Takayasu ArteritisTACTICNCT02981979
Takayasu Arteritis Clinical Trial in China
A study testing Leflunomide(LEF) and Prednisone Acetate Tablets in people with Takayasu Arteritis, run by Jiang lindi at 6 sites in China.
Trial summary
To investigate the efficacy and safety of Leflunomide (LEF) versus placebo combined with prednisone for active Takayasu arteritis (TAK) in Chinese population. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Takayasu Arteritis
- What is being tested?
- Leflunomide(LEF) and Prednisone Acetate Tablets
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 116 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 22 Dec 2016to 22 Nov 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Inclusion criteria i. Male or females aged 18-65 years diagnosed with TAK according to the classification criteria set by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) in 1990; ii. With active disease within the last 3 months, meeting at least two of the following conditions:
- new vascular ischemic manifestations/physical signs or systemic symptoms;
- evaluated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP) ≥6 mg/L or C reactive protein (CRP) ≥10 mg/L without other confounding factors (e.g., infection);
- active vascular inflammation as indicated by contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), color Doppler ultrasonography or positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT); iii. Individuals should not receive LEF within 3 months before screening; iv. For individuals who received cyclophosphamide before screening, cyclophosphamide should be discontinued for ≥8 weeks; for patients who received a biological agent before screening, biological agents (e.g., tocilizumab, rituximab, and inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor) should be discontinued for ≥12 weeks; v. For patients who were taking prednisone (or its equivalent) before screening, the dose should be ≤0.6 mg/kg/day and the dose should be stable for ≥4 weeks; vi. Pregnancy should not be planned and a pregnancy test should be negative.
Exclusion criteria i. Individuals who had only vascular dilatation or aneurysm formation; ii. Individuals who had received revascularization surgery within the previous 3 months; iii. Individuals with severe organ dysfunction meeting at least one of the following:
- heart dysfunction: New York Heart Association grade IV;
- renal dysfunction: estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60 mL/min;
- liver dysfunction: Child-Pugh grade ≥2;
- neurologic severe ischemic event: amaurosis on 3 consecutive days, acute cerebral infarction, or cerebral hemorrhage;
- uncontrolled blood pressure >160/100 mmHg; iv. Individuals had at least one following abnormal laboratory test results: (1) alanine aminotransferase or aspartate transaminase ≥1.5-fold of the upper limit of normal in serum; (2) white blood cell count ≤4×109/L; (3) platelet count ≤100×109/L; (4) hemoglobin ≤85 g/L; v. Individuals had other types of autoimmune disease or uncontrolled asthma who need prednisone ≥10 mg/day, a history of malignant tumor or any serious acute/chronic infection, including positivity for hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibody, or clinical/radiological/laboratory evidence of active tuberculosis; vi. Individuals who were allergic to any of the investigational drugs; vii. Individuals had at least one of the following unacceptable treatments or medications:
- previous treatment with LEF for ≥3 months but not efficacious;
- planning to receive an attenuated vaccine during the study period;
- planning to undergo (or have undergone) organ transplantation.
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
China6 sites
Beijing Anzhen Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality
The first affiliated hospital of Nanchang University
Nanchang, Jiangxi
Zhongshan hospital, Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200032
Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality
The First Hospital of China Medical University
Shenyang, Liaoning
People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi
Ürümqi, Xinjiang
About this study
Official title: Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Leflunomide Versus Placebo Combined With Basic Prednisone Therapy in Patients With Active Takayasu Arteritis: a Randomized Double-blind Controlled Clinical Trial
To investigate the efficacy and safety of Leflunomide (LEF) versus placebo combined with prednisone for active Takayasu arteritis (TAK) in Chinese population.
Read the detailed description
Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a rare form of large-vessel vasculitis, characterized by immune -induced vascular inflammation, resulting in the stenosis and occlusion of blood vessels [1]. TAK is observed predominantly in Asian females under 40 years of age [2, 3]. The stenosis or occlusion of blood vessels can cause severe ischemic events (e.g., acute myocardial infarction, stroke, death) involving multiple organs. Patients with TAK experience impaired quality of life [4] and face a significantly higher risk of death compared with that in the sex- and age-matched general population, with a standardized mortality ranging from 2.7 to 17.3 [5, 6, 7]. Thus, timely and efficacious treatment is important to improve the prognosis in such a young population.
