AzTrials
AzTrials

Systemic Lupus ErythematosusPhase 2NCT02975336

A Phase II Study of M2951 in SLE

A Phase 2 study testing M2951 in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. at 157 sites in 19 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

M2951 is an investigational drug under evaluation for treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. The purpose of the study was to assess the Safety and Efficacy of M2951 in participants with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
What is being tested?
M2951
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
469 participants
Where
157 sitesin 19 countries
Study dates
4 Jan 2017to 23 Mar 2020
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Eligible male and female participants, aged 18 to 75 years
  • Must have diagnosis of SLE with either the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria for SLE, or at least four of the 11 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for SLE, of at least six months duration prior to Screening
  • SLEDAI-2K total score greater than or equal to (>=) 6 (including clinical SLEDAI greater than or equal to (>=) 4) at Screening Visit
  • And be positive for anti-double-stranded Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) and/or anti-nuclear antibody (ANA greater than or equal to (>=) 1:80) and/or anti-Smith (anti-Sm) antibody at the time of Screening
  • Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply

Who cannot join

  • Participants are not eligible for this study if they have active, clinically significant interstitial lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • Proteinuria (urine protein to creatinine ratio [UPCR] > 4 mg/mg)
  • Acutely worsened renal function
  • Central nervous system SLE
  • Or within two weeks prior to Screening or during Screening: use of oral corticosteroids greater than (>) 30 mg daily prednisone equivalent
  • Use of injectable corticosteroids, or change in dose of corticosteroids.
  • Other protocol defined exclusion criteria could apply

Trial locations and contacts

157 sites in 19 countries.

157 sites in 19 countries

United States42 sites
  • Advanced Research Center, Inc.

    Anaheim, California, 92805

  • Pinnacle Research Group LLC

    Anniston, Alabama, 36207

  • University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Wallace Rheumatic Study Center

    Beverly Hills, California, 90211

  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

  • The University of Chicago Medicine

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • Clinical Research of West Florida - Corporate

    Clearwater, Florida, 33765

  • Medvin Clinical Research

    Covina, California, 91722

  • Metroplex Clinical Research Center, LLC

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Omega Research Consultants

    DeBary, Florida, 32713

  • Henry Ford Health System

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

  • AA MRC LLC Ahmed Arif Medical Research Center

    Flint, Michigan, 48439

  • Southern California Permanent Medical Group

    Fontana, California, 92335

  • Center for Rheumatology, Immunology & Arthritis

    Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33309

  • Global Research Management

    Glendale, California, 91204

  • Medication Management, LLC

    Greensboro, North Carolina, 27408

  • Innovative Clinical Research, LLC

    Greenville, South Carolina, 29601

  • Accurate Clinical Research, Inc.

    Houston, Texas, 77034

  • Accurate Clinical Management - Brionez

    Houston, Texas, 77084

  • University of Mississippi Medical Center

    Jackson, Mississippi, 39216

  • University of Southern California

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • Marietta Rheumatology Associates, PC

    Marietta, Georgia, 30060

  • Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, P.C.

    Mesa, Arizona, 85210

  • Hope Clinical Trials

    Miami, Florida, 33165

  • Yale School Of Medicine

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06519

  • Hospital for Special Surgery

    New York, New York, 10021

  • Medical Center Research, LLC Webster Office

    Pearland, Texas, 77584

  • Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, P.C.

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85032

  • Allegheny-Singer Research Institute

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224

  • IRIS Research and Development

    Plantation, Florida, 33324

  • East Bay Rheumatology Medical Group, Inc.

    San Leandro, California, 94578

  • FSAEI HE " First Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov" of the MoH of the RF

    Seattle, Washington

  • LSU Health Sciences Center Gastroenterology

    Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103

  • Washington University in St. Louis

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • SUNY Upstate Medical Center

    Syracuse, New York, 13210

  • McIlwain Medical Group, PA

    Tampa, Florida, 33614

  • Meridien Research, Inc.

    Tampa, Florida, 33634

  • Montefiore Medical Center PRIME

    The Bronx, New York, 10461

  • DM Clinical Research

    Tomball, Texas, 77375

  • Inland Rheumatology Clinical Trials, Inc.

