AzTrials
AzTrials

Neck PainNCT02979041

VR Training for Pilots With Neck Pain

A study testing Interactive virtual reality training in people with Neck Pain and Cervical Pain, run by University of Haifa at 2 sites in Israel.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the proposed study is to investigate the effectiveness of an interactive, virtual reality (VR) training program for pilots compared with standard care. The study will be a randomized controlled trial (RCT) consisting of 60 pilots randomized into one of two groups: standard physiotherapy and medical care vs… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Neck Pain, Cervical Pain
What is being tested?
Interactive virtual reality training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
47 participants
Where
2 sitesIsrael
Study dates
1 Sep 2016to 30 Dec 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • fighter and helicopter pilots from the Israeli Air Force
  • acute, sub-acute, and chronic neck pain, with or without referral to the upper limbs

Who cannot join

  • neurological disorders (e.g. evidence for positive neurological signs), systemic disease, history of spinal surgery, or any disorders that may limit the ability to exercise

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Israel2 sites
  • The Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences

    Haifa, 3498838

  • Medical Aviation Unit

    Tel Litwinsky

Other trials in Israel

About this study

Official title: Therapeutic Virtual Reality Training for Neck Pain in Israeli Air Force Pilots - A Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of the proposed study is to investigate the effectiveness of an interactive, virtual reality (VR) training program for pilots compared with standard care. The study will be a randomized controlled trial (RCT) consisting of 60 pilots randomized into one of two groups: standard physiotherapy and medical care vs standard care and VR training. Outcome measures will include subjective scores of pain intensity and global perceived effect; objective measures of range of motion (ROM), neck motion velocity, and motion accuracy; and functional measure of days grounded due to neck pain. Data will be analyzed using ANOVA for within and between groups analyses.

Read the detailed description

The aim of the proposed study is to investigate the effectiveness of an interactive, virtual reality (VR) training program for pilots compared with standard care. The proposed intervention program includes training in neck range of motion, control, accuracy and coordination and is expected to reduce the prevalence and operational impact of neck pain in the intervention group more effectively than does standard care alone.

The proposed study will be designed as a randomized, controlled trial (RCT). Sixty fighter and helicopter pilots will be randomized into two groups, to receive either standard physiotherapy and medical care or standard care with the addition of interactive, dynamic, controlled training (a self-exercise program) in VR to address the fast, accurate head control required in flying tasks.

Subjective outcome measures will include pain intensity and global perceived effect. Objective measures will include range of motion, motion velocity and accuracy. The functional measure will include days grounded due to neck pain.

Statistical analysis will use independent, repeated measures ANOVA on each parameter, within and between groups. Post hoc comparisons, including several preplanned contrasts, will be performed to assess differences before and after treatment, and the stability of changes over time, in each group. The relationship of risk factors to performance failures will be assessed using multivariate logistic regression analyses.

This study is the first in the Israeli Air Force to evaluate this type of comprehensive, functional intervention program. Such research will dramatically advance the military's health care approach to neck pain, and may be further applied to other populations in and outside the Israeli Defence Force (IDF). This study may serve as a stepping stone to further research related to diagnosis, treatment, and prevention methods during a pilot's active service.

Being tested
Interactive virtual reality training, Standard Care
Keywords
neck pain, Virtual reality, Range of motion, physiotherapy, Air force, kinematics
Medical subject headings
Neck Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Interactive virtual reality trainingBehavioural

    The proposed VR intervention program will provide active training to be performed individually 4 times a week for 20 minutes a session.

    The intervention program will be supervised by qualified, experienced physiotherapists, and will include individual training and two follow up meetings during the study period. The intervention program will include strengthening and endurance exercises for the cervical and shoulder girdle muscles. Training will include sensorimotor control and functional, quick, accurate, neck motion, using interactive VR training systems. This type of advanced training is very relevant to the pilots function in the cockpit as it includes interactive tasks aimed to increase range, speed, smoothness, accuracy, and control of cervical motion.

  • Standard CareOther

    physiotherapy and medical care as provided currently

Study groups in NCT02979041
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
controlActive comparatorPatients in the control group will receive standard physiotherapy and medical care, as provided to all patients with neck pain in the aviation medicine clinic. This will reflect the standard care that has been provided to all patients.
Receives: Other: Standard Care
interventionExperimentalStandard care (as provided to controls) with the addition of virtual reality training (a self-exercise program) using a VR system to address the fast, accurate head control required in flying tasks.
Receives: Behavioral: Interactive virtual reality training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain intensity is measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-100mm)

    Pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-100mm)

    Measured: change from baseline at 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months.

