Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseNCT02985918
High-Intensity vs Low-Intensity NPPV in Patients With an AECOPD: The HAPPEN Trial
A study testing High-intensity NPPV and Low-intensity NPPV in people with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Beijing Chao Yang Hospital at 31 sites in China.
Trial summary
To determine whether high-intensity NPPV, compared with low-intensity NPPV, could reduce the need for endotracheal intubation during hospitalization in patients with an AECOPD and hypercapnia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- What is being tested?
- High-intensity NPPV and Low-intensity NPPV
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 31 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 3 Jan 2019to 22 Apr 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- AECOPD confirmed by the 2019 criteria of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)
- Arterial pH <7.35 and PaCO2 >45 mmHg at screening entry
- PaCO2 >45 mmHg after a 6-hour trial of low-intensity NPPV
Who cannot join
- Age <18 years
- Excessive respiratory secretions with weak cough
- Upper airway obstruction
- Recent oral, facial, or cranial trauma or surgery
- Recent gastric or esophageal surgery
- Presence of restrictive ventilatory dysfunction (eg, consolidation or removal of at least one pulmonary lobe, massive pleural effusion, chest wall deformity, continuous strapping with thoracic or abdominal bandage, or severe abdominal distension)
Show all 17Show fewer
- Active upper gastrointestinal bleeding
- Cardiac or respiratory arrest
- Arterial oxygen tension/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) <100 mmHg
- Pneumothorax
- Obvious emphysematous bullae confirmed by chest CT scan
- Ventricular arrhythmia or myocardial ischemia
- Severe hemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg)
- Severe metabolic acidosis (pH <7.20 and bicarbonate <22 mmol/L)
- Refusal to receive NPPV or give informed consent
- Prior endotracheal intubation or tracheostomy during the current hospitalization
- A do-not-intubate order
Trial locations and contacts
31 sites in 1 country.
31 sites in 1 country
China31 sites
Wuyuan Hospital of Inner Mongolia
Bayan Nur
Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital
Beijing
Beijing Fangshan Liangxiang Hospital,
Beijing
Beijing Jingmei Group General Hospital
Beijing
Beijing Luhe Hospital
Beijing
Beijing Mentougou District Hospital
Beijing
Beijing Pinggu Hospital
Beijing
Beijing Zhongguancun Hospital
Beijing
Capital Medical University Daxing Teaching Hospital
Beijing
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing
Dalian Friendship Hospital
Dalian
Dalian Municipal Central Hospital
Dalian
Shulan (Hang Zhou) Hospital
Hangzhou
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou
Hemei General Hospital
Hebi
Huangshi Central Hospital
Huangshi
Jiaozuo People's Hospital
Jiaozuo
Jiaozuo Second Hospital
Jiaozuo
Kaifeng Central Hospital
Kaifeng
The First Affiliated Hospital of Hanan University,
Kaifeng
The First People's Hospital of Luoyang
Luoyang
The Third Hospital of Mianyang
Mianyang
Nanyang Central Hospital
Nanyang
Nanyang First People's Hospital
Nanyang
Sanmenxia Central Hospital
Sanmenxia
The Second Hospital of Tongliao
Tongliao
People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region
Ürümqi
Xinxiang Central Hospital
Xinxiang
Zhengzhou Central Hospital
Zhengzhou
Hunan Province Directly Affiliated TCM Hospital
Zhuzhou
Zibo First Hospital
Zibo
About this study
Official title: Effect of High-Intensity vs Low-Intensity Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation on the Need for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With an Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease The HAPPEN Randomized Clinical Trial
To determine whether high-intensity NPPV, compared with low-intensity NPPV, could reduce the need for endotracheal intubation during hospitalization in patients with an AECOPD and hypercapnia.
- Being tested
- High-intensity NPPV, Low-intensity NPPV
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High-intensity NPPVDevice
In the high-intensity NPPV group, IPAP is initially adjusted in increments/decrements of 1-2 cmH2O, typically ranging from 20 to 30 cmH2O (or a tolerated maximum), to obtain a VT 10-15 mL/kg PBW and a respiratory rate <25 breaths/min. Subsequent adjustments to IPAP are based on the results of arterial blood gases (ABGs; up to 30 cmH2O) to achieve normocapnia (if possible), or to maximally decrease PaCO2 toward normocapnia if normocapnia can not be achieved. If PaCO2 decreases to less than 35 mmHg, IPAP will be decreased to achieve normocapnia.
