Systemic Lupus ErythematosusPhase 2NCT02975336
A Phase II Study of M2951 in SLE
A Phase 2 study testing M2951 in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. at 157 sites in 19 countries.
Trial summary
M2951 is an investigational drug under evaluation for treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. The purpose of the study was to assess the Safety and Efficacy of M2951 in participants with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- What is being tested?
- M2951
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 469 participants
- Where
- 157 sitesin 19 countries
- Study dates
- 4 Jan 2017to 23 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Eligible male and female participants, aged 18 to 75 years
- Must have diagnosis of SLE with either the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria for SLE, or at least four of the 11 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for SLE, of at least six months duration prior to Screening
- SLEDAI-2K total score greater than or equal to (>=) 6 (including clinical SLEDAI greater than or equal to (>=) 4) at Screening Visit
- And be positive for anti-double-stranded Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) and/or anti-nuclear antibody (ANA greater than or equal to (>=) 1:80) and/or anti-Smith (anti-Sm) antibody at the time of Screening
- Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply
Who cannot join
- Participants are not eligible for this study if they have active, clinically significant interstitial lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension
- Proteinuria (urine protein to creatinine ratio [UPCR] > 4 mg/mg)
- Acutely worsened renal function
- Central nervous system SLE
- Or within two weeks prior to Screening or during Screening: use of oral corticosteroids greater than (>) 30 mg daily prednisone equivalent
- Use of injectable corticosteroids, or change in dose of corticosteroids.
- Other protocol defined exclusion criteria could apply
Trial locations and contacts
157 sites in 19 countries.
157 sites in 19 countries
United States42 sites
Advanced Research Center, Inc.
Anaheim, California, 92805
Pinnacle Research Group LLC
Anniston, Alabama, 36207
University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Wallace Rheumatic Study Center
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
The University of Chicago Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Clinical Research of West Florida - Corporate
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
Medvin Clinical Research
Covina, California, 91722
Metroplex Clinical Research Center, LLC
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Omega Research Consultants
DeBary, Florida, 32713
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
AA MRC LLC Ahmed Arif Medical Research Center
Flint, Michigan, 48439
Southern California Permanent Medical Group
Fontana, California, 92335
Center for Rheumatology, Immunology & Arthritis
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33309
Global Research Management
Glendale, California, 91204
Medication Management, LLC
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27408
Innovative Clinical Research, LLC
Greenville, South Carolina, 29601
Accurate Clinical Research, Inc.
Houston, Texas, 77034
Accurate Clinical Management - Brionez
Houston, Texas, 77084
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Marietta Rheumatology Associates, PC
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, P.C.
Mesa, Arizona, 85210
Hope Clinical Trials
Miami, Florida, 33165
Yale School Of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, 06519
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, 10021
Medical Center Research, LLC Webster Office
Pearland, Texas, 77584
Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, P.C.
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032
Allegheny-Singer Research Institute
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224
IRIS Research and Development
Plantation, Florida, 33324
East Bay Rheumatology Medical Group, Inc.
San Leandro, California, 94578
FSAEI HE " First Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov" of the MoH of the RF
Seattle, Washington
LSU Health Sciences Center Gastroenterology
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103
Washington University in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
SUNY Upstate Medical Center
Syracuse, New York, 13210
McIlwain Medical Group, PA
Tampa, Florida, 33614
Meridien Research, Inc.
Tampa, Florida, 33634
Montefiore Medical Center PRIME
The Bronx, New York, 10461
DM Clinical Research
Tomball, Texas, 77375
Inland Rheumatology Clinical Trials, Inc.
Upland, California, 91786
Nazanin Firooz, MD Inc.
