Nonsmall Cell Lung CancerPhase 3NCT02973789
Effect of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) (150 kHz) Concurrent With Standard of Care Therapies for Treatment of Stage 4 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Following Platinum Failure (LUNAR)
A Phase 3 study testing NovoTTF-200T and Immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxel in people with Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer and NSCLC, run by NovoCure GmbH at 124 sites in 18 countries.
Trial summary
The study is a prospective, randomized controlled phase III trial aimed to test the efficacy and safety of TTFields, using the NovoTTF-200T device, concurrent with standard therapies for stage 4 NSCLC patients, following progression while on or after platinum based treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 22 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer, NSCLC
- What is being tested?
- NovoTTF-200T and Immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxel
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 291 participants
- Where
- 124 sitesin 18 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 2016to 9 Oct 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 22 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 22 years of age and older (some regional variations to inclusion age exist)
- Life expectancy of ≥ 3 months
- Histological diagnosis of squamous or non-squamous, inoperable, metastatic NSCLC
- Diagnosis of radiological progression while on or after first platinum-based systemic therapy administered for advanced or metastatic disease.
- Patients who received adjuvant or neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy (after surgery and/or radiation therapy) and developed metastatic disease within 6 months of completing therapy are eligible.
- Patients with metastatic disease more than 6 months after adjuvant or neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, who also subsequently progressed during or after a platinum- based regimen given to treat the advanced or metastatic disease, are eligible.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Patients should not receive any systemic therapy after platinum failure before enrollment into the study. Maintenance therapy after platinum based therapy and prior to progression is allowed.
- ECOG Score of 0-2
- Assigned by the physician to receive either docetaxel or immune checkpoint inhibitor per standard of care regimen
- Able to operate the NovoTTF-200T device independently or with the help of a caregiver
- Signed informed consent for the study protocol
Who cannot join
- Metastases to central nervous system (CNS) with clinical symptoms or evidence of new metastases to CNS during screening. Patients who previously received treatments for the metastases to CNS, are stable and meet the following requirements are allowed to be enrolled:
- The patients are neurologically returned to baseline (except for residual signs or symptoms related to CNS treatment).
- No treatment for the metastases to CNS during the screening period (e.g. surgery, radiotherapy, corticosteroid therapy- prednisone > 10 mg/day or equivalent).
- No progress in CNS lesions as indicated by MRI within 14 days prior to randomization.
- No meningeal metastasis or spinal cord compression.
- Patients planned to receive immune checkpoint inhibitor with contra-indications to receive immunotherapy
Show all 22Show fewer
- Patients planned to receive docetaxel with contra-indications to receive docetaxel
- Severe comorbidities:
- Clinically significant (as determined by the investigator) hematological, hepatic and renal dysfunction, defined as: Neutrophil count < 1.5 x 10^9/L and platelet count < 100 x 10^9/L; bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN; AST and/or ALT > 2.5 x ULN or > 5 x ULN if patient has documented liver metastases; and serum creatinine > 1.5 x ULN
- History of significant cardiovascular disease unless the disease is well controlled. Significant cardiac disease includes second/third degree heart block; significant ischemic heart disease; poorly controlled hypertension; congestive heart failure of the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II or worse (slight limitation of physical activity; comfortable at rest, but ordinary activity results in fatigue, palpitation or dyspnea)
- History of arrhythmia that is symptomatic or requires treatment. Patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter controlled by medication are not excluded from participation in the trial
- History of pericarditis
- History of interstitial lung disease
- History of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within 6 months prior to randomization or that is not stable
- Active infection or serious underlying medical condition that would impair the ability of the patient to received protocol therapy
- History of any psychiatric condition that might impair patient's ability to understand or comply with the requirements of the study or to provide consent
- Any other malignancy requiring anti-tumor treatment in the past three years, excluding treated stage I prostate cancer, in situ cervical cancer, in situ breast cancer and non-melanomatous skin cancer
- Concurrent treatment with other experimental treatments for NSCLC while on the study
- Implantable electronic medical devices (e.g. pacemaker, defibrillator) in the upper torso
- Known allergies to medical adhesives or hydrogel
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding (patients with reproductive potential must use effective contraception methods throughout the entire study period, as determined by their investigator/gynecologist)
- Admitted to an institution by administrative or court order
Trial locations and contacts
124 sites in 18 countries.
124 sites in 18 countries
United States73 sites
Summa Health
Akron, Ohio, 44304
Presbyterian Cancer Center
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87110
Texas Oncology - Amarillo
Amarillo, Texas, 79106
Texas Oncology - Arlington
Arlington, Texas, 76012
University of Maryland School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Overlake Medical Center & Clinics
Bellevue, Washington, 98004
Vita Medical Associates, P.C.