Glucocorticoids (GCs) are the first-line therapy for active TAK [8, 9]. High-dose GCs are initially efficacious. However, disease recurrence can occur in approximately 60% patients during the GCs tapering [10, 11]. Prolonged use of GCs is associated with significant toxicity, including glucose-metabolism disorders, cardiovascular adverse events (AEs), and osteoporosis [12, 13]. Therefore, immunosuppressive therapy is required to minimize the dose and duration of GC exposure [8, 9]. Conventional immunosuppressants have been recommended as GC-tapering agents for active TAK, whereas biological agents are recommended in refractory cases [8, 9]. Most previous studies focused on TAK treatment have been observational, only five randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are found, among which, just one study reported the effect of conventional immunosuppressants mycophenolate [14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. Thus, high-quality evidence to support therapeutic options of conventional immunosuppressants is very limited.
Leflunomide (LEF) is a conventional immunosuppressant [19], which has shown satisfied GC-tapering effects in the treatment of giant cell arteritis, another large vessel vasculitis, in several observational studies [20, 21, 22]. In 2012, the first open-label study of 14 TAK patients demonstrated that 70% of patients could achieve at least partial clinical remission, and the GC dose could be reduced by 50% during LEF treatment [23]. Since then, several observational cohort or case-control studies have reported the efficacy of LEF for active TAK [24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29]. A most recent study reported a comparable complete response rate of LEF (78%) versus adalimumab (88%) at 15-month follow-up [30]. Thus, LEF would be a promising alternative treatment for TAK, but evidence from RCTs is lacking.
We conducted this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of LEF versus placebo combined with prednisone for active TAK, namely "Takayasu arteritis clinical trial in China" (TACTIC; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02981979).
- Conditions
- Takayasu Arteritis
- Being tested
- Leflunomide(LEF), Prednisone Acetate Tablets, Placebos
- Keywords
- Takayasu Arteritis, Leflunomide
- Medical subject headings
- Takayasu Arteritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Leflunomide(LEF)Drug
Leflunomide:
For LEF arm, 20mg per day, p.o. through the whole study. For placebo group, 20mg per day, p.o. from week 25 to week 52.
Prednisone Acetate TabletsDrug
Prednisone (5mg/tab): basic therapy, start with 0.6mg/kg/d and maintained for 4 weeks, then reducing 5mg every 2 weeks until 10mg per day.
PlacebosDrug
2 tabs/d used in placebo arm for the first 24 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Leflunomide group | Active comparator | For the first 24 weeks, patients in the LEF group were treated with prednisone (0.6mg/kg/d, p.o.) and LEF (20mg/d, p.o.). The initial dose of prednisone was maintained for 4 weeks and then tapered by 5.0 mg every 2 weeks. The tapering of prednisone dose was determined by the investigators based on their assessment of disease activity. Two investigators formulated a tapering plan for the same time. If there were differences between the 2 investigators' perspectives, a third experienced senior rheumatologist (Lindi Jiang) made the final decision. Once the prednisone dose was reduced to 10 mg/d, this dose was maintained to the end of week 52.
By week 24, if clinical remission had been achieved, the patients proceeded to maintenance therapy with LEF (20 mg/day) from week 25. If the patient did not meet the criteria for clinical remission, unblinding was carried out: patients in the LEF group discontinued the study. Receives: Drug: Leflunomide(LEF); Drug: Prednisone Acetate Tablets |
| Control Group | Placebo comparator | For the first 24 weeks, patients in the placebo group received prednisone (0.6mg/kg/d, p.o.) and LEF simulator (2 tablets/d, p.o.). Patients were instructed to take tablets regularly. The initial dose of prednisone was maintained for 4 weeks and then tapered by 5.0 mg every 2 weeks. The tapering of prednisone dose was determined by the investigators based on their assessment of disease activity. Two investigators formulated a tapering plan for the same time. If there were differences between the 2 investigators' perspectives, a third experienced senior rheumatologist (Lindi Jiang) made the final decision. Once the prednisone dose was reduced to 10 mg/d, this dose was maintained to the end of week 52.
