AzTrials
AzTrials

Primary Osteoarthritis of Hip NosNCT02983526

Randomized Controlled Study Comparing a Short Stem Hip Prosthesis With a Stem of Standard Length

A study testing Total hip replacement (2 different designs) in people with Primary Osteoarthritis of Hip Nos and Secondary Osteoarthritis of Hip, run by Johan Karrholm.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

80 patients eligible for a total hip replacement (THR) mainly due to primary osteoarthritis were recruited from the waiting list for hip arthroplasty at a university hospital in Sweden. The patients were randomized to either CFP or Corail stem, both groups received Delta cup from Lima. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 35 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Total hip replacement (2 different designs)
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
80 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Nov 2011to Nov 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 35 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • primary osteoarthritis of hip
  • secondary osteoarthritis due to hip dysplasia or Perthes under condition that the collum anatomy is well preserved and largely unaffected by the primary disease
  • avascular necrosis of femoral head
  • anatomy suitable for both designs according to preoperative planning

Who cannot join

  • previous treatment with cortisone
  • generalized joint disease

About this study

80 patients eligible for a total hip replacement (THR) mainly due to primary osteoarthritis were recruited from the waiting list for hip arthroplasty at a university hospital in Sweden. The patients were randomized to either CFP or Corail stem, both groups received Delta cup from Lima. Randomisation was done using envelopes. Patients could only participate with one hip. Patients are evaluated with different questionnaires, radiographs and RSA analysis.

Read the detailed description

The concept of femoral neck preserving hip replacement is intended for the young and active patients. By preserving proximal bone load, the transmission to the proximal femur is supposed to improve and future revision surgery would be facilitated. The hypothesis is that a more conservative resection of the femoral neck could lead to better clinical outcomes compared to a conventional stem. The clinical outcomes and the fixation of a short femoral stem were therefore compared with a stem of standard length. 83 patients were included in our randomized controlled trial where patients either received a Collum Femoris Preserving (CFP) stem or a Corail hip stem. Clinical outcomes are being assessed, plain radiographs are studied and the early migration is being measured using radiostereometric analysis. All of the patients have gone through 1 year follow-up. The 2 years results will be available at the end of 2017.

Being tested
Total hip replacement (2 different designs)
Keywords
short stem

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Total hip replacement (2 different designs)Device

    Also called CFP stem or Corail stem

    Patients will randomly receive either CFP or Corail stem

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Oxford Hip Score

    The Oxford Hip Score (OHS) is a short 12-item patient-reported PRO specifically designed and developed to assess function and pain with patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. It is short, reproducible, valid and sensitive to clinically important changes.

    Measured: Preoperatively to 2 years

  2. Radiostereometric analysis

    Radiostereometric analysis is an accurate method of determining the migration and wear of orthopaedic implants such as total hip arthroplasties. The overall concept of RSA is straightforward: determining the precise location of two distinct objects relative to each other in three dimension (such as the relative position of the femoral component and the proximal femur).

    Measured: Preoperatively to 2 years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Patient satisfaction (VAS), Pain (VAS)

    Patient satisfaction and pain are reported on visual analogue scales.

    Measured: Preoperatively to 2 years

  2. Harris hip score

    One of the oldest and most commonly used scores to assess function and pain with patients undergoing hip replacement surgery.

    Measured: Preoperatively to 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Dec 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2011
  3. Primary completionMay 2016
  4. Study completionNov 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02983526
Sponsor's protocol ID
CFP-SUH
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
2 Dec 2016
Last updated
11 Apr 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Total hip replacement (2 different designs) in people with Primary Osteoarthritis of Hip Nos and Secondary Osteoarthritis of Hip, run by Johan Karrholm.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Oxford Hip Score (time frame: Preoperatively to 2 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Apr 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in