Allergic ConjunctivitisPhase 2NCT02978183
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of ST266 Ophthalmic Drops Compared to Placebo to Treat Allergic Conjunctivitis
A Phase 2 study testing ST266 and Saline (0.9% NaCl) in people with Allergic Conjunctivitis, run by Noveome Biotherapeutics, formerly Stemnion at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ST266 ophthalmic drops compared to placebo for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Allergic Conjunctivitis
- What is being tested?
- ST266 and Saline (0.9% NaCl)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2016to Nov 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- be at least 18 years of age of either gender and any race;
- provide written informed consent and sign the HIPAA form;
- be willing and able to follow all instructions and attend all study visits; have a positive history of ocular allergies and a positive skin test reaction to a seasonal AND perennial allergen as confirmed by an allergic skin test;
- be able and willing to avoid all disallowed medication for the appropriate washout period and during the study;
- be able and willing to discontinue wearing contact lenses for at least 72 hours prior to and during the study trial period;
- (for females capable of becoming pregnant) agree to have urine pregnancy testing performed at screening (must be negative) and at the study exit; must not be lactating; and must agree to use a medically acceptable form of birth control throughout the study duration and for at least 14 days prior to instillation of investigational product). Women considered capable of becoming pregnant include all females who have experienced menarche and have not experienced menopause (as defined by amenorrhea for greater than 12 consecutive months) or have not undergone successful surgical sterilization (hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy);
Show all 10Show fewer
- have a calculated visual acuity of 0.7 logMAR or better in each eye as measured using an ETDRS chart;
- have a positive post-CAC reaction;
- have a positive post-CAC reaction in two out of the first three time points;
- be able to self-administer eye drops satisfactorily or have a caregiver at home routinely available for this purpose.
Who cannot join
- have known contraindications or sensitivities to the use of the investigational product or any of its components;
- have any ocular condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect the subject's safety or trial parameters (including but not limited to narrow angle glaucoma, clinically significant blepharitis, follicular conjunctivitis, iritis, or pterygium);
- have had ocular surgical intervention within 3 months prior to initiating the study or during the study and/or a history of refractive surgery within the past 6 months;
- have a known history of retinal detachment, diabetic retinopathy, or active retinal disease;
- have the presence of an active ocular infection (bacterial, viral or fungal) or positive history of an ocular herpetic infection at any visit;
- use any of the disallowed medications during the period indicated prior to and during the study;
Show all 12Show fewer
- have any significant illness (e.g. any autoimmune disease requiring therapy, severe cardiovascular disease [including arrhythmias]) the investigator feels could be expected to interfere with the subject's health or with the study parameters and/or put the subject at any unnecessary risk (includes but is not limited to: poorly controlled hypertension or poorly controlled diabetes, a history of status asthmaticus, organ transplants, a known history of persistent moderate or severe asthma, or a known history of moderate to severe allergic asthmatic reactions to any of the study allergens);
- manifest signs or symptoms of clinically active allergic conjunctivitis in either eye at the screening visit;
- have planned surgery (ocular or systemic) during the trial period or within 30 days after;
- have used an investigational drug or medical device within 30 days of the study or be concurrently enrolled in another investigational product trial;
- be a female who is currently pregnant, planning a pregnancy, or lactating.
- have cancer or have a history of cancer within the last 5 years.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Study site
Andover, Massachusetts, 01810
Study site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
About this study
Official title: A Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Randomized, Phase 2 Evaluation of the Effectiveness of ST266 Ophthalmic Drops Compared to Placebo for the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis Using a Modified Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ST266 ophthalmic drops compared to placebo for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.
Read the detailed description
The study is a multi-center, double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled, modified conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) model. The primary endpoints of ocular itching and conjunctival redness will be evaluated at the subject's final visit. Subjects who meet inclusion criteria will be randomized to one of two treatment groups (1:1). Randomization will be stratified by average post-CAC itching scores at baseline.
