Psoriatic ArthritisPhase 2NCT02986373
A Study to Investigate Safety With Risankizumab in Psoriatic Arthritis Subjects Who Have Completed Week 24 Visit of Study M16-002 (NCT02719171)
A Phase 2 study testing risankizumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by AbbVie.
Trial summary
This is an open-label extension (OLE) study to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of risankizumab in participants with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- risankizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 145 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 15 Dec 2016to 30 Jul 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants who have completed all doses of study drug and Week 24 visit of the lead-in study.
- Women of childbearing potential who are sexually active, must agree to use at least one accepted method of contraception throughout the study, including 20 weeks after last dose of study drug is given.
- Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Baseline (Week 0/V1).
- Participants must voluntarily sign and date an informed consent, approved by an Independent Ethics Committee (IEC)/Institutional Review Board (IRB), prior to the initiation of any study specific procedures.
- Participant is judged to be in good health as determined by the Investigator.
Who cannot join
- Female participant who is pregnant, breastfeeding or is considering becoming pregnant during study participation, including 20 weeks after the last dose of study drug is given.
- Premature discontinuation of the study drug in the lead-in study for any reason.
- Use of a biologic treatment other than risankizumab since first dose of study drug in the lead-in study.
- Time elapsed is > 8 weeks since the Week 24 visit in the lead-in study.
- Active systemic infections during the last 2 weeks (exception: common cold) prior to the first dose, as assessed by the investigator.
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2 Single-Arm Open-Label Extension Study to Investigate Safety With Risankizumab in Psoriatic Arthritis Subjects Who Have Completed Week 24 Visit of Study M16-002 (1311.5)
This is an open-label extension (OLE) study to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of risankizumab in participants with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
Read the detailed description
Participants who had completed all doses of study drug and the Week 24 visit of M16-002 (NCT02719171; the lead-in study) were eligible to enroll in M16-244 (this study). Participants were allowed to either finish the Week 24 visit of the lead-in study and take the first dose of study drug for this study on the same day, or delay the start of this study up to 8 weeks if needed.
- Conditions
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Being tested
- risankizumab
- Keywords
- risankizumab, ABBV-066, BI655066
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Psoriatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
risankizumabBiological
Also called ABBV-066, BI 655066, SKYRIZI
Risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Risankizumab | Experimental | Participants received open-label risankizumab 150 mg by subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 12, 24, and 36. Receives: Biological: risankizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assessed the relationship of each event to the use of study drug as either probably related, possibly related, probably not related or not related. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent events (TEAEs) are defined as an AE that began or worsened in severity after initiation of study drug and 20 weeks (140 days) after last dose. Abbreviations: NMSC=non-melanoma skin cancer
Measured: From the first dose of study drug in this study until 20 weeks after the last dose of study drug (up to 56 weeks).
Secondary outcomes (31)
Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS): Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24 in the Lead-in Study
The mTSS is a measure of change in joint health. X-rays of hands, wrists, and feet (including distal interphalangeal joints) were obtained at Week 24 and Week 48. Totals for hands and feet for erosion scores (range 0 to 320) and joint space narrowing scores (range 0 to 208) were calculated and added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 528 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening; no progression was defined as a change of ≤0.5. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24 (Lead-in Study)
mTSS: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24
The mTSS is a measure of change in joint health. X-rays of hands, wrists, and feet (including distal interphalangeal joints) were obtained at Week 24 and Week 48. Totals for hands and feet for erosion scores (range 0 to 320) and joint space narrowing scores (range 0 to 208) were calculated and added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 528 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening; no progression was defined as a change of ≤0.5. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24
mTSS: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 48
The mTSS is a measure of change in joint health. X-rays of hands, wrists, and feet (including distal interphalangeal joints) were obtained at Week 24 and Week 48. Totals for hands and feet for erosion scores (range 0 to 320) and joint space narrowing scores (range 0 to 208) were calculated and added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 528 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening; no progression was defined as a change of ≤0.5. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 48
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 0
Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 0: ≥20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity visual analog scale (VAS), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study.
Measured: Week 0
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 4
Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 4: ≥20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity VAS, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study.
Measured: Week 4
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 12
Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 12: ≥20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity VAS, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 24
Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 24: ≥20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity VAS, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 36
Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 36: ≥20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity VAS, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study.
Measured: Week 36
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 48
Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 48: ≥20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity VAS, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study.
Measured: Week 48
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 52
Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 52: ≥20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity VAS, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study.
Measured: Week 52
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI): Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 0
The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 0
HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 4
The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 4
HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 12
The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 12
HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24
The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24
HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 36
The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 36
HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 48
The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 48
HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 52
The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 52
Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 0
The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 0
SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 4
The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 4
SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 12
The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 12
SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24
The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24
SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 36
The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 36
SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 48
The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 48
SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 52
The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 52
SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 0
The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 0
SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 4
The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 4
SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 12
The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 12
SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24
The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24
SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 36
The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 36
SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 48
The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 48
SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 52
The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.
Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study start15 Dec 2016
- Primary completion8 Jul 2018
- Study completion30 Jul 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Psoriatic ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AbbVieThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- AbbVie Inc., Study director, AbbVie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02986373
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M16-244
- Other IDs
- 2016-003113-94, 2016
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 6 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 28 May 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.
Publications
Thakre N, D'Cunha R, Goebel A, Liu W, Pang Y, Suleiman AA. Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analyses for Risankizumab in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Dec;9(6):1587-1603. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00495-0. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
PubMed 36178584Mease PJ, Kellner H, Morita A, Kivitz AJ, Aslanyan S, Padula SJ, Topp AS, Eldred A, Behrens F, Papp KA. Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from a 76-Week Phase 2 Randomized Trial. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Oct;9(5):1361-1375. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00474-5. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
PubMed 35931879
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2 Single-Arm Open-Label Extension Study to Investigate Safety With Risankizumab in Psoriatic Arthritis Subjects Who Have Completed Week 24 Visit of Study M16-002 (1311.5)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02986373
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- M16-244
- Conditions
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Keywords
- risankizumab, ABBV-066, BI655066
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVieIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 15 Dec 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jul 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 28 May 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is an open-label extension (OLE) study to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of risankizumab in participants with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
Detailed description
Participants who had completed all doses of study drug and the Week 24 visit of M16-002 (NCT02719171; the lead-in study) were eligible to enroll in M16-244 (this study). Participants were allowed to either finish the Week 24 visit of the lead-in study and take the first dose of study drug for this study on the same day, or delay the start of this study up to 8 weeks if needed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Risankizumab | Experimental | Biological: risankizumabParticipants received open-label risankizumab 150 mg by subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 12, 24, and 36. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Participants who have completed all doses of study drug and Week 24 visit of the lead-in study.
- Women of childbearing potential who are sexually active, must agree to use at least one accepted method of contraception throughout the study, including 20 weeks after last dose of study drug is given.
- Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Baseline (Week 0/V1).
- Participants must voluntarily sign and date an informed consent, approved by an Independent Ethics Committee (IEC)/Institutional Review Board (IRB), prior to the initiation of any study specific procedures.
- Participant is judged to be in good health as determined by the Investigator.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Female participant who is pregnant, breastfeeding or is considering becoming pregnant during study participation, including 20 weeks after the last dose of study drug is given.
- Premature discontinuation of the study drug in the lead-in study for any reason.
- Use of a biologic treatment other than risankizumab since first dose of study drug in the lead-in study.
- Time elapsed is > 8 weeks since the Week 24 visit in the lead-in study.
- Active systemic infections during the last 2 weeks (exception: common cold) prior to the first dose, as assessed by the investigator.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| risankizumabAlso: ABBV-066, BI 655066, SKYRIZIRisankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection. | Biological | Risankizumab |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug in this study until 20 weeks after the last dose of study drug (up to 56 weeks).
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assessed the relationship of each event to the use of study drug as either probably related, possibly related, probably not related or not related. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent events (TEAEs) are defined as an AE that began or worsened in severity after initiation of study drug and 20 weeks (140 days) after last dose. Abbreviations: NMSC=non-melanoma skin cancer
31 secondary outcomes
Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS): Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24 in the Lead-in Study
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24 (Lead-in Study)
mTSS: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24
mTSS: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 48
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 48
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 0
Time frame: Week 0
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 4
Time frame: Week 4
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 36
Time frame: Week 36
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 48
Time frame: Week 48
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI): Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 0
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 0
HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 4
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 4
HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 12
HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24
HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 36
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 36
HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 48
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 48
HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 52
Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 0
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 0
SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 4
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 4
SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 12
SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24
SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 36
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 36
SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 48
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 48
SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 52
SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 0
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 0
SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 4
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 4
SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 12
SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24
SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 36
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 36
SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 48
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 48
SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 May 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36178584Thakre N, D'Cunha R, Goebel A, Liu W, Pang Y, Suleiman AA. Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analyses for Risankizumab in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Dec;9(6):1587-1603. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00495-0. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35931879Mease PJ, Kellner H, Morita A, Kivitz AJ, Aslanyan S, Padula SJ, Topp AS, Eldred A, Behrens F, Papp KA. Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from a 76-Week Phase 2 Randomized Trial. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Oct;9(5):1361-1375. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00474-5. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.
Related trials for Psoriatic Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Extension Study of Safety and Tolerability of DDY391 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis (CDDY391A12201-extension)
Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis
Recruiting
Efficacy of a Self-Management Smartphone App to Improve Safety Skills in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis
Rhumatoid Arthisis, Spondyloarthritis (SA)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn if Bimekizumab Given in Different Ways is Safe and Moves Similarly Throughout the Body Over Time in Adults
Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis
RecruitingPhase 4
Impact of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Analogs on Disease Outcomes in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Guselkumab vs Golimumab in PsA TNF Inadequate Responder Patients
Psoriatic Arthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
AbbVie Inc. study director
AbbVie
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing risankizumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by AbbVie.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 May 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (time frame: From the first dose of study drug in this study until 20 weeks after the last dose of study drug (up to 56 weeks).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02986373, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2019.