Low-intensity NPPVDevice
In the low-intensity NPPV group, as well as during the 6-hour trial of low-intensity NPPV, IPAP is initially adjusted in increments/decrements of 1-2 cmH2O (up to 20 cmH2O), according to patients' tolerance, to obtain a VT 6-10 mL/kg PBW and a respiratory rate <25 breaths/min. Subsequent adjustments to IPAP are based on the results of ABGs (up to 20 cmH2O) to achieve a pH of ≥7.35 and to reduce PaCO2 to a level deemed appropriate by the attending physician.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High-intensity NPPV | Experimental | Patients will receive high-intensity NPPV. Receives: Device: High-intensity NPPV |
| Low-intensity NPPV | Active comparator | Patients will receive low-intensity NPPV. Receives: Device: Low-intensity NPPV |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The need for endotracheal intubation during hospitalization
Defined as the proportion of patients who needed for endotracheal intubation during hospitalization after randomization
Measured: From randomization to discharge from hospital
Secondary outcomes (15)
Actual intubation during hospitalization
Defined as the proportion of patients actually receiving intubation and invasive ventilation during hospitalization after randomization
Measured: From randomization to discharge from hospital
Need for endotracheal intubation at day 28
Defined as the proportion of patients who needed endotracheal intubation within 28 days since randomization
Measured: Within 28 days since randomization
Actual intubation at day 28
Defined as the proportion of patients receiving intubation and invasive ventilation within 28 days after randomization
Measured: Within 28 days since randomization
The composite of actual intubation or avoiding intubation by crossover to high-intensity NPPV
Defined as the incidence of patients receiving actual intubation in the high-intensity NPPV group vs the composite incidence of actual intubation or avoiding intubation by crossover to high-intensity NPPV in case of intubation criteria in the low-intensity NPPV group) during hospitalization after randomization
Measured: From randomization to discharge from hospital
NPPV weaning success
Defined as the proportion of patients with persistent disconnection of NPPV without the presence of respiratory distress within the following 72 hours during hospitalization after randomization
Measured: From randomization to discharge from hospital
Mortality in hospital
Measured: From randomization to discharge from hospital
Mortality at day 28
Measured: Within 28 days since randomization
Mortality at day 90
Measured: Within 90 days since randomization
Intensive care unit admission
Defined as the proportion of patients who transferred to ICU during hospitalization after randomization
Measured: From randomization to discharge from hospital
Live discharge from the hospital
Defined as the proportion of patients with the exception of those who died and withdrawn treatment therapy during hospitalization after randomization.
Measured: From randomization to discharge from hospital
Length of hospital stay
Defined as the number of days for the index hospitalization
Measured: From hospital admission to discharge
Length of hospital stay after randomization
Defined as the number of hospitalization days since randomization
Measured: From randomization to discharge from hospital
Invasive ventilator-free days at day 28
Defined as 28 minus the number of days with invasive ventilator (range, 0-28 days) since randomization
Measured: Within 28 days since randomization
ICU-free days at day 28
Defined as 28 minus the number of days in the ICU (range, 0-28 days) since randomization
Measured: Within 28 days since randomization
Hospital readmission at day 90
Defined as the number of hospitalization days within 90 days since randomization
Measured: Within 90 days since randomization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study start3 Jan 2019
- Primary completion31 Jan 2022
- Study completion22 Apr 2022
Why it stopped: The trial has been terminated by the DSMB and the trial steering committee, based on the interim analysis results and the impracticality of continuing the trial in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Beijing Chao Yang HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Zujin Luo, Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
- Investigators
- Zujin Luo, MD, Principal investigator, Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02985918
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BeijingCYH-ICU-004
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 2 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 7 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Luo Z, Li Y, Li W, Li Y, Nie Q, Shi Y, Wang J, Ji Q, Han X, Liu S, Li D, Wang S, Li Z, Jia D, Ge H, Xu P, Feng Z, Li F, An F, Tai N, Yue L, Xie H, Jin X, Liu H, Dang Q, Zhang Y, Sun L, Wang J, Huang H, Chen L, Ma Y, Cao Z, Wang C; HAPPEN Investigators. Effect of High-Intensity vs Low-Intensity Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation on the Need for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With an Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The HAPPEN Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2024 Nov 26;332(20):1709-1722. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.15815.
PubMed 39283649Luo Z, Wu C, Li Q, Zhu J, Pang B, Shi Y, Ma Y, Cao Z; HAPPEN collaboration group. High-intensity versus low-intensity noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HAPPEN): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Nov 21;19(1):645. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2991-y.
