RheumatoId ArthritisNCT02984943
The Effects of Hyperbaric Oxygen on Rheumatoid Arthritis
A study testing Hyperbaric Oxygen in people with RheumatoId Arthritis, run by David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this investigation is to determine the effects and ease of using hyperbaric oxygen therapy HBO2 for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis joint pain and prevention of disease progression. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- RheumatoId Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Hyperbaric Oxygen
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 14 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 19 Jan 2017to 10 Apr 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18
- Active duty or Department of Defense (DoD) beneficiary
- Diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis meeting ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria and any one of the following:
- Patient does not want to be on rheumatologic medications
- Patient has contraindications to standard rheumatologic medications
- Patient has failed treatment or an incomplete response with standard rheumatologic medications
- Women of childbearing age must have a negative pregnancy test and currently be on a reliable form of birth control
Who cannot join
- Severe depression
- Dementia, mental disability
- Claustrophobia
- Uncontrolled seizure disorder
- Uncontrolled asthma/severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) > 45 mmHg on arterial blood gas
- Grade 4 congestive heart failure
Show all 13Show fewer
- Unstable angina
- Chronic/acute otitis media/sinusitis
- Major tympanic membrane trauma
- Severe kyphoscoliosis
- Prior chemotherapy with Bleomycin and evidence of deterioration in diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) after a single hyperbaric oxygen exposure
- History of renal insufficiency or glomerular filtration rate (GFR)< 30
- Women that are currently pregnant or breast feeding or intend on becoming pregnant while enrolled in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
David Grant Medical Center
Travis Air Force Base, California, 94535
About this study
Official title: The Effects of Hyperbaric Oxygen on Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Pilot Study
The purpose of this investigation is to determine the effects and ease of using hyperbaric oxygen therapy HBO2 for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis joint pain and prevention of disease progression. In this study it is our intention to not only evaluate effects and ease of treatment but time, cost, possible adverse events and effect size in an attempt to predict an appropriate sample size and improve on the study design prior to a more extensive study.
Read the detailed description
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic, inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology that primarily involves synovial joints, typically symmetrically. If untreated and/or uncontrolled, joint destruction due to erosion of cartilage and bone can cause joint destruction, joint deformities, loss of physical function, severe disability, and difficulties maintaining employment. American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR 2010 classification criteria is a score-based algorithm which adds scores of 4 categories including, joint involvement, serology, acute-phase reactants and duration of symptoms. A score of >6/10 is needed for classification of a patient as having definite RA.
Non-pharmacologic and supplementary therapies include patient education, rest, exercise, nutrition counseling, cardiovascular disease risk reduction, and immunizations to decrease risk of infectious complications of immunosuppression. These are important in the comprehensive management of RA in all stages of disease and are used in addition to drug therapy.
Pharmacologic therapies typically start with a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD), preferably as soon as possible after diagnosis. DMARDs are commonly used in combination with anti-inflammatory drugs such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and glucocorticoids which are often used as bridging therapies until the DMARDs become effective. The goal is disease remission. To assess response, disease activity scores are used along with inflammatory markers.
Three patients with active RA treated in the multi-place hyperbaric facility at David Grant Medical Center (DGMC), Travis Air Force Base, California, for non RA-related indications, all noted significant improvement in arthralgias, sleep patterns and overall well-being during the course of therapy. Two were treated at 2 atmospheres absolute (ATA) oxygen for 90 minutes daily Monday through Friday. One patient received 2 ATA air on the same treatment protocol as a participant in a research study, and a subsequent course of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) at 2 ATA.
This is a pilot study. Patients will be recruited through the Rheumatologists, IRB-approved HIPAA waiver to contact patients that have been seen in the military treatment facility (MTF) within the past year with a diagnosis of RA, flyers in the Rheumatology Clinic or thru Commander Calls.
During the initial screening visit:
The rheumatologist will discuss the trial and at this point the subject will be consented and the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be reviewed. If subject qualifies they will see the Hyperbaric physician who will do physical examination to determine if it is safe for the subject to receive HBO2. An human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) by point of care testing (POCT) will be completed by the coordinator in women capable of pregnancy. After this exam is done the subject will be scheduled for a trial Hyperbaric session.
Baseline visit will be done after the subject has tolerated the trial hyperbaric session. This visit includes:
- A visit with the rheumatologist to do routine assessments to establish baseline measurement using the Disease Activity Scale (DAS28)
- Labs (CRP and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), basic metabolic panel (BMP) and microparticles), will be completed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with and without contrast and ultrasound will be done on both hands from wrists to proximal phalanges the wrist. BMP is done pre-MRI to guarantee adequate kidney function.