Subjects will be evaluated at baseline and on Days 6, 7 and 8.
- Conditions
- Allergic Conjunctivitis
- Being tested
- ST266, Saline (0.9% NaCl)
- Medical subject headings
- Conjunctivitis, Allergic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ST266Biological
One (1) drop of 1X ST266 ophthalmic eye drops will be administered to each eye 4 times a day for 8 days.
Saline (0.9% NaCl)Drug
One (1) drop of saline ophthalmic eye drops will be administered to each eye 4 times a day for 8 days.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Active comparator | 1X ST266 dosed 4 times a day for 8 days Receives: Biological: ST266 |
| Group 2 | Placebo comparator | Placebo dosed 4 times a day for 8 days Receives: Drug: Saline (0.9% NaCl) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ocular Itching
Ocular itching evaluated by the subject. Ocular itching was evaluated on a 0-4 scale (with half unit increments allowed). Lower scores indicated less itching.
Measured: Day 7 and 8
Conjunctival Redness
Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator. Conjunctival redness was evaluated on a 0-4 scale (with half unit increments allowed). Lower scores indicated less redness.
Measured: Day 7 and 8
Secondary outcomes (10)
Ciliary Redness
Ciliary redness evaluated by the investigator. Ciliary redness was evaluated on a 0-4 scale (with half unit increments allowed). A lower score was indicative of less redness.
Measured: Day 7 and 8
Episcleral Redness
Episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator. Episcleral redness was evaluated on a 0-4 scale (with half unit increments allowed). A lower score was indicative of less redness.
Measured: Day 7 and 8
Chemosis
Chemosis evaluated by the investigator. Chemosis was evaluated on a 0-4 scale (with half unit increments allowed). A lower score was indicative of less chemosis.
Measured: Day 7 and 8
Eyelid Swelling
Eyelid swelling evaluated by the subject. Eyelid swelling was evaluated on a 0-4 scale in which 0.5 unit increments were not allowed. A lower score was indicative of less swelling.
Measured: Day 7 and 8
Tearing/Watery Eyes
Tearing evaluated by the subject. Tearing was evaluated on a 0-4 scale in which 0.5 unit increments were not allowed. A lower score was indicative of less tearing.
Measured: Day 7 and 8
Rhinorrhea
Rhinorrhea evaluated by the subject. Rhinorrhea was evaluated on a 0-4 scale in which 0.5 unit increments were not allowed. A lower score was indicative of less severity.
Measured: Day 7 and 8
Nasal Pruritus
Nasal Pruritus evaluated by the subject. Nasal pruritus was evaluated on a 0-4 scale in which 0.5 unit increments were not allowed. A lower score was indicative of less severity.
Measured: Day 7 and 8
Ear or Palate Pruritus
Ear or palate pruritus evaluated by the subject. Ear or palate pruritus was evaluated on a 0-4 scale in which 0.5 unit increments were not allowed. A lower score was indicative of less severity.
Measured: Day 7 and 8
Nasal Congestion
Nasal congestion evaluated by the subject. Nasal congestion was evaluated on a 0-4 scale in which 0.5 unit increments were not allowed. A lower score was indicative of less severity.
Measured: Day 7 and 8
Nasal Composite Score
A composite score of presence or absence of at least one nasal symptom evaluated by the subject
Measured: Day 7 and 8
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2016
- Primary completionFeb 2017
- Study completionNov 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Allergic ConjunctivitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Noveome Biotherapeutics, formerly Stemnion
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02978183
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ST266-AC-201
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 28 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 10 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Randomized, Phase 2 Evaluation of the Effectiveness of ST266 Ophthalmic Drops Compared to Placebo for the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis Using a Modified Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02978183
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ST266-AC-201
- Conditions
- Allergic Conjunctivitis
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Noveome Biotherapeutics, formerly StemnionIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 Sep 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ST266 ophthalmic drops compared to placebo for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.