West Hills, California, 91307
Japan15 sites
NHO Asahikawa Medical Center
Asahikawa-shi, Hokkaido
St. Luke's International Hospital
Chūōku, Tokyo-To
Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center
Fuchu-shi, Tokyo-To
Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital
Hamamatsu, Shizuoka
Eiraku Clinic
Kagoshima, Kagoshima-ken
Kanazawa University Hospital
Kanazawa, Ishikawa-ken
Kagawa University Hospital
Kita-gun, Kagawa-ken
Tobata General Hospital
Kitakyushu-shi, Fukuoka
University of Occupational and Environmental Health Hospital
Kitakyushu-shi, Fukuoka
Tohoku University Hospital
Sendai, Miyagi
Dokkyo Medical University Hospital
Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi
Keio University Hospital
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo-To
Nihon University Itabashi Hospital
tabashi City, Tokyo-To
Ehime University Hospital
Toon-shi, Ehime
Tottori University Hospital
Yonago-shi, Tottori
Argentina14 sites
APRILLUS
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Centro Medico Dra Laura Maffei Investigacion Clinica Aplicada
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Clinica Adventista Belgrano
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Hospital Britanico de Buenos Aires
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Hospital General de Agudos Dr. J. M. Ramos Mejia
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Sanatorio Allende
Córdoba
Instituto de Investigaciones Clinicas
Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires
Instituto de Reumatologia
Mendoza
Instituto de Investigaciones Clinicas Quilmes
Quilmes, Buenos Aires
Cordis S.A.
Salta
Centro Polivalente de Asistencia e Inv. Clinica CER
San Juan
Centro Integral de Reumatologia
San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province
Centro Medico Privado de Reumatologia
San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province
Investigaciones Clinicas Tucuman
San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province
Mexico9 sites
Investigacion y Biomedicina de Chihuahua, S.C.
Chihuahua City
Unidad de Investigacion de las Enfermedades Reumaticas
Cuauhtémoc, Mexico City
Clinica de Investigacion en Reumatologia y Obesidad S.C.
Guadalajara, Jalisco
Unidad de Investigacion en Enfermedades Cronico Degenerativas SC
Guadalajara, Jalisco
Morales Vargas Centro de Investigacion, S.C.
León, Guanajuato
Clinstile, S.A. de C.V.
Mexico City, Mexico City
Accelerium S. de R.L. de C.V.
Monterrey, Nuevo León
Hospital Central Dr Ignacio Morones Prieto
San Luis Potosí City, San Luis Potos
Clinical Research Institute S.C.
Tlalnepantla, State of Mexico
Peru9 sites
Hogar Clínica San Juan de Dios - Arequipa
Arequipa
Clinica El Golf
Lima
Clinica Medica Cayetano Heredia
Lima
Clinica San Juan Bautista
Lima
Clinica Vesalio
Lima
GINOBS SA. Instituto de Ginecologia y Reproduccion
Lima
Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia
Lima
University of Washington Medical Center
Lima
ICCV Research Instituto del Cerebro y la Columna Vertebral
Miraflores
Russia9 sites
LLC "Alliance Biomedical - Ural Group"
Izhevsk
TSBIH "Krasnoyarsk Interdistrict Clinical Hospital of Emergency Medical Care n.a. N.S. Karpovich
Krasnoyarsk
HMA - Hospital Maria Auxiliadora
Moscow
Ultramed
Omsk
LLC Medical Sanitary Unit#157
Saint Petersburg
Research Institute of Emergency Medical Care
Saint Petersburg
SPb SBIH "Clinical Rheumatological Hospital # 25"
Saint Petersburg
SIH "Saratov City Clinical Hospital # 12"
Saratov
Nebbiolo LLC
Tomsk
Bulgaria7 sites
UMHAT "Pulmed" OOD
Plovdiv
MHAT - Ruse, AD
Rousse
Medizinski Zentar-1-Sevlievo EOOD
Sevlievo
Medical Center "Excelsior", OOD
Sofia
Medical Center Comac Medical EOOD
Sofia
UMHAT "SofiaMed", OOD
Sofia
UMHAT "Sv. Ivan Rilski", EAD
Sofia
Philippines7 sites
Angeles University Foundation Medical Center
Angeles City, Pampanga
Mary Mediatrix Medical Center
Batangas
De La Salle University Medical Center
Dasmariñas City, Cavite
Davao Doctors Hospital
Davao City
Southern Philippines Medical Center
Davao City
Iloilo Doctors Hospital
Iloilo City
St. Luke's Medical Center
Quezon City
South Korea7 sites
Dong-A University Hospital
Busan
Kyungpook National University Hospital
Daegu
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do
Konkuk University Medical Center
Seoul
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University
Seoul
The Catholic University of Korea, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital
Seoul
Ajou University Hospital
Suwon, Gyeonggi-do
Chile6 sites
Corporacion de Beneficencia Osorno
Osorno
Centro de Estudios Reumatologicos
Santiago
Centro Medico Prosalud
Santiago
Interin
Santiago
Psicomedica Clinical and Research Group
Santiago
Quantum Research Santiago
Santiago
Poland6 sites
CERMED
Bialystok
Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im.dr J. Biziela
Bydgoszcz
Centrum Reumatologiczne Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska lek. Barbara Bazela
Elblag
Centrum Medyczne Plejady
Krakow
Nzoz Atopia
Krakow
Rheuma Medicus Zaklad
Warsaw
Colombia5 sites
Centro de Reumatologia y Ortopedia SAS
Barranquilla
Clínica de la Costa Ltda.