- Subjective patient reporting will be captured using the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID 3)
- Sleep quality will be tracked using the Pain and Sleep Quality Questionnaire (PSQ-3).
- Visual Analog Scores (VAS) for pain will be tracked.
- Surveys will be done by a study team member
The subject at this time will be scheduled to start HBO2 treatments. Screening, baseline, first HBO2 treatment all in one month. Participants will complete 30 sessions within 10 weeks.
If the subject reports pain relief (> 40% or zero pain) during the HBO2 treatments the will be referred to the rheumatologist for assessment. Pain improvement will be based on a pain assessment (1-10 scale reported verbally) at hyperbaric treatment visits. Labs will be drawn at this time. RAPID 3, PSQ-3 and VAS will be done at least six times while undergoing HBO2 treatment to track subject progress. Labs (CRP, ESR, microparticles) will be repeated at the conclusion of the HBO2 treatments.
At the month 3 and month 6 visit (+/- 2 week window) the subject will see the rheumatologist to track disease activity using the DAS-28. The date of the visit will be scheduled for three and six months from the baseline visit. The rheumatologist will order the MRI, ultrasound and lab studies prior to the visit. RAPID 3, PSQ-3 and VAS will be administered at this time. Lab samples will be collected prior to the Rheumatology appointment.
The six month visit marks the end of the trial. Patients will continue to be followed in Rheumatology Clinic every three months.
If the patient's RA symptoms worsen during the study, the physicians will institute measures to address the cause. The medical monitor will be notified and if any adverse events are involved, they will be recorded and reported to the Institutional Review Board (IRB).
Data:
Data will be entered by authorized study personnel only. Demographic information will be collected including sex, age and ethnic background in accordance with HIPPA compliance.
Data collected during this study will be analyzed at various points in time to include physician exams, labs (CRP, ESR, BMP, analysis of microparticles, neutrophil and platelet activation), radiologic studies, joint inspection.
Changes in joint pain will be determined by self-reporting and results of the standard outcome measures questionnaires (RAPID 3, PSQ-3 and VAS). A separate sleep survey will be administered.
- Conditions
- RheumatoId Arthritis
- Being tested
- Hyperbaric Oxygen
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Hyperbaric Oxygen
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hyperbaric OxygenDevice
30 treatments of Hyperbaric Oxygen.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hyperbaric Oxygen | Experimental | Hyperbaric Oxygen Receives: Device: Hyperbaric Oxygen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sleep Quality - Trouble Falling Asleep, 6 Weeks
The Pain Sleep Quality (PSQ)-3 questionnaire will be used to measure outcome. Participants will score the question "How often have you had trouble falling asleep because of pain?" by placing a slash (/) on a 10 cm line directly beneath the question. The line will have "never" and "always" at each end. A ruler will be used to determine were the slash falls. The value between, 0-10, that corresponds on the ruler with the slash will be documented. "0" is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to obtain a median and inter-quartile range at 6 weeks
Measured: 6 weeks
Sleep Quality - Trouble Falling Asleep, 6 Months
The PSQ-3 questionnaire will be used to measure outcome. Participants will score the question "How often have you had trouble falling asleep because of pain?" by placing a slash (/) on a 10 cm line directly beneath the question. The line will have "never" and "always" at each end. A ruler will be used to determine were the slash falls. The value between, 0-10, that corresponds on the ruler with the slash will be documented. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months.
