Inguinal HerniaNCT02984917
Anterior Transversalis Fascia Approach Versus Preperitoneal Space Approach for Inguinal Hernia Repair in Residents
A study testing Anterior transversalis fascia approach and Preperitoneal space approach in people with Inguinal Hernia, run by The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University at 9 sites in China.
Trial summary
To investigate the advantages and disadvantages of the anterior transversalis fascia approach versus the preperitoneal approach for inguinal hernia repair in residents from northern China regarding common postoperative complications (including acute and chronic pain, wound infection, rates of wound infection… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Inguinal Hernia
- What is being tested?
- Anterior transversalis fascia approach and Preperitoneal space approach
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,000 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 6 Feb 2017to Jun 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed with primary unilateral inguinal hernia
- Aged 18-80 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
- Provision of informed consent
Who cannot join
- Severe organ dysfunction or inability to tolerate surgery
- Hernia recurrence
- Giant hernia (inner size of the hernia > 4 cm)
- Scrotal hernia
- Incarcerated inguinal hernia
- Inability to complete follow-up or questionnaire because of mental disorder or other reasons
- History of preperitoneal surgery, such as radical prostatectomy
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country.
9 sites in 1 country
China9 sites, 9 recruiting
- Recruiting
General Hospital of Benxi Steel and Iron (Group) Co., LTD
Benxi, Liaoning, 117000
Zhong-shu Dai, Ph.D, 8613841460709, dzs20092009@163.com
Zhong-shu Dai, Ph.D
- Recruiting
The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
Dalian, Liaoning, 116011
De-wei An, Ph.D, 8613704262820, anweide@sina.com
De-wei An, Ph.D
- Recruiting
The First Hospital of Dandong City
Dandong, Liaoning, 118000
Yao-qiang Wu, Ph.D, 8613704959939, wuyaoqiang@sina.com
Yao-qiang Wu, Ph.D
- Recruiting
The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University
Jinzhou, Liaoning, 121001
Shi-feng Qiao, Ph.D, 8618004969133, shifengqiao2013@163.com
Shi-feng Qiao, Ph.D
- Recruiting
The 202nd Hospital of PLA
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110000
Fu-rong Wang, Ph.D, 8613352457285, furong_jiyu@126.com
Fu-rong Wang, Ph.D
- Recruiting
Fengtian Hospital of Shenyang Medical College
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110024
Shao-jun Zhang, Ph.D, 8613909888012, shaojunzhang@163.com
Shao-jun Zhang, Ph.D
- Recruiting
General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110031
Hui-yong Jiang, Ph.D, 8613352457673, huiyongj@126.com
Hui-yong Jiang, Ph.D
- Recruiting
The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110032
Hang-yu Li, Ph.D, 8618940257002, li_hangyu@126.com
Hang-yu Li, Ph.D
- Recruiting
Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University
Shenyang, Liaoning, 117004
Fu-quan Yang, Ph.D, 8618940251755, yangfq@sj-hospital.org
Fu-quan Yang, Ph.D
About this study
Official title: Anterior Transversalis Fascia Approach Versus Preperitoneal Space Approach for Inguinal Hernia Repair in Residents in Northern China: a Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Controlled Trial
To investigate the advantages and disadvantages of the anterior transversalis fascia approach versus the preperitoneal approach for inguinal hernia repair in residents from northern China regarding common postoperative complications (including acute and chronic pain, wound infection, rates of wound infection, hematoma, seroma, and hernia recurrence) and severe postoperative complications.
Read the detailed description
History and current related studies Inguinal hernia is a common surgical disease that manifests as protrusion of abdominal cavity contents through the inguinal canal because of an abdominal wall defect. It is more common in males than in females, with an overall incidence of 5-10%. Methods for surgical repair of abdominal wall defects in the inguinal region are classified as either 'tension'repairs or 'tension-free' repairs. Herniorrhaphy through repair of the posterior wall of the inguinal canal was first described by Bassini in 1887, and is regarded as a classic surgical method.
As understanding of the anatomic location and pathophysical characteristics of inguinal hernia developed, the American surgeon Lichtenstein proposed a new concept of tension-free herniorrhaphy. This technique was quickly adopted worldwide because of its advantages including minimal invasion, technical ease, effectiveness, low complication rate, low recurrence rate, and allowance of resumption of unrestricted physical activity. The most common technique is open tension-free herniorrhaphy.