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015
Beverly Hills Cancer Center
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
Central Alabama Research
Birmingham, Alabama, 35209
Tufts Medical Center, Division of Hematology and Oncology
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Ironwood Cancer & Research Center
Chandler, Arizona, 85224
Oncology Specialists of Charlotte
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204
UT/Erlanger Oncology & Hematology
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37403
University of Illinois Cancer Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Christus Health Spohn Ministry
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78404
Dallas VA Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75216
Texas Oncology- Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Geisinger Cancer Institute
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Associated Neurologists of Southern CT, P.C.
Fairfield, Connecticut, 06824
Clinical Oncology Associates
Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48336
Detroit Clinical Research Center
Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48336
New York-Presbyterian/Queens Radiation Oncology
Flushing, New York, 11355
California Cancer Associates for Research and Excellence, Inc. cCARE
Fresno, California, 93720
St. Joseph Heritage Healthcare
Fullerton, California, 92835
Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center at North Colorado Medical Center
Greeley, Colorado, 80631
Oncology Consultants, P.A.
Houston, Texas, 77030
Franciscan Health Indianapolis
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46237
GenesisCare USA
Jacksonville, Florida, 32204
Saint Luke's Cancer Institute
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Saddleback Memorial Medical Center
Laguna Hills, California, 92653
OptumCare Cancer Care
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89102
Central Maine Medical Center
Lewiston, Maine
Norton Cancer Institute
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
University Medical Center, Inc; DBA University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
UW Carbone Cancer Center
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
Texas Oncology-McKinney
McKinney, Texas, 75071
Miami Cancer Institute
Miami, Florida, 33176
Mount Sinai Medical Center
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140
Northern Westchester Hospital
Mount Kisco, New York, 10549-3417
LSU Health Sciences Center -New Orleans
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Tulane Cancer Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
CHI Health Research Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68124
Oncology Hematology West, PC dba Nebraska Cancer Specialists
Omaha, Nebraska, 68130
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska
AdventHealth Orlando
Orlando, Florida, 32804
Adult Oncology Research
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Texas Oncology - Paris
Paris, Texas, 75460
Illinois CancerCare, P.C.
Peoria, Illinois, 61615
Cancer Center at St. Joseph Hospital and Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85004
Texas Oncology- Plano West
Plano, Texas, 75093
BRCR Medical Center INC
Plantation, Florida
Redlands Community Hospital (Emad Ibrahim, MD, Inc.)
Redlands, California, 92373
Renown Regional Medical Center Institute for Cancer
Reno, Nevada, 89502
Dignity Health - Mercy Cancer Centers
Sacramento, California, 95186
Sutter Institute for Medical Research
Sacramento, California, 95816
HealthPartners Institute, Regions Cancer Care Center
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101
W.G. Bill Hefner VA Med Center
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144
Huntsman Cancer Institute/University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
CHRISTUS Health
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71105
Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine, Simmons Cancer Institute at SIU
Springfield, Illinois, 62702
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Stony Brook Cancer Center
Stony Brook, New York, 11794
Toledo Clinic Cancer Center
Toledo, Ohio, 43623
Baylor Scott & White Health/McClinton Cancer Center
Waco, Texas, 76712
Texas Oncology-Waco
Waco, Texas, 76712
Washington Cancer Institute at MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
University of Kansas Cancer Center
Westwood, Kansas, 66205
Innovative Clinical Research Institute
Whittier, California, 90603
Piedmont Radiation Oncology, PA
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Saint Joseph Mercy Health System
Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48197
China8 sites
Beijing Cancer Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality
Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
Guangzhou
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 31000
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 311000
Henan Cancer Hospital
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450003
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
Zhengzhou, Henan, 45003
PKUCare Luzhong Hospital
Zibo, Shandong, 250014
Spain8 sites
Hospital Quirón Teknon, Instituto Oncológico Dr. Rosell
Barcelona
Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova
Lleida, Catalonia
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid
Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón
Madrid
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro
Madrid
Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Haya Medical Oncology Department
Málaga
Hospital Virgen de la Salud
Toledo, Toledo, 45071
Hospital Universitari i Politécnic La Fe
Valencia
France6 sites
Centre Hospitalier de Beauvais
Beauvais, 60021
INSTITUT BERGONIE Centre Régional de Lutte Contre le Cancer
Bordeaux
Groupe Hospitalier Bretagne Sud
Lorient, 56100
CHU Caremeau Service de Pneumologie
Nîmes, 30029
AH-HP Hôpital Saint Louis
Paris
Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Quentin Service de pneumologie
Saint-Quentin, 21000
Poland5 sites
Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne
Gdansk
Centrum Terapii Współczesnej
Lodz
MS Clinsearch Specjalistyczny NZOZ
Lublin
Clinical Hospital of Przemienienia Pańskiego UM in Poznaniu
