AzTrials
AzTrials

Psoriatic ArthritisPhase 2NCT02986373

A Study to Investigate Safety With Risankizumab in Psoriatic Arthritis Subjects Who Have Completed Week 24 Visit of Study M16-002 (NCT02719171)

A Phase 2 study testing risankizumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by AbbVie.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is an open-label extension (OLE) study to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of risankizumab in participants with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Psoriatic Arthritis
What is being tested?
risankizumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
145 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
15 Dec 2016to 30 Jul 2018
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants who have completed all doses of study drug and Week 24 visit of the lead-in study.
  • Women of childbearing potential who are sexually active, must agree to use at least one accepted method of contraception throughout the study, including 20 weeks after last dose of study drug is given.
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Baseline (Week 0/V1).
  • Participants must voluntarily sign and date an informed consent, approved by an Independent Ethics Committee (IEC)/Institutional Review Board (IRB), prior to the initiation of any study specific procedures.
  • Participant is judged to be in good health as determined by the Investigator.

Who cannot join

  • Female participant who is pregnant, breastfeeding or is considering becoming pregnant during study participation, including 20 weeks after the last dose of study drug is given.
  • Premature discontinuation of the study drug in the lead-in study for any reason.
  • Use of a biologic treatment other than risankizumab since first dose of study drug in the lead-in study.
  • Time elapsed is > 8 weeks since the Week 24 visit in the lead-in study.
  • Active systemic infections during the last 2 weeks (exception: common cold) prior to the first dose, as assessed by the investigator.

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2 Single-Arm Open-Label Extension Study to Investigate Safety With Risankizumab in Psoriatic Arthritis Subjects Who Have Completed Week 24 Visit of Study M16-002 (1311.5)

This is an open-label extension (OLE) study to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of risankizumab in participants with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Read the detailed description

Participants who had completed all doses of study drug and the Week 24 visit of M16-002 (NCT02719171; the lead-in study) were eligible to enroll in M16-244 (this study). Participants were allowed to either finish the Week 24 visit of the lead-in study and take the first dose of study drug for this study on the same day, or delay the start of this study up to 8 weeks if needed.

Being tested
risankizumab
Keywords
risankizumab, ABBV-066, BI655066
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Psoriatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • risankizumabBiological

    Also called ABBV-066, BI 655066, SKYRIZI

    Risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection.

Study groups in NCT02986373
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RisankizumabExperimentalParticipants received open-label risankizumab 150 mg by subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 12, 24, and 36.
Receives: Biological: risankizumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assessed the relationship of each event to the use of study drug as either probably related, possibly related, probably not related or not related. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent events (TEAEs) are defined as an AE that began or worsened in severity after initiation of study drug and 20 weeks (140 days) after last dose. Abbreviations: NMSC=non-melanoma skin cancer

    Measured: From the first dose of study drug in this study until 20 weeks after the last dose of study drug (up to 56 weeks).

Secondary outcomes (31)
  1. Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS): Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24 in the Lead-in Study

    The mTSS is a measure of change in joint health. X-rays of hands, wrists, and feet (including distal interphalangeal joints) were obtained at Week 24 and Week 48. Totals for hands and feet for erosion scores (range 0 to 320) and joint space narrowing scores (range 0 to 208) were calculated and added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 528 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening; no progression was defined as a change of ≤0.5. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24 (Lead-in Study)

  2. mTSS: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24

    The mTSS is a measure of change in joint health. X-rays of hands, wrists, and feet (including distal interphalangeal joints) were obtained at Week 24 and Week 48. Totals for hands and feet for erosion scores (range 0 to 320) and joint space narrowing scores (range 0 to 208) were calculated and added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 528 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening; no progression was defined as a change of ≤0.5. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24

  3. mTSS: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 48

    The mTSS is a measure of change in joint health. X-rays of hands, wrists, and feet (including distal interphalangeal joints) were obtained at Week 24 and Week 48. Totals for hands and feet for erosion scores (range 0 to 320) and joint space narrowing scores (range 0 to 208) were calculated and added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 528 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening; no progression was defined as a change of ≤0.5. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 48

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 0

    Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 0: ≥20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity visual analog scale (VAS), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Week 0

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 4

    Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 4: ≥20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity VAS, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Week 4

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 12

    Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 12: ≥20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity VAS, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Week 12

  7. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 24

    Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 24: ≥20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity VAS, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Week 24

  8. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 36

    Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 36: ≥20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity VAS, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Week 36

  9. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 48

    Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 48: ≥20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity VAS, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Week 48

  10. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 52

    Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 52: ≥20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity VAS, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Week 52

  11. Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI): Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 0

    The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 0

  12. HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 4

    The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 4

  13. HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 12

    The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 12

  14. HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24

    The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24

  15. HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 36

    The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 36

  16. HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 48

    The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 48

  17. HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 52

    The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 52

  18. Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 0

    The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 0

  19. SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 4

    The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 4

  20. SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 12

    The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 12

  21. SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24

    The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24

  22. SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 36

    The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 36

  23. SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 48

    The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 48

  24. SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 52

    The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 52

  25. SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 0

    The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 0

  26. SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 4

    The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 4

  27. SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 12

    The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 12

  28. SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24

    The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24

  29. SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 36

    The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 36

  30. SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 48

    The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 48

  31. SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 52

    The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study.

    Measured: Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Dec 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start15 Dec 2016
  3. Primary completion8 Jul 2018
  4. Study completion30 Jul 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
145 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02986373
Sponsor's protocol ID
M16-244
Other IDs
2016-003113-94, 2016
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
6 Dec 2016
Last updated
28 May 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.

Publications

  • Thakre N, D'Cunha R, Goebel A, Liu W, Pang Y, Suleiman AA. Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analyses for Risankizumab in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Dec;9(6):1587-1603. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00495-0. Epub 2022 Sep 30.

    PubMed 36178584
  • Mease PJ, Kellner H, Morita A, Kivitz AJ, Aslanyan S, Padula SJ, Topp AS, Eldred A, Behrens F, Papp KA. Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from a 76-Week Phase 2 Randomized Trial. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Oct;9(5):1361-1375. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00474-5. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

    PubMed 35931879

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing risankizumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by AbbVie.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 May 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (time frame: From the first dose of study drug in this study until 20 weeks after the last dose of study drug (up to 56 weeks).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02986373, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in