Perinatal DepressionMInD-INCT02976025
Remote Supervision for Implementing Collaborative Care for Perinatal Depression
A study testing Longitudinal Remote Consultation and Collaborative Care in people with Perinatal Depression, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study evaluates the impact of a longitudinal remote consultation (LRC) implementation strategy for collaborative care depression treatment among perinatal women. All participating health centers will receive training in collaborative care. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Perinatal Depression
- What is being tested?
- Longitudinal Remote Consultation and Collaborative Care
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2017to Jul 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient participants must be perinatal women,
- Age 18-45,
- Receiving care at one of the 20 OCHIN or non-OCHIN health centers participating in the study and must have major depression as determined by a score of ≥10 on the PHQ-9 depression screener.
- Use of the shared OCHIN Epic electronic record for perinatal care or use of the secure AIMS CMTS/Caseload Tracker/spreadsheet patient registry for perinatal care and
- A minimum of 50 prenatal patients annually.
Who cannot join
- Age <18 or >45,
- Male.
- Health Center Participating Sites:
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This study evaluates the impact of a longitudinal remote consultation (LRC) implementation strategy for collaborative care depression treatment among perinatal women. All participating health centers will receive training in collaborative care. Cluster randomization will be used to assign the addition of LRC to select health centers. Differences in implementation success, clinical outcomes, and costs will be compared after a 12 month implementation period and 13-21 month sustainment period.
Read the detailed description
Depression is a common and serious disorder among pregnant women but few from low income groups receive effective treatment. The highly evidence based collaborative care (CC) model for depression has been shown to work for women in pregnancy but has not been widely implemented in this population. The proposed study targets improving dissemination of the evidence based CC treatment model for pregnant and postpartum women with depression, a common disorder of the perinatal period (pregnancy and the first year following birth). Longitudinal remote consultation (LRC) is an implementation strategy that has been have shown to improve fidelity to evidence-based practices and patient outcomes for mental health innovations. The investigators believe LRC can be used with equal benefit for complex interventions such as CC.
The purpose of this study is to compare two implementation strategies for Collaborative Care depression treatment: 1) standard implementation and 2) standard implementation + Longitudinal Remote Consultation (LRC). This research is being done in order to assess implementation and patient outcomes in sites receiving a standard implementation approach with and without LRC. The results of the proposed study will provide information on the benefits and relative value of ongoing consultation, such as LRC, for implementation of complex interventions like collaborative care.
The proposed study will involve twenty health centers providing prenatal care which are part of the national OCHIN Network or other health center network. All sites will receive a standard implementation approach. After pre-implementation training ten of the sites will be randomly selected to receive LRC. Implementation and clinical outcomes as well as costs will be compared between the study conditions after a 12 month implementation period and a 13-21 month sustainment period. The results of the proposed study will provide critical generalizable knowledge regarding the benefits of ongoing consultation for implementation of complex interventions like collaborative care.
- Conditions
- Perinatal Depression
- Being tested
- Longitudinal Remote Consultation, Collaborative Care
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Longitudinal Remote ConsultationOther
Also called LRC
Longitudinal Remote Consultation utilizes video conferencing to efficiently link providers to consultants who provide timely feedback and training in collaborative care. LRC will be provided in addition to standard collaborative care training and support.
Collaborative CareOther
Also called CC
Standard collaborative care implementation training and support.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Longitudinal Remote Consultation | Experimental | This is the active treatment arm consisting of 10 cluster randomized health centers receiving both training in collaborative care and longitudinal remote consultation (LRC) support. Receives: Other: Longitudinal Remote Consultation |
| Collaborative Care | Active comparator | This comparator arm will consist of 10 cluster randomized health centers who receive training in collaborative care. Receives: Other: Collaborative Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical depression outcomes
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9); level of depression symptomatology and functional impairment.
Measured: 12 months post-initiation of collaborative care
Secondary outcomes (1)
Implementation outcomes
To assess the degree to which sites in the two conditions complete implementation, the investigators will use the Stages of Implementation Completion tool tailored for collaborative care, SIC-CC.
Measured: 12 month post-implementation of collaborative care
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study start1 Apr 2017
- Primary completionJul 2021 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Perinatal DepressionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of WashingtonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Washington
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- OCHIN, Inc., Oregon Social Learning Center, University of Pennsylvania, Washington University School of Medicine, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ian Bennett, University of Washington
- Investigators
- Ian Bennett, Principal investigator, University of Washington
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02976025
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00001294
- Other IDs
- 1R01MH108548-01
- Acronym
- MInD-I
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 23 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 28 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: We intend to share de-identified data once study is complete.
Publications
Grover T, Bennett IM, Campbell M, Vredevoogd M, Saldana L. Implementation cost analysis of collaborative care for perinatal mental health in community health centers. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 Nov 27:rs.3.rs-5256122. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5256122/v1.