Poznan
Samodzielny Publiczny Wojewódzki Szpital Zespolony w Szczecinie
Szczecin, 70-891
Italy4 sites
ASL 3, Ospedale Villa Scassi
Genova, 16132
IRCCS - Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST)
Meldola
UOC Oncologia Medica Presidio Ospedaliero di Ravenna AUSL della Romagna
Ravenna
Saronno Hospital
Saronno, 21047
Belgium3 sites
Institut Jules Bordet - Department of Intensive Care and Thoracic Oncology
Brussels, 1000
Clinique André Renard Herstal Oncologie
Herstal, 4040
AZ Sint Maarten
Mechelen, 2800
Canada3 sites
McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1
Allan Blair Cancer Center
Regina, Saskatchewan, S4T 7T1
Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS)
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4
Czechia3 sites
General University Hospital in Prague
Prague
Thomayerova Nemocnice Dept. of Pneumology
Prague
Vitkovicka nemocnice
Vítkovice
Netherlands2 sites
St Jansdal Ziekenhuis
Harderwijk
Erasmus Mc
Rotterdam, 3015
Serbia2 sites
Bezanijska kosa Clinical Hospital Center
Belgrade, 11080
University Clinical Center Kragujevac
Kragujevac, 34000
Austria1 site
Medical University Salzburg, State Hospital, University hospital for internal medicine III / PMU
Salzburg, 5020
Germany1 site
Universitätsklinikum Halle - Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin IV
Halle
Hungary1 site
Tolna County, Balassa Janos Hospital, Department of oncology
Szekszárd, 7100
Switzerland1 site
Kantonsspital Winterthur Tumorzentrum Winterthur
Winterthur, 8400
About this study
Official title: LUNAR: Pivotal, Randomized, Open-label Study of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Concurrent With Standard of Care Therapies for Treatment of Stage 4 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Following Platinum Failure
The study is a prospective, randomized controlled phase III trial aimed to test the efficacy and safety of TTFields, using the NovoTTF-200T device, concurrent with standard therapies for stage 4 NSCLC patients, following progression while on or after platinum based treatment. The device is an experimental, portable, battery operated device for chronic administration of alternating electric fields (termed TTFields or TTF) to the region of the malignant tumor, by means of surface, insulated electrode arrays.
Read the detailed description
PAST PRE-CLINICAL AND CLINICAL EXPERIENCE:
The effect of the electric fields (TTFields, TTF) has demonstrated significant activity in in vitro and in vivo NSCLC pre-clinical models both as a single modality treatment and in combination with chemotherapies and PD-1 inhibitors. TTFields have been demonstrated to act synergistically with taxanes and have been shown to be additive when combined with PD-1 inhibitors. In addition, TTFields have shown to inhibit metastatic spread of malignant melanoma in in vivo experiment.
In a pilot study, 42 patients with advanced NSCLC who had had tumor progression after at least one line of prior chemotherapy, received pemetrexed together with TTFields (150 kHz) applied to the chest and upper abdomen until disease progression (Pless M., et al., Lung Cancer 2011). The combination was well tolerated and the only device-related adverse event was mild to moderate contact dermatitis. Efficacy endpoints were remarkably high compared to historical data for pemetrexed alone.
In addition, a phase III trial of Optune® (200 kHz) as monotherapy compared to active chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma patients showed TTFields to be equivalent to active chemotherapy in extending survival, associated with minimal toxicity, good quality of life, and activity within the brain (14% response rate) (Stupp R., et al., EJC 2012). Finally, a phase III trial of Optune® combined with maintenance temozolomide compared to maintenance temozolomide alone has shown that combined therapy led to a significant improvement in both progression free survival and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma without the addition of high grade toxicity and without decline in quality of life (Stupp R., et al., JAMA 2015).
DESCRIPTION OF THE TRIAL:
All patients included in this trial are patients with squamous or non-squamous, stage 4 NSCLC who had disease progression on or after receiving platinum based chemotherapy. In addition, all patients must meet all eligibility criteria.
Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:
Patients receive docetaxel or immune checkpoint inhibitor in combination with TTFields using the NovoTTF-100L System.
Patients receive docetaxel or immune checkpoint inhibitor without TTFields. Patients will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio. Baseline tests will be performed in patients enrolled in both arms. If assigned to the NovoTTF-100L group, the patients will be treated continuously with the device until disease progression in the thorax and/or liver according to RECIST or irRECIST (Immune-Related Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) (depending if the patient is receiving docetaxel or immune checkpoint inhibitor, respectively).
On both arms, patients who have disease progression according to RECIST or irRECIST (depending if the patient is receiving docetaxel or immune checkpoint inhibitor, respectively) will switch to a third line treatment according to local practice.
SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND:
Electric fields exert forces on electric charges similar to the way a magnet exerts forces on metallic particles within a magnetic field. These forces cause movement and rotation of electrically charged biological building blocks, much like the alignment of metallic particles seen along the lines of force radiating outwards from a magnet.
Electric fields can also cause muscles to twitch and if strong enough may heat tissues. TTFields are alternating electric fields of low intensity. This means that they change their direction repetitively many times a second. Since they change direction very rapidly (150 thousand times a second), they do not cause muscles to twitch, nor do they have any effects on other electrically activated tissues in the body (brain, nerves and heart). Since the intensities of TTFields in the body are very low, they do not cause heating.