    Upland, California, 91786

  • Nazanin Firooz, MD Inc.

    West Hills, California, 91307

Other trials in United States

Japan15 sites
  • NHO Asahikawa Medical Center

    Asahikawa-shi, Hokkaido

  • St. Luke's International Hospital

    Chūōku, Tokyo-To

  • Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center

    Fuchu-shi, Tokyo-To

  • Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital

    Hamamatsu, Shizuoka

  • Eiraku Clinic

    Kagoshima, Kagoshima-ken

  • Kanazawa University Hospital

    Kanazawa, Ishikawa-ken

  • Kagawa University Hospital

    Kita-gun, Kagawa-ken

  • Tobata General Hospital

    Kitakyushu-shi, Fukuoka

  • University of Occupational and Environmental Health Hospital

    Kitakyushu-shi, Fukuoka

  • Tohoku University Hospital

    Sendai, Miyagi

  • Dokkyo Medical University Hospital

    Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi

  • Keio University Hospital

    Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo-To

  • Nihon University Itabashi Hospital

    tabashi City, Tokyo-To

  • Ehime University Hospital

    Toon-shi, Ehime

  • Tottori University Hospital

    Yonago-shi, Tottori

Other trials in Japan

Argentina14 sites
  • APRILLUS

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires

  • Centro Medico Dra Laura Maffei Investigacion Clinica Aplicada

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires

  • Clinica Adventista Belgrano

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires

  • Hospital Britanico de Buenos Aires

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires

  • Hospital General de Agudos Dr. J. M. Ramos Mejia

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires

  • Sanatorio Allende

    Córdoba

  • Instituto de Investigaciones Clinicas

    Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires

  • Instituto de Reumatologia

    Mendoza

  • Instituto de Investigaciones Clinicas Quilmes

    Quilmes, Buenos Aires

  • Cordis S.A.

    Salta

  • Centro Polivalente de Asistencia e Inv. Clinica CER

    San Juan

  • Centro Integral de Reumatologia

    San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province

  • Centro Medico Privado de Reumatologia

    San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province

  • Investigaciones Clinicas Tucuman

    San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province

Other trials in Argentina

Mexico9 sites
  • Investigacion y Biomedicina de Chihuahua, S.C.

    Chihuahua City

  • Unidad de Investigacion de las Enfermedades Reumaticas

    Cuauhtémoc, Mexico City

  • Clinica de Investigacion en Reumatologia y Obesidad S.C.

    Guadalajara, Jalisco

  • Unidad de Investigacion en Enfermedades Cronico Degenerativas SC

    Guadalajara, Jalisco

  • Morales Vargas Centro de Investigacion, S.C.

    León, Guanajuato

  • Clinstile, S.A. de C.V.

    Mexico City, Mexico City

  • Accelerium S. de R.L. de C.V.

    Monterrey, Nuevo León

  • Hospital Central Dr Ignacio Morones Prieto

    San Luis Potosí City, San Luis Potos

  • Clinical Research Institute S.C.

    Tlalnepantla, State of Mexico

Other trials in Mexico

Peru9 sites
  • Hogar Clínica San Juan de Dios - Arequipa

    Arequipa

  • Clinica El Golf

    Lima

  • Clinica Medica Cayetano Heredia

    Lima

  • Clinica San Juan Bautista

    Lima

  • Clinica Vesalio

    Lima

  • GINOBS SA. Instituto de Ginecologia y Reproduccion

    Lima

  • Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia

    Lima

  • University of Washington Medical Center

    Lima

  • ICCV Research Instituto del Cerebro y la Columna Vertebral

    Miraflores

Other trials in Peru

Russia9 sites
  • LLC "Alliance Biomedical - Ural Group"

    Izhevsk

  • TSBIH "Krasnoyarsk Interdistrict Clinical Hospital of Emergency Medical Care n.a. N.S. Karpovich

