ScoliosisNCT02978820
The Comparison of Core Stabilization Exercise With Scientific Exercise Approach to Scoliosis in Idiopathic Scoliosis
A study testing SEAS exercise and CS exercise in people with Scoliosis and Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis, run by Hacettepe University.
Trial summary
Scoliosis specific exercises have been shown to improve curve progression but there have been few studies that compare the different exercise approaches in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 16 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Scoliosis, Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
- What is being tested?
- SEAS exercise and CS exercise
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Nov 2015to Nov 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 16 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- The patients included in the current study were consecutive adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis seen in our department who were referred to receive both brace and exercise treatment conservatively. Additional inclusion criteria included the following: female gender; at least age 12 years; primary curve magnitude between 20 and 45 degrees of Cobb angle; double curve (right thoracic-left lumbar) or single thoracolumbar curve having an apex in the main thoracic region; Risser 2-3 and no previous treatment.
Who cannot join
- Exclusion criteria for both groups were as follows: evidence of congenital curve; neuromuscular, rheumatologic, renal, cardiovascular, pulmonary or vestibular diseases or surgical correction history.
About this study
Official title: Core Stabilization Exercise Versus Scientific Exercises Approach to Scoliosis in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Randomized Single Blind Trial
Scoliosis specific exercises have been shown to improve curve progression but there have been few studies that compare the different exercise approaches in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The objective of this study was to compare the effects of Core stabilization (CS) exercises with Scientific Exercises Approach to Scoliosis (SEAS exercises) in addition to brace wearing in patients with AIS. It is important to compare different exercise methods on different aspects of scoliotic deformity, such as curve progression, angle of trunk rotation, body symmetry, cosmetic trunk deformity, satisfaction with treatment and quality of life.
Read the detailed description
The aim of this study was to investigate whether adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis receiving scoliosis specific exercise approach, such as SEAS exercises, in accordance with the bracing approach for moderate curves would have greater improvement in curve progression, trunk deformity, body symmetry and quality of life than adolescent receiving exercise therapy based on the general core stabilization approach with similar intensity. Thirty female patients with AIS aged 12 to16 years, who have moderate curves (20 to 45 degree) randomly divided into two groups. One group received CS exercise, while other received SEAS exercise for forty-min once weekly for four months. Both groups underwent full-time bracing (23 hours per day) intervention. Outcome was based on Cobb angle, angle of trunk rotation, body symmetry (Posterior Trunk Symmetry Index), cosmetic trunk deformity (Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale) and quality of life (Scoliosis Research Society - 22 Questionnaire) measured at baseline and after intervention period. Results were analyzed using the paired sample t-test to compare repeated measurements and independent sample t-test to compare the groups.
- Conditions
- Scoliosis, Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
- Being tested
- SEAS exercise, CS exercise
- Keywords
- scientific exercise approach to scoliosis, core stabilization training, bracing, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
- Medical subject headings
- Scoliosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SEAS exerciseOther
Patient were referred by medical doctor with a prescription of brace and exercise training for their moderate scoliotic curves. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. The SEAS group received SEAS exercises one times in a week for four months. In addition patients in SEAS groups were wearing spinal brace for their scoliosis in this period
CS exerciseOther
Patient were referred by medical doctor with a prescription of brace and exercise training for their moderate scoliotic curves. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. The CS group received core stabilization exercise training one times in a week for four months. In addition patients in SEAS groups were wearing spinal brace for their scoliosis in this period
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SEAS exercise group | Experimental | This group received SEAS exercises in addition to brace wearing for four months Receives: Other: SEAS exercise |
| CS exercise group | Experimental | This group received core stabilization exercise training (CS) in addition to brace wearing for four months Receives: Other: CS exercise |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Cobb angle
Cobb angle is considered a gold standard to determine the magnitude of spinal curve on frontal plan radiograph
Measured: Change from baseline Cobb angle at 4 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Chance in Posterior trunk symmetry index
Posterior trunk symmetry index includes the sensitive assessment of the frontal plane asymmetry of trunk deformity as a two-dimensional surface topographic method in scoliosis. The index based on assessing trunk asymmetry with regard to C7 plumb line, shoulder and hip asymmetry based on back surface photograph of patient.
