Gingival RecessionNCT02986191
The Use of Mucograft® to Treat Gingival Recession
A study testing Mucograft and Connective Tissue Graft in people with Gingival Recession, run by Damascus University at 1 site in Syria.
Trial summary
Twenty patients with gingival recession will be enrolled in this trial. Gingival recession will be treated in one side by applying Mucograft® with coronally advanced flap (CAF) while on the opposite side a connective tissue graft (from the palate) will be applied with a CAF. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 45 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Gingival Recession
- What is being tested?
- Mucograft and Connective Tissue Graft
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSyria
- Study dates
- Aug 2016to 20 Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 45 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Presence of Type I or II (Miller Classification) of gingival recession
Who cannot join
- Smoking
- Pregnancy or lactating
- Presence of any systematic diseases can affect the periodontal surgery.
- Subjects with significant moderate to severe periodontal disease.
- Patients under orthodontic treatment
- Presence of restorative materials (e.g. crown)
Show all 9Show fewer
- Effectiveness of frenum
- Subjects have failed to maintain good plaque control.
- Subjects having previous surgical treatment for covering the recession in the chosen area.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Syria1 site
Department of Periodontics, University of Damascus Dental School
Damascus, DM20AM18
About this study
Official title: Clinical Applications of 3D Collagen Matrix (Mucograft®) in the Management of Gingival Recession: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Twenty patients with gingival recession will be enrolled in this trial. Gingival recession will be treated in one side by applying Mucograft® with coronally advanced flap (CAF) while on the opposite side a connective tissue graft (from the palate) will be applied with a CAF.
Patients will be followed for 3 and 6 months by measuring the clinical indexes and statistical analyses will be performed to compare the results and to assess the success of Mucograft®.
Read the detailed description
Many surgical techniques have used to treat gingival recession such aas repositioned flaps, autologous soft tissue grafts (connective tissue graft or free gingival grafts) or allografts like acellular dermal which can be used as substitutes for palatal donor tissue. Mucograft® (3D collagen matrix) is also an allograft from porcine origin and is designed for soft tissue regeneration and considered the ideal solution to autogenous soft tissue grafts and it provides an ideal matrix for blood vessel and soft tissue ingrowth.
- Conditions
- Gingival Recession
- Being tested
- Mucograft, Connective Tissue Graft
- Keywords
- gingival graft, free gingival graft, coronally advanced flap, reduced keratinized gingiva
- Medical subject headings
- Gingival Recession
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MucograftProcedure or surgery
This method of grafting will be used to treat the gingival recession using coronally advanced flaps.
Connective Tissue GraftProcedure or surgery
This will be used in the traditional manner to correct gingival recession
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mucograft | Experimental | One side of the mouth will be subjected to Mucograft in this split-mouth study design. Receives: Procedure: Mucograft |
| Connective tissue graft | Active comparator | The opposite side of the mouth will be subjected to a connective tissue graft. Receives: Procedure: Connective Tissue Graft |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in the Clinical Attachment Level Index
Clinical Attachment Level is dependent on measuring the pocket depth as well as the amount of gingival recession using specific tools. The measurement is going to be recorded in millimeters.
Measured: Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Secondary outcomes (8)
Change in Probing Depth
Probing depth is going to be measuring using a specific tool (UNC-15 probe).
Measured: Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Change in Gingival Recession
Gingival recession is measured from the cemento-enamel junction to the gingival margin of the recessed tissues.
Measured: Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Change in Gingival Biotype
Gingival biotype is assessed by an endodontic file which used to determine the thickness of the gingival tissues (i.e. thick or thin).
Measured: Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Change in Root Coverage Index
The amount of root exposure will be measured and compared to the total length of the root
Measured: Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Change in Resistance to Muscular Pull
The cheeks or lips are going to be retracted by hand or by a mirror in order to see the movement of the free gingival tissues. The movement will be esitmated in millimeters.
Measured: Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Change in Color Match Index
Measured: Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Shrinkage index at three months
Measured: Measurements will be done at two time points to calculate the amount of shrinkage :(1) at one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively.