    Krasnoyarsk

  • HMA - Hospital Maria Auxiliadora

    Moscow

  • Ultramed

    Omsk

  • LLC Medical Sanitary Unit#157

    Saint Petersburg

  • Research Institute of Emergency Medical Care

    Saint Petersburg

  • SPb SBIH "Clinical Rheumatological Hospital # 25"

    Saint Petersburg

  • SIH "Saratov City Clinical Hospital # 12"

    Saratov

  • Nebbiolo LLC

    Tomsk

Other trials in Russia

Bulgaria7 sites
  • UMHAT "Pulmed" OOD

    Plovdiv

  • MHAT - Ruse, AD

    Rousse

  • Medizinski Zentar-1-Sevlievo EOOD

    Sevlievo

  • Medical Center "Excelsior", OOD

    Sofia

  • Medical Center Comac Medical EOOD

    Sofia

  • UMHAT "SofiaMed", OOD

    Sofia

  • UMHAT "Sv. Ivan Rilski", EAD

    Sofia

Other trials in Bulgaria

Philippines7 sites
  • Angeles University Foundation Medical Center

    Angeles City, Pampanga

  • Mary Mediatrix Medical Center

    Batangas

  • De La Salle University Medical Center

    Dasmariñas City, Cavite

  • Davao Doctors Hospital

    Davao City

  • Southern Philippines Medical Center

    Davao City

  • Iloilo Doctors Hospital

    Iloilo City

  • St. Luke's Medical Center

    Quezon City

Other trials in Philippines

South Korea7 sites
  • Dong-A University Hospital

    Busan

  • Kyungpook National University Hospital

    Daegu

  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

    Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do

  • Konkuk University Medical Center

    Seoul

  • Severance Hospital, Yonsei University

    Seoul

  • The Catholic University of Korea, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital

    Seoul

  • Ajou University Hospital

    Suwon, Gyeonggi-do

Other trials in South Korea

Chile6 sites
  • Corporacion de Beneficencia Osorno

    Osorno

  • Centro de Estudios Reumatologicos

    Santiago

  • Centro Medico Prosalud

    Santiago

  • Interin

    Santiago

  • Psicomedica Clinical and Research Group

    Santiago

  • Quantum Research Santiago

    Santiago

Other trials in Chile

Poland6 sites
  • CERMED

    Bialystok

  • Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im.dr J. Biziela

    Bydgoszcz

  • Centrum Reumatologiczne Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska lek. Barbara Bazela

    Elblag

  • Centrum Medyczne Plejady

    Krakow

  • Nzoz Atopia

    Krakow

  • Rheuma Medicus Zaklad

    Warsaw

Other trials in Poland

Colombia5 sites
  • Centro de Reumatologia y Ortopedia SAS

    Barranquilla

  • Clínica de la Costa Ltda.

    Barranquilla

  • Fundacion Instituto de Reumatologia Fernando Chalem

    Bogotá

  • Simedics Ips Sas

    Bogotá

  • Servimed S.A.S.

    Bucaramanga

Other trials in Colombia

Italy5 sites
  • Ospedale San Raffaele

    Milan

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria- Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"

    Naples

  • Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova Azienda Ospedaliera di Reggio Emilia

    Reggio Emilia

  • Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli

    Roma

  • Humanitas Research Hospital

    Rozzano, Milano

Other trials in Italy

Malaysia5 sites
  • Hospital Selayang

    Batu Caves, Selangor

  • International Medical University (IMU) Healthcare

    Bukit Jalil, Selangor

  • Hospital Kuala Lumpur

    Kuala Lumpur

  • Hospital Umum Sarawak

    Kuching, Sarawak

  • Hospital Pakar Sultanah Fatimah

    Muar town, Johor

Other trials in Malaysia

Romania3 sites
  • Spitalul Clinic "Dr.I. Cantacuzino"

    Bucharest

  • Spitalul Clinic "Sf. Maria"

    Bucharest

  • S.C Mediab S.R.L

    Târgu Mureş

Other trials in Romania

South Africa3 sites
  • Naidoo, A - Netcare Umhlanga Hospital

    Durban, 4319

  • Wits Clinical Research

    Johannesburg, Gauteng

  • Winelands Medical Research Centre

    Stellenbosch, Western Cape

Other trials in South Africa

Taiwan3 sites
  • Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    Kaohsiung City

  • Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital

    Kaohsiung City

  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital

    Taichung

Other trials in Taiwan

Germany1 site
  • Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin - Campus Charite Mitte

    Berlin

Other trials in Germany

Mauritius1 site
  • CAP Research

    Solferino-Phoenix

Other trials in Mauritius

About this study

Official title: A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Dose-Ranging Study To Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of M2951 in Subjects With SLE

M2951 is an investigational drug under evaluation for treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. The purpose of the study was to assess the Safety and Efficacy of M2951 in participants with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE).

Being tested
Placebo, M2951
Keywords
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, M2951, Placebo, Dose response, Oral Corticosteroids, Safety, Efficacy, Autoimmune And Inflammatory Disorders
Medical subject headings
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Participants received placebo matched to M2951 orally for 52 weeks.

  • M2951Drug

    Also called Evobrutinib

    Participants received 25 milligrams (mg) of M2951 orally once daily (QD) for 52 weeks.

  • M2951Drug

    Also called Evobrutinib

    Participants received 75 mg of M2951 orally QD for 52 weeks.

  • M2951Drug

    Also called Evobrutinib

    Participants received 50 mg of M2951 orally twice daily (BID) for 52 weeks.

  • M2951Drug

    Also called Evobrutinib

    Participants who had received Placebo or M2951 (25 mg QD, 75 mg QD or 50 mg BID) during DBPC period were switched to receive 50 mg M2951 orally BID in LTE period for 104 weeks.

Study groups in NCT02975336
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled (DBPC) Period: PlaceboPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Placebo
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QDExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: M2951
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QDExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: M2951
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BIDExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: M2951
Long-Term Extension (LTE) Period: Placebo/ M2951 50 mg BIDExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: M2951
LTE Period: M2951 25 mg QD/ M2951 50 mg BIDExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: M2951
LTE Period: M2951 75 mg QD/ M2951 50 mg BIDExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: M2951
LTE Period: M2951 50 mg BID/ M2951 50 mg BIDExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: M2951

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Week 52

    SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor).

    Measured: Week 52

  2. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 6 (SRI-6) at Week 52

    SRI-6 response was defined as >= 6-point reduction in SLEDAI-2K total score, no new BILAG A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system :A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor).

    Measured: Week 52

  3. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs According to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03)

    Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, which does not necessarily have causal relationship with treatment. A serious AE was defined as an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged in participant hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAEs: events between first dose of study drug that were absent before treatment/that worsened relative to pre-treatment state up to 56 weeks. TEAEs included both serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Number of participants with TEAEs and serious TEAEs were reported.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 56

  4. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity According to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03)

    Severity of TEAEs were graded using NCI-CTCAE v4.03 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 1= Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with TEAEs by severity were reported.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 56

  5. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs

    Vital signs included body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, weight and height. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in vital signs were reported.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 56

  6. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

    12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTcF) was calculated using Fridericia's formula. 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 10 minutes in semisupine position. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in 12-lead ECG findings were reported.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 56

  7. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters

    Laboratory investigation included hematology, biochemistry, urinalysis and coagulation. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in laboratory parameters were reported.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 56

  8. DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 2

    Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 2.

    Measured: Week 2

  9. DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 4

    Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 4.

    Measured: Week 4

  10. DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 12

    Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 12.

    Measured: Week 12

  11. DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 24

    Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 24.

    Measured: Week 24

  12. DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 36

    Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 36.

    Measured: Week 36

  13. DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 52

    Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 52

    Measured: Week 52

  14. DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Value of Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 56

    Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 56

    Measured: Week 56

  15. DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Total B Cell Count at Week 4

    Mean total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.

    Measured: Week 4

  16. DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Total B Cell Count at Week 24

    Mean absolute total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.

    Measured: Week 24

  17. DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Total B Cell Count at Week 52

    Mean absolute total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.

