AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2NCT02989649

Non-Interventional Study of the Use of Alogliptin and Alogliptin Fixed-Dose Combinations With Pioglitazone and With Metformin in Standard Clinical Practice

An observational study of Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Takeda at 11 sites in 2 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to observe alogliptin and alogliptin fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) utilization patterns, as well as clinical response to treatment with alogliptin or alogliptin FDCs, in standard clinical practice. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What is being tested?
Alogliptin, Alogliptin FDC With Pioglitazone and Alogliptin FDC With Metformin
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
How many people
593 participants
Where
11 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
22 Dec 2016to 26 Jan 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult participants diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) will be observed.

Who may be able to join

  • Has a diagnosis of T2DM.
  • Has made the decision, along with his/her treating physician, to begin treatment with alogliptin or alogliptin fixed-dose combinations (FDCs).
  • Has an glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value recorded at most 3 months before initiation of treatment with alogliptin or alogliptin FDCs.
  • Alogliptin or alogliptin FDCs is prescribed according to the approved label for China and Hong Kong.

Who cannot join

  • Has gestational diabetes or type 1 diabetes mellitus.
  • Has used Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-IV inhibitors) or Glucagon like peptide-1 agonists (aGLP-1) within the 3 months prior to the start of alogliptin or alogliptin FDCs treatment.

Trial locations and contacts

11 sites in 2 countries.

11 sites in 2 countries

China9 sites
  • Study site

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality

  • Study site

    Dalian, Liaoning

  • Study site

    Jinan, Shandong

  • Study site

    Qingdao, Shandong

  • Study site

    Shenyang, Liaoning

  • Study site

    Tai’an, Shandong

  • Study site

    Taian, Shandong

  • Study site

    Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality

  • Study site

    Wuhan, Hubei

Other trials in China

Hong Kong2 sites
  • Study site

    Sai Ying Pun

  • Study site

    Shatin

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: A Prospective, Non-Interventional Study of the Use of Alogliptin and Alogliptin Fixed-Dose Combinations With Pioglitazone and With Metformin in Standard Clinical Practice

The purpose of this study is to observe alogliptin and alogliptin fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) utilization patterns, as well as clinical response to treatment with alogliptin or alogliptin FDCs, in standard clinical practice.

Read the detailed description

The drug being studied in this study is called alogliptin and alogliptin FDCs. Alogliptin and alogliptin FDCs is being researched to treat people who have diabetes mellitus type 2. This study will look at the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level dynamics in participants with diabetes mellitus type 2.

The study enrolled 593 patients. Alogliptin and alogliptin FDCs will be prescribed by the physician as part of participants' T2DM treatment program (independent of participation in this study).

This multi-center study will be conducted in China. The overall duration of study for observation will be approximately 6 months, or up to loss to follow-up or death, whichever occurs first. Participants will make multiple visits to the clinic as per regular doctor's appointments.

Being tested
Alogliptin, Alogliptin FDC With Pioglitazone, Alogliptin FDC With Metformin
Keywords
Drug Therapy
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AlogliptinDrug

    Alogliptin tablets

  • Alogliptin FDC With PioglitazoneDrug

    Alogliptin FDC with pioglitazone tablets

  • Alogliptin FDC With MetforminDrug

    Alogliptin FDC with metformin tablets

Study groups in NCT02989649
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Alogliptin or Alogliptin Fixed Dose Combinations (FDCs)Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who received alogliptin or alogliptin FDCs, orally, prescribed by the physician as part of participants' T2DM treatment program (independent of participation in this study) were observed for approximately 6 months, or up to loss to follow-up or death, whichever occurred first.
Receives: Drug: Alogliptin; Drug: Alogliptin FDC With Pioglitazone; Drug: Alogliptin FDC With Metformin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level at Month 6

    The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at Month 6 relative to baseline. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus is ≥6.5%. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Month 6

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level at Month 6 in Subgroups of Participants With Different Clinical Characteristics

    The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at Month 6 relative to baseline. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus is ≥6.5%. Subgroups included participants with different baseline clinical characteristics with predictors such as prior therapy of diabetes mellitus, sex, age group, cardiovascular risk group, therapy type (monotherapy or combined therapy), baseline body mass index (BMI) and initial glycemic control. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Month 6

  2. Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in HbA1c Level by <7.0%

    Percentage of participants with a decrease of <7.0% from baseline in HbA1c were reported.

    Measured: Baseline and Month 6

  3. Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in HbA1c Level by >0.3% and No Tolerability Findings

    Percentage of participants with a decrease of >0.3% from baseline in HbA1c along with no tolerability findings were reported. Tolerability findings included hypoglycemic event, or weight gain ≥5%.

    Measured: Baseline and Month 6

  4. Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Level Over Time

    The change between the fasting plasma glucose value collected at Months 3 and 6 relative to baseline. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Months 3 and 6

  5. Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Over Time

    The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at Months 3 and 6 relative to baseline. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Months 3 and 6

  6. Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

    An ADR is defined as any response to a medicinal product that is noxious and unintended and that occurs at doses normally used in humans for the prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy of diseases or for the restoration, correction, or modification of physiological function. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically important due to other reasons than the above mentioned criteria. Adverse events such as pancreatitis, hepatic disorders, and hypersensitivity reactions (including angioedema, anaphylaxis, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome) were considered as AESI.

    Measured: Baseline up to Month 6

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Remain on Treatment With Alogliptin or Alogliptin FDCs

    Measured: Months 3 and 6

  8. Time to Alogliptin or Alogliptin FDCs Dose Escalation or Dose Reduction

    Measured: Months 3 and 6

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Dec 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start22 Dec 2016
  3. Primary completion26 Jan 2018
  4. Study completion26 Jan 2018

Why it stopped: Business Decision; No Safety Or Efficacy Concerns

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
593 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02989649
Sponsor's protocol ID
Alogliptin-5009
Status last verified
Jan 2019
First submitted
8 Dec 2016
Last updated
19 Apr 2019
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Takeda makes patient-level, de-identified data sets and associated documents available after applicable marketing approvals and commercial availability have been received, an opportunity for the primary publication of the research has been allowed, and other criteria have been met as set forth in Takeda's Data Sharing Policy (see www.TakedaClinicalTrials.com/Approach for details). To obtain access, researchers must submit a legitimate academic research proposal for adjudication by an independent review panel, who will review the scientific merit of the research and the requestor's qualifications and conflict of interest that can result in potential bias. Once approved, qualified researchers who sign a data sharing agreement are provided access to these data in a secure research environment.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Takeda at 11 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 11 sites in China, Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level at Month 6 (time frame: Baseline and Month 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in