The breakthrough finding made by Novocure was that finely tuned alternating fields of very low intensity, now termed TTFields (Tumor Treating Fields), cause a significant slowing in the growth of cancer cells. Due to the unique geometric shape of cancer cells when they are multiplying, TTFields cause electrically-charged cellular components of these cells to change their location within the dividing cell, disrupting their normal function and ultimately leading to cell death. In addition, cancer cells also contain miniature building blocks which act as tiny motors in moving essential parts of the cells from place to place. TTFields interfere with the normal orientation of these tiny motors related to other cellular components since they are electrically-charged as well. As a result of these two effects, tumor cell division is slowed, results in cellular death or reverses after continuous exposure to TTFields.
Other cells in the body (normal healthy tissues) are affected much less than cancer cells since they multiply at a much slower rate if at all. In addition TTFields can be directed to a certain part of the body, leaving sensitive areas out of their reach. Finally, the frequency of TTFields applied to each type of cancer is specific and may not damage normally dividing cells in healthy tissues.
In conclusion, TTFields hold the promise of serving as a brand new treatment for NSCLC with very few side effects.
- Conditions
- Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer, NSCLC
- Being tested
- NovoTTF-200T, Immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxel
- Keywords
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, NSCLC, Treatment, Minimal Toxicity, TTFields, TTF, Tumor Treating Fields, Novocure, Docetaxel, PD-1 inhibitor, PD-L1 inhibitor, Immune checkpoint inhibitor
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NovoTTF-200TDevice
Also called TTFields
Patients receive continuous TTFields treatment using the NovoTTF-200T device. TTFields treatment will consist of wearing four electrically insulated electrode arrays on the chest. The treatment enables the patient to maintain regular daily routine.
Other Name: TTFields
Drug: Immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxel Patients receive standard of care with Immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxel
Immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxelDrug
Patients receive standard of care with Immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxel
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NovoTTF-200T | Experimental | Patients receive TTFields using the NovoTTF-200T device together with immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxel Receives: Device: NovoTTF-200T; Drug: Immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxel |
| Best Standard of Care | Active comparator | Patients receive best standard of care with immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxel Receives: Drug: Immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival of Patients Treated With TTFields + Docetaxel or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors vs. Docetaxel or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone (Superiority Analysis)
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 12 month after the last participant was enrolled (median duration of follow-up was 10.0 months).
Secondary outcomes (10)
Overall Survival of Patients Treated With TTFields + Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors vs. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone (Superiority)
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 12 month after the last participant was enrolled (median duration of follow-up was 10.6 months).
Overall Survival of Patients Treated With TTFields + Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel Alone (Superiority Analysis)
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 12 month after the last participant was enrolled (median duration of follow-up was 9.7 months).
Overall Survival of Patients Treated With TTFields + Docetaxel Vs. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone (Non-inferiority Analysis)
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 12 month after the last participant was enrolled. (median duration of follow-up was 10.1 months)
Progression-free Survival of Patients Treated With Docetaxel or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors + TTFields vs. Docetaxel or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone, Based on RECIST Criteria
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of disease progression according to RECIST criteria, assessed up to 12 month after the last participant was enrolled (median duration of follow-up was 10.0 months, maximal follow-up duration was 64.4 months).
Overall Radiological Response Rate (Based on RECIST Criteria) of Patients Treated With Docetaxel or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors + TTFields vs. Docetaxel or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of disease progression according to RECIST criteria, assessed up to 12 month after the last participant was enrolled (median duration of follow-up was 4.2 months, maximal follow-up duration was 64.4 months).
Quality of Life Using the EORTC QLQ C30 Questionnaire With LC13 Addendum
Quality of life was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-LC13. QLQ-C30 includes global health status; five functioning scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social); three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting); and single-item symptoms (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). QLQ-LC13 includes 13 lung cancer-specific symptom/treatment items. All scores are transformed to 0-100 per EORTC scoring. For global health and all functioning scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life (0 worst, 100 best). For all symptom scales/items in QLQ-C30 and all QLQ-LC13 measures, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden (0 best, 100 worst). Change from baseline = Week 54 minus baseline; positive change indicates improvement for global health/functioning and worsening for symptoms. A >10-point change was considered clinically meaningful.
Measured: From baseline up to 54 weeks
Analyses of the Effects of NovoTTF-200T With Each Type of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor on Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (OS), or until date of disease progression according to RECIST criteria (PFS) , assessed up to 12 month after last participant enrolled (median duration of follow-up 10.7 months).
Analysis of the Effects of NovoTTF-200T on Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival Within Each Histological Subgroup (Squamous and Non-squamous)
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (OS), or until date of disease progression according to RECIST criteria (PFS) , assessed up to 12 month after last participant enrolled (median duration of follow-up 10.0 months).
The Effect of Treatment Compliance With NovoTTF-200T on Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival Outcomes
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (OS), or until date of disease progression according to RECIST criteria (PFS) , assessed up to 12 month after last participant enrolled (median duration of follow-up 10.7 months).
