AzTrials
AzTrials

Patients Requiring Endotracheal Intubation and Invasive Mechanical VentilationNCT02981589

Weaning Outcome From Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

An observational study of Patients Requiring Endotracheal Intubation and Invasive Mechanical Ventilation, run by Beijing Chao Yang Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main purpose of the present study was to explore the weaning failure rate from invasive mechanical ventilation and to identify risk factors of weaning failure. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Invasive mechanical ventilation
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Jul 2013to 31 Mar 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients requiring endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation

Who may be able to join

  • Requiring endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation

Who cannot join

  • Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation < 48 hours;
  • Presence of tracheostomy;
  • Presence of upper airway obstruction.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Zujin Luo, MD contact

xmjg2002@163.com

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Respiratory intensive care unit, Beijing Chao Yang Hospital Jingxi Campus

    Beiling

    Zujin Luo, MD, xmjg2002@163.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Weaning Outcome From Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: a Prospective, Observational Cohort Study

The main purpose of the present study was to explore the weaning failure rate from invasive mechanical ventilation and to identify risk factors of weaning failure.

Being tested
Invasive mechanical ventilation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Invasive mechanical ventilationDevice

    Invasive ventilation was performed to all eligible patients. When patients met predefined criteria, spontaneous breathing trial was performed. Given spontaneous breathing trial passed, patients were extubated; on the contrary, patients would continue to receive invasive ventilation. If patients had respiratory failure after extubation, reintubation and invasive ventilation were necessary.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Weaning failure rate

    Measured: 3.5 years

  2. Spontaneous breathing trial failure rate

    Measured: 3.5 years

  3. Extubation failure rate

    Measured: 3.5 years

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. ICU mortality

    Measured: 3.5 years

  2. Hospital mortality

    Measured: 3.5 years

  3. ICU length of stay

    Measured: 3.5 years

  4. Hospital length of stay

    Measured: 3.5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Dec 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2013
  3. Primary completionDec 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02981589
Sponsor's protocol ID
BeijingCYH-ICU-003
Status last verified
Jun 2021
First submitted
1 Dec 2016
Last updated
2 Jul 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Luo Z, Zheng Y, Yang L, Liu S, Zhu J, Zhao N, Pang B, Cao Z, Ma Y. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio is helpful for predicting weaning failure: a prospective, observational cohort study. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Sep;10(9):5232-5245. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.08.68.

    PubMed 30416770

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Patients Requiring Endotracheal Intubation and Invasive Mechanical Ventilation, run by Beijing Chao Yang Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Zujin Luo, MD (xmjg2002@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Weaning failure rate (time frame: 3.5 years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02981589, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in