Ocular Motility DisordersNCT02981875
Oculomotor Training Improves Reading Eye Movement
A study testing oculomotor training in people with Ocular Motility Disorders, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
Trial summary
Children with reading eye movement problems were recruited for this study. The treatment group was provided with oculomotor training for 8 weeks, the control group was given placebo exercises. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 9 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Ocular Motility Disorders
- What is being tested?
- oculomotor training
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2015to 30 Sep 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 9 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Reported by teachers or parents to have reading difficulties and failed to meet the Taylor reading eye movement norms when tested with the Visagraph III (below age norm for both fixation and regression number).
- Studying in mainstream primary schools (8-9 years of age)
- With normal near visual acuities for both eyes (with or without spectacles)
- Hyperopia below +4.00 D
- Myopia below -4.00 D
- Astigmatism below -2.00 D
Show all 12Show fewer
- Anisometropia less than 2.0 D difference between the two eyes
- Near heterophoria within 0-4 exophoria
- Vertical heterophoria less than 1 prism dioptre
- Monocular amplitude of accommodation over 10 D in both eyes
- With parents who were willing to perform vision therapy exercises for the children at home on a regular basis
- Both genders were acceptable as Eden et al (1994) stated that gender had no effect on oculomotor skills
Who cannot join
- With strabismus
- Presence of eye diseases
- History of dyslexia (learning disability) or developmental delay
About this study
Children with reading eye movement problems were recruited for this study. The treatment group was provided with oculomotor training for 8 weeks, the control group was given placebo exercises.
Read the detailed description
Purpose of study Reading is one of the integral elements for learning and poor readers were reported to have less efficient reading eye movements. They were typically characterized by having higher number in fixation and regression, reduced reading speed and perceptual span. The purpose of this study was to investigate if vision therapy which limited to training of oculomotor skills can improve reading eye movement.
Methodology This was a randomized, prospective study. 30 subjects aged from 8-9 years of age with reading difficulties and reading eye movement problems were recruited. They all have normal intelligence and ocular health, but failed to meet the Taylor reading eye movement norms when tested with the Visagraph III. The subjects were randomly assigned into either the treatment group (15) or the control group (15). The treatment group had to go through a course of oculomotor vision therapy and the control group was given placebo exercises. Vision therapy for the treatment group involved 8 weeks of training (office training - 3 times a week, 30 min per session; home training - 4 times a week, 30 min per session). Office training involved the use of Vis-Flex (Visual Flexibility Trainer - an electronic device with L.E.D. lights which can display various flashing patterns at variable speeds). Home training involved several saccadic eye movement exercises. Subjects and parents were also asked to grade the reading symptoms checklist before and after the training.
- Conditions
- Ocular Motility Disorders
- Being tested
- oculomotor training, placebo
- Keywords
- reading eye movement
- Medical subject headings
- Ocular Motility Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
oculomotor trainingOther
a sequence of vision training exercises which focused mainly in oculomotor skill
placeboOther
placebo vision training exercises involving minimal accommodation and vergence eye movement.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| experimental | Experimental | oculomotor training Receives: Other: oculomotor training |
| control | Placebo comparator | placebo vision training exercises Receives: Other: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in number of fixation and regression during reading after 8 weeks of oculomotor training
number of fixation and regression is measured by Visagraph per 100 words
Measured: 8 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change in reading rate during reading after 8 weeks of oculomotor training
reading rate in number of words/min and fixation duration measured in seconds
Measured: 8 weeks
Change in perceptual span (words per fixation) during reading after 8 weeks of oculomotor training
perceptual span measured in words per fixation
Measured: 8 weeks
Change in fixation duration (seconds) during reading after 8 weeks of oculomotor training
fixation duration measured in seconds
Measured: 8 weeks
Change in symptom scores after 8 weeks of oculomotor training
symptom scores is calculated with a scale of 0 to 4 for all the 8 items of manifested symptoms
Measured: 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study start1 Jan 2015
- Primary completion30 Sep 2016
- Study completion30 Sep 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ocular Motility DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Carly Lam, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
- Investigators
- Carly SY Lam, Principal investigator, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02981875
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HongKongPUVT
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 17 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 4 Aug 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bigelow ER, McKenzie BE. Unstable ocular dominance and reading ability. Perception. 1985;14(3):329-35. doi: 10.1068/p140329.
PubMed 4088794Biscaldi M, Gezeck S, Stuhr V. Poor saccadic control correlates with dyslexia. Neuropsychologia. 1998 Nov;36(11):1189-202. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00170-x.