Measured: 6 months
Sleep Quality - Morning Pain, 6 Weeks
The PSQ-3 questionnaire will be used to measure outcome. Participants will score the question "How often have you been awakened by pain during the morning?" by placing a slash (/) on a 10 cm line directly beneath the question. The line will have "never" and "always" at each end. A ruler will be used to determine were the slash falls. The value between, 0-10, that corresponds on the ruler with the slash will be documented. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 weeks
Measured: 6 weeks
Sleep Quality - Morning Pain, 6 Months
The PSQ-3 questionnaire will be used to measure outcome. Participants will score the question "How often have you been awakened by pain during the morning?" by placing a slash (/) on a 10 cm line directly beneath the question. The line will have "never" and "always" at each end. A ruler will be used to determine were the slash falls. The value between, 0-10, that corresponds on the ruler with the slash will be documented. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
Sleep Quality - Night Pain, 6 Weeks
The PSQ-3 questionnaire will be used to measure outcome. Participants will score the question "How often have you been awakened by pain during the night?" by placing a slash (/) on a 10 cm line directly beneath the question. The line will have "never" and "always" at each end. A ruler will be used to determine were the slash falls. The value between, 0-10, that corresponds on the ruler with the slash will be documented. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 weeks
Measured: 6 weeks
Sleep Quality - Night Pain, 6 Months
The PSQ-3 questionnaire will be used to measure outcome. Participants will score the question "How often have you been awakened by pain during the night?" by placing a slash (/) on a 10 cm line directly beneath the question. The line will have "never" and "always" at each end. A ruler will be used to determine were the slash falls. The value between, 0-10, that corresponds on the ruler with the slash will be documented. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
DAS28 - Global Health (GH), 3 Months
DAS28 quantifies disease activity based on visual analogue scales (VAS) assessment of well-being rated on a scale of 0-100 mm."0"is a better outcome, and "100" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to obtain a median and inter-quartile range at 3 months
Measured: 3 months
DAS28 - Global Health (GH), 6 Months
DAS28 quantifies disease activity based on visual analogue scales (VAS) assessment of well-being rated on a scale of 0-100 mm. "0"is a better outcome, and "100" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to obtain a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
DAS28 - C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3 Months
DAS28 quantifies disease activity based on a mathematical formula that computes four variables: number of swollen and tender joints (total number of joints assessed is 28), CRP (mg/L) and visual analogue scales (VAS) for patient global assessment of well-being (0-100 mm). "0"is a better outcome, and "100" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to obtain a median and inter-quartile range at 3 months
Measured: 3 months
DAS28 - C-reactive Protein (CRP), 6 Months
DAS28 quantifies disease activity based on a mathematical formula that computes four variables: number of swollen and tender joints (total number of joints assessed is 28), CRP (mg/L) and visual analogue scales (VAS) for patient global assessment of wellbeing (0-100 mm). "0"is a better outcome, and "100" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to obtain a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
DAS28 - Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), 3 Months
DAS28 quantifies disease activity based on a mathematical formula that computes four variables: number of swollen and tender joints (total number of joints assessed is 28), ESR (mm/h) and visual analogue scales (VAS) for patient global assessment of well-being (0-100 mm). "0"is a better outcome, and "100" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to obtain a median and inter-quartile range at 3 months
Measured: 3 months
DAS28 - Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), 6 Months
DAS28 quantifies disease activity based on a mathematical formula that computes four variables: number of swollen and tender joints (total number of joints assessed is 28), ESR (mm/h) and visual analogue scales (VAS) for patient global assessment of well-being (0-100 mm). "0"is a better outcome, and "100" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to obtain a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
RAPID 3 - Abilities, 6 Weeks
A questionnaire that assesses abilities on a scale of 0-10. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 weeks.
Measured: 6 weeks
RAPID 3 - Abilities, 6 Months
A questionnaire that assesses abilities on a scale of 0-10. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
RAPID 3 - Pain, 6 Weeks
A questionnaire that assesses pain on a scale of 0-10. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 weeks
Measured: 6 weeks
RAPID 3 - Pain, 6 Months
A questionnaire that assesses pain on a scale of 0-10. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
RAPID 3 - Illness/Health, 6 Weeks
A questionnaire that assesses illness/health on a scale of 0-10. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 weeks
Measured: 6 weeks
RAPID 3 - Illness/Health, 6 Months
A questionnaire that assesses illness/health on a scale of 0-10. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
RAPID 3 - Cumulative Scores, 6 Weeks
The combined abilities, pain and illness/health scores. Recorded as a number between 0-30. "0"is a better outcome, and "30" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 weeks
Measured: 6 weeks
RAPID 3 - Cumulative Scores, 6 Months
The combined abilities, pain and illness/health scores. Recorded as a number between 0-30. "0"is a better outcome, and "30" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
RAPID 3 - Weighed Scores, 6 Weeks
The cumulative score conversion (based on a table). Recorded as a number between 0-10. 0-1 is near remission, 1.3-2 is low severity, 2.3 -4 is moderate severity, and 4.3 - 10 is high severity. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 weeks
Measured: 6 weeks
RAPID 3 - Weighed Scores, 6 Months
The cumulative score conversion (based on a table). Recorded as a number between 0-10. 0-1 is near remission, 1.3-2 is low severity, 2.3 -4 is moderate severity, and 4.3 - 10 is high severity. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
VAS Pain Scale - 6 Weeks
A pain assessment using a horizontal line with numbers, 0-10, along the axis with endpoints "no pain" to "worse possible pain". "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. Participants will mark on the line the level of pain they are experiencing now. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 weeks
Measured: 6 weeks
VAS Pain Scale - 6 Months
A pain assessment using a horizontal line with numbers, 0-10, along the axis with endpoints "no pain" to "worse possible pain". "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. Participants will mark on the line the level of pain they are experiencing now. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