Shrinkage index at six months
Measured: Measurements will be done at two time points to calculate the amount of shrinkage :(1) at one hour before applying the graft, (2) at six months exactly post-operatively.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2016
- Primary completionApr 2017
- Study completion20 Dec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gingival RecessionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Damascus University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Haydar Barakat, DDS MSc, Principal investigator, PhD Student in Periodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, SyriaSuleiman Dayoub, DDS MSc PhD, Study director, Associate Professor of Periodontics, Department of Peridontics, Univ. of Damascus Dental School
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02986191
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UDDS-Perio-01-2016
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 29 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 6 Feb 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Herford AS, Akin L, Cicciu M, Maiorana C, Boyne PJ. Use of a porcine collagen matrix as an alternative to autogenous tissue for grafting oral soft tissue defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jul;68(7):1463-70. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.054. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
PubMed 20417009Nevins M, Nevins ML, Kim SW, Schupbach P, Kim DM. The use of mucograft collagen matrix to augment the zone of keratinized tissue around teeth: a pilot study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):367-73.
PubMed 21837302Rocchietta I, Schupbach P, Ghezzi C, Maschera E, Simion M. Soft tissue integration of a porcine collagen membrane: an experimental study in pigs. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012 Feb;32(1):e34-40.
PubMed 22254233Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L. Treatment of gingival recession defects using coronally advanced flap with a porcine collagen matrix compared to coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2012 Mar;83(3):321-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110215. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
PubMed 21721988Jepsen K, Jepsen S, Zucchelli G, Stefanini M, de Sanctis M, Baldini N, Greven B, Heinz B, Wennstrom J, Cassel B, Vignoletti F, Sanz M. Treatment of gingival recession defects with a coronally advanced flap and a xenogeneic collagen matrix: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Jan;40(1):82-9. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12019. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
PubMed 23050490McGuire MK, Scheyer ET. Randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a xenogeneic collagen matrix as an alternative to free gingival grafting for oral soft tissue augmentation. J Periodontol. 2014 Oct;85(10):1333-41. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.130692. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
PubMed 24597764McGuire MK, Scheyer ET. Long-Term Results Comparing Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix and Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafts With Coronally Advanced Flaps for Treatment of Dehiscence-Type Recession Defects. J Periodontol. 2016 Mar;87(3):221-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.150386. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
PubMed 26469812
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Feb 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Applications of 3D Collagen Matrix (Mucograft®) in the Management of Gingival Recession: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02986191
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UDDS-Perio-01-2016
- Conditions
- Gingival Recession
- Keywords
- gingival graft, free gingival graft, coronally advanced flap, reduced keratinized gingiva
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Damascus UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Twenty patients with gingival recession will be enrolled in this trial. Gingival recession will be treated in one side by applying Mucograft® with coronally advanced flap (CAF) while on the opposite side a connective tissue graft (from the palate) will be applied with a CAF.
Patients will be followed for 3 and 6 months by measuring the clinical indexes and statistical analyses will be performed to compare the results and to assess the success of Mucograft®.
Detailed description
Many surgical techniques have used to treat gingival recession such aas repositioned flaps, autologous soft tissue grafts (connective tissue graft or free gingival grafts) or allografts like acellular dermal which can be used as substitutes for palatal donor tissue. Mucograft® (3D collagen matrix) is also an allograft from porcine origin and is designed for soft tissue regeneration and considered the ideal solution to autogenous soft tissue grafts and it provides an ideal matrix for blood vessel and soft tissue ingrowth.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mucograft | Experimental | Procedure: MucograftOne side of the mouth will be subjected to Mucograft in this split-mouth study design. |
| Connective tissue graft | Active comparator | Procedure: Connective Tissue GraftThe opposite side of the mouth will be subjected to a connective tissue graft. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Presence of Type I or II (Miller Classification) of gingival recession
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Smoking
- Pregnancy or lactating
- Presence of any systematic diseases can affect the periodontal surgery.
- Subjects with significant moderate to severe periodontal disease.