    Measured: Week 52

  18. DBPC Period: Mean Absolute Total B Cell Count at Week 56

    Mean absolute total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.

    Measured: Week 56

  19. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 2

    Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 2

  20. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 4

    Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 4

  21. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 12

    Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  22. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 24

    Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  23. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 36

    Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 36

  24. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 52

    Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 52

  25. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 56

    Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 56

  26. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Total B Cell Count at Week 4

    Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 4

  27. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Total B Cell Count at Week 24

    Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  28. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Total B Cell Count at Week 52

    Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 52

  29. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Total B Cell Count at Week 56

    Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 56

Secondary outcomes (27)
  1. DBPC Period: Time to First Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A Flare

    BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. BILAG evaluated by scoring each of a list of signs and symptoms as: improving (1); same (2); worse (3); new (4); not present (0); not done (ND). Total BILAG score is sum of scores of 9 domains where A=12, B=8, C=1, D=0, and E=0. Total score ranges from 0 to 108 with a higher score indicating greater lupus activity. Time to first severe flare, where a severe flare is defined as at least one BILAG A (Severe disease activity) score in any organ system due to items that are new or worse, compared to the BILAG evaluation at the previous visit, during the 52-Week Treatment. It was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 56

  2. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Week 52 in Serologically Active (SA) Subgroup

    SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor).

    Measured: Week 52

  3. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 6 (SRI-6) at Week 52 in Serologically Active Subgroup

    SRI-6 response was defined as >= 6-point reduction in SLEDAI-2K total score, no new BILAG A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system :A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale = from 0(very well) to 100(very poor).

    Measured: Week 52

  4. DBPC Period: Time to First British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A or 2B Moderate to Severe Flare

    BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. BILAG evaluated by scoring each of a list of signs and symptoms as: improving (1); same (2); worse (3); new (4); not present (0); not done (ND). Total BILAG score is sum of scores of 9 domains where A=12, B=8, C=1, D=0, and E=0. Total score ranges from 0 to 108 with a higher score indicating greater lupus activity. A Moderate to Severe (BILAG A or 2B) flare is defined as at least one BILAG A (severe disease activity) grade or two BILAG B (moderate disease activity) grade in any organ system due to items that are new or worse, compared to the BILAG evaluation at the previous visit, during the 52 week treatment. It was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 56

  5. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 Flare-Free Status During the 52-Week Treatment Period

    A participant has a flare-free status if no flare has been reported during the 52-week treatment period. Participants who discontinued treatment prior to Week 52, without having a flare are counted as not being flare free at Week 52. A flare was defined as either 1 or more new BILAG-2004 A (severe disease activity) or 2 or more new BILAG-2004 B (moderate disease activity) items compared to the previous visit. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected.

    Measured: up to Week 52

  6. DBPC Period: Annualized Flare Rate

    A flare was defined as either 1 or more new BILAG-2004 A (severe disease activity) or 2 or more new BILAG-2004 B (moderate disease activity) items compared to the previous visit. The occurrence of a new flare was checked for each available visit versus the previous available visit up to Week 52. If no new flares occurred, the number of flares was set to 0. Otherwise all flares were counted leading to the maximum number of flares of 13. The annualized flare rate was calculated as the number of flares divided by the flare exposure time in days multiplied with 365.25 (1 year). The flare exposure time is the time up to Week 52 (date of BILAG-2004 assessment at Week 52) or up to the date of last available BILAG 2004 assessment.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 52

  7. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Low Disease Activity Status, Defined by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Score of Less Than or Equal (<= ) 2 at Week 52

    Low disease activity is defined as SLEDAI-2K score <=2. SLEDAI-2K is an activity index that measures disease activity and records feature of active lupus as present or not present. SLEDAI-2K uses a weighted checklist to assign a numerical score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms at the time of assessment or during the previous 30 days. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms).

    Measured: Week 52

  8. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Low Disease Activity Status, Defined by Clinical Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Score of Less Than or Equal (<= ) 2 at Week 52

    Low disease activity is defined as SLEDAI-2K score <=2. SLEDAI-2K is an activity index that measures disease activity and records feature of active lupus as present or not present. SLEDAI-2K uses a weighted checklist to assign a numerical score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms at the time of assessment or during the previous 30 days. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms). Clinical SLEDAI-2K score is equal to the SLEDAI-2K score from electronic case report form (eCRF) excluding the components 'Increased Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) Binding' and 'Low Complement'.