MRI - Synovitis, Combined Score (CS), Right, 3 Months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 3 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 3 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 3 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 3 months
Measured: 3 months
MRI - Synovitis, Combined Score (CS), Right, 6 Months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 6 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 6 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 6 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
MRI - Synovitis, Combined Score (CS), Left, 3 Months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 3 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 3 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 3 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 3 months
Measured: 3 months
MRI - Synovitis, Combined Score (CS), Left, 6 Months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 6 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 6 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 6 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
MRI - Bone Erosion, Combined Score (CS), Right, 3 Months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-10 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "10"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 3 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a higher median score at 3 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 3 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 3 months
Measured: 3 months
MRI - Bone Erosion, Combined Score (CS), Right, 6 Months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-10 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "10"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 6 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a higher median score at 6 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 6 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
MRI - Bone Erosion, Combined Score (CS), Left, 3 Months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-10 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "10"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 3 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a higher median score at 3 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 3 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 3 months
Measured: 3 months
MRI - Bone Erosion, Combined Score (CS), Left, 6 Months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-10 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "10"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 6 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a higher median score at 6 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 6 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
MRI - Oedema, Combined Score (CS), Left, 3 Months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 3 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 3 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 3 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 3 months
Measured: 3 months
MRI - Oedema, Combined Score (CS), Left, 6 Months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 6 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 6 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 6 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
MRI - Oedema, Combined Score (CS), Right, 3 Months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 3 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 3 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 3 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 3 months
Measured: 3 months
MRI - Oedema, Combined Score (CS), Right, 6 Months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 6 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 6 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 6 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
Ultrasound - Synovitis, Combined Score (CS), Right, 3 Months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 3 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 3 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 3 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 3 months
Measured: 3 months
Ultrasound - Synovitis, Combined Scale (CS), Right - 6 Months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 6 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 6 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 6 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
Ultrasound - Synovitis, Combined Score (CS), Left, 3 Months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 3 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 3 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 3 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 3 months
Measured: 3 months
Ultrasound - Synovitis, Combined Score (CS), Left, 6 Months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 6 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 6 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the t month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at t months
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study start19 Jan 2017
- Primary completion10 Apr 2019
- Study completion10 Apr 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for RheumatoId ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michelle Sit, MD, David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center
- Investigators
- Michelle T Sit, MD, Principal investigator, David Grant Medical Center. Travis AFB
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02984943
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FDG20160004H
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 15 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 24 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO 3rd, Birnbaum NS, Burmester GR, Bykerk VP, Cohen MD, Combe B, Costenbader KH, Dougados M, Emery P, Ferraccioli G, Hazes JM, Hobbs K, Huizinga TW, Kavanaugh A, Kay J, Kvien TK, Laing T, Mease P, Menard HA, Moreland LW, Naden RL, Pincus T, Smolen JS, Stanislawska-Biernat E, Symmons D, Tak PP, Upchurch KS, Vencovsky J, Wolfe F, Hawker G. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Sep;69(9):1580-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.138461.
PubMed 20699241Ayearst L, Harsanyi Z, Michalko KJ. The Pain and Sleep Questionnaire three-item index (PSQ-3): a reliable and valid measure of the impact of pain on sleep in chronic nonmalignant pain of various etiologies. Pain Res Manag. 2012 Jul-Aug;17(4):281-90. doi: 10.1155/2012/635967.
PubMed 22891194Pincus T, Swearingen C, Wolfe F. Toward a multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ): assessment of advanced activities of daily living and psychological status in the patient-friendly health assessment questionnaire format. Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Oct;42(10):2220-30. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199910)42:103.0.CO;2-5.
PubMed 10524697Varga OIu, Ignat'ev VK, Vezikova NN, Kheifetz IV. [Radiation-modifying effect of oxygen barotherapy in complex treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthrosis]. Ter Arkh. 2002;74(12):83-6. Russian.