Barranquilla
Fundacion Instituto de Reumatologia Fernando Chalem
Bogotá
Simedics Ips Sas
Bogotá
Servimed S.A.S.
Bucaramanga
Italy5 sites
Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria- Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Naples
Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova Azienda Ospedaliera di Reggio Emilia
Reggio Emilia
Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli
Roma
Humanitas Research Hospital
Rozzano, Milano
Malaysia5 sites
Hospital Selayang
Batu Caves, Selangor
International Medical University (IMU) Healthcare
Bukit Jalil, Selangor
Hospital Kuala Lumpur
Kuala Lumpur
Hospital Umum Sarawak
Kuching, Sarawak
Hospital Pakar Sultanah Fatimah
Muar town, Johor
Romania3 sites
Spitalul Clinic "Dr.I. Cantacuzino"
Bucharest
Spitalul Clinic "Sf. Maria"
Bucharest
S.C Mediab S.R.L
Târgu Mureş
South Africa3 sites
Naidoo, A - Netcare Umhlanga Hospital
Durban, 4319
Wits Clinical Research
Johannesburg, Gauteng
Winelands Medical Research Centre
Stellenbosch, Western Cape
Taiwan3 sites
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
Taichung
Germany1 site
Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin - Campus Charite Mitte
Berlin
About this study
Official title: A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Dose-Ranging Study To Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of M2951 in Subjects With SLE
M2951 is an investigational drug under evaluation for treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. The purpose of the study was to assess the Safety and Efficacy of M2951 in participants with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE).
- Conditions
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Being tested
- Placebo, M2951
- Keywords
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, M2951, Placebo, Dose response, Oral Corticosteroids, Safety, Efficacy, Autoimmune And Inflammatory Disorders
- Medical subject headings
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PlaceboDrug
Participants received placebo matched to M2951 orally for 52 weeks.
M2951Drug
Also called Evobrutinib
Participants received 25 milligrams (mg) of M2951 orally once daily (QD) for 52 weeks.
M2951Drug
Also called Evobrutinib
Participants received 75 mg of M2951 orally QD for 52 weeks.
M2951Drug
Also called Evobrutinib
Participants received 50 mg of M2951 orally twice daily (BID) for 52 weeks.
M2951Drug
Also called Evobrutinib
Participants who had received Placebo or M2951 (25 mg QD, 75 mg QD or 50 mg BID) during DBPC period were switched to receive 50 mg M2951 orally BID in LTE period for 104 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled (DBPC) Period: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: M2951 |
| DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: M2951 |
| DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: M2951 |
| Long-Term Extension (LTE) Period: Placebo/ M2951 50 mg BID | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: M2951 |
| LTE Period: M2951 25 mg QD/ M2951 50 mg BID | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: M2951 |
| LTE Period: M2951 75 mg QD/ M2951 50 mg BID | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: M2951 |
| LTE Period: M2951 50 mg BID/ M2951 50 mg BID | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: M2951 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Week 52
SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor).
Measured: Week 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 6 (SRI-6) at Week 52
SRI-6 response was defined as >= 6-point reduction in SLEDAI-2K total score, no new BILAG A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system :A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor).
