Chronic PainNCT02988713
Study to Characterize Effects of Programming in SCS Patients Undergoing a Temporary Trial
A study testing Programming in people with Chronic Pain, run by Boston Scientific Corporation at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, exploratory, single-arm study characterize the effects of programming spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients undergoing a Boston Scientific (BSC) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) temporary trial Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Pain
- What is being tested?
- Programming
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 35 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 13 Dec 2016to 2 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Study candidate is undergoing a spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trial of BSC neurostimulation system, per local directions for use (DFU).
- Subject signed a valid, Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved informed consent form.
- Subject is 18 years of age or older when written informed consent is obtained.
Who cannot join
- Subject meets any contraindication in BSC neurostimulation system local directions for use (DFU).
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
PCPMG Clinical Research Unit, LLC
Greenville, South Carolina, 29601
Pacific Pain Management, Inc.
Ventura, California, 93003
About this study
Official title: Study to Characterize the Effects of Programming Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in Patients Undergoing a Boston Scientific (BSC) SCS Temporary Trial
This is a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, exploratory, single-arm study characterize the effects of programming spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients undergoing a Boston Scientific (BSC) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) temporary trial
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Being tested
- Programming
- Keywords
- stimulation, chronic pain, back pain, leg pain
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Pain, Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ProgrammingDevice
Programming spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients undergoing a Boston Scientific (BSC) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) temporary trial
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal cord stimulation | Experimental | Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients undergoing a Boston Scientific (BSC) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) temporary trial Receives: Device: Programming |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient Comfort
Number of participants reporting comfort level of stimulation sensation as "Very Comfortable" or "Slightly Comfortable"
Measured: An estimated average of 7 days post temporary trial procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study start13 Dec 2016
- Primary completion2 Dec 2020
- Study completion2 Dec 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boston Scientific CorporationThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Scientific Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Roshini Jain, M.S., Study director, Boston Scientific Corporation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02988713
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 91153461
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 29 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 18 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Zhu C, Esteller R, Block J, Lechleiter K, Frey R, Moffitt MA. Exploratory evaluation of spinal cord stimulation with dynamic pulse patterns: a promising approach to improve stimulation sensation, coverage of pain areas, and expected pain relief. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 31;4:1339892. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1339892. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 38361978
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study to Characterize the Effects of Programming Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in Patients Undergoing a Boston Scientific (BSC) SCS Temporary Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02988713
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 91153461
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Keywords
- stimulation, chronic pain, back pain, leg pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Scientific CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 13 Dec 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 4 Apr 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, exploratory, single-arm study characterize the effects of programming spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients undergoing a Boston Scientific (BSC) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) temporary trial
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal cord stimulation | Experimental | Device: ProgrammingSpinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients undergoing a Boston Scientific (BSC) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) temporary trial |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Study candidate is undergoing a spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trial of BSC neurostimulation system, per local directions for use (DFU).
- Subject signed a valid, Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved informed consent form.
- Subject is 18 years of age or older when written informed consent is obtained.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Subject meets any contraindication in BSC neurostimulation system local directions for use (DFU).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ProgrammingProgramming spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients undergoing a Boston Scientific (BSC) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) temporary trial | Device | Spinal cord stimulation |
Primary outcome
Patient Comfort
Time frame: An estimated average of 7 days post temporary trial procedure
Number of participants reporting comfort level of stimulation sensation as "Very Comfortable" or "Slightly Comfortable"
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Apr 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38361978Zhu C, Esteller R, Block J, Lechleiter K, Frey R, Moffitt MA. Exploratory evaluation of spinal cord stimulation with dynamic pulse patterns: a promising approach to improve stimulation sensation, coverage of pain areas, and expected pain relief. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 31;4:1339892. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1339892. eCollection 2023.
Related trials for Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Digital Use, 24-Hour Movement Behaviors, and Myofascial Release in University Students With Neck Pain
Forward Head Posture, Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Virtual Reality Exergames Versus Spinal Manipulation in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Chronic Nonspecific Low-back Pain, CNSLBP
Recruiting
Dietary Intervention for Migraine Relief
Migraine
Active, not recruiting
Healing Opioid Misuse and Pain Through Engagement (HOPE) Trial
Opioid Use Disorder, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Opioid Reduction and Enhanced Recovery in Orthopaedic Surgery (OREOS)-Knee
Knee Arthroplasty, Total, Partial Knee Arthroplasty
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Roshini Jain, M.S. study director
Boston Scientific Corporation
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Programming in people with Chronic Pain, run by Boston Scientific Corporation at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Apr 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient Comfort (time frame: An estimated average of 7 days post temporary trial procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02988713, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2022.