Many surgical repair methods involving patches (of varying types and materials) are available for inguinal hernia repair.
Tension-free herniorrhaphy methods include anterior transversalis fascia repair, preperitoneal repair, abdominal cavity patch repair and combined repair approaches. Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy is the representative technique of anterior transversalis fascia repair. Preperitoneal repair techniques include transabdominal preperitoneal, total extraperitoneal, and Kugel repair techniques. The combined repair approaches refer to tension-free herniorrhaphy using a modified Kugel patch and the Ultrapro hernia system.
There are few reports on the effects of different inguinal hernia repair approaches on postoperative complications, particularly regarding severe postoperative complications, in patients in northern China. The incidence of severe complications after inguinal hernia repair is relatively low, but this surgery can lead to physical impairment or organ dysfunction that greatly decreases patient quality of life and places a heavy burden on the patient's family and society. At present, there is a scarcity of clinical evidence from large-sample, randomized, controlled trials investigating the effectiveness of inguinal hernia repair via the anterior transversalis fascia approach versus the preperitoneal approach.
Adverse events and serious adverse events (SAE) According to the study protocol and clinical judgment, AE/SAE occurring after herniorrhaphy will be reported to the Department of General Surgery, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University.
AE refer to any adverse medical events occurring after herniorrhaphy in patients or clinical subjects. SAE refer to any adverse postoperative medical events involving one or more of the following criteria:
Death, irrespective of the cause Life-threatening event Severe or permanent disability or organ dysfunction Hemorrhage Malformation, birth defect Hospitalization or extended hospital stay Re-admission to hospital Recurrence (symptomatic) of inguinal hernia
Statistical analysis Descriptive statistics will be used to analyze the data. For measurement data, the number of patients (number of missing patients), mean, median, standard deviation, first quartile, third quartile, and maximum and minimum will be described, and 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. For counted data, the frequency and relative numbers will be described, and 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. According to whether the differences between scores before and after treatments are normally distributed, the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test will be used for comparison of measurement data in the same group. The chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test will be used for analysis of counted data, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test will be used for analysis of ranked data. The last-observation-carried-forward imputation method will be used when the effects-related visit data at the last visit are missing.
Full analysis set According to the intention-to-treat principle, patients who receive at least one treatment according to study protocol and undergo at least one evaluation regarding curative effects after baseline evaluation will be included in the full analysis set.
Curative effects analysis Full analysis set analysis of curative effects will be performed. The proportions of patients with no complications, patients with common complications, and patients with severe complications within postoperative 3 weeks will be analyzed using descriptive statistics. The chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test will be used for comparison of differences between groups. If statistical differences exist between groups, the Bonferroni method will be used to adjust the α value, and pairwise comparisons will be made.
If the change in VAS pain score after treatment meets the normality and homogeneity of variance, analysis of variance will be performed. If the statistical analysis of variance results are significant, in-depth statistical analysis will be performed, and the Bonferroni method will be used for pairwise comparisons. Otherwise, the Kruskal-Wallis test will be performed. If the statistical results of the Kruskal-Wallis test are significant, in-depth statistical analysis will be performed, and the independent Wilcoxon signed rank test will be performed. The Bonferroni method will be used to adjust P values for pairwise comparisons.
Safety evaluation Safety analysis and analysis of the incidence of postoperative complications will be performed using descriptive statistics. The chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test will be performed for comparisons between groups. If significant differences exist, the Bonferroni method will be used to adjust the α value, and in-depth pairwise comparisons will be made between groups. Vital signs and laboratory outcomes will be analyzed using descriptive statistics. The paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test will be used to analyze the differences between values before and after surgery. Imaging data and electrocardiograms will be analyzed using cross tabulations.
Economic analysis Cost-utility analysis will be used for economic evaluation, and sensitivity analysis of cost and utility will be performed.
