Urothelial CarcinomaNCT02986867
SAbR Induced Innate Immunity in Urothelial Carcinoma, Melanoma, and Cervical Carcinoma
A study testing SAbR Treatment of Lesions in people with Urothelial Carcinoma and Melanoma, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The study is an exploratory prospective, single center study with correlative endpoints. The study will investigate the association of tumor cGAS STING signaling with SAbR. Tumor core biopsies will be processed and analyzed as described above. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Urothelial Carcinoma, Melanoma, Cervical Carcinoma in Situ
- What is being tested?
- SAbR Treatment of Lesions
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 27 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 13 Jun 2017to 7 Mar 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologic diagnosis of advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma, melanoma, or cervical carcinoma.
- Planned treated with SAbR.
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years.
- Lesion to receive SAbR safely accessible for core biopsy-mass >1.5cm diameter and located in node, liver, or soft tissues.
- Hgb >10g/dL before or after transfusion.
- Platelets >50,000/L
Show all 9Show fewer
- INR <1.5
- If contrast enhanced CT needed to locate the lesion for core biopsy, then derived creatinine clearance >30cc/min
- Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Prior radiation therapy to target lesion.
- Target lesion not safely accessible for core biopsies.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75063
About this study
Official title: SAbR-Induced Innate Immunity in Urothelial Carcinoma, Melanoma, and Cervical Carcinoma
The study is an exploratory prospective, single center study with correlative endpoints. The study will investigate the association of tumor cGAS STING signaling with SAbR. Tumor core biopsies will be processed and analyzed as described above. Medical records electronic medical records will be used to collect demographic and medical information and imaging studies.
Read the detailed description
Within 2 weeks of planned SAbR, patients will have a core biopsy of the lesion to receive SAbR. Laboratory values will be obtained prior to biopsy. Once the laboratory values are found to be within the safe margin for biopsy, multiple (approximately 5) core biopsies will be obtained with an 18-guage or 19-gauge needle under CT or US guidance. Tissue will be snap frozen with liquid nitrogen and immediately transferred to the laboratory of Dr. Zhijian "James" Chen, PhD, Professor, Department of Molecular Biology.
SAbR will be administered as per the guidelines of UTSW with a single 24-27Gy or three 10-14 Gy/fraction fractions totaling 33-48Gy. Lesions receiving SAbR will be called "radiated" lesions. Prior irradiated lesions will be excluded. SABR will be administered within 2 weeks of the study initial core biopsy. The SAbR dose and fractionation scheme is generated to deliver a potent dose to ablate the targeted lesions and at the same time maximize an immune response. Since multiple studies have shown an influx of lymphocytes and monocytes after tumor irradiation and since these cells play a critical role in antigen presentation and initiation of an adaptive immune response, multiple fraction irradiation which would kill these infiltrating immunocytes, is discouraged. Therefore a single fraction or a three fraction treatment regimen is recommended, and a single fraction treatment is preferred over three fractions. Due to normal organ toxicity and limits of dose constraints, sometimes a three fraction treatment must be undertaken and in those cases it is recommended that the treatment course is completed within 7-10 days-preferably 5 business days. Radiation dose-immune response studies have shown a linear increase in immune response with increased dose per fraction of radiation without demonstration of a plateau. Two studies comparing 15Gy x 1 vs 5Gy x3, and 20Gy x1 vs 5Gy x4 have shown a superior immune response generated by the single fraction radiation. Clinical experience with oligometastatic patients treated at 1-5 sites of disease has also showed an increase in progression-free survival with the increasing radiation dose per fraction. A dose of less than 7.5 Gy per fraction has demonstrated lower induction of systemic IFN-γ producing cells, and a previous phase II study of mRCC patients treated with HD IL-2 and singe fraction of 8Gy irradiation to a single lesion did not show an overall improvement in response rate. Therefore 8Gy per fraction is the lowest permitted dose for this study and can be used only when administering the three fraction regimen as described in the prescription dose table below. Investigators will have discretion in choosing from either of the biologically equivalent dose levels using one or three fractions, although a single fraction is preferred over three fraction treatments. Treating physician will have further discretion in selecting the number and location of sites to treat if multiple sites of disease are present. Maximum number of lesions treated is deemed as feasible per the treating radiation oncologist. However, for the purposes of this protocol, only a single site will be studied and must be safely amenable to repeat core biopsy. Thus, the single site for the study will be either in subcutaneous tissues, nodes, isolated masses or liver. The gross target/tumor volume--GTV should be at least 2 cm3 in size, corresponding to roughly a 1.5 cm diameter tumor. This is to ensure that adequate tumor volume for therapy and for biopsy and therefore adequate tumor cells roughly 108 -109 cells/cm3 are killed for antigen presentation. Treating physicians should choose their dose based on established planning guidelines at their center including their ability to respect normal tissue tolerance.