Measured: Week 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs According to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03)
Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, which does not necessarily have causal relationship with treatment. A serious AE was defined as an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged in participant hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAEs: events between first dose of study drug that were absent before treatment/that worsened relative to pre-treatment state up to 56 weeks. TEAEs included both serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Number of participants with TEAEs and serious TEAEs were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 56
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity According to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03)
Severity of TEAEs were graded using NCI-CTCAE v4.03 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 1= Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with TEAEs by severity were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 56
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs
Vital signs included body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, weight and height. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in vital signs were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 56
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTcF) was calculated using Fridericia's formula. 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 10 minutes in semisupine position. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in 12-lead ECG findings were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 56
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters
Laboratory investigation included hematology, biochemistry, urinalysis and coagulation. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in laboratory parameters were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 56
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 2
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 2.
Measured: Week 2
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 4
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 4.
Measured: Week 4
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 12
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 12.
Measured: Week 12
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 24
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 24.
Measured: Week 24
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 36
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 36.
Measured: Week 36
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 52
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 52
Measured: Week 52
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 56
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 56
Measured: Week 56
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Total B Cell Count at Week 4
Mean total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.
Measured: Week 4
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Total B Cell Count at Week 24
Mean absolute total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.
Measured: Week 24
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Total B Cell Count at Week 52
Mean absolute total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.
Measured: Week 52
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Total B Cell Count at Week 56
Mean absolute total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.
Measured: Week 56
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 2
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.
Measured: Baseline and Week 2
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 4
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 12
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 24
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 36
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.
Measured: Baseline and Week 36
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 52
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 56
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.
Measured: Baseline and Week 56
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Total B Cell Count at Week 4
Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Total B Cell Count at Week 24
Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Total B Cell Count at Week 52
Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Total B Cell Count at Week 56
Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.
Measured: Baseline and Week 56
Secondary outcomes (27)
DBPC Period: Time to First Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A Flare
BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. BILAG evaluated by scoring each of a list of signs and symptoms as: improving (1); same (2); worse (3); new (4); not present (0); not done (ND). Total BILAG score is sum of scores of 9 domains where A=12, B=8, C=1, D=0, and E=0. Total score ranges from 0 to 108 with a higher score indicating greater lupus activity. Time to first severe flare, where a severe flare is defined as at least one BILAG A (Severe disease activity) score in any organ system due to items that are new or worse, compared to the BILAG evaluation at the previous visit, during the 52-Week Treatment. It was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 56
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Week 52 in Serologically Active (SA) Subgroup
SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor).
Measured: Week 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 6 (SRI-6) at Week 52 in Serologically Active Subgroup
SRI-6 response was defined as >= 6-point reduction in SLEDAI-2K total score, no new BILAG A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system :A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale = from 0(very well) to 100(very poor).
Measured: Week 52
DBPC Period: Time to First British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A or 2B Moderate to Severe Flare
BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. BILAG evaluated by scoring each of a list of signs and symptoms as: improving (1); same (2); worse (3); new (4); not present (0); not done (ND). Total BILAG score is sum of scores of 9 domains where A=12, B=8, C=1, D=0, and E=0. Total score ranges from 0 to 108 with a higher score indicating greater lupus activity. A Moderate to Severe (BILAG A or 2B) flare is defined as at least one BILAG A (severe disease activity) grade or two BILAG B (moderate disease activity) grade in any organ system due to items that are new or worse, compared to the BILAG evaluation at the previous visit, during the 52 week treatment. It was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 56
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 Flare-Free Status During the 52-Week Treatment Period
A participant has a flare-free status if no flare has been reported during the 52-week treatment period. Participants who discontinued treatment prior to Week 52, without having a flare are counted as not being flare free at Week 52. A flare was defined as either 1 or more new BILAG-2004 A (severe disease activity) or 2 or more new BILAG-2004 B (moderate disease activity) items compared to the previous visit. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected.