Interim analysis When an adequate number of patients are enrolled and followed-up, interim analysis will be performed. When data are included for the full analysis set and recorded in the database, the first interim analysis during the management period will be performed to check whether the core data collected are suitable for preliminary significant data analysis. According to research progression, subsequent interim analysis of all data included in the database will then be designated. After acquiring approval from the Department of General Surgery and Scientific Construction Committee, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, the data collected in the Department of General Surgery, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University are likely to be analyzed together with the data collected from the other research centers. In accordance with applicable laws and regulations, the information on the subjects in the study will be kept confidential. The data for interim analysis will be precisely described in a statistical analysis plan. The interim analysis results will be submitted to the sponsor and the project manager in the form of a statistical analysis report, and as slides by the co-sponsors.
Sample size Investigators hypothesized that anterior transversalis fascia repair can reduce the percentage of patients with postoperative pain by 15% compared with the percentage of patients with pain before surgery. Taking α = 0.05 and power = 80%, the final effective sample size of n = 300 was calculated. Assuming a patient loss rate of 20%, investigators require 360 patients. This study is planned to be performed in more than nine institutes to investigate the effectiveness of inguinal hernia repair via the anterior transversalis fascia approach versus the preperitoneal approach in patients in northern China. Investigators plan to include at least 2,000 patients.
- Conditions
- Inguinal Hernia
- Being tested
- Anterior transversalis fascia approach, Preperitoneal space approach
- Keywords
- anterior transversalis fascia repair; preperitoneal repair
- Medical subject headings
- Hernia, Inguinal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Anterior transversalis fascia approachProcedure or surgery
Patients will undergo inguinal hernia repair via the anterior transversalis fascia approach.
Preperitoneal space approachProcedure or surgery
Patients will undergo inguinal hernia repair via the preperitoneal space approach.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| anterior transversalis fascia approach | Experimental | Patients with inguinal hernia will undergo inguinal hernia repair via the anterior transversalis fascia approach. Receives: Procedure: Anterior transversalis fascia approach |
| preperitoneal space approach | Experimental | Patients with inguinal hernia will undergo inguinal hernia repair via the preperitoneal space approach. Receives: Procedure: Preperitoneal space approach |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
VAS pain score
Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) pain score is one of the most commonly used tools for assessing pain.It comprises a 10 cm line with 0 at one end, representing no pain, and 10 at the other end, representing the worst pain imaginable; the patient places a mark on the line to indicate the degree of pain that they are experiencing.
Measured: changes of month 1, month 3, month 12, month 24 after operation
Secondary outcomes (1)
Postoperative complications
Postoperative complications including wound infection, rates of hematoma, seroma, hernia recurrence, intestinal obstruction, intestinal fistula, entocele, mesenteric thrombosis, femoral vein thrombosis, ischemic orchitis, painful ejaculation, varicocele and scrotal edema.
Measured: changes of month 1, month 3, month 12, month 24 after operation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study start6 Feb 2017
- Primary completionDec 2019 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Inguinal HerniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 2,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hangyu Li, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University
- Investigators
- Hangyu Li, Ph.D, Principal investigator, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02984917
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FourthAHChinaMU_002
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 1 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 15 Jun 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Fan Q, Zhang DW, Yang DY, Li HW, Wei SB, Yang L, Yang FQ, Zhang SJ, Wu YQ, An WD, Dai ZS, Jiang HY, Wang FR, Qiao SF, Li HY. Anterior transversalis fascia approach versus preperitoneal space approach for inguinal hernia repair in residents in northern China: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 31;7(8):e016481. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016481.
PubMed 28860228
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jun 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Anterior Transversalis Fascia Approach Versus Preperitoneal Space Approach for Inguinal Hernia Repair in Residents in Northern China: a Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02984917
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FourthAHChinaMU_002
- Conditions
- Inguinal Hernia
- Keywords
- anterior transversalis fascia repair; preperitoneal repair
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 2,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To investigate the advantages and disadvantages of the anterior transversalis fascia approach versus the preperitoneal approach for inguinal hernia repair in residents from northern China regarding common postoperative complications (including acute and chronic pain, wound infection, rates of wound infection, hematoma, seroma, and hernia recurrence) and severe postoperative complications.
Detailed description
History and current related studies Inguinal hernia is a common surgical disease that manifests as protrusion of abdominal cavity contents through the inguinal canal because of an abdominal wall defect. It is more common in males than in females, with an overall incidence of 5-10%. Methods for surgical repair of abdominal wall defects in the inguinal region are classified as either 'tension'repairs or 'tension-free' repairs. Herniorrhaphy through repair of the posterior wall of the inguinal canal was first described by Bassini in 1887, and is regarded as a classic surgical method.