By week 24, if clinical remission had been achieved, the patients proceeded to maintenance therapy with LEF (20 mg/day) from week 25. If the patient did not meet the criteria for clinical remission, unblinding was carried out: patients in the placebo group switched to LEF (20 mg/day) . Receives: Drug: Leflunomide(LEF); Drug: Prednisone Acetate Tablets; Drug: Placebos |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Achievement of clinical remission at week 24
Clinical remission is defined as follows:
(i) have no systemic symptoms (e.g., fever, fatigue, weight loss); (ii) have no new onset of ischemic symptoms and signs; (iii) have a normal level of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). If not achieved, the investigator excluded other influencing factors (especially infection), re-measure the ESR after 1 week, and use the re-examined value in the analyses.
Subject achieving clinical remission should meet all these criteria above.
The clinical remission rate and its difference between LEF and placebo group with 95% confidence interval (CI) at week 24 was estimated by Newcombe-Wilson procedure. If the lower limit of the 95%CI of the difference >10%, it is considered that the efficacy of LEF is significantly superior to placebo.
Measured: From the date of randomization until the end of induced remission therapy, assessed up to 24 weeks
Secondary outcomes (7)
Time to clinical remission
Measured: From the date of randomization until the date of first documented clinical remission, assessed up to 24 weeks
The mean prednisone dose at week 24
Measured: At the end of induced remission therapy, assessed up to 24 weeks
Achievement of clinical remission at week 52 in those who switched from placebo to LEF from week 25
Measured: From the time of switch from placebo to LEF treatment (week 25), assessed up to week 52
Disease recurrence through week 25 to week 52
Disease recurrence is defined as NIH score ≥2 or not meeting ≥2 criteria for clinical remission.
NIH score:
- presence of systemic symptoms as fever, fatigue and weight loss (1');
2)presence of ischemic symptoms or signs (1');
- abnormal serum ESR levels (1');
- progression or new site of vascular lesions on MRA or CTA compared to baseline(1').
Measured: From the beginning of week 25 to the end of follow up, assessed up to week 52
Time to recurrence
Measured: from the beginning of achieving clinical remission to the date of the first documented disease recurrence, assessed up to 52 weeks
Imaging changes at the end of week 24 and week 52 compared to the baseline
Measured: From the date of randomization until the end of week 24 and week 52
Safety-adverse events
For safety analysis, the incidence and severity of AEs, adverse drug reactions and laboratory values in the LEF and placebo group would be estimated and compared using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. The association of an abnormal laboratory index and adverse event with the investigational drug would be evaluated.
Measured: From the date of randomization until the end of this trial, assessed up to 52 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study start22 Dec 2016
- Primary completion22 May 2022
- Study completion22 Nov 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Takayasu ArteritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 116 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jiang lindi
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Jiang lindi, Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
- Investigators
- Lindi Jiang, Doctor, Study director, Fudan University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02981979
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016ZSLC-06
- Acronym
- TACTIC
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 22 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 24 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Sun Y, Kong X, Dai X, Wu R, Pan L, Wu L, Chen X, Yang P, Chen H, Ma L, Jin X, Zhang W, Jiang L. Efficacy of leflunomide in active Takayasu arteritis: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial subtitle: Takayasu arteritis clinical trial in China (TACTIC). BMC Med. 2026 Jul 3. doi: 10.1186/s12916-026-05009-1. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42399917Sun Y, Wu B, Zhang W, Ma L, Kong X, Chen H, Jiang L. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of leflunomide versus placebo combined with basic prednisone therapy in patients with active disease phase of Takayasu arteritis: study protocol for a randomized, double-blinded controlled trial (Takayasu arteritis clinical trial in China: TACTIC). Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2023 Mar 4;14:20406223231158567. doi: 10.1177/20406223231158567. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 36895331
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Leflunomide Versus Placebo Combined With Basic Prednisone Therapy in Patients With Active Takayasu Arteritis: a Randomized Double-blind Controlled Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02981979
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TACTIC / 2016ZSLC-06
- Conditions
- Takayasu Arteritis
- Keywords
- Takayasu Arteritis, Leflunomide
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 116 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Jiang lindiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 Dec 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 May 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Nov 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To investigate the efficacy and safety of Leflunomide (LEF) versus placebo combined with prednisone for active Takayasu arteritis (TAK) in Chinese population.