PubMed 12577851Sit MT, Schmidt TW, Edmonds LD, Kelly JA, Sky KM, Thornton JA, McNeary-Garvin AM, Thom SR, Slade JB. The Effects of Hyperbaric Oxygen on Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Pilot Study. J Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Dec 1;27(8):e462-e468. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001540.
PubMed 32947434
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effects of Hyperbaric Oxygen on Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02984943
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FDG20160004H
- Conditions
- RheumatoId Arthritis
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Hyperbaric Oxygen
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical CenterUS federal agency
- Study start
- 19 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Apr 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Mar 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this investigation is to determine the effects and ease of using hyperbaric oxygen therapy HBO2 for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis joint pain and prevention of disease progression. In this study it is our intention to not only evaluate effects and ease of treatment but time, cost, possible adverse events and effect size in an attempt to predict an appropriate sample size and improve on the study design prior to a more extensive study.
Detailed description
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic, inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology that primarily involves synovial joints, typically symmetrically. If untreated and/or uncontrolled, joint destruction due to erosion of cartilage and bone can cause joint destruction, joint deformities, loss of physical function, severe disability, and difficulties maintaining employment. American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR 2010 classification criteria is a score-based algorithm which adds scores of 4 categories including, joint involvement, serology, acute-phase reactants and duration of symptoms. A score of >6/10 is needed for classification of a patient as having definite RA.
Non-pharmacologic and supplementary therapies include patient education, rest, exercise, nutrition counseling, cardiovascular disease risk reduction, and immunizations to decrease risk of infectious complications of immunosuppression. These are important in the comprehensive management of RA in all stages of disease and are used in addition to drug therapy.
Pharmacologic therapies typically start with a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD), preferably as soon as possible after diagnosis. DMARDs are commonly used in combination with anti-inflammatory drugs such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and glucocorticoids which are often used as bridging therapies until the DMARDs become effective. The goal is disease remission. To assess response, disease activity scores are used along with inflammatory markers.
Three patients with active RA treated in the multi-place hyperbaric facility at David Grant Medical Center (DGMC), Travis Air Force Base, California, for non RA-related indications, all noted significant improvement in arthralgias, sleep patterns and overall well-being during the course of therapy. Two were treated at 2 atmospheres absolute (ATA) oxygen for 90 minutes daily Monday through Friday. One patient received 2 ATA air on the same treatment protocol as a participant in a research study, and a subsequent course of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) at 2 ATA.
This is a pilot study. Patients will be recruited through the Rheumatologists, IRB-approved HIPAA waiver to contact patients that have been seen in the military treatment facility (MTF) within the past year with a diagnosis of RA, flyers in the Rheumatology Clinic or thru Commander Calls.
During the initial screening visit:
The rheumatologist will discuss the trial and at this point the subject will be consented and the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be reviewed. If subject qualifies they will see the Hyperbaric physician who will do physical examination to determine if it is safe for the subject to receive HBO2. An human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) by point of care testing (POCT) will be completed by the coordinator in women capable of pregnancy. After this exam is done the subject will be scheduled for a trial Hyperbaric session.
Baseline visit will be done after the subject has tolerated the trial hyperbaric session. This visit includes:
- A visit with the rheumatologist to do routine assessments to establish baseline measurement using the Disease Activity Scale (DAS28)
- Labs (CRP and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), basic metabolic panel (BMP) and microparticles), will be completed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with and without contrast and ultrasound will be done on both hands from wrists to proximal phalanges the wrist. BMP is done pre-MRI to guarantee adequate kidney function.
- Subjective patient reporting will be captured using the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID 3)
- Sleep quality will be tracked using the Pain and Sleep Quality Questionnaire (PSQ-3).
- Visual Analog Scores (VAS) for pain will be tracked.
- Surveys will be done by a study team member
The subject at this time will be scheduled to start HBO2 treatments. Screening, baseline, first HBO2 treatment all in one month. Participants will complete 30 sessions within 10 weeks.
If the subject reports pain relief (> 40% or zero pain) during the HBO2 treatments the will be referred to the rheumatologist for assessment. Pain improvement will be based on a pain assessment (1-10 scale reported verbally) at hyperbaric treatment visits. Labs will be drawn at this time. RAPID 3, PSQ-3 and VAS will be done at least six times while undergoing HBO2 treatment to track subject progress. Labs (CRP, ESR, microparticles) will be repeated at the conclusion of the HBO2 treatments.