Measured: up to Week 52
DBPC Period: Annualized Flare Rate
A flare was defined as either 1 or more new BILAG-2004 A (severe disease activity) or 2 or more new BILAG-2004 B (moderate disease activity) items compared to the previous visit. The occurrence of a new flare was checked for each available visit versus the previous available visit up to Week 52. If no new flares occurred, the number of flares was set to 0. Otherwise all flares were counted leading to the maximum number of flares of 13. The annualized flare rate was calculated as the number of flares divided by the flare exposure time in days multiplied with 365.25 (1 year). The flare exposure time is the time up to Week 52 (date of BILAG-2004 assessment at Week 52) or up to the date of last available BILAG 2004 assessment.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Low Disease Activity Status, Defined by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Score of Less Than or Equal (<= ) 2 at Week 52
Low disease activity is defined as SLEDAI-2K score <=2. SLEDAI-2K is an activity index that measures disease activity and records feature of active lupus as present or not present. SLEDAI-2K uses a weighted checklist to assign a numerical score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms at the time of assessment or during the previous 30 days. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms).
Measured: Week 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Low Disease Activity Status, Defined by Clinical Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Score of Less Than or Equal (<= ) 2 at Week 52
Low disease activity is defined as SLEDAI-2K score <=2. SLEDAI-2K is an activity index that measures disease activity and records feature of active lupus as present or not present. SLEDAI-2K uses a weighted checklist to assign a numerical score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms at the time of assessment or during the previous 30 days. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms). Clinical SLEDAI-2K score is equal to the SLEDAI-2K score from electronic case report form (eCRF) excluding the components 'Increased Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) Binding' and 'Low Complement'.
Measured: Week 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
SLEDAI-2K is an activity index that measures disease activity and records feature of active lupus as present or not present. SLEDAI-2K uses a weighted checklist to assign a numerical score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms at the time of assessment or during the previous 30 days. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms).
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CLASI-A) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
CLASI is an validated measurement instrument for lupus erythematosus developed for use in clinical studies that consists of separate scores for the activity of the disease (CLASI-A). The CLASI activity score is calculated on the basis of erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and non-scarring alopecia. The CLASI activity score ranges from 0-70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease. Severity categories based on the CLASI activity score are as follows: mild (0-9), moderate (10-20), and severe (21-70).
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on BILAG-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) at Week 52
BICLA response defined as participants meeting following criteria: [1] At least one gradation of improvement in baseline BILAG scores in all body systems with moderate or severe disease activity at entry (example: all A (severe disease) scores falling to B (moderate), C (mild), or D (no activity) and all B scores falling to C or D; [2] No new BILAG A or more than one new BILAG B scores; [3] No worsening of total SLEDAI-2K score from baseline; [4] No significant deterioration (=<10%) in physician's global assessment and [5] No treatment failure (initiation of non-protocol treatment).
Measured: Week 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-2004 Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
BILAG 2004 disease activity Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. BILAG evaluated by scoring each of a list of signs and symptoms as: improving (1); same (2); worse (3); new (4); not present (0); not done (ND). Total BILAG score is sum of scores of 9 domains where A=12, B=8, C=1, D=0, and E=0. Total score ranges from 0 to 108 with a higher score indicating greater lupus activity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was recorded using the 100 millimeter horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Physician rated participant's disease activity on a scale ranged from 0-100 millimeter (mm), where 0 indicated no disease activity and 100 represented maximum disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical Component Summary Score and Mental Component Summary Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52
The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) was a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being. These eight subscales were summarized as relating to either physical health or mental health. Physical component summary (PCS) was based primarily on physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health scales and mental component summary (MCS) encompasses vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health scales. Score from mental health, role emotional, social functioning, and vitality domains were averaged to calculate MCS. Total score range for MCS was 0 - 100 (100 = highest level of mental functioning). Score from physical function, role physical, bodily pain, and general health domains were averaged to calculate PCS. Total score range for PCS was 0-100 (100 = highest level of physical functioning).