- Patients under orthodontic treatment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MucograftThis method of grafting will be used to treat the gingival recession using coronally advanced flaps. | Procedure or surgery | Mucograft |
| Connective Tissue GraftThis will be used in the traditional manner to correct gingival recession | Procedure or surgery | Connective tissue graft |
Primary outcome
Change in the Clinical Attachment Level Index
Time frame: Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Clinical Attachment Level is dependent on measuring the pocket depth as well as the amount of gingival recession using specific tools. The measurement is going to be recorded in millimeters.
8 secondary outcomes
Change in Probing Depth
Time frame: Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Change in Gingival Recession
Time frame: Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Change in Gingival Biotype
Time frame: Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Change in Root Coverage Index
Time frame: Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Change in Resistance to Muscular Pull
Time frame: Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Change in Color Match Index
Time frame: Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Shrinkage index at three months
Time frame: Measurements will be done at two time points to calculate the amount of shrinkage :(1) at one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively.
Shrinkage index at six months
Time frame: Measurements will be done at two time points to calculate the amount of shrinkage :(1) at one hour before applying the graft, (2) at six months exactly post-operatively.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Feb 2018.
- Background: PubMed 20417009Herford AS, Akin L, Cicciu M, Maiorana C, Boyne PJ. Use of a porcine collagen matrix as an alternative to autogenous tissue for grafting oral soft tissue defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jul;68(7):1463-70. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.054. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
- Background: PubMed 21837302Nevins M, Nevins ML, Kim SW, Schupbach P, Kim DM. The use of mucograft collagen matrix to augment the zone of keratinized tissue around teeth: a pilot study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):367-73.
- Background: PubMed 22254233Rocchietta I, Schupbach P, Ghezzi C, Maschera E, Simion M. Soft tissue integration of a porcine collagen membrane: an experimental study in pigs. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012 Feb;32(1):e34-40.
- Background: PubMed 21721988Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L. Treatment of gingival recession defects using coronally advanced flap with a porcine collagen matrix compared to coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2012 Mar;83(3):321-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110215. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
- Background: PubMed 23050490Jepsen K, Jepsen S, Zucchelli G, Stefanini M, de Sanctis M, Baldini N, Greven B, Heinz B, Wennstrom J, Cassel B, Vignoletti F, Sanz M. Treatment of gingival recession defects with a coronally advanced flap and a xenogeneic collagen matrix: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Jan;40(1):82-9. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12019. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
- Background: PubMed 24597764McGuire MK, Scheyer ET. Randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a xenogeneic collagen matrix as an alternative to free gingival grafting for oral soft tissue augmentation. J Periodontol. 2014 Oct;85(10):1333-41. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.130692. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
- Background: PubMed 26469812McGuire MK, Scheyer ET. Long-Term Results Comparing Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix and Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafts With Coronally Advanced Flaps for Treatment of Dehiscence-Type Recession Defects. J Periodontol. 2016 Mar;87(3):221-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.150386. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Gingival Recession
Not yet recruiting
Free Soft Tissue Grafts (FSTG) Using Autograft Palatal Donor Tissue vs. Xenograft Collagen Matrix (Zderm™)
Gingival Recession Localized Moderate, Dental Implant
Recruiting
i-PRF-Based Bioactive Matrix vs. Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Gingival Recessions
Gingival Graft, Recession, Gingival
Recruiting
Palatal Wound Healing After Free Gingival Graft Harvest in Diabetic Patients: A Clinical Trial
Diabetes Mellitus, Gingival Recession, Generalized
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Effect of Smoking on Palatal Donor Site Tissue Profile in the Success of Connective Tissue Grafts
Soft Tissue Augmentation, Gingival Recession Localized Moderate
Active, not recruiting
Vertically Coronally Advanced Flap Versus Coronally Advanced Flap for Miller Class I Gingival Recession
Gingival Recession
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Haydar Barakat, DDS MSc principal investigator
PhD Student in Periodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria
Suleiman Dayoub, DDS MSc PhD study director
Associate Professor of Periodontics, Department of Peridontics, Univ. of Damascus Dental School
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mucograft and Connective Tissue Graft in people with Gingival Recession, run by Damascus University at 1 site in Syria.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Syria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in the Clinical Attachment Level Index (time frame: Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02986191, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2018.