At the month 3 and month 6 visit (+/- 2 week window) the subject will see the rheumatologist to track disease activity using the DAS-28. The date of the visit will be scheduled for three and six months from the baseline visit. The rheumatologist will order the MRI, ultrasound and lab studies prior to the visit. RAPID 3, PSQ-3 and VAS will be administered at this time. Lab samples will be collected prior to the Rheumatology appointment.
The six month visit marks the end of the trial. Patients will continue to be followed in Rheumatology Clinic every three months.
If the patient's RA symptoms worsen during the study, the physicians will institute measures to address the cause. The medical monitor will be notified and if any adverse events are involved, they will be recorded and reported to the Institutional Review Board (IRB).
Data:
Data will be entered by authorized study personnel only. Demographic information will be collected including sex, age and ethnic background in accordance with HIPPA compliance.
Data collected during this study will be analyzed at various points in time to include physician exams, labs (CRP, ESR, BMP, analysis of microparticles, neutrophil and platelet activation), radiologic studies, joint inspection.
Changes in joint pain will be determined by self-reporting and results of the standard outcome measures questionnaires (RAPID 3, PSQ-3 and VAS). A separate sleep survey will be administered.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hyperbaric Oxygen | Experimental | Device: Hyperbaric OxygenHyperbaric Oxygen |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age ≥ 18
- Active duty or Department of Defense (DoD) beneficiary
- Diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis meeting ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria and any one of the following:
- Women of childbearing age must have a negative pregnancy test and currently be on a reliable form of birth control
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Severe depression
- Dementia, mental disability
- Claustrophobia
- Uncontrolled seizure disorder
- Uncontrolled asthma/severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) > 45 mmHg on arterial blood gas
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hyperbaric Oxygen30 treatments of Hyperbaric Oxygen. | Device | Hyperbaric Oxygen |
Primary outcome
Sleep Quality - Trouble Falling Asleep, 6 Weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks
The Pain Sleep Quality (PSQ)-3 questionnaire will be used to measure outcome. Participants will score the question "How often have you had trouble falling asleep because of pain?" by placing a slash (/) on a 10 cm line directly beneath the question. The line will have "never" and "always" at each end. A ruler will be used to determine were the slash falls. The value between, 0-10, that corresponds on the ruler with the slash will be documented. "0" is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to obtain a median and inter-quartile range at 6 weeks
Sleep Quality - Trouble Falling Asleep, 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
The PSQ-3 questionnaire will be used to measure outcome. Participants will score the question "How often have you had trouble falling asleep because of pain?" by placing a slash (/) on a 10 cm line directly beneath the question. The line will have "never" and "always" at each end. A ruler will be used to determine were the slash falls. The value between, 0-10, that corresponds on the ruler with the slash will be documented. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months.
Sleep Quality - Morning Pain, 6 Weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks
The PSQ-3 questionnaire will be used to measure outcome. Participants will score the question "How often have you been awakened by pain during the morning?" by placing a slash (/) on a 10 cm line directly beneath the question. The line will have "never" and "always" at each end. A ruler will be used to determine were the slash falls. The value between, 0-10, that corresponds on the ruler with the slash will be documented. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 weeks
Sleep Quality - Morning Pain, 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
The PSQ-3 questionnaire will be used to measure outcome. Participants will score the question "How often have you been awakened by pain during the morning?" by placing a slash (/) on a 10 cm line directly beneath the question. The line will have "never" and "always" at each end. A ruler will be used to determine were the slash falls. The value between, 0-10, that corresponds on the ruler with the slash will be documented. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
Sleep Quality - Night Pain, 6 Weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks
The PSQ-3 questionnaire will be used to measure outcome. Participants will score the question "How often have you been awakened by pain during the night?" by placing a slash (/) on a 10 cm line directly beneath the question. The line will have "never" and "always" at each end. A ruler will be used to determine were the slash falls. The value between, 0-10, that corresponds on the ruler with the slash will be documented. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 weeks
Sleep Quality - Night Pain, 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
The PSQ-3 questionnaire will be used to measure outcome. Participants will score the question "How often have you been awakened by pain during the night?" by placing a slash (/) on a 10 cm line directly beneath the question. The line will have "never" and "always" at each end. A ruler will be used to determine were the slash falls. The value between, 0-10, that corresponds on the ruler with the slash will be documented. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
DAS28 - Global Health (GH), 3 Months
Time frame: 3 months
DAS28 quantifies disease activity based on visual analogue scales (VAS) assessment of well-being rated on a scale of 0-100 mm."0"is a better outcome, and "100" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to obtain a median and inter-quartile range at 3 months
DAS28 - Global Health (GH), 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
DAS28 quantifies disease activity based on visual analogue scales (VAS) assessment of well-being rated on a scale of 0-100 mm. "0"is a better outcome, and "100" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to obtain a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
DAS28 - C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3 Months
Time frame: 3 months
