |
| Transarterial chemoembolization | Active comparator | Procedure/Surgery: Transarterial chemoembolization Drug: TACE Drug Protocol. Hepatic intra-arterial infusion with lipiodol mixed with chemotherapy drugs (EADM, lobaplatin, with or without MMC), and embolization with polyvinyl alcohol particles (PVA). Receives: Procedure: Transarterial chemoembolization; Drug: TACE Drug Protocol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall survival
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Time to progression
Measured: 24 months
Adverse Events
Postoperative adverse events were graded based on CTCAE v4.03
Measured: 30 Days after HAIC
Number of of Patients developed Adverse Events
Number of of patients who developed adverse event. Postoperative adverse events were graded based on CTCAE v3.0
Measured: 30 Days after HAIC
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study start1 Oct 2016
- Primary completion28 Nov 2020
- Study completion28 Nov 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HepatoCellular CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sun Yat-sen UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 315 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Guangzhou No.12 People's Hospital, First People's Hospital of Foshan
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Shi Ming, Sun Yat-sen University
- Investigators
- Ming Shi, MD, Principal investigator, The Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02973685
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HCC-S023
- Status last verified
- Jun 2023
- First submitted
- 20 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Han X, Peng C, Ruan SM, Li L, He M, Shi M, Huang B, Luo Y, Liu J, Wen H, Wang W, Zhou J, Lu M, Chen X, Zou R, Liu Z. A Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Cine-Based Deep Learning Model for Predicting the Response of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined With Systemic Therapies. Cancer Sci. 2025 Jul;116(7):1930-1940. doi: 10.1111/cas.70089. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
PubMed 40302359Li QJ, He MK, Chen HW, Fang WQ, Zhou YM, Xu L, Wei W, Zhang YJ, Guo Y, Guo RP, Chen MS, Shi M. Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jan 10;40(2):150-160. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00608. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
PubMed 34648352
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Efficacy and Safety of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Compared With Transarterial Chemoembolization as Initial Treatment in Patients With Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staged BCLC A/B.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02973685
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HCC-S023
- Conditions
- HepatoCellular Carcinoma
- Keywords
- Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, Transarterial Chemoembolization, BCLC A/B
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 315 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Guangzhou No.12 People's Hospital, First People's Hospital of Foshan
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Nov 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) compared with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma staged BCLC A/B.
Detailed description
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the most widely used palliative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. While a number of studies demonstrate poor effect of TACE for patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma staged BCLC A/B especially for those with tumor larger than 10 cm. Our previous prospective study also revealed similar results of large HCC patients treated with TACE. Recently, the results of our preliminary pilot study suggested that, compared with TACE, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) may improve the survivals for HCC with large HCC. Thus, the investigators carried out this prospective randomized control to demonstrate the superiority of HAIC over TACE.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy | Experimental | Procedure: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, Drug: Folfox ProtocolProcedure/Surgery: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy Drug: Folfox Protocol. Hepatic intra-arterial infusion via the tumor feeding arteries of Oxaliplatin , fluorouracil, and leucovorin |
| Transarterial chemoembolization | Active comparator | Procedure: Transarterial chemoembolization, Drug: TACE Drug ProtocolProcedure/Surgery: Transarterial chemoembolization Drug: TACE Drug Protocol. Hepatic intra-arterial infusion with lipiodol mixed with chemotherapy drugs (EADM, lobaplatin, with or without MMC), and embolization with polyvinyl alcohol particles (PVA). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Age range from 18-75 years;
- KPS≥70;
- The diagnosis of HCC was based on the diagnostic criteria for HCC used by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), simultaneously staged as BCLC A or BCLC B based on Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system.
- Patients must have at least one tumor lesion that can be accurately measured;
- The sum of diameters of all lesions longer than 10 cm with the maximum lesion longer than 7 cm.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patients with clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry.
- Known of serious heart disease which can nor endure the treatment such as cardiac ventricular arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy
- Evidence of hepatic decompensation including ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding or hepatic encephalopathy
- Known history of HIV
- History of organ allograft
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapyA standard hepatic artery catheter was introduced via the femoral artery percutaneously. Selective catheterization of the proper hepatic artery was performed using standard diagnostic catheters and fluoroscopic guidance. In the event of multiple arterial supply(including superior-mesenteric artery), the proportion of the liver supplied by each artery was estimated by the arteriogram. After optimal positioning of the catheter in dominant supplying artery to ensure minimal reflux, the catheter was fixed and connected with infusion tube. In the condition of multiple tumors on both left and right lobe, the gastroduodenal artery was embolized and the catheter was positioned in the hepatic proper artery for infusion. Folfox Protocol were infused through the fixed catheter sequentially. | Procedure or surgery | Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy |
| Transarterial chemoembolizationPrevious procedure was same with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. After optimal positioning of the catheter, TACE Drug Protocol were injected. | Procedure or surgery | Transarterial chemoembolization |
| Folfox ProtocolAlso: Folfox for TAIoxaliplatin,leucovorin and 5-FU | Drug | Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy |
| TACE Drug ProtocolAlso: Drugs for transarterial chemotherapy and embolizationlipiodol mixed with chemotherapy drugs(EADM , lobaplatin, with or without MMC) followed by polyvinyl alcohol particles (PVA) | Drug | Transarterial chemoembolization |
Primary outcome
Overall survival
Time frame: 24 months
3 secondary outcomes
Time to progression
Time frame: 24 months
Adverse Events
Time frame: 30 Days after HAIC
Number of of Patients developed Adverse Events
Time frame: 30 Days after HAIC
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jun 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40302359Han X, Peng C, Ruan SM, Li L, He M, Shi M, Huang B, Luo Y, Liu J, Wen H, Wang W, Zhou J, Lu M, Chen X, Zou R, Liu Z. A Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Cine-Based Deep Learning Model for Predicting the Response of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined With Systemic Therapies. Cancer Sci. 2025 Jul;116(7):1930-1940. doi: 10.1111/cas.70089. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34648352Li QJ, He MK, Chen HW, Fang WQ, Zhou YM, Xu L, Wei W, Zhang YJ, Guo Y, Guo RP, Chen MS, Shi M. Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jan 10;40(2):150-160. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00608. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for HepatoCellular Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Real-world Evaluation of the HistoSonics Edison System for Treatment of Liver Tumors Across Multidisciplinary Users (BOOMBOX: Master Study)
Liver Neoplasms, Primary Liver Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Effectiveness, and Safety of Atezolizumab in Participants Treated in Routine Clinical Practice
Lung Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ming Shi, MD principal investigator
The Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, Transarterial chemoembolization and Folfox Protocol in people with HepatoCellular Carcinoma, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 3 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall survival (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02973685, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2023.