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Health Outcome Questionnaire at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52
The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a generic measure of health status that provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value. The EQ-5D-5L profile defines health in terms of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. Each dimension has five levels: 1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, and 5: extreme problems. Responses were used to generate a weighted summary index (EQ-5D index), which ranges from 0 (dead) to 1.00 (perfect health). A higher score indicates better health and positive changes from baseline indicate improvement of health.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52
The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a generic measure of health status that provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value. The EQ-5D-5L profile defines health in terms of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. Each dimension has five levels: 1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, and 5: extreme problems. The responses were used to derive overall score using a visual analog scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm), where 0 was the worst health you can imagine and 100 was the best health you can imagine.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL) Questionnaire Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52
The Lupus QoL assessment is a 34 item questionnaire across 8 domains that is designed to find out how systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) affects a participant's life. Domains include physical health, pain, planning, intimate relationships, burden to others, emotional health, body image, and fatigue. Participants indicate their responses on a 5-point Likert response format, where 4=never, 3=occasionally, 2= a good bit of the time, 1=most of the time, and 0=worst of the time. Summary scores can be calculated for all 8 domains. A LupusQoL score for each domain was reported on a 0 to 100 scale, with greater values indicating better health related QoL.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale Score of Any Improvement, no Change and Any Worsening
The PGIC is a self-rated scale that asks the participant to describe the change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall quality of life (QoL) related to the participants painful condition on the following scale: 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse) and 7 (very much worse). Number of participants in the PGIC categories of any improvement (that is PGIC scale score 1, 2 or 3), no change (that is PGIC scale score 4) and any worsening (that is PGIC scale score 5, 6 or 7) are reported.
Measured: Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52
The FACIT-Fatigue score was calculated according to a 13-item questionnaire that assess self reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. It uses a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse possible score) to 52 (best score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Prednisone Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Dose by >=25% to a Dose of <=7.5 Milligram Per Day (mg/Day), With no BILAG A or 2B Flare in Disease Activity at Week 52
BILAG A or 2B flare is defined as at least one BILAG A grade or two BILAG B grade in any organ system due to items that are new or worse, compared to the BILAG evaluation at the previous visit, during the 52 week treatment period. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Prednisone Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Daily Dose at at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Baseline in Prednisone-equivalent CS Daily Dose at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52 were reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Reduction From Baseline in Prednisone Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Daily Dose by > 0 to 25%, >25% to 50%, >50% to 100% or an Increase at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Number of Participants With Reduction From Baseline in Prednisone-equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Daily Dose by > 0 to 25%, >25% to 50%, >50% to 100% or an Increase at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52 were reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
DBPC Period: Cumulative Prednisone Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Dose at Week 52
Cumulative Prednisone-equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Dose was calculated at Week 52.
Measured: Week 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With a Sustained Reduction of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Dose to 7.5 mg Prednisone Equivalent Per Day or Less With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Week 52
SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor).
Measured: Week 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With a Sustained Reduction of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Dose to 7.5 mg Prednisone Equivalent Per Day or Less With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 6 (SRI-6) at Week 52
SRI-6 response was defined as >= 6-point reduction in SLEDAI-2K total score, no new BILAG A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system :A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor).
Measured: Week 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With a Sustained Reduction of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Dose to 7.5 mg Prednisone Equivalent Per Day or Less With Response Based on SRI-4 at Week 52 in Serologically Active Subgroup
SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale = from very well(0)-very poor(100).
Measured: Week 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) at Week 52
Lupus low disease activity state will be measured as: SLEDAI-2K <= 4; No activity in any major organ systems (renal, central nervous system, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, fever); No new features of disease activity compared with the previous assessment; Prednisone-equivalent <= 7.5 milligram per day; Unchanged background immunosuppressive therapy.
Measured: Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study start4 Jan 2017
- Primary completion27 Nov 2019
- Study completion23 Mar 2020
Why it stopped: Study is completed; primary analysis completed.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Systemic Lupus ErythematosusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 469 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Responsible, Study director, EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02975336
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MS200527-0018
- Other IDs
- 2016-002950-19, 2016
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 23 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 12 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Montalban X, Wallace D, Genovese MC, Tomic D, Parsons-Rich D, Bolay CL, Kao AH, Guehring H. A plain language summary of what clinical studies can tell us about the safety of evobrutinib - a potential treatment for multiple sclerosis. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2023 Aug;13(4):207-213. doi: 10.2217/nmt-2023-0003. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
PubMed 37345645Montalban X, Wallace D, Genovese MC, Tomic D, Parsons-Rich D, Le Bolay C, Kao AH, Guehring H. Characterisation of the safety profile of evobrutinib in over 1000 patients from phase II clinical trials in multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus: an integrated safety analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;94(1):1-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2022-328799. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
PubMed 36418156Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.