DAS28 quantifies disease activity based on a mathematical formula that computes four variables: number of swollen and tender joints (total number of joints assessed is 28), CRP (mg/L) and visual analogue scales (VAS) for patient global assessment of well-being (0-100 mm). "0"is a better outcome, and "100" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to obtain a median and inter-quartile range at 3 months
DAS28 - C-reactive Protein (CRP), 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
DAS28 quantifies disease activity based on a mathematical formula that computes four variables: number of swollen and tender joints (total number of joints assessed is 28), CRP (mg/L) and visual analogue scales (VAS) for patient global assessment of wellbeing (0-100 mm). "0"is a better outcome, and "100" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to obtain a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
DAS28 - Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), 3 Months
Time frame: 3 months
DAS28 quantifies disease activity based on a mathematical formula that computes four variables: number of swollen and tender joints (total number of joints assessed is 28), ESR (mm/h) and visual analogue scales (VAS) for patient global assessment of well-being (0-100 mm). "0"is a better outcome, and "100" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to obtain a median and inter-quartile range at 3 months
DAS28 - Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
DAS28 quantifies disease activity based on a mathematical formula that computes four variables: number of swollen and tender joints (total number of joints assessed is 28), ESR (mm/h) and visual analogue scales (VAS) for patient global assessment of well-being (0-100 mm). "0"is a better outcome, and "100" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to obtain a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
RAPID 3 - Abilities, 6 Weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks
A questionnaire that assesses abilities on a scale of 0-10. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 weeks.
RAPID 3 - Abilities, 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
A questionnaire that assesses abilities on a scale of 0-10. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
RAPID 3 - Pain, 6 Weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks
A questionnaire that assesses pain on a scale of 0-10. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 weeks
RAPID 3 - Pain, 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
A questionnaire that assesses pain on a scale of 0-10. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
RAPID 3 - Illness/Health, 6 Weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks
A questionnaire that assesses illness/health on a scale of 0-10. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 weeks
RAPID 3 - Illness/Health, 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
A questionnaire that assesses illness/health on a scale of 0-10. "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
RAPID 3 - Cumulative Scores, 6 Weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks
The combined abilities, pain and illness/health scores. Recorded as a number between 0-30. "0"is a better outcome, and "30" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 weeks
RAPID 3 - Cumulative Scores, 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
The combined abilities, pain and illness/health scores. Recorded as a number between 0-30. "0"is a better outcome, and "30" is a worse outcome. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
RAPID 3 - Weighed Scores, 6 Weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks
The cumulative score conversion (based on a table). Recorded as a number between 0-10. 0-1 is near remission, 1.3-2 is low severity, 2.3 -4 is moderate severity, and 4.3 - 10 is high severity. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 weeks
RAPID 3 - Weighed Scores, 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
The cumulative score conversion (based on a table). Recorded as a number between 0-10. 0-1 is near remission, 1.3-2 is low severity, 2.3 -4 is moderate severity, and 4.3 - 10 is high severity. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
VAS Pain Scale - 6 Weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks
A pain assessment using a horizontal line with numbers, 0-10, along the axis with endpoints "no pain" to "worse possible pain". "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. Participants will mark on the line the level of pain they are experiencing now. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 weeks
VAS Pain Scale - 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
A pain assessment using a horizontal line with numbers, 0-10, along the axis with endpoints "no pain" to "worse possible pain". "0"is a better outcome, and "10" is a worse outcome. Participants will mark on the line the level of pain they are experiencing now. The value for each participant will be combined to report a median and inter-quartile range at 6 months
MRI - Synovitis, Combined Score (CS), Right, 3 Months
Time frame: 3 months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 3 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 3 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 3 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 3 months
MRI - Synovitis, Combined Score (CS), Right, 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 6 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 6 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 6 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 6 months
MRI - Synovitis, Combined Score (CS), Left, 3 Months
Time frame: 3 months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 3 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 3 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 3 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 3 months
MRI - Synovitis, Combined Score (CS), Left, 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 6 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 6 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 6 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 6 months
MRI - Bone Erosion, Combined Score (CS), Right, 3 Months
Time frame: 3 months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-10 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "10"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 3 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a higher median score at 3 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 3 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 3 months
MRI - Bone Erosion, Combined Score (CS), Right, 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-10 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "10"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 6 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a higher median score at 6 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 6 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 6 months