PubMed 9842764Borsting EJ, Rouse MW, Mitchell GL, Scheiman M, Cotter SA, Cooper J, Kulp MT, London R; Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial Group. Validity and reliability of the revised convergence insufficiency symptom survey in children aged 9 to 18 years. Optom Vis Sci. 2003 Dec;80(12):832-8. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200312000-00014.
PubMed 14688547Bosse ML, Tainturier MJ, Valdois S. Developmental dyslexia: the visual attention span deficit hypothesis. Cognition. 2007 Aug;104(2):198-230. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.009. Epub 2006 Jul 21.
PubMed 16859667Bucci MP, Nassibi N, Gerard CL, Bui-Quoc E, Seassau M. Immaturity of the oculomotor saccade and vergence interaction in dyslexic children: evidence from a reading and visual search study. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033458. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
PubMed 22438934Eden GF, Stein JF, Wood HM, Wood FB. Differences in eye movements and reading problems in dyslexic and normal children. Vision Res. 1994 May;34(10):1345-58. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90209-7.
PubMed 8023443Hutzler F, Wimmer H. Eye movements of dyslexic children when reading in a regular orthography. Brain Lang. 2004 Apr;89(1):235-42. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00401-2.
PubMed 15010255Jainta S, Kapoula Z. Dyslexic children are confronted with unstable binocular fixation while reading. PLoS One. 2011 Apr 6;6(4):e18694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018694.
PubMed 21494641McConkie GW, Kerr PW, Reddix MD, Zola D. Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Res. 1988;28(10):1107-18. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(88)90137-x.
PubMed 3257013McConkie GW, Kerr PW, Reddix MD, Zola D, Jacobs AM. Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word. Percept Psychophys. 1989 Sep;46(3):245-53. doi: 10.3758/bf03208086.
PubMed 2771616Pavlidis GT. Eye movement differences between dyslexics, normal, and retarded readers while sequentially fixating digits. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1985 Dec;62(12):820-32. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198512000-00003.
PubMed 4083326Poynter HL, Schor C, Haynes HM, Hirsch J. Oculomotor functions in reading disability. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1982 Feb;59(2):116-27. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198202000-00002.
PubMed 7065104Prado C, Dubois M, Valdois S. The eye movements of dyslexic children during reading and visual search: impact of the visual attention span. Vision Res. 2007 Sep;47(19):2521-30. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Aug 23.
PubMed 17719073Rounds BB, Manley CW, Norris RH. The effect of oculomotor training on reading efficiency. J Am Optom Assoc. 1991 Feb;62(2):92-9.
PubMed 1814996Shainberg MJ. Vision therapy and orthoptics. Am Orthopt J. 2010;60:28-32. doi: 10.3368/aoj.60.1.28.
PubMed 21061881
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Aug 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Oculomotor Training Improves Reading Eye Movement
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02981875
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HongKongPUVT
- Conditions
- Ocular Motility Disorders
- Keywords
- reading eye movement
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Children with reading eye movement problems were recruited for this study. The treatment group was provided with oculomotor training for 8 weeks, the control group was given placebo exercises.
Detailed description
Purpose of study Reading is one of the integral elements for learning and poor readers were reported to have less efficient reading eye movements. They were typically characterized by having higher number in fixation and regression, reduced reading speed and perceptual span. The purpose of this study was to investigate if vision therapy which limited to training of oculomotor skills can improve reading eye movement.
Methodology This was a randomized, prospective study. 30 subjects aged from 8-9 years of age with reading difficulties and reading eye movement problems were recruited. They all have normal intelligence and ocular health, but failed to meet the Taylor reading eye movement norms when tested with the Visagraph III. The subjects were randomly assigned into either the treatment group (15) or the control group (15). The treatment group had to go through a course of oculomotor vision therapy and the control group was given placebo exercises. Vision therapy for the treatment group involved 8 weeks of training (office training - 3 times a week, 30 min per session; home training - 4 times a week, 30 min per session). Office training involved the use of Vis-Flex (Visual Flexibility Trainer - an electronic device with L.E.D. lights which can display various flashing patterns at variable speeds). Home training involved several saccadic eye movement exercises. Subjects and parents were also asked to grade the reading symptoms checklist before and after the training.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| experimental | Experimental | Other: oculomotor trainingoculomotor training |
| control | Placebo comparator | Other: placeboplacebo vision training exercises |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 9 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Reported by teachers or parents to have reading difficulties and failed to meet the Taylor reading eye movement norms when tested with the Visagraph III (below age norm for both fixation and regression number).