PubMed 33687069
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Dose-Ranging Study To Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of M2951 in Subjects With SLE
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02975336
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MS200527-0018
- Conditions
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Keywords
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, M2951, Placebo, Dose response, Oral Corticosteroids, Safety, Efficacy, Autoimmune And Inflammatory Disorders
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Study is completed; primary analysis completed.
- Enrolment
- 469 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
- Study start
- 4 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Mar 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Dec 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
M2951 is an investigational drug under evaluation for treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. The purpose of the study was to assess the Safety and Efficacy of M2951 in participants with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 8
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled (DBPC) Period: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo |
| DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | Experimental | Drug: M2951 |
| DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | Experimental | Drug: M2951 |
| DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | Experimental | Drug: M2951 |
| Long-Term Extension (LTE) Period: Placebo/ M2951 50 mg BID | Experimental | Drug: M2951 |
| LTE Period: M2951 25 mg QD/ M2951 50 mg BID | Experimental | Drug: M2951 |
| LTE Period: M2951 75 mg QD/ M2951 50 mg BID | Experimental | Drug: M2951 |
| LTE Period: M2951 50 mg BID/ M2951 50 mg BID | Experimental | Drug: M2951 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Eligible male and female participants, aged 18 to 75 years
- Must have diagnosis of SLE with either the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria for SLE, or at least four of the 11 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for SLE, of at least six months duration prior to Screening
- SLEDAI-2K total score greater than or equal to (>=) 6 (including clinical SLEDAI greater than or equal to (>=) 4) at Screening Visit
- And be positive for anti-double-stranded Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) and/or anti-nuclear antibody (ANA greater than or equal to (>=) 1:80) and/or anti-Smith (anti-Sm) antibody at the time of Screening
- Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Participants are not eligible for this study if they have active, clinically significant interstitial lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension
- Proteinuria (urine protein to creatinine ratio [UPCR] > 4 mg/mg)
- Acutely worsened renal function
- Central nervous system SLE
- Or within two weeks prior to Screening or during Screening: use of oral corticosteroids greater than (>) 30 mg daily prednisone equivalent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PlaceboParticipants received placebo matched to M2951 orally for 52 weeks. | Drug | Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled (DBPC) Period: Placebo |
| M2951Also: EvobrutinibParticipants received 25 milligrams (mg) of M2951 orally once daily (QD) for 52 weeks. | Drug | DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD |
| M2951Also: EvobrutinibParticipants received 75 mg of M2951 orally QD for 52 weeks. | Drug | DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD |
| M2951Also: EvobrutinibParticipants received 50 mg of M2951 orally twice daily (BID) for 52 weeks. | Drug | DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID |
| M2951Also: EvobrutinibParticipants who had received Placebo or M2951 (25 mg QD, 75 mg QD or 50 mg BID) during DBPC period were switched to receive 50 mg M2951 orally BID in LTE period for 104 weeks. | Drug | LTE Period: M2951 25 mg QD/ M2951 50 mg BID, LTE Period: M2951 50 mg BID/ M2951 50 mg BID, LTE Period: M2951 75 mg QD/ M2951 50 mg BID, Long-Term Extension (LTE) Period: Placebo/ M2951 50 mg BID |
Primary outcome
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor).
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 6 (SRI-6) at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
SRI-6 response was defined as >= 6-point reduction in SLEDAI-2K total score, no new BILAG A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system :A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor).
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs According to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03)
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 56
Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, which does not necessarily have causal relationship with treatment. A serious AE was defined as an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged in participant hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAEs: events between first dose of study drug that were absent before treatment/that worsened relative to pre-treatment state up to 56 weeks. TEAEs included both serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Number of participants with TEAEs and serious TEAEs were reported.
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity According to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03)
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 56
Severity of TEAEs were graded using NCI-CTCAE v4.03 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 1= Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with TEAEs by severity were reported.