Detailed description
Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a rare form of large-vessel vasculitis, characterized by immune -induced vascular inflammation, resulting in the stenosis and occlusion of blood vessels [1]. TAK is observed predominantly in Asian females under 40 years of age [2, 3]. The stenosis or occlusion of blood vessels can cause severe ischemic events (e.g., acute myocardial infarction, stroke, death) involving multiple organs. Patients with TAK experience impaired quality of life [4] and face a significantly higher risk of death compared with that in the sex- and age-matched general population, with a standardized mortality ranging from 2.7 to 17.3 [5, 6, 7]. Thus, timely and efficacious treatment is important to improve the prognosis in such a young population.
Glucocorticoids (GCs) are the first-line therapy for active TAK [8, 9]. High-dose GCs are initially efficacious. However, disease recurrence can occur in approximately 60% patients during the GCs tapering [10, 11]. Prolonged use of GCs is associated with significant toxicity, including glucose-metabolism disorders, cardiovascular adverse events (AEs), and osteoporosis [12, 13]. Therefore, immunosuppressive therapy is required to minimize the dose and duration of GC exposure [8, 9]. Conventional immunosuppressants have been recommended as GC-tapering agents for active TAK, whereas biological agents are recommended in refractory cases [8, 9]. Most previous studies focused on TAK treatment have been observational, only five randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are found, among which, just one study reported the effect of conventional immunosuppressants mycophenolate [14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. Thus, high-quality evidence to support therapeutic options of conventional immunosuppressants is very limited.
Leflunomide (LEF) is a conventional immunosuppressant [19], which has shown satisfied GC-tapering effects in the treatment of giant cell arteritis, another large vessel vasculitis, in several observational studies [20, 21, 22]. In 2012, the first open-label study of 14 TAK patients demonstrated that 70% of patients could achieve at least partial clinical remission, and the GC dose could be reduced by 50% during LEF treatment [23]. Since then, several observational cohort or case-control studies have reported the efficacy of LEF for active TAK [24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29]. A most recent study reported a comparable complete response rate of LEF (78%) versus adalimumab (88%) at 15-month follow-up [30]. Thus, LEF would be a promising alternative treatment for TAK, but evidence from RCTs is lacking.
We conducted this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of LEF versus placebo combined with prednisone for active TAK, namely "Takayasu arteritis clinical trial in China" (TACTIC; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02981979).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Leflunomide group | Active comparator | Drug: Leflunomide(LEF), Drug: Prednisone Acetate TabletsFor the first 24 weeks, patients in the LEF group were treated with prednisone (0.6mg/kg/d, p.o.) and LEF (20mg/d, p.o.). The initial dose of prednisone was maintained for 4 weeks and then tapered by 5.0 mg every 2 weeks. The tapering of prednisone dose was determined by the investigators based on their assessment of disease activity. Two investigators formulated a tapering plan for the same time. If there were differences between the 2 investigators' perspectives, a third experienced senior rheumatologist (Lindi Jiang) made the final decision. Once the prednisone dose was reduced to 10 mg/d, this dose was maintained to the end of week 52. By week 24, if clinical remission had been achieved, the patients proceeded to maintenance therapy with LEF (20 mg/day) from week 25. If the patient did not meet the criteria for clinical remission, unblinding was carried out: patients in the LEF group discontinued the study. |
| Control Group | Placebo comparator | Drug: Leflunomide(LEF), Drug: Prednisone Acetate Tablets, Drug: PlacebosFor the first 24 weeks, patients in the placebo group received prednisone (0.6mg/kg/d, p.o.) and LEF simulator (2 tablets/d, p.o.). Patients were instructed to take tablets regularly. The initial dose of prednisone was maintained for 4 weeks and then tapered by 5.0 mg every 2 weeks. The tapering of prednisone dose was determined by the investigators based on their assessment of disease activity. Two investigators formulated a tapering plan for the same time. If there were differences between the 2 investigators' perspectives, a third experienced senior rheumatologist (Lindi Jiang) made the final decision. Once the prednisone dose was reduced to 10 mg/d, this dose was maintained to the end of week 52. By week 24, if clinical remission had been achieved, the patients proceeded to maintenance therapy with LEF (20 mg/day) from week 25. If the patient did not meet the criteria for clinical remission, unblinding was carried out: patients in the placebo group switched to LEF (20 mg/day) . |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Leflunomide(LEF)Leflunomide: For LEF arm, 20mg per day, p.o. through the whole study. For placebo group, 20mg per day, p.o. from week 25 to week 52. | Drug | Control Group, Leflunomide group |