    Measured: Week 52

  9. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52

    SLEDAI-2K is an activity index that measures disease activity and records feature of active lupus as present or not present. SLEDAI-2K uses a weighted checklist to assign a numerical score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms at the time of assessment or during the previous 30 days. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52

  10. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CLASI-A) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52

    CLASI is an validated measurement instrument for lupus erythematosus developed for use in clinical studies that consists of separate scores for the activity of the disease (CLASI-A). The CLASI activity score is calculated on the basis of erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and non-scarring alopecia. The CLASI activity score ranges from 0-70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease. Severity categories based on the CLASI activity score are as follows: mild (0-9), moderate (10-20), and severe (21-70).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52

  11. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on BILAG-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) at Week 52

    BICLA response defined as participants meeting following criteria: [1] At least one gradation of improvement in baseline BILAG scores in all body systems with moderate or severe disease activity at entry (example: all A (severe disease) scores falling to B (moderate), C (mild), or D (no activity) and all B scores falling to C or D; [2] No new BILAG A or more than one new BILAG B scores; [3] No worsening of total SLEDAI-2K score from baseline; [4] No significant deterioration (=<10%) in physician's global assessment and [5] No treatment failure (initiation of non-protocol treatment).

    Measured: Week 52

  12. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-2004 Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52

    BILAG 2004 disease activity Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. BILAG evaluated by scoring each of a list of signs and symptoms as: improving (1); same (2); worse (3); new (4); not present (0); not done (ND). Total BILAG score is sum of scores of 9 domains where A=12, B=8, C=1, D=0, and E=0. Total score ranges from 0 to 108 with a higher score indicating greater lupus activity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52

  13. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52

    The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was recorded using the 100 millimeter horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Physician rated participant's disease activity on a scale ranged from 0-100 millimeter (mm), where 0 indicated no disease activity and 100 represented maximum disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52

  14. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical Component Summary Score and Mental Component Summary Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52

    The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) was a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being. These eight subscales were summarized as relating to either physical health or mental health. Physical component summary (PCS) was based primarily on physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health scales and mental component summary (MCS) encompasses vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health scales. Score from mental health, role emotional, social functioning, and vitality domains were averaged to calculate MCS. Total score range for MCS was 0 - 100 (100 = highest level of mental functioning). Score from physical function, role physical, bodily pain, and general health domains were averaged to calculate PCS. Total score range for PCS was 0-100 (100 = highest level of physical functioning).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52

  15. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Health Outcome Questionnaire at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52

    The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a generic measure of health status that provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value. The EQ-5D-5L profile defines health in terms of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. Each dimension has five levels: 1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, and 5: extreme problems. Responses were used to generate a weighted summary index (EQ-5D index), which ranges from 0 (dead) to 1.00 (perfect health). A higher score indicates better health and positive changes from baseline indicate improvement of health.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52

  16. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52

    The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a generic measure of health status that provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value. The EQ-5D-5L profile defines health in terms of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. Each dimension has five levels: 1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, and 5: extreme problems. The responses were used to derive overall score using a visual analog scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm), where 0 was the worst health you can imagine and 100 was the best health you can imagine.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52

  17. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL) Questionnaire Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52

    The Lupus QoL assessment is a 34 item questionnaire across 8 domains that is designed to find out how systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) affects a participant's life. Domains include physical health, pain, planning, intimate relationships, burden to others, emotional health, body image, and fatigue. Participants indicate their responses on a 5-point Likert response format, where 4=never, 3=occasionally, 2= a good bit of the time, 1=most of the time, and 0=worst of the time. Summary scores can be calculated for all 8 domains. A LupusQoL score for each domain was reported on a 0 to 100 scale, with greater values indicating better health related QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52

  18. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale Score of Any Improvement, no Change and Any Worsening

    The PGIC is a self-rated scale that asks the participant to describe the change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall quality of life (QoL) related to the participants painful condition on the following scale: 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse) and 7 (very much worse). Number of participants in the PGIC categories of any improvement (that is PGIC scale score 1, 2 or 3), no change (that is PGIC scale score 4) and any worsening (that is PGIC scale score 5, 6 or 7) are reported.