Adverse Events, Severity and Frequency Based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) V4.03
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, or study completion (up to 100 days following treatment termination, maximal follow-up duration was 55.8 months).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2016
- Primary completion24 Sep 2024
- Study completion9 Oct 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nonsmall Cell Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 291 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NovoCure GmbH
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02973789
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EF-24
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 18 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Kirson ED, Gurvich Z, Schneiderman R, Dekel E, Itzhaki A, Wasserman Y, Schatzberger R, Palti Y. Disruption of cancer cell replication by alternating electric fields. Cancer Res. 2004 May 1;64(9):3288-95. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-0083.
PubMed 15126372Kirson ED, Dbaly V, Tovarys F, Vymazal J, Soustiel JF, Itzhaki A, Mordechovich D, Steinberg-Shapira S, Gurvich Z, Schneiderman R, Wasserman Y, Salzberg M, Ryffel B, Goldsher D, Dekel E, Palti Y. Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 12;104(24):10152-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702916104. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
PubMed 17551011Stupp R, Wong ET, Kanner AA, Steinberg D, Engelhard H, Heidecke V, Kirson ED, Taillibert S, Liebermann F, Dbaly V, Ram Z, Villano JL, Rainov N, Weinberg U, Schiff D, Kunschner L, Raizer J, Honnorat J, Sloan A, Malkin M, Landolfi JC, Payer F, Mehdorn M, Weil RJ, Pannullo SC, Westphal M, Smrcka M, Chin L, Kostron H, Hofer S, Bruce J, Cosgrove R, Paleologous N, Palti Y, Gutin PH. NovoTTF-100A versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Sep;48(14):2192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.04.011. Epub 2012 May 18.
PubMed 22608262Pless M, Droege C, von Moos R, Salzberg M, Betticher D. A phase I/II trial of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy in combination with pemetrexed for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2013 Sep;81(3):445-450. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.06.025. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
PubMed 23891283Kirson ED, Giladi M, Gurvich Z, Itzhaki A, Mordechovich D, Schneiderman RS, Wasserman Y, Ryffel B, Goldsher D, Palti Y. Alternating electric fields (TTFields) inhibit metastatic spread of solid tumors to the lungs. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2009;26(7):633-40. doi: 10.1007/s10585-009-9262-y. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
PubMed 19387848Giladi M, Schneiderman RS, Voloshin T, Porat Y, Munster M, Blat R, Sherbo S, Bomzon Z, Urman N, Itzhaki A, Cahal S, Shteingauz A, Chaudhry A, Kirson ED, Weinberg U, Palti Y. Mitotic Spindle Disruption by Alternating Electric Fields Leads to Improper Chromosome Segregation and Mitotic Catastrophe in Cancer Cells. Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 11;5:18046. doi: 10.1038/srep18046.
PubMed 26658786Giladi M, Weinberg U, Schneiderman RS, Porat Y, Munster M, Voloshin T, Blatt R, Cahal S, Itzhaki A, Onn A, Kirson ED, Palti Y. Alternating electric fields (tumor-treating fields therapy) can improve chemotherapy treatment efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer both in vitro and in vivo. Semin Oncol. 2014 Oct;41 Suppl 6:S35-41. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
PubMed 25213867Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner AA, Kesari S, Steinberg DM, Toms SA, Taylor LP, Lieberman F, Silvani A, Fink KL, Barnett GH, Zhu JJ, Henson JW, Engelhard HH, Chen TC, Tran DD, Sroubek J, Tran ND, Hottinger AF, Landolfi J, Desai R, Caroli M, Kew Y, Honnorat J, Idbaih A, Kirson ED, Weinberg U, Palti Y, Hegi ME, Ram Z. Maintenance Therapy With Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Temozolomide vs Temozolomide Alone for Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Dec 15;314(23):2535-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.16669.
PubMed 26670971Voloshin T, Kaynan N, Davidi S, Porat Y, Shteingauz A, Schneiderman RS, Zeevi E, Munster M, Blat R, Tempel Brami C, Cahal S, Itzhaki A, Giladi M, Kirson ED, Weinberg U, Kinzel A, Palti Y. Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) induce immunogenic cell death resulting in enhanced antitumor efficacy when combined with anti-PD-1 therapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2020 Jul;69(7):1191-1204. doi: 10.1007/s00262-020-02534-7. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
PubMed 32144446Leal T, Kotecha R, Ramlau R, Zhang L, Milanowski J, Cobo M, Roubec J, Petruzelka L, Havel L, Kalmadi S, Ward J, Andric Z, Berghmans T, Gerber DE, Kloecker G, Panikkar R, Aerts J, Delmonte A, Pless M, Greil R, Rolfo C, Akerley W, Eaton M, Iqbal M, Langer C; LUNAR Study Investigators. Tumor Treating Fields therapy with standard systemic therapy versus standard systemic therapy alone in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer following progression on or after platinum-based therapy (LUNAR): a randomised, open-label, pivotal phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Sep;24(9):1002-1017. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00344-3.