Measured: Change from baseline trunk symmetry at 4 months
Change in Walter reed visual assessment scale
Walter reed visual assessment scale assesses patient's cosmetic trunk deformity with set of figures representing seven visible aspects of spinal deformity: Item 1, spinal deformity; item 2, rib prominence; item 3, lumbar prominence; item 4, thoracic deformity; item 5, trunk imbalance; item 6, shoulder asymmetry; and item 7, scapular asymmetry
Measured: Change from baseline cosmetic trunk deformity at 4 months
Change in Scoliosis Research Society 22 Questionnaire
Scoliosis Research Society 22 Questionnaire is widely used to evaluate the efficacy of several treatment regimens for idiopathic scoliosis from the patient's perception of his or her condition. The questionnaire consists of 22 items exploring 5 domains related to psychophysical wellbeing: function/activity level, pain, mental health, self-image and treatment satisfaction.
Measured: Change from baseline quality of life at 4 months
Change in Angle of trunk rotation
Angle of Trunk rotation is assessed with scoliometer in forward bending test
Measured: Change from baseline angle of trunk rotation at 4 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2015
- Primary completionSep 2016
- Study completionNov 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ScoliosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hacettepe UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hacettepe University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gözde Gür, Hacettepe University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02978820
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GO 16/82
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 20 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 1 Dec 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Negrini S, Aulisa AG, Aulisa L, Circo AB, de Mauroy JC, Durmala J, Grivas TB, Knott P, Kotwicki T, Maruyama T, Minozzi S, O'Brien JP, Papadopoulos D, Rigo M, Rivard CH, Romano M, Wynne JH, Villagrasa M, Weiss HR, Zaina F. 2011 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis. 2012 Jan 20;7(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-7-3.
PubMed 22264320Negrini S, Grivas TB, Kotwicki T, Maruyama T, Rigo M, Weiss HR; Members of the Scientific society On Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT). Why do we treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? What we want to obtain and to avoid for our patients. SOSORT 2005 Consensus paper. Scoliosis. 2006 Apr 10;1:4. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-1-4.
PubMed 16759352Weinstein SL. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: prevalence and natural history. Instr Course Lect. 1989;38:115-28.
PubMed 2649564Smania N, Picelli A, Romano M, Negrini S. Neurophysiological basis of rehabilitation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(10):763-71. doi: 10.1080/17483100801921311.
PubMed 18432434Fusco C, Zaina F, Atanasio S, Romano M, Negrini A, Negrini S. Physical exercises in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an updated systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract. 2011 Jan;27(1):80-114. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2010.533342.
PubMed 21198407Romano M, Negrini A, Parzini S, Tavernaro M, Zaina F, Donzelli S, Negrini S. SEAS (Scientific Exercises Approach to Scoliosis): a modern and effective evidence based approach to physiotherapic specific scoliosis exercises. Scoliosis. 2015 Feb 5;10:3. doi: 10.1186/s13013-014-0027-2. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 25729406Gur G, Ayhan C, Yakut Y. The effectiveness of core stabilization exercise in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A randomized controlled trial. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017 Jun;41(3):303-310. doi: 10.1177/0309364616664151. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
PubMed 27625122
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Dec 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Core Stabilization Exercise Versus Scientific Exercises Approach to Scoliosis in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Randomized Single Blind Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02978820
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GO 16/82
- Conditions
- Scoliosis, Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
- Keywords
- scientific exercise approach to scoliosis, core stabilization training, bracing, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hacettepe UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2015
- Primary completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Scoliosis specific exercises have been shown to improve curve progression but there have been few studies that compare the different exercise approaches in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The objective of this study was to compare the effects of Core stabilization (CS) exercises with Scientific Exercises Approach to Scoliosis (SEAS exercises) in addition to brace wearing in patients with AIS. It is important to compare different exercise methods on different aspects of scoliotic deformity, such as curve progression, angle of trunk rotation, body symmetry, cosmetic trunk deformity, satisfaction with treatment and quality of life.