MRI - Bone Erosion, Combined Score (CS), Left, 3 Months
Time frame: 3 months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-10 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "10"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 3 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a higher median score at 3 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 3 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 3 months
MRI - Bone Erosion, Combined Score (CS), Left, 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-10 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "10"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 6 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a higher median score at 6 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 6 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 6 months
MRI - Oedema, Combined Score (CS), Left, 3 Months
Time frame: 3 months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 3 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 3 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 3 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 3 months
MRI - Oedema, Combined Score (CS), Left, 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 6 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 6 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 6 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 6 months
MRI - Oedema, Combined Score (CS), Right, 3 Months
Time frame: 3 months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 3 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 3 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 3 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 3 months
MRI - Oedema, Combined Score (CS), Right, 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 6 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 6 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 6 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 6 months
Ultrasound - Synovitis, Combined Score (CS), Right, 3 Months
Time frame: 3 months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 3 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 3 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 3 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 3 months
Ultrasound - Synovitis, Combined Scale (CS), Right - 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 6 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 6 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 6 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 6 months
Ultrasound - Synovitis, Combined Score (CS), Left, 3 Months
Time frame: 3 months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 3 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 3 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the 3 month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at 3 months
Ultrasound - Synovitis, Combined Score (CS), Left, 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
Each of the 23 joints in the hand/wrist will be assigned a score from 0-3 based on the proportion of bone involved. "0" is best outcome, "3"worse outcome. The median score of all 23 joints at baseline and 6 months will then be calculated for each participant. Participants with a lower median score at 6 months relative to baseline will be considered "improved" for the t month time point. The number of participants with "improved" scores will be added to form the total number with improvement at t months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Mar 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 20699241Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO 3rd, Birnbaum NS, Burmester GR, Bykerk VP, Cohen MD, Combe B, Costenbader KH, Dougados M, Emery P, Ferraccioli G, Hazes JM, Hobbs K, Huizinga TW, Kavanaugh A, Kay J, Kvien TK, Laing T, Mease P, Menard HA, Moreland LW, Naden RL, Pincus T, Smolen JS, Stanislawska-Biernat E, Symmons D, Tak PP, Upchurch KS, Vencovsky J, Wolfe F, Hawker G. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Sep;69(9):1580-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.138461.
- Background: PubMed 22891194Ayearst L, Harsanyi Z, Michalko KJ. The Pain and Sleep Questionnaire three-item index (PSQ-3): a reliable and valid measure of the impact of pain on sleep in chronic nonmalignant pain of various etiologies. Pain Res Manag. 2012 Jul-Aug;17(4):281-90. doi: 10.1155/2012/635967.
- Background: PubMed 10524697Pincus T, Swearingen C, Wolfe F. Toward a multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ): assessment of advanced activities of daily living and psychological status in the patient-friendly health assessment questionnaire format. Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Oct;42(10):2220-30. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199910)42:103.0.CO;2-5.
- Results publication: PubMed 12577851Varga OIu, Ignat'ev VK, Vezikova NN, Kheifetz IV. [Radiation-modifying effect of oxygen barotherapy in complex treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthrosis]. Ter Arkh. 2002;74(12):83-6. Russian.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32947434Sit MT, Schmidt TW, Edmonds LD, Kelly JA, Sky KM, Thornton JA, McNeary-Garvin AM, Thom SR, Slade JB. The Effects of Hyperbaric Oxygen on Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Pilot Study. J Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Dec 1;27(8):e462-e468. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001540.
- Hyperbaric oxygen in chronic traumatic brain injury: oxygen, pressure, and gene therapyLink provided by the sponsor.
- Disease activity score for rheumatoid arthritis.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Approaches to the management of rheumatoid arthritisLink provided by the sponsor.
- The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is directed toward the control of synovitis and the prevention of joint injury.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for RheumatoId Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michelle T Sit, MD principal investigator
David Grant Medical Center. Travis AFB
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hyperbaric Oxygen in people with RheumatoId Arthritis, run by David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Mar 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sleep Quality - Trouble Falling Asleep, 6 Weeks (time frame: 6 weeks). The study lists 40 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02984943, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2020.