PubMed 37657460
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- LUNAR: Pivotal, Randomized, Open-label Study of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Concurrent With Standard of Care Therapies for Treatment of Stage 4 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Following Platinum Failure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02973789
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EF-24
- Conditions
- Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer, NSCLC
- Keywords
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, NSCLC, Treatment, Minimal Toxicity, TTFields, TTF, Tumor Treating Fields, Novocure
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 291 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NovoCure GmbHIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2016
- Primary completion
- 24 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Oct 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Mar 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study is a prospective, randomized controlled phase III trial aimed to test the efficacy and safety of TTFields, using the NovoTTF-200T device, concurrent with standard therapies for stage 4 NSCLC patients, following progression while on or after platinum based treatment. The device is an experimental, portable, battery operated device for chronic administration of alternating electric fields (termed TTFields or TTF) to the region of the malignant tumor, by means of surface, insulated electrode arrays.
Detailed description
PAST PRE-CLINICAL AND CLINICAL EXPERIENCE:
The effect of the electric fields (TTFields, TTF) has demonstrated significant activity in in vitro and in vivo NSCLC pre-clinical models both as a single modality treatment and in combination with chemotherapies and PD-1 inhibitors. TTFields have been demonstrated to act synergistically with taxanes and have been shown to be additive when combined with PD-1 inhibitors. In addition, TTFields have shown to inhibit metastatic spread of malignant melanoma in in vivo experiment.
In a pilot study, 42 patients with advanced NSCLC who had had tumor progression after at least one line of prior chemotherapy, received pemetrexed together with TTFields (150 kHz) applied to the chest and upper abdomen until disease progression (Pless M., et al., Lung Cancer 2011). The combination was well tolerated and the only device-related adverse event was mild to moderate contact dermatitis. Efficacy endpoints were remarkably high compared to historical data for pemetrexed alone.
In addition, a phase III trial of Optune® (200 kHz) as monotherapy compared to active chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma patients showed TTFields to be equivalent to active chemotherapy in extending survival, associated with minimal toxicity, good quality of life, and activity within the brain (14% response rate) (Stupp R., et al., EJC 2012). Finally, a phase III trial of Optune® combined with maintenance temozolomide compared to maintenance temozolomide alone has shown that combined therapy led to a significant improvement in both progression free survival and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma without the addition of high grade toxicity and without decline in quality of life (Stupp R., et al., JAMA 2015).
DESCRIPTION OF THE TRIAL:
All patients included in this trial are patients with squamous or non-squamous, stage 4 NSCLC who had disease progression on or after receiving platinum based chemotherapy. In addition, all patients must meet all eligibility criteria.
Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:
Patients receive docetaxel or immune checkpoint inhibitor in combination with TTFields using the NovoTTF-100L System.
Patients receive docetaxel or immune checkpoint inhibitor without TTFields. Patients will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio. Baseline tests will be performed in patients enrolled in both arms. If assigned to the NovoTTF-100L group, the patients will be treated continuously with the device until disease progression in the thorax and/or liver according to RECIST or irRECIST (Immune-Related Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) (depending if the patient is receiving docetaxel or immune checkpoint inhibitor, respectively).
On both arms, patients who have disease progression according to RECIST or irRECIST (depending if the patient is receiving docetaxel or immune checkpoint inhibitor, respectively) will switch to a third line treatment according to local practice.
SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND:
Electric fields exert forces on electric charges similar to the way a magnet exerts forces on metallic particles within a magnetic field. These forces cause movement and rotation of electrically charged biological building blocks, much like the alignment of metallic particles seen along the lines of force radiating outwards from a magnet.
Electric fields can also cause muscles to twitch and if strong enough may heat tissues. TTFields are alternating electric fields of low intensity. This means that they change their direction repetitively many times a second. Since they change direction very rapidly (150 thousand times a second), they do not cause muscles to twitch, nor do they have any effects on other electrically activated tissues in the body (brain, nerves and heart). Since the intensities of TTFields in the body are very low, they do not cause heating.
The breakthrough finding made by Novocure was that finely tuned alternating fields of very low intensity, now termed TTFields (Tumor Treating Fields), cause a significant slowing in the growth of cancer cells. Due to the unique geometric shape of cancer cells when they are multiplying, TTFields cause electrically-charged cellular components of these cells to change their location within the dividing cell, disrupting their normal function and ultimately leading to cell death. In addition, cancer cells also contain miniature building blocks which act as tiny motors in moving essential parts of the cells from place to place. TTFields interfere with the normal orientation of these tiny motors related to other cellular components since they are electrically-charged as well. As a result of these two effects, tumor cell division is slowed, results in cellular death or reverses after continuous exposure to TTFields.
Other cells in the body (normal healthy tissues) are affected much less than cancer cells since they multiply at a much slower rate if at all. In addition TTFields can be directed to a certain part of the body, leaving sensitive areas out of their reach. Finally, the frequency of TTFields applied to each type of cancer is specific and may not damage normally dividing cells in healthy tissues.
