AzTrials
AzTrials

Pain, PostoperativePhase 2/3ITVSEpiduralNCT02988700

Spinal Versus Caudal Analgesia After Pediatric Infra-umbilical Surgery

A Phase 2/3 study testing Intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.25mg/kg 0.5% and caudal plain bupivacaine 2.5mg/kg 0.25% in people with Pain, Postoperative, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Caudal analgesia along with general anesthesia is a very popular regional technique for prolonged postoperative analgesia in different pediatric surgical procedures where the surgical site is sub-umbilical. Caudal anesthetics usually provide analgesia for approximately 4-6 hours. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 12 years
Conditions the study is for
Pain, Postoperative
What is being tested?
Intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.25mg/kg 0.5% and caudal plain bupivacaine 2.5mg/kg 0.25%
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
Nov 2016to Nov 2018
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Age: 2-12 years.
  • Weight: 15-40 kg.
  • Sex: both males and females.
  • ASA physical status: 1-II.
  • Operation: surgery below umbilicus.

Who cannot join

  • Allergic reaction to local anesthetics (LAs).
  • Local or systemic infection (risk of meningitis).
  • Coagulopathy.
  • Intracranial hypertension.
  • Hydrocephalus.
  • Intracranial hemorrhage.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Parental refusal.
  • Hypovolemia.
  • Spinal deformities, such as spina bifida or myelomeningocele.
  • Presence of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt because of a risk of shunt infection or dural leak.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Hala Saad Abdel-Ghaffar

    Asyut, Assiut Governorate, 715715

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Safety and Analgesic Efficacy of Spinal Versus Caudal Block in Pediatric Infra-umbilical Surgery

Caudal analgesia along with general anesthesia is a very popular regional technique for prolonged postoperative analgesia in different pediatric surgical procedures where the surgical site is sub-umbilical. Caudal anesthetics usually provide analgesia for approximately 4-6 hours.

Recently, the use of spinal anesthesia in infants and children requiring surgeries of sub-umbilical region is gaining considerable popularity worldwide.

  • The ease of performance and the safety regarding cardio-respiratory functions makes spinal anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia in infants and children undergoing surgeries of sub-umbilical regions.
Read the detailed description

The historic view that young children neither respond to, nor remember, painful experiences to the same degree as adults is no longer thought to be true. About 40% of pediatric surgical patients experienced moderate or severe postoperative pain and 75% had insufficient analgesia.

-Pediatric acute pain services use techniques of concurrent or co-analgesia based on four classes of analgesics, namely local anesthetics, opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and acetaminophen (paracetamol).

Caudal analgesia along with general anesthesia is a very popular regional technique for prolonged postoperative analgesia in different pediatric surgical procedures where the surgical site is sub-umbilical. Caudal anesthetics usually provide analgesia for approximately 4-6 hours.

Recently, the use of spinal anesthesia in infants and children requiring surgeries of sub-umbilical region is gaining considerable popularity worldwide.

  • The ease of performance and the safety regarding cardio-respiratory functions makes spinal anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia in infants and children undergoing surgeries of sub-umbilical regions.
Being tested
Intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.25mg/kg 0.5%, caudal plain bupivacaine 2.5mg/kg 0.25%
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.25mg/kg 0.5%Drug

    Also called Marcain

    The lumber puncture will be made in the lateral position at the L4-5 or L5-S1 interspace with a 25 G pencil point Quincke spinal needle with a short bevel and the orifice of the spinal needle will be turned cephalad.

  • caudal plain bupivacaine 2.5mg/kg 0.25%Drug

    Also called Bucain

    The sacral hiatus between the sacral conru will be palpated. While inserting the 23-G needle at 45° to the skin in the midline, a distance "give" or "pop" will be felt as the needle passes the sacral ligament into the caudal space, the needle will be tilted more toward the skin surface and inserted 2-3mm deeper.

Study groups in NCT02988700
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Spinal groupActive comparatorIntrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.25mg/kg will be give by lumber puncture that will be made in the lateral position at the L4-5 or L5-S1 interspace with a 25 G pencil point Quincke spinal needle with a short bevel and the orifice of the spinal needle will be turned cephalad. be given by .
Receives: Drug: Intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.25mg/kg 0.5%
Caudal groupActive comparatorcaudal plain bupivacaine 2.5mg/kg 0.25% will be given caudally in The sacral hiatus between the sacral conru that will be palpated. While inserting the 23-G needle at 45° to the skin in the midline, a distance "give" or "pop" will be felt as the needle passes the sacral ligament into the caudal space, the needle will be tilted more toward the skin surface and inserted 2-3mm deeper.
Receives: Drug: caudal plain bupivacaine 2.5mg/kg 0.25%

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. FLACC Score

    FLACC scores will be recorded.

    Measured: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Total consumption of rescue analgesics

    The total consumption of postoperative rescue analgesics will be recorded.

    Measured: 24 hours

  2. Postoperative Agitation

    Postoperative agitation will be evaluated by the Four Point Agitation Sedation scale.

    Measured: 60 min.

  3. Adverse effects

    Any adverse effect will be treated and recorded.

    Measured: 24 hours

  4. Residual motor paralysis

    By the Modified Bromage scale

    Measured: 6 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Dec 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2016
  3. Primary completionOct 2018
  4. Study completionNov 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
120 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02988700
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00008718/36800
Acronym
ITVSEpidural
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
25 Nov 2016
Last updated
13 Jan 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.25mg/kg 0.5% and caudal plain bupivacaine 2.5mg/kg 0.25% in people with Pain, Postoperative, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

FLACC Score (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jan 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in