As understanding of the anatomic location and pathophysical characteristics of inguinal hernia developed, the American surgeon Lichtenstein proposed a new concept of tension-free herniorrhaphy. This technique was quickly adopted worldwide because of its advantages including minimal invasion, technical ease, effectiveness, low complication rate, low recurrence rate, and allowance of resumption of unrestricted physical activity. The most common technique is open tension-free herniorrhaphy.
Many surgical repair methods involving patches (of varying types and materials) are available for inguinal hernia repair.
Tension-free herniorrhaphy methods include anterior transversalis fascia repair, preperitoneal repair, abdominal cavity patch repair and combined repair approaches. Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy is the representative technique of anterior transversalis fascia repair. Preperitoneal repair techniques include transabdominal preperitoneal, total extraperitoneal, and Kugel repair techniques. The combined repair approaches refer to tension-free herniorrhaphy using a modified Kugel patch and the Ultrapro hernia system.
There are few reports on the effects of different inguinal hernia repair approaches on postoperative complications, particularly regarding severe postoperative complications, in patients in northern China. The incidence of severe complications after inguinal hernia repair is relatively low, but this surgery can lead to physical impairment or organ dysfunction that greatly decreases patient quality of life and places a heavy burden on the patient's family and society. At present, there is a scarcity of clinical evidence from large-sample, randomized, controlled trials investigating the effectiveness of inguinal hernia repair via the anterior transversalis fascia approach versus the preperitoneal approach.
Adverse events and serious adverse events (SAE) According to the study protocol and clinical judgment, AE/SAE occurring after herniorrhaphy will be reported to the Department of General Surgery, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University.
AE refer to any adverse medical events occurring after herniorrhaphy in patients or clinical subjects. SAE refer to any adverse postoperative medical events involving one or more of the following criteria:
Death, irrespective of the cause Life-threatening event Severe or permanent disability or organ dysfunction Hemorrhage Malformation, birth defect Hospitalization or extended hospital stay Re-admission to hospital Recurrence (symptomatic) of inguinal hernia
Statistical analysis Descriptive statistics will be used to analyze the data. For measurement data, the number of patients (number of missing patients), mean, median, standard deviation, first quartile, third quartile, and maximum and minimum will be described, and 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. For counted data, the frequency and relative numbers will be described, and 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. According to whether the differences between scores before and after treatments are normally distributed, the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test will be used for comparison of measurement data in the same group. The chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test will be used for analysis of counted data, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test will be used for analysis of ranked data. The last-observation-carried-forward imputation method will be used when the effects-related visit data at the last visit are missing.
Full analysis set According to the intention-to-treat principle, patients who receive at least one treatment according to study protocol and undergo at least one evaluation regarding curative effects after baseline evaluation will be included in the full analysis set.
Curative effects analysis Full analysis set analysis of curative effects will be performed. The proportions of patients with no complications, patients with common complications, and patients with severe complications within postoperative 3 weeks will be analyzed using descriptive statistics. The chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test will be used for comparison of differences between groups. If statistical differences exist between groups, the Bonferroni method will be used to adjust the α value, and pairwise comparisons will be made.
If the change in VAS pain score after treatment meets the normality and homogeneity of variance, analysis of variance will be performed. If the statistical analysis of variance results are significant, in-depth statistical analysis will be performed, and the Bonferroni method will be used for pairwise comparisons. Otherwise, the Kruskal-Wallis test will be performed. If the statistical results of the Kruskal-Wallis test are significant, in-depth statistical analysis will be performed, and the independent Wilcoxon signed rank test will be performed. The Bonferroni method will be used to adjust P values for pairwise comparisons.
Safety evaluation Safety analysis and analysis of the incidence of postoperative complications will be performed using descriptive statistics. The chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test will be performed for comparisons between groups. If significant differences exist, the Bonferroni method will be used to adjust the α value, and in-depth pairwise comparisons will be made between groups. Vital signs and laboratory outcomes will be analyzed using descriptive statistics. The paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test will be used to analyze the differences between values before and after surgery. Imaging data and electrocardiograms will be analyzed using cross tabulations.