- Studying in mainstream primary schools (8-9 years of age)
- With normal near visual acuities for both eyes (with or without spectacles)
- Hyperopia below +4.00 D
- Myopia below -4.00 D
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- With strabismus
- Presence of eye diseases
- History of dyslexia (learning disability) or developmental delay
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| oculomotor traininga sequence of vision training exercises which focused mainly in oculomotor skill | Other | experimental |
| placeboplacebo vision training exercises involving minimal accommodation and vergence eye movement. | Other | control |
Primary outcome
Change in number of fixation and regression during reading after 8 weeks of oculomotor training
Time frame: 8 weeks
number of fixation and regression is measured by Visagraph per 100 words
4 secondary outcomes
Change in reading rate during reading after 8 weeks of oculomotor training
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change in perceptual span (words per fixation) during reading after 8 weeks of oculomotor training
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change in fixation duration (seconds) during reading after 8 weeks of oculomotor training
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change in symptom scores after 8 weeks of oculomotor training
Time frame: 8 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Aug 2020.
- Background: PubMed 4088794Bigelow ER, McKenzie BE. Unstable ocular dominance and reading ability. Perception. 1985;14(3):329-35. doi: 10.1068/p140329.
- Background: PubMed 9842764Biscaldi M, Gezeck S, Stuhr V. Poor saccadic control correlates with dyslexia. Neuropsychologia. 1998 Nov;36(11):1189-202. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00170-x.
- Background: PubMed 14688547Borsting EJ, Rouse MW, Mitchell GL, Scheiman M, Cotter SA, Cooper J, Kulp MT, London R; Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial Group. Validity and reliability of the revised convergence insufficiency symptom survey in children aged 9 to 18 years. Optom Vis Sci. 2003 Dec;80(12):832-8. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200312000-00014.
- Background: PubMed 16859667Bosse ML, Tainturier MJ, Valdois S. Developmental dyslexia: the visual attention span deficit hypothesis. Cognition. 2007 Aug;104(2):198-230. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.009. Epub 2006 Jul 21.
- Background: PubMed 22438934Bucci MP, Nassibi N, Gerard CL, Bui-Quoc E, Seassau M. Immaturity of the oculomotor saccade and vergence interaction in dyslexic children: evidence from a reading and visual search study. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033458. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
- Background: PubMed 8023443Eden GF, Stein JF, Wood HM, Wood FB. Differences in eye movements and reading problems in dyslexic and normal children. Vision Res. 1994 May;34(10):1345-58. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90209-7.
- Background: PubMed 15010255Hutzler F, Wimmer H. Eye movements of dyslexic children when reading in a regular orthography. Brain Lang. 2004 Apr;89(1):235-42. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00401-2.
- Background: PubMed 21494641Jainta S, Kapoula Z. Dyslexic children are confronted with unstable binocular fixation while reading. PLoS One. 2011 Apr 6;6(4):e18694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018694.
- Background: PubMed 3257013McConkie GW, Kerr PW, Reddix MD, Zola D. Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Res. 1988;28(10):1107-18. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(88)90137-x.
- Background: PubMed 2771616McConkie GW, Kerr PW, Reddix MD, Zola D, Jacobs AM. Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word. Percept Psychophys. 1989 Sep;46(3):245-53. doi: 10.3758/bf03208086.
- Background: PubMed 4083326Pavlidis GT. Eye movement differences between dyslexics, normal, and retarded readers while sequentially fixating digits. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1985 Dec;62(12):820-32. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198512000-00003.
- Background: PubMed 7065104Poynter HL, Schor C, Haynes HM, Hirsch J. Oculomotor functions in reading disability. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1982 Feb;59(2):116-27. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198202000-00002.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Ocular Motility Disorders
RecruitingPhase 2
The Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Clinical Trial Platform
Progressive Supranuclear Palsy(PSP)
RecruitingObservational study
Investigating Complex Neurodegenerative Disorders Related to Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Dementia
Frontotemporal Dementia, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Study Of Combined Recession-Resection And Fenestration of Superior Rectus Muscle for Treatment of Dissociated Vertical Deviation
Dissociated Vertical Deviation
RecruitingObservational study
Intraoperative OCT Guidance of Intraocular Surgery II
Macular Holes, Epiretinal Membrane
Recruiting
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy
Palsy Supranuclear, Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Carly SY Lam principal investigator
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing oculomotor training in people with Ocular Motility Disorders, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in number of fixation and regression during reading after 8 weeks of oculomotor training (time frame: 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02981875, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2020.