In conclusion, TTFields hold the promise of serving as a brand new treatment for NSCLC with very few side effects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NovoTTF-200T | Experimental | Device: NovoTTF-200T, Drug: Immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxelPatients receive TTFields using the NovoTTF-200T device together with immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxel |
| Best Standard of Care | Active comparator | Drug: Immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxelPatients receive best standard of care with immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxel |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 22 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- 22 years of age and older (some regional variations to inclusion age exist)
- Life expectancy of ≥ 3 months
- Histological diagnosis of squamous or non-squamous, inoperable, metastatic NSCLC
- Diagnosis of radiological progression while on or after first platinum-based systemic therapy administered for advanced or metastatic disease.
- ECOG Score of 0-2
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Metastases to central nervous system (CNS) with clinical symptoms or evidence of new metastases to CNS during screening. Patients who previously received treatments for the metastases to CNS, are stable and meet the following requirements are allowed to be enrolled:
- Patients planned to receive immune checkpoint inhibitor with contra-indications to receive immunotherapy
- Patients planned to receive docetaxel with contra-indications to receive docetaxel
- Severe comorbidities:
- Concurrent treatment with other experimental treatments for NSCLC while on the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NovoTTF-200TAlso: TTFieldsPatients receive continuous TTFields treatment using the NovoTTF-200T device. TTFields treatment will consist of wearing four electrically insulated electrode arrays on the chest. The treatment enables the patient to maintain regular daily routine. Other Name: TTFields Drug: Immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxel Patients receive standard of care with Immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxel | Device | NovoTTF-200T |
| Immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxelPatients receive standard of care with Immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxel | Drug | Best Standard of Care, NovoTTF-200T |
Primary outcome
Overall Survival of Patients Treated With TTFields + Docetaxel or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors vs. Docetaxel or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone (Superiority Analysis)
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 12 month after the last participant was enrolled (median duration of follow-up was 10.0 months).
10 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival of Patients Treated With TTFields + Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors vs. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone (Superiority)
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 12 month after the last participant was enrolled (median duration of follow-up was 10.6 months).
Overall Survival of Patients Treated With TTFields + Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel Alone (Superiority Analysis)
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 12 month after the last participant was enrolled (median duration of follow-up was 9.7 months).
Overall Survival of Patients Treated With TTFields + Docetaxel Vs. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone (Non-inferiority Analysis)
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 12 month after the last participant was enrolled. (median duration of follow-up was 10.1 months)
Progression-free Survival of Patients Treated With Docetaxel or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors + TTFields vs. Docetaxel or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone, Based on RECIST Criteria
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of disease progression according to RECIST criteria, assessed up to 12 month after the last participant was enrolled (median duration of follow-up was 10.0 months, maximal follow-up duration was 64.4 months).
Overall Radiological Response Rate (Based on RECIST Criteria) of Patients Treated With Docetaxel or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors + TTFields vs. Docetaxel or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of disease progression according to RECIST criteria, assessed up to 12 month after the last participant was enrolled (median duration of follow-up was 4.2 months, maximal follow-up duration was 64.4 months).
Quality of Life Using the EORTC QLQ C30 Questionnaire With LC13 Addendum
Time frame: From baseline up to 54 weeks
Analyses of the Effects of NovoTTF-200T With Each Type of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor on Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (OS), or until date of disease progression according to RECIST criteria (PFS) , assessed up to 12 month after last participant enrolled (median duration of follow-up 10.7 months).
Analysis of the Effects of NovoTTF-200T on Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival Within Each Histological Subgroup (Squamous and Non-squamous)
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (OS), or until date of disease progression according to RECIST criteria (PFS) , assessed up to 12 month after last participant enrolled (median duration of follow-up 10.0 months).
The Effect of Treatment Compliance With NovoTTF-200T on Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival Outcomes
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (OS), or until date of disease progression according to RECIST criteria (PFS) , assessed up to 12 month after last participant enrolled (median duration of follow-up 10.7 months).
Adverse Events, Severity and Frequency Based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) V4.03
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, or study completion (up to 100 days following treatment termination, maximal follow-up duration was 55.8 months).
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Mar 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 15126372Kirson ED, Gurvich Z, Schneiderman R, Dekel E, Itzhaki A, Wasserman Y, Schatzberger R, Palti Y. Disruption of cancer cell replication by alternating electric fields. Cancer Res. 2004 May 1;64(9):3288-95. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-0083.