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 56
Vital signs included body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, weight and height. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in vital signs were reported.
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 56
12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTcF) was calculated using Fridericia's formula. 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 10 minutes in semisupine position. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in 12-lead ECG findings were reported.
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 56
Laboratory investigation included hematology, biochemistry, urinalysis and coagulation. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in laboratory parameters were reported.
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 2
Time frame: Week 2
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 2.
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 4
Time frame: Week 4
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 4.
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 12.
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 24.
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 36
Time frame: Week 36
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 36.
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 52
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 56
Time frame: Week 56
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 56
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Total B Cell Count at Week 4
Time frame: Week 4
Mean total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Total B Cell Count at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Mean absolute total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Total B Cell Count at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Mean absolute total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.
DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Total B Cell Count at Week 56
Time frame: Week 56
Mean absolute total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 2
Time frame: Baseline and Week 2
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 36
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 56
Time frame: Baseline and Week 56
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Total B Cell Count at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Total B Cell Count at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Total B Cell Count at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Total B Cell Count at Week 56
Time frame: Baseline and Week 56
Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.
27 secondary outcomes
DBPC Period: Time to First Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A Flare
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 56
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Week 52 in Serologically Active (SA) Subgroup
Time frame: Week 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 6 (SRI-6) at Week 52 in Serologically Active Subgroup
Time frame: Week 52
DBPC Period: Time to First British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A or 2B Moderate to Severe Flare
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 56
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 Flare-Free Status During the 52-Week Treatment Period
Time frame: up to Week 52
DBPC Period: Annualized Flare Rate
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Low Disease Activity Status, Defined by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Score of Less Than or Equal (<= ) 2 at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Low Disease Activity Status, Defined by Clinical Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Score of Less Than or Equal (<= ) 2 at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CLASI-A) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on BILAG-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-2004 Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical Component Summary Score and Mental Component Summary Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Health Outcome Questionnaire at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL) Questionnaire Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale Score of Any Improvement, no Change and Any Worsening
Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Prednisone Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Dose by >=25% to a Dose of <=7.5 Milligram Per Day (mg/Day), With no BILAG A or 2B Flare in Disease Activity at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Prednisone Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Daily Dose at at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Reduction From Baseline in Prednisone Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Daily Dose by > 0 to 25%, >25% to 50%, >50% to 100% or an Increase at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
DBPC Period: Cumulative Prednisone Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Dose at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With a Sustained Reduction of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Dose to 7.5 mg Prednisone Equivalent Per Day or Less With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With a Sustained Reduction of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Dose to 7.5 mg Prednisone Equivalent Per Day or Less With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 6 (SRI-6) at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With a Sustained Reduction of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Dose to 7.5 mg Prednisone Equivalent Per Day or Less With Response Based on SRI-4 at Week 52 in Serologically Active Subgroup
Time frame: Week 52
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Apr 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37345645Montalban X, Wallace D, Genovese MC, Tomic D, Parsons-Rich D, Bolay CL, Kao AH, Guehring H. A plain language summary of what clinical studies can tell us about the safety of evobrutinib - a potential treatment for multiple sclerosis. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2023 Aug;13(4):207-213. doi: 10.2217/nmt-2023-0003. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36418156Montalban X, Wallace D, Genovese MC, Tomic D, Parsons-Rich D, Le Bolay C, Kao AH, Guehring H. Characterisation of the safety profile of evobrutinib in over 1000 patients from phase II clinical trials in multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus: an integrated safety analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;94(1):1-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2022-328799. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33687069Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.
- Trial Awareness and Transparency websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- US Medical Information website, Medical ResourcesLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingPhase 4
Dapagliflozin in Active Lupus Nephritis
Lupus Nephritis (LN)
RecruitingObservational study
Electroencephalogram Recording in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Deciphering the Genetic Architecture of Autoimmune Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Responsible study director
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
157 sites in 19 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing M2951 in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. at 157 sites in 19 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 157 sites in United States, Japan, Argentina, Mexico, Peru and 14 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Dec 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Week 52 (time frame: Week 52). The study lists 29 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02975336, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Apr 2021.