    Measured: Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52

  19. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52

    The FACIT-Fatigue score was calculated according to a 13-item questionnaire that assess self reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. It uses a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse possible score) to 52 (best score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52

  20. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Prednisone Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Dose by >=25% to a Dose of <=7.5 Milligram Per Day (mg/Day), With no BILAG A or 2B Flare in Disease Activity at Week 52

    BILAG A or 2B flare is defined as at least one BILAG A grade or two BILAG B grade in any organ system due to items that are new or worse, compared to the BILAG evaluation at the previous visit, during the 52 week treatment period. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 52

  21. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Prednisone Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Daily Dose at at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52

    Change From Baseline in Prednisone-equivalent CS Daily Dose at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52 were reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52

  22. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Reduction From Baseline in Prednisone Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Daily Dose by > 0 to 25%, >25% to 50%, >50% to 100% or an Increase at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52

    Number of Participants With Reduction From Baseline in Prednisone-equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Daily Dose by > 0 to 25%, >25% to 50%, >50% to 100% or an Increase at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52 were reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52

  23. DBPC Period: Cumulative Prednisone Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Dose at Week 52

    Cumulative Prednisone-equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Dose was calculated at Week 52.

    Measured: Week 52

  24. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With a Sustained Reduction of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Dose to 7.5 mg Prednisone Equivalent Per Day or Less With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Week 52

    SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor).

    Measured: Week 52

  25. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With a Sustained Reduction of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Dose to 7.5 mg Prednisone Equivalent Per Day or Less With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 6 (SRI-6) at Week 52

    SRI-6 response was defined as >= 6-point reduction in SLEDAI-2K total score, no new BILAG A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system :A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor).

    Measured: Week 52

  26. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With a Sustained Reduction of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Dose to 7.5 mg Prednisone Equivalent Per Day or Less With Response Based on SRI-4 at Week 52 in Serologically Active Subgroup

    SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale = from very well(0)-very poor(100).

    Measured: Week 52

  27. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) at Week 52

    Lupus low disease activity state will be measured as: SLEDAI-2K <= 4; No activity in any major organ systems (renal, central nervous system, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, fever); No new features of disease activity compared with the previous assessment; Prednisone-equivalent <= 7.5 milligram per day; Unchanged background immunosuppressive therapy.

    Measured: Week 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Nov 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start4 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completion27 Nov 2019
  4. Study completion23 Mar 2020

Why it stopped: Study is completed; primary analysis completed.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
469 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02975336
Sponsor's protocol ID
MS200527-0018
Other IDs
2016-002950-19, 2016
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
23 Nov 2016
Last updated
12 Apr 2021
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Montalban X, Wallace D, Genovese MC, Tomic D, Parsons-Rich D, Bolay CL, Kao AH, Guehring H. A plain language summary of what clinical studies can tell us about the safety of evobrutinib - a potential treatment for multiple sclerosis. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2023 Aug;13(4):207-213. doi: 10.2217/nmt-2023-0003. Epub 2023 Jun 22.

    PubMed 37345645
  • Montalban X, Wallace D, Genovese MC, Tomic D, Parsons-Rich D, Le Bolay C, Kao AH, Guehring H. Characterisation of the safety profile of evobrutinib in over 1000 patients from phase II clinical trials in multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus: an integrated safety analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;94(1):1-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2022-328799. Epub 2022 Nov 23.

    PubMed 36418156
  • Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.

    PubMed 33687069

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing M2951 in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. at 157 sites in 19 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 157 sites in United States, Japan, Argentina, Mexico, Peru and 14 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Dec 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Response Based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Week 52 (time frame: Week 52). The study lists 29 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02975336, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Apr 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in