- Background: PubMed 17551011Kirson ED, Dbaly V, Tovarys F, Vymazal J, Soustiel JF, Itzhaki A, Mordechovich D, Steinberg-Shapira S, Gurvich Z, Schneiderman R, Wasserman Y, Salzberg M, Ryffel B, Goldsher D, Dekel E, Palti Y. Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 12;104(24):10152-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702916104. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
- Background: PubMed 22608262Stupp R, Wong ET, Kanner AA, Steinberg D, Engelhard H, Heidecke V, Kirson ED, Taillibert S, Liebermann F, Dbaly V, Ram Z, Villano JL, Rainov N, Weinberg U, Schiff D, Kunschner L, Raizer J, Honnorat J, Sloan A, Malkin M, Landolfi JC, Payer F, Mehdorn M, Weil RJ, Pannullo SC, Westphal M, Smrcka M, Chin L, Kostron H, Hofer S, Bruce J, Cosgrove R, Paleologous N, Palti Y, Gutin PH. NovoTTF-100A versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Sep;48(14):2192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.04.011. Epub 2012 May 18.
- Background: PubMed 23891283Pless M, Droege C, von Moos R, Salzberg M, Betticher D. A phase I/II trial of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy in combination with pemetrexed for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2013 Sep;81(3):445-450. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.06.025. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
- Background: PubMed 19387848Kirson ED, Giladi M, Gurvich Z, Itzhaki A, Mordechovich D, Schneiderman RS, Wasserman Y, Ryffel B, Goldsher D, Palti Y. Alternating electric fields (TTFields) inhibit metastatic spread of solid tumors to the lungs. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2009;26(7):633-40. doi: 10.1007/s10585-009-9262-y. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
- Background: PubMed 26658786Giladi M, Schneiderman RS, Voloshin T, Porat Y, Munster M, Blat R, Sherbo S, Bomzon Z, Urman N, Itzhaki A, Cahal S, Shteingauz A, Chaudhry A, Kirson ED, Weinberg U, Palti Y. Mitotic Spindle Disruption by Alternating Electric Fields Leads to Improper Chromosome Segregation and Mitotic Catastrophe in Cancer Cells. Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 11;5:18046. doi: 10.1038/srep18046.
- Background: PubMed 25213867Giladi M, Weinberg U, Schneiderman RS, Porat Y, Munster M, Voloshin T, Blatt R, Cahal S, Itzhaki A, Onn A, Kirson ED, Palti Y. Alternating electric fields (tumor-treating fields therapy) can improve chemotherapy treatment efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer both in vitro and in vivo. Semin Oncol. 2014 Oct;41 Suppl 6:S35-41. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
- Background: PubMed 26670971Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner AA, Kesari S, Steinberg DM, Toms SA, Taylor LP, Lieberman F, Silvani A, Fink KL, Barnett GH, Zhu JJ, Henson JW, Engelhard HH, Chen TC, Tran DD, Sroubek J, Tran ND, Hottinger AF, Landolfi J, Desai R, Caroli M, Kew Y, Honnorat J, Idbaih A, Kirson ED, Weinberg U, Palti Y, Hegi ME, Ram Z. Maintenance Therapy With Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Temozolomide vs Temozolomide Alone for Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Dec 15;314(23):2535-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.16669.
- Background: PubMed 32144446Voloshin T, Kaynan N, Davidi S, Porat Y, Shteingauz A, Schneiderman RS, Zeevi E, Munster M, Blat R, Tempel Brami C, Cahal S, Itzhaki A, Giladi M, Kirson ED, Weinberg U, Kinzel A, Palti Y. Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) induce immunogenic cell death resulting in enhanced antitumor efficacy when combined with anti-PD-1 therapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2020 Jul;69(7):1191-1204. doi: 10.1007/s00262-020-02534-7. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37657460Leal T, Kotecha R, Ramlau R, Zhang L, Milanowski J, Cobo M, Roubec J, Petruzelka L, Havel L, Kalmadi S, Ward J, Andric Z, Berghmans T, Gerber DE, Kloecker G, Panikkar R, Aerts J, Delmonte A, Pless M, Greil R, Rolfo C, Akerley W, Eaton M, Iqbal M, Langer C; LUNAR Study Investigators. Tumor Treating Fields therapy with standard systemic therapy versus standard systemic therapy alone in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer following progression on or after platinum-based therapy (LUNAR): a randomised, open-label, pivotal phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Sep;24(9):1002-1017. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00344-3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity Between SB27 and Keytruda in Subjects With Metastatic Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IV
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Calderasib (MK-1084) Plus Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Participants With KRAS G12C Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) With Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) ≥50% (MK-1084-004/KANDLELIT-004)
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Testing the Timing of Pembrolizumab Alone or With Chemotherapy as First Line Treatment and Maintenance in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Lung Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Carcinoma, Stage IIIB Lung Cancer AJCC v8
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of ABSK112 in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing the Impact of an Anti-Cancer Drug, Atezolizumab, After Surgery to Prevent Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer From Returning, AASI-NSCLC Trial
Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
124 sites in 18 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing NovoTTF-200T and Immune checkpoint inhibitors or docetaxel in people with Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer and NSCLC, run by NovoCure GmbH at 124 sites in 18 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 124 sites in United States, China, Spain, France, Poland and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Mar 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival of Patients Treated With TTFields + Docetaxel or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors vs. Docetaxel or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone (Superiority Analysis) (time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 12 month after the last participant was enrolled (median duration of follow-up was 10.0 months).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02973789, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2026.