  2. Global perceived effect of the provided treatment is measured on a scale from -5 to +5.

    Global perceived effect of the provided treatment was measured on a scale from -5 to +5. Zero represented no change, +5 excellent improvement due to the treatment provided, and -5, vast worsening.

    Measured: change from baseline at 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months.

  3. Functional outcome is measured by the number of grounding days from flying due to neck pain.

    The number of days the pilot was grounded due to neck pain.

    Measured: change from baseline at 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months.

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Cervical range of motion is measured using the neck VR system (ROM, degrees)

    Cervical range of motion (ROM, degrees) is measured using the neck VR system, into flexion, extension, right and left rotation.

    Measured: change from baseline at 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months.

  2. Cervical motion velocity is measured using the neck VR system (degrees/second)

    Cervical motion velocity is measured using the neck VR system (degrees/second) into flexion, extension, right and left rotation.

    Measured: change from baseline at 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months.

  3. Cervical muscles isometric strength is measures using a dynamometer (Newton)

    Cervical muscles isometric strength is measures using a dynamometer (Newton), in the directions of static flexion and extension.

    Measured: change from baseline at 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Dec 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Sep 2016
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2017
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
47 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02979041
Sponsor's protocol ID
UHaifaAF
Status last verified
Jun 2016
First submitted
5 Oct 2016
Last updated
24 May 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • van den Oord MH, De Loose V, Meeuwsen T, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Neck pain in military helicopter pilots: prevalence and associated factors. Mil Med. 2010 Jan;175(1):55-60. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-09-00038.

    PubMed 20108843
  • Tucker B, Netto K, Hampson G, Oppermann B, Aisbett B. Predicting neck pain in Royal Australian Air Force fighter pilots. Mil Med. 2012 Apr;177(4):444-50. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-11-00256.

    PubMed 22594136
  • Grossman A, Nakdimon I, Chapnik L, Levy Y. Back symptoms in aviators flying different aircraft. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2012 Jul;83(7):702-5. doi: 10.3357/asem.3225.2012.

    PubMed 22779315
  • Knudson R, McMillan D, Doucette D, Seidel M. A comparative study of G-induced neck injury in pilots of the F/A-18, A-7, and A-4. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1988 Aug;59(8):758-60.

    PubMed 3178626
  • Sarig Bahat H, Weiss PL, Laufer Y. The effect of neck pain on cervical kinematics, as assessed in a virtual environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Dec;91(12):1884-90. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.007.

    PubMed 21112430
  • Jones JA, Hart SF, Baskin DS, Effenhauser R, Johnson SL, Novas MA, Jennings R, Davis J. Human and behavioral factors contributing to spine-based neurological cockpit injuries in pilots of high-performance aircraft: recommendations for management and prevention. Mil Med. 2000 Jan;165(1):6-12.

    PubMed 10658420
  • Ang BO, Monnier A, Harms-Ringdahl K. Neck/shoulder exercise for neck pain in air force helicopter pilots: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 15;34(16):E544-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa6870.

    PubMed 19770596
  • Alricsson M, Harms-Ringdahl K, Larsson B, Linder J, Werner S. Neck muscle strength and endurance in fighter pilots: effects of a supervised training program. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004 Jan;75(1):23-8.

    PubMed 14736129
  • Hamalainen O, Heinijoki H, Vanharanta H. Neck training and +Gz-related neck pain: a preliminary study. Mil Med. 1998 Oct;163(10):707-8.

    PubMed 9795549
  • Sarig Bahat H, Takasaki H, Chen X, Bet-Or Y, Treleaven J. Cervical kinematic training with and without interactive VR training for chronic neck pain - a randomized clinical trial. Man Ther. 2015 Feb;20(1):68-78. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Jul 5.

    PubMed 25066503

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Interactive virtual reality training in people with Neck Pain and Cervical Pain, run by University of Haifa at 2 sites in Israel.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain intensity is measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-100mm) (time frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02979041, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 May 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in