AzTrials
AzTrials

Patients in Minimally Conscious StateNCT02988206

Personalized Objects Can Improve the Diagnosis of EMCS From MCS

A study testing Personalized Objects and non-personalized Objects in people with Patients in Minimally Conscious State, run by Hangzhou Normal University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this study,researchers will use personalized objects to assess patients' level of consciousness in chronic patients in minimally conscious state (MCS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Patients in Minimally Conscious State
What is being tested?
Personalized Objects and non-personalized Objects
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
21 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Mar 2015to Aug 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients in minimally conscious state;
  • patients with stable condition;
  • each patient has athletic ability to some extent.

Who cannot join

  • premorbid neurology antecedent;
  • patients in coma or vegetative state;
  • patients < 1 months after the acute brain injury.

About this study

In this study,researchers will use personalized objects to assess patients' level of consciousness in chronic patients in minimally conscious state (MCS).

Read the detailed description

The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) is an important tool for the assessment of behaviors in DOC.Clinical practice has shown that self-referential stimuli, such as the patient's own name and face, are more effective to elicit the patient's response than that of non-self-referential stimuli.

The item "Functional Object Use" was assessed by using personalized objects (e.g., cigarette, paper) and non-personalized objects, which presented in a random order.The rest assessments were performed following the standard protocol of CRS-R. The differences between functional use of the two types of objects was analyzed by Chi-square test.

Researchers expected to see some of the patients in MCS are re-diagnosed as EMCS with the using of personalized objects.

Being tested
Personalized Objects, non-personalized Objects

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Personalized ObjectsBehavioural

    personalized objects are based on the observation or the reports from family

  • non-personalized ObjectsBehavioural

    non-personalized objects are based on the suggestion in CRS-R,which are comb and cup

Study groups in NCT02988206
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Personalized ObjectsOtherThe item "Functional Object Use" was assessed by using personalized objects (e.g., cigarette, paper) and non-personalized objects, which presented in a random order..
Receives: Behavioral: Personalized Objects; Behavioral: non-personalized Objects
non-personalized objectsOtherThe item "Functional Object Use" was assessed by using non-personalized objects
Receives: Behavioral: non-personalized Objects

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The frequency of behavioral response elicited by the stimuli suggested by CRS-R scale and the personalized stimuli they prefer

    Measured: one week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Dec 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2015
  3. Primary completionAug 2016
  4. Study completionAug 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
21 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02988206
Sponsor's protocol ID
2016R423055
Status last verified
Dec 2016
First submitted
5 Dec 2016
Last updated
14 Dec 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Sun Y, Wang J, Heine L, Huang W, Wang J, Hu N, Hu X, Fang X, Huang S, Laureys S, Di H. Personalized objects can optimize the diagnosis of EMCS in the assessment of functional object use in the CRS-R: a double blind, randomized clinical trial. BMC Neurol. 2018 Apr 12;18(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1040-5.

    PubMed 29649978

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Personalized Objects and non-personalized Objects in people with Patients in Minimally Conscious State, run by Hangzhou Normal University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The frequency of behavioral response elicited by the stimuli suggested by CRS-R scale and the personalized stimuli they prefer (time frame: one week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02988206, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Dec 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in