Detailed description
The aim of this study was to investigate whether adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis receiving scoliosis specific exercise approach, such as SEAS exercises, in accordance with the bracing approach for moderate curves would have greater improvement in curve progression, trunk deformity, body symmetry and quality of life than adolescent receiving exercise therapy based on the general core stabilization approach with similar intensity. Thirty female patients with AIS aged 12 to16 years, who have moderate curves (20 to 45 degree) randomly divided into two groups. One group received CS exercise, while other received SEAS exercise for forty-min once weekly for four months. Both groups underwent full-time bracing (23 hours per day) intervention. Outcome was based on Cobb angle, angle of trunk rotation, body symmetry (Posterior Trunk Symmetry Index), cosmetic trunk deformity (Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale) and quality of life (Scoliosis Research Society - 22 Questionnaire) measured at baseline and after intervention period. Results were analyzed using the paired sample t-test to compare repeated measurements and independent sample t-test to compare the groups.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SEAS exercise group | Experimental | Other: SEAS exerciseThis group received SEAS exercises in addition to brace wearing for four months |
| CS exercise group | Experimental | Other: CS exerciseThis group received core stabilization exercise training (CS) in addition to brace wearing for four months |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 16 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- The patients included in the current study were consecutive adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis seen in our department who were referred to receive both brace and exercise treatment conservatively. Additional inclusion criteria included the following: female gender; at least age 12 years; primary curve magnitude between 20 and 45 degrees of Cobb angle; double curve (right thoracic-left lumbar) or single thoracolumbar curve having an apex in the main thoracic region; Risser 2-3 and no previous treatment.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Exclusion criteria for both groups were as follows: evidence of congenital curve; neuromuscular, rheumatologic, renal, cardiovascular, pulmonary or vestibular diseases or surgical correction history.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SEAS exercisePatient were referred by medical doctor with a prescription of brace and exercise training for their moderate scoliotic curves. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. The SEAS group received SEAS exercises one times in a week for four months. In addition patients in SEAS groups were wearing spinal brace for their scoliosis in this period | Other | SEAS exercise group |
| CS exercisePatient were referred by medical doctor with a prescription of brace and exercise training for their moderate scoliotic curves. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. The CS group received core stabilization exercise training one times in a week for four months. In addition patients in SEAS groups were wearing spinal brace for their scoliosis in this period | Other | CS exercise group |
Primary outcome
Change in Cobb angle
Time frame: Change from baseline Cobb angle at 4 months
Cobb angle is considered a gold standard to determine the magnitude of spinal curve on frontal plan radiograph
4 secondary outcomes
Chance in Posterior trunk symmetry index
Time frame: Change from baseline trunk symmetry at 4 months
Change in Walter reed visual assessment scale
Time frame: Change from baseline cosmetic trunk deformity at 4 months
Change in Scoliosis Research Society 22 Questionnaire
Time frame: Change from baseline quality of life at 4 months
Change in Angle of trunk rotation
Time frame: Change from baseline angle of trunk rotation at 4 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Dec 2016.
- Background: PubMed 22264320Negrini S, Aulisa AG, Aulisa L, Circo AB, de Mauroy JC, Durmala J, Grivas TB, Knott P, Kotwicki T, Maruyama T, Minozzi S, O'Brien JP, Papadopoulos D, Rigo M, Rivard CH, Romano M, Wynne JH, Villagrasa M, Weiss HR, Zaina F. 2011 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis. 2012 Jan 20;7(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-7-3.
- Background: PubMed 16759352Negrini S, Grivas TB, Kotwicki T, Maruyama T, Rigo M, Weiss HR; Members of the Scientific society On Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT). Why do we treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? What we want to obtain and to avoid for our patients. SOSORT 2005 Consensus paper. Scoliosis. 2006 Apr 10;1:4. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-1-4.
- Background: PubMed 2649564Weinstein SL. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: prevalence and natural history. Instr Course Lect. 1989;38:115-28.
- Background: PubMed 18432434Smania N, Picelli A, Romano M, Negrini S. Neurophysiological basis of rehabilitation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(10):763-71. doi: 10.1080/17483100801921311.
- Background: PubMed 21198407Fusco C, Zaina F, Atanasio S, Romano M, Negrini A, Negrini S. Physical exercises in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an updated systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract. 2011 Jan;27(1):80-114. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2010.533342.
- Background: PubMed 25729406Romano M, Negrini A, Parzini S, Tavernaro M, Zaina F, Donzelli S, Negrini S. SEAS (Scientific Exercises Approach to Scoliosis): a modern and effective evidence based approach to physiotherapic specific scoliosis exercises. Scoliosis. 2015 Feb 5;10:3. doi: 10.1186/s13013-014-0027-2. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 27625122Gur G, Ayhan C, Yakut Y. The effectiveness of core stabilization exercise in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A randomized controlled trial. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017 Jun;41(3):303-310. doi: 10.1177/0309364616664151. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Scoliosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical and Biological Parameters in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS)
Recruiting
Studying Melatonin and Recovery in Teens
Juvenile; Scoliosis, Scoliosis Idiopathic
Recruiting
Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Clinician-Supervised Home-School-Hospital-Linked Digital Health Platform-Supported Conservative Management Pathway for AIS
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Construction of a Screening and Precision Intervention System for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Based on the DIERS Spinal Moiré System
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS)
Recruiting
Detecting and Monitoring Scoliosis Without Radiography: Standard Radiographic Monitoring Program Versus Self-Screening With Momentum SpineTM
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SEAS exercise and CS exercise in people with Scoliosis and Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis, run by Hacettepe University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Cobb angle (time frame: Change from baseline Cobb angle at 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02978820, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Dec 2016.