Within 24 + 6 hours of the first SAbR, a second core biopsy of the "target" irradiated lesion will be performed identically to the first biopsy.
- Conditions
- Urothelial Carcinoma, Melanoma, Cervical Carcinoma in Situ
- Being tested
- SAbR Treatment of Lesions
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell, Melanoma, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SAbR Treatment of LesionsRadiation
SAbR will be administered as per the guidelines of UTSW with a single 24-27Gy or three 10-14 Gy/fraction fractions totaling 33-48Gy. Lesions receiving SAbR will be called "radiated" lesions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SAbR | Experimental | SAbR treatment of lesions Receives: Radiation: SAbR Treatment of Lesions |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Comparison of immune checkpoint treated tumors
Compare cGAMP levels, interferon response gene expression and phospho-STING in tumors of immune checkpoint treated patients.
Measured: 36 months
SAbR effects on cGAMP in tumors
Number of participants with SAbRrelated tumor changes indicated by cGAMP in comparison to Baseline.
Measured: 36 months
SAbR effects on interferon response in tumors
Number of participants with SAbRrelated tumor changes indicated by interferon response mRNAs in comparison to Baseline.
Measured: 36 months
SAbR effects on phosphor-STING in tumors
Number of participants with SAbRrelated tumor changes indicated by phospho-STING in comparison to Baseline.
Measured: 36 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study start13 Jun 2017
- Primary completion7 Mar 2018
- Study completion7 Mar 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Urothelial CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02986867
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STU 092016-055
- Status last verified
- Jan 2019
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 10 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- SAbR-Induced Innate Immunity in Urothelial Carcinoma, Melanoma, and Cervical Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02986867
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STU 092016-055
- Conditions
- Urothelial Carcinoma, Melanoma, Cervical Carcinoma in Situ
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Mar 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study is an exploratory prospective, single center study with correlative endpoints. The study will investigate the association of tumor cGAS STING signaling with SAbR. Tumor core biopsies will be processed and analyzed as described above. Medical records electronic medical records will be used to collect demographic and medical information and imaging studies.
Detailed description
Within 2 weeks of planned SAbR, patients will have a core biopsy of the lesion to receive SAbR. Laboratory values will be obtained prior to biopsy. Once the laboratory values are found to be within the safe margin for biopsy, multiple (approximately 5) core biopsies will be obtained with an 18-guage or 19-gauge needle under CT or US guidance. Tissue will be snap frozen with liquid nitrogen and immediately transferred to the laboratory of Dr. Zhijian "James" Chen, PhD, Professor, Department of Molecular Biology.