Economic analysis Cost-utility analysis will be used for economic evaluation, and sensitivity analysis of cost and utility will be performed.
Interim analysis When an adequate number of patients are enrolled and followed-up, interim analysis will be performed. When data are included for the full analysis set and recorded in the database, the first interim analysis during the management period will be performed to check whether the core data collected are suitable for preliminary significant data analysis. According to research progression, subsequent interim analysis of all data included in the database will then be designated. After acquiring approval from the Department of General Surgery and Scientific Construction Committee, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, the data collected in the Department of General Surgery, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University are likely to be analyzed together with the data collected from the other research centers. In accordance with applicable laws and regulations, the information on the subjects in the study will be kept confidential. The data for interim analysis will be precisely described in a statistical analysis plan. The interim analysis results will be submitted to the sponsor and the project manager in the form of a statistical analysis report, and as slides by the co-sponsors.
Sample size Investigators hypothesized that anterior transversalis fascia repair can reduce the percentage of patients with postoperative pain by 15% compared with the percentage of patients with pain before surgery. Taking α = 0.05 and power = 80%, the final effective sample size of n = 300 was calculated. Assuming a patient loss rate of 20%, investigators require 360 patients. This study is planned to be performed in more than nine institutes to investigate the effectiveness of inguinal hernia repair via the anterior transversalis fascia approach versus the preperitoneal approach in patients in northern China. Investigators plan to include at least 2,000 patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| anterior transversalis fascia approach | Experimental | Procedure: Anterior transversalis fascia approachPatients with inguinal hernia will undergo inguinal hernia repair via the anterior transversalis fascia approach. |
| preperitoneal space approach | Experimental | Procedure: Preperitoneal space approachPatients with inguinal hernia will undergo inguinal hernia repair via the preperitoneal space approach. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Diagnosed with primary unilateral inguinal hernia
- Aged 18-80 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
- Provision of informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Severe organ dysfunction or inability to tolerate surgery
- Hernia recurrence
- Giant hernia (inner size of the hernia > 4 cm)
- Scrotal hernia
- Incarcerated inguinal hernia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Anterior transversalis fascia approachPatients will undergo inguinal hernia repair via the anterior transversalis fascia approach. | Procedure or surgery | anterior transversalis fascia approach |
| Preperitoneal space approachPatients will undergo inguinal hernia repair via the preperitoneal space approach. | Procedure or surgery | preperitoneal space approach |
Primary outcome
VAS pain score
Time frame: changes of month 1, month 3, month 12, month 24 after operation
Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) pain score is one of the most commonly used tools for assessing pain.It comprises a 10 cm line with 0 at one end, representing no pain, and 10 at the other end, representing the worst pain imaginable; the patient places a mark on the line to indicate the degree of pain that they are experiencing.
1 secondary outcome
Postoperative complications
Time frame: changes of month 1, month 3, month 12, month 24 after operation
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jun 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28860228Fan Q, Zhang DW, Yang DY, Li HW, Wei SB, Yang L, Yang FQ, Zhang SJ, Wu YQ, An WD, Dai ZS, Jiang HY, Wang FR, Qiao SF, Li HY. Anterior transversalis fascia approach versus preperitoneal space approach for inguinal hernia repair in residents in northern China: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 31;7(8):e016481. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016481.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Inguinal Hernia
Recruiting
Permanent Versus Slowly Dissolving Stitches for Non-Mesh (Shouldice) Groin Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia
Recruiting
Watchful Waiting Versus Immediate Repair for Occult Contralateral Inguinal Hernias.
Inguinal Hernia Bilateral, Inguinal Hernia Unilateral
Recruiting
Primary Sac Abandonment and Distal Sac Fixation vs Complete Sac Dissection for Inguinoscrotal Hernias
Seroma, Inguinal Hernias
Recruiting
Comparing Two Laparoscopic Techniques for Hernia Repair in Children
Inguinal Hernia
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar ESP Block Versus TAP Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Children Undergoing Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hangyu Li, Ph.D principal investigator
The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Anterior transversalis fascia approach and Preperitoneal space approach in people with Inguinal Hernia, run by The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University at 9 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Hangyu Li, Ph.D (8618940257002, li_hangyu@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
VAS pain score (time frame: changes of month 1, month 3, month 12, month 24 after operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02984917, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2017.