PubMed 39649162
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Remote Supervision for Implementing Collaborative Care for Perinatal Depression
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02976025
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MInD-I / STUDY00001294
- Conditions
- Perinatal Depression
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of WashingtonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- OCHIN, Inc., Oregon Social Learning Center, University of Pennsylvania, Washington University School of Medicine, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the impact of a longitudinal remote consultation (LRC) implementation strategy for collaborative care depression treatment among perinatal women. All participating health centers will receive training in collaborative care. Cluster randomization will be used to assign the addition of LRC to select health centers. Differences in implementation success, clinical outcomes, and costs will be compared after a 12 month implementation period and 13-21 month sustainment period.
Detailed description
Depression is a common and serious disorder among pregnant women but few from low income groups receive effective treatment. The highly evidence based collaborative care (CC) model for depression has been shown to work for women in pregnancy but has not been widely implemented in this population. The proposed study targets improving dissemination of the evidence based CC treatment model for pregnant and postpartum women with depression, a common disorder of the perinatal period (pregnancy and the first year following birth). Longitudinal remote consultation (LRC) is an implementation strategy that has been have shown to improve fidelity to evidence-based practices and patient outcomes for mental health innovations. The investigators believe LRC can be used with equal benefit for complex interventions such as CC.
The purpose of this study is to compare two implementation strategies for Collaborative Care depression treatment: 1) standard implementation and 2) standard implementation + Longitudinal Remote Consultation (LRC). This research is being done in order to assess implementation and patient outcomes in sites receiving a standard implementation approach with and without LRC. The results of the proposed study will provide information on the benefits and relative value of ongoing consultation, such as LRC, for implementation of complex interventions like collaborative care.
The proposed study will involve twenty health centers providing prenatal care which are part of the national OCHIN Network or other health center network. All sites will receive a standard implementation approach. After pre-implementation training ten of the sites will be randomly selected to receive LRC. Implementation and clinical outcomes as well as costs will be compared between the study conditions after a 12 month implementation period and a 13-21 month sustainment period. The results of the proposed study will provide critical generalizable knowledge regarding the benefits of ongoing consultation for implementation of complex interventions like collaborative care.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Longitudinal Remote Consultation | Experimental | Other: Longitudinal Remote ConsultationThis is the active treatment arm consisting of 10 cluster randomized health centers receiving both training in collaborative care and longitudinal remote consultation (LRC) support. |
| Collaborative Care | Active comparator | Other: Collaborative CareThis comparator arm will consist of 10 cluster randomized health centers who receive training in collaborative care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patient participants must be perinatal women,
- Age 18-45,
- Receiving care at one of the 20 OCHIN or non-OCHIN health centers participating in the study and must have major depression as determined by a score of ≥10 on the PHQ-9 depression screener.
- Use of the shared OCHIN Epic electronic record for perinatal care or use of the secure AIMS CMTS/Caseload Tracker/spreadsheet patient registry for perinatal care and
- A minimum of 50 prenatal patients annually.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age <18 or >45,
- Male.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Longitudinal Remote ConsultationAlso: LRCLongitudinal Remote Consultation utilizes video conferencing to efficiently link providers to consultants who provide timely feedback and training in collaborative care. LRC will be provided in addition to standard collaborative care training and support. | Other | Longitudinal Remote Consultation |
| Collaborative CareAlso: CCStandard collaborative care implementation training and support. | Other | Collaborative Care |
Primary outcome
Clinical depression outcomes
Time frame: 12 months post-initiation of collaborative care
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9); level of depression symptomatology and functional impairment.
1 secondary outcome
Implementation outcomes
Time frame: 12 month post-implementation of collaborative care
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Apr 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39649162Grover T, Bennett IM, Campbell M, Vredevoogd M, Saldana L. Implementation cost analysis of collaborative care for perinatal mental health in community health centers. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 Nov 27:rs.3.rs-5256122. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5256122/v1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. We intend to share de-identified data once study is complete.
Related trials for Perinatal Depression
Not yet recruiting
e-Perinatal Butterfly: An Embedded Study for Parents Experiencing Perinatal Loss
Depressive Symptoms, Perinatal Loss
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Resources, Inspiration, Support and Empowerment (RISE) for Black Pregnant Women
Pregnancy Related, Pregnancy Complications
Not yet recruiting
Improving Perinatal Mental Health Through a Collaborative, Community Health Worker and Social Worker Intervention
Perinatal Anxiety, Perinatal Depression
Recruiting
Deconstructing Maternal Burdens: Doulas and the Community Unite for Health
Pregnancy, Post Partum
Not yet recruiting
Healthy Adaptation to Pregnancy, Postpartum and Parenthood
Perinatal Mental Health, Gestational Weight Gain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ian Bennett principal investigator
University of Washington
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Longitudinal Remote Consultation and Collaborative Care in people with Perinatal Depression, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical depression outcomes (time frame: 12 months post-initiation of collaborative care). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02976025, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Apr 2021.