SAbR will be administered as per the guidelines of UTSW with a single 24-27Gy or three 10-14 Gy/fraction fractions totaling 33-48Gy. Lesions receiving SAbR will be called "radiated" lesions. Prior irradiated lesions will be excluded. SABR will be administered within 2 weeks of the study initial core biopsy. The SAbR dose and fractionation scheme is generated to deliver a potent dose to ablate the targeted lesions and at the same time maximize an immune response. Since multiple studies have shown an influx of lymphocytes and monocytes after tumor irradiation and since these cells play a critical role in antigen presentation and initiation of an adaptive immune response, multiple fraction irradiation which would kill these infiltrating immunocytes, is discouraged. Therefore a single fraction or a three fraction treatment regimen is recommended, and a single fraction treatment is preferred over three fractions. Due to normal organ toxicity and limits of dose constraints, sometimes a three fraction treatment must be undertaken and in those cases it is recommended that the treatment course is completed within 7-10 days-preferably 5 business days. Radiation dose-immune response studies have shown a linear increase in immune response with increased dose per fraction of radiation without demonstration of a plateau. Two studies comparing 15Gy x 1 vs 5Gy x3, and 20Gy x1 vs 5Gy x4 have shown a superior immune response generated by the single fraction radiation. Clinical experience with oligometastatic patients treated at 1-5 sites of disease has also showed an increase in progression-free survival with the increasing radiation dose per fraction. A dose of less than 7.5 Gy per fraction has demonstrated lower induction of systemic IFN-γ producing cells, and a previous phase II study of mRCC patients treated with HD IL-2 and singe fraction of 8Gy irradiation to a single lesion did not show an overall improvement in response rate. Therefore 8Gy per fraction is the lowest permitted dose for this study and can be used only when administering the three fraction regimen as described in the prescription dose table below. Investigators will have discretion in choosing from either of the biologically equivalent dose levels using one or three fractions, although a single fraction is preferred over three fraction treatments. Treating physician will have further discretion in selecting the number and location of sites to treat if multiple sites of disease are present. Maximum number of lesions treated is deemed as feasible per the treating radiation oncologist. However, for the purposes of this protocol, only a single site will be studied and must be safely amenable to repeat core biopsy. Thus, the single site for the study will be either in subcutaneous tissues, nodes, isolated masses or liver. The gross target/tumor volume--GTV should be at least 2 cm3 in size, corresponding to roughly a 1.5 cm diameter tumor. This is to ensure that adequate tumor volume for therapy and for biopsy and therefore adequate tumor cells roughly 108 -109 cells/cm3 are killed for antigen presentation. Treating physicians should choose their dose based on established planning guidelines at their center including their ability to respect normal tissue tolerance.
Within 24 + 6 hours of the first SAbR, a second core biopsy of the "target" irradiated lesion will be performed identically to the first biopsy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SAbR | Experimental | Radiation: SAbR Treatment of LesionsSAbR treatment of lesions |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Histologic diagnosis of advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma, melanoma, or cervical carcinoma.
- Planned treated with SAbR.
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years.
- Lesion to receive SAbR safely accessible for core biopsy-mass >1.5cm diameter and located in node, liver, or soft tissues.
- Hgb >10g/dL before or after transfusion.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Prior radiation therapy to target lesion.
- Target lesion not safely accessible for core biopsies.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SAbR Treatment of LesionsSAbR will be administered as per the guidelines of UTSW with a single 24-27Gy or three 10-14 Gy/fraction fractions totaling 33-48Gy. Lesions receiving SAbR will be called "radiated" lesions. | Radiation | SAbR |
Primary outcome
Comparison of immune checkpoint treated tumors
Time frame: 36 months
Compare cGAMP levels, interferon response gene expression and phospho-STING in tumors of immune checkpoint treated patients.
SAbR effects on cGAMP in tumors
Time frame: 36 months
Number of participants with SAbRrelated tumor changes indicated by cGAMP in comparison to Baseline.
SAbR effects on interferon response in tumors
Time frame: 36 months
Number of participants with SAbRrelated tumor changes indicated by interferon response mRNAs in comparison to Baseline.
SAbR effects on phosphor-STING in tumors
Time frame: 36 months
Number of participants with SAbRrelated tumor changes indicated by phospho-STING in comparison to Baseline.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jan 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Urothelial Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Registry Platform Urologic Cancer
Renal Cell Carcinoma, Urothelial Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SAbR Treatment of Lesions in people with Urothelial Carcinoma and Melanoma, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Comparison of immune checkpoint treated tumors (time frame: 36 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jan 2019.