Detailed description
The study is a multi-center, double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled, modified conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) model. The primary endpoints of ocular itching and conjunctival redness will be evaluated at the subject's final visit. Subjects who meet inclusion criteria will be randomized to one of two treatment groups (1:1). Randomization will be stratified by average post-CAC itching scores at baseline.
Subjects will be evaluated at baseline and on Days 6, 7 and 8.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Active comparator | Biological: ST2661X ST266 dosed 4 times a day for 8 days |
| Group 2 | Placebo comparator | Drug: Saline (0.9% NaCl)Placebo dosed 4 times a day for 8 days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- be at least 18 years of age of either gender and any race;
- provide written informed consent and sign the HIPAA form;
- be willing and able to follow all instructions and attend all study visits; have a positive history of ocular allergies and a positive skin test reaction to a seasonal AND perennial allergen as confirmed by an allergic skin test;
- be able and willing to avoid all disallowed medication for the appropriate washout period and during the study;
- be able and willing to discontinue wearing contact lenses for at least 72 hours prior to and during the study trial period;
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- have known contraindications or sensitivities to the use of the investigational product or any of its components;
- have any ocular condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect the subject's safety or trial parameters (including but not limited to narrow angle glaucoma, clinically significant blepharitis, follicular conjunctivitis, iritis, or pterygium);
- have had ocular surgical intervention within 3 months prior to initiating the study or during the study and/or a history of refractive surgery within the past 6 months;
- have a known history of retinal detachment, diabetic retinopathy, or active retinal disease;
- have the presence of an active ocular infection (bacterial, viral or fungal) or positive history of an ocular herpetic infection at any visit;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ST266One (1) drop of 1X ST266 ophthalmic eye drops will be administered to each eye 4 times a day for 8 days. | Biological | Group 1 |
| Saline (0.9% NaCl)One (1) drop of saline ophthalmic eye drops will be administered to each eye 4 times a day for 8 days. | Drug | Group 2 |
Primary outcome
Ocular Itching
Time frame: Day 7 and 8
Ocular itching evaluated by the subject. Ocular itching was evaluated on a 0-4 scale (with half unit increments allowed). Lower scores indicated less itching.
Conjunctival Redness
Time frame: Day 7 and 8
Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator. Conjunctival redness was evaluated on a 0-4 scale (with half unit increments allowed). Lower scores indicated less redness.
10 secondary outcomes
Ciliary Redness
Time frame: Day 7 and 8
Episcleral Redness
Time frame: Day 7 and 8
Chemosis
Time frame: Day 7 and 8
Eyelid Swelling
Time frame: Day 7 and 8
Tearing/Watery Eyes
Time frame: Day 7 and 8
Rhinorrhea
Time frame: Day 7 and 8
Nasal Pruritus
Time frame: Day 7 and 8
Ear or Palate Pruritus
Time frame: Day 7 and 8
Nasal Congestion
Time frame: Day 7 and 8
Nasal Composite Score
Time frame: Day 7 and 8
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Apr 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Allergic Conjunctivitis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fel d 1 Monoclonal Antibodies in Adult and Pediatric Participants With Allergic Conjunctivitis Due to Cat Allergy
Allergic Conjunctivitis
Recruiting
Daydrop® Triple Action for Allergic Eye Symptoms
Allergic Conjunctivitis of Both Eyes
RecruitingPhase 3
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Cenegermin Ophthalmic Solution Compared With Vehicle in the Treatment of PCED
Persistent Corneal Epithelial Defect
RecruitingObservational study
Investigating Nasal and Ocular Immune Response to Conjunctival Allergen Exposure
Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
RecruitingObservational study
Treatment of Ocular Surface Inflammations
Ocular Surface Allergy, Conjunctivitis, Allergic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing ST266 and Saline (0.9% NaCl) in people with Allergic Conjunctivitis, run by Noveome Biotherapeutics, formerly Stemnion at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Sep 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ocular Itching (time frame: Day 7 and 8). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Apr 2023.