| Prednisone Acetate TabletsPrednisone (5mg/tab): basic therapy, start with 0.6mg/kg/d and maintained for 4 weeks, then reducing 5mg every 2 weeks until 10mg per day. | Drug | Control Group, Leflunomide group |
| Placebos2 tabs/d used in placebo arm for the first 24 weeks. | Drug | Control Group |
Primary outcome
Achievement of clinical remission at week 24
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the end of induced remission therapy, assessed up to 24 weeks
Clinical remission is defined as follows: (i) have no systemic symptoms (e.g., fever, fatigue, weight loss); (ii) have no new onset of ischemic symptoms and signs; (iii) have a normal level of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). If not achieved, the investigator excluded other influencing factors (especially infection), re-measure the ESR after 1 week, and use the re-examined value in the analyses. Subject achieving clinical remission should meet all these criteria above. The clinical remission rate and its difference between LEF and placebo group with 95% confidence interval (CI) at week 24 was estimated by Newcombe-Wilson procedure. If the lower limit of the 95%CI of the difference >10%, it is considered that the efficacy of LEF is significantly superior to placebo.
7 secondary outcomes
Time to clinical remission
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of first documented clinical remission, assessed up to 24 weeks
The mean prednisone dose at week 24
Time frame: At the end of induced remission therapy, assessed up to 24 weeks
Achievement of clinical remission at week 52 in those who switched from placebo to LEF from week 25
Time frame: From the time of switch from placebo to LEF treatment (week 25), assessed up to week 52
Disease recurrence through week 25 to week 52
Time frame: From the beginning of week 25 to the end of follow up, assessed up to week 52
Time to recurrence
Time frame: from the beginning of achieving clinical remission to the date of the first documented disease recurrence, assessed up to 52 weeks
Imaging changes at the end of week 24 and week 52 compared to the baseline
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the end of week 24 and week 52
Safety-adverse events
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the end of this trial, assessed up to 52 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Apr 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42399917Sun Y, Kong X, Dai X, Wu R, Pan L, Wu L, Chen X, Yang P, Chen H, Ma L, Jin X, Zhang W, Jiang L. Efficacy of leflunomide in active Takayasu arteritis: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial subtitle: Takayasu arteritis clinical trial in China (TACTIC). BMC Med. 2026 Jul 3. doi: 10.1186/s12916-026-05009-1. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36895331Sun Y, Wu B, Zhang W, Ma L, Kong X, Chen H, Jiang L. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of leflunomide versus placebo combined with basic prednisone therapy in patients with active disease phase of Takayasu arteritis: study protocol for a randomized, double-blinded controlled trial (Takayasu arteritis clinical trial in China: TACTIC). Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2023 Mar 4;14:20406223231158567. doi: 10.1177/20406223231158567. eCollection 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Takayasu Arteritis
RecruitingObservational study
Studies of the Natural History, Pathogenesis, and Outcome of Idiopathic Systemic Vasculitis
Takayasu's Arteritis, Giant Cell Arteritis
Not yet recruiting
Long-Axial Field of View (LAFOV) [18F]FDG PET/CT Imaging in Large Vessel Vasculitis (LVV): Protocol Optimisation Study.
Large Vessel Vasculitis, Takayasu Arteritis
RecruitingObservational study
Treatment of Patients With Takayasu Arteritis Complicated With Pulmonary Artery Involvement
Takayasu Arteritis With Pulmonary Artery Involvement, Percutaneous Transluminal Pulmonary Angioplasty
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Inflammatory Disease Biobank for Immunophenotyping and Cardiovascular Research
Pericarditis, Tako-TSUBO Cardiomyopathy
RecruitingPhase 4
Safety and Immunogenicity of the Live Attenuated Tetravalent Butantan-Dengue Vaccine in Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lindi Jiang, Doctor study director
Fudan University
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Leflunomide(LEF) and Prednisone Acetate Tablets in people with Takayasu Arteritis, run by Jiang lindi at 6 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Achievement of clinical remission at week 24 (time frame: From the date of randomization until the end of induced remission therapy, assessed up to 24 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02981979, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.