PubMed 30463622
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of High-Intensity vs Low-Intensity Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation on the Need for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With an Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease The HAPPEN Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02985918
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BeijingCYH-ICU-004
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The trial has been terminated by the DSMB and the trial steering committee, based on the interim analysis results and the impracticality of continuing the trial in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Beijing Chao Yang HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Apr 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To determine whether high-intensity NPPV, compared with low-intensity NPPV, could reduce the need for endotracheal intubation during hospitalization in patients with an AECOPD and hypercapnia.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High-intensity NPPV | Experimental | Device: High-intensity NPPVPatients will receive high-intensity NPPV. |
| Low-intensity NPPV | Active comparator | Device: Low-intensity NPPVPatients will receive low-intensity NPPV. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- AECOPD confirmed by the 2019 criteria of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)
- Arterial pH <7.35 and PaCO2 >45 mmHg at screening entry
- PaCO2 >45 mmHg after a 6-hour trial of low-intensity NPPV
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Age <18 years
- Excessive respiratory secretions with weak cough
- Upper airway obstruction
- Recent oral, facial, or cranial trauma or surgery
- Recent gastric or esophageal surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High-intensity NPPVIn the high-intensity NPPV group, IPAP is initially adjusted in increments/decrements of 1-2 cmH2O, typically ranging from 20 to 30 cmH2O (or a tolerated maximum), to obtain a VT 10-15 mL/kg PBW and a respiratory rate <25 breaths/min. Subsequent adjustments to IPAP are based on the results of arterial blood gases (ABGs; up to 30 cmH2O) to achieve normocapnia (if possible), or to maximally decrease PaCO2 toward normocapnia if normocapnia can not be achieved. If PaCO2 decreases to less than 35 mmHg, IPAP will be decreased to achieve normocapnia. | Device | High-intensity NPPV |
| Low-intensity NPPVIn the low-intensity NPPV group, as well as during the 6-hour trial of low-intensity NPPV, IPAP is initially adjusted in increments/decrements of 1-2 cmH2O (up to 20 cmH2O), according to patients' tolerance, to obtain a VT 6-10 mL/kg PBW and a respiratory rate <25 breaths/min. Subsequent adjustments to IPAP are based on the results of ABGs (up to 20 cmH2O) to achieve a pH of ≥7.35 and to reduce PaCO2 to a level deemed appropriate by the attending physician. | Device | Low-intensity NPPV |
Primary outcome
The need for endotracheal intubation during hospitalization
Time frame: From randomization to discharge from hospital
Defined as the proportion of patients who needed for endotracheal intubation during hospitalization after randomization
15 secondary outcomes
Actual intubation during hospitalization
Time frame: From randomization to discharge from hospital
Need for endotracheal intubation at day 28
Time frame: Within 28 days since randomization
Actual intubation at day 28
Time frame: Within 28 days since randomization
The composite of actual intubation or avoiding intubation by crossover to high-intensity NPPV
Time frame: From randomization to discharge from hospital
NPPV weaning success
Time frame: From randomization to discharge from hospital
Mortality in hospital
Time frame: From randomization to discharge from hospital
Mortality at day 28
Time frame: Within 28 days since randomization
Mortality at day 90
Time frame: Within 90 days since randomization
Intensive care unit admission
Time frame: From randomization to discharge from hospital
Live discharge from the hospital
Time frame: From randomization to discharge from hospital
Length of hospital stay
Time frame: From hospital admission to discharge
Length of hospital stay after randomization
Time frame: From randomization to discharge from hospital
Invasive ventilator-free days at day 28
Time frame: Within 28 days since randomization
ICU-free days at day 28
Time frame: Within 28 days since randomization
Hospital readmission at day 90
Time frame: Within 90 days since randomization
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: The trial has been terminated by the DSMB and the trial steering committee, based on the interim analysis results and the impracticality of continuing the trial in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Feb 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39283649Luo Z, Li Y, Li W, Li Y, Nie Q, Shi Y, Wang J, Ji Q, Han X, Liu S, Li D, Wang S, Li Z, Jia D, Ge H, Xu P, Feng Z, Li F, An F, Tai N, Yue L, Xie H, Jin X, Liu H, Dang Q, Zhang Y, Sun L, Wang J, Huang H, Chen L, Ma Y, Cao Z, Wang C; HAPPEN Investigators. Effect of High-Intensity vs Low-Intensity Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation on the Need for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With an Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The HAPPEN Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2024 Nov 26;332(20):1709-1722. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.15815.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30463622Luo Z, Wu C, Li Q, Zhu J, Pang B, Shi Y, Ma Y, Cao Z; HAPPEN collaboration group. High-intensity versus low-intensity noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HAPPEN): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Nov 21;19(1):645. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2991-y.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Active, not recruiting
Influence of FreeO2 on Percentage of Time Within Oxygen Saturation Target Using Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) for Patients Admitted for AECOPD or Bariatric Surgery
COPD Exacerbation, Oxygen Toxicity
RecruitingPhase 2
Rademikibart IV for Acute Asthma and COPD Exacerbation
Asthma Acute, COPD Exacerbation Acute
RecruitingObservational study
Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Admitted to ICU for a Severe Acute Exacerbation of COPD.
COPD Exacerbation, ICU
Recruiting
A Prospective Study of Cardiovascular Risk of Patients Admitted for Acute Exacerbation of COPD
COPD
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Efficacy of Nebulized Long-Acting Bronchodilators (Formoterol and Revefenacin) vs. Short-Acting Bronchodilators (Albuterol and Ipratropium) in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Acute Exacerbation of COPD (ECOPD)
COPD Exacerbation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Zujin Luo, MD principal investigator
Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
31 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing High-intensity NPPV and Low-intensity NPPV in people with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Beijing Chao Yang Hospital at 31 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 31 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: The trial has been terminated by the DSMB and the trial steering committee, based on the interim analysis results and the impracticality of continuing the trial in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The need for endotracheal intubation during hospitalization (time frame: From randomization to discharge from hospital). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02985918, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Feb 2024.