Plasma Cell MyelomaPhase 3ICARIA-MMNCT02990338
Multinational Clinical Study Comparing Isatuximab, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone to Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients
A Phase 3 study testing Isatuximab, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in people with Plasma Cell Myeloma, run by Sanofi at 111 sites in 24 countries.
Trial summary
Primary Objective: To demonstrate the benefit of isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in the prolongation of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as compared to pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in participants with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Plasma Cell Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- Isatuximab, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 307 participants
- Where
- 111 sitesin 24 countries
- Study dates
- 22 Dec 2016to 1 Nov 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age superior or equal to 18 years or country's legal age of majority if the legal age was superior to 18 years old.
- Participants had a documented diagnosis of multiple myeloma with evidence of measurable disease i.e. serum M protein superior or equal to 0.5 grams per decilitre (g/dL) measured using serum protein immunoelectrophoresis and or urine M protein superior or equal to 200 mg per 24 hours measured using urine protein immunoelectrophoresis.
- Participants had received at least 2 prior lines of anti-myeloma therapy, which must include at least 2 consecutive cycles of lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib or ixazomib) given alone or in combination.
- Participants had failed treatment with lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib, or ixazomib) alone or in combination (Intolerant, progression within 6 months after reaching Partial Response or better).
- Participants had progressed on or within 60 days after end of previous therapy before to study entry, i.e., refractory to the last line of treatment.
Who cannot join
- Primary refractory multiple myeloma defined as participants who had never achieved at least a minimal response (MR) with any treatment during the disease course.
- Free Light Chain measurable disease only.
- Prior therapy with pomalidomide.
- Any anti-myeloma drug treatment within 14 days before randomization, including dexamethasone.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status superior to 2.
- Platelets inferior to 75 000 cells per microliter (mcL) if inferior to 50% of bone marrow (BM) nucleated cells are plasma cells, and inferior to 30 000 cells per mcL if superior or equal to 50% of BM nucleated cells are plasma cells. Platelet transfusion was not allowed within three days before the screening visit.
Show all 18Show fewer
- Absolute neutrophil count inferior to 1000 per mcL (1*10^9/L).
- Creatinine clearance inferior to 30 mL per minute (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] Formula).
- Total bilirubin superior to 2*ULN (Upper Limit of Normal).
- Corrected serum calcium superior to 14 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (superior to 3.5 millimoles per liter (mmol/L).
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) superior to 3*ULN.
- Hypersensitivity to immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) (thalidomide or lenalidomide) defined as any hypersensitivity reaction leading to stop IMiDs within the 2 first cycles or toxicity, which does meet intolerance definition.
- Hypersensitivity to dexamethasone, sucrose histidine (as base and hydrochloride salt), and polysorbate 80 or any of the components of study therapy that are not amenable to premedication with steroids, or H2 blockers that would prohibit further treatment with these agents.
- Significant cardiac dysfunction; myocardial infarction within 12 months; unstable, poorly controlled angina pectoris.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman or female who intends to become pregnant during the participation in the study.
- Male participants who disagreed to practice true abstinence or disagreed to use a condom during sexual contact with a pregnant female or a female of childbearing potential while participating in the study, during dose interruptions and at least 3 or 5 months following study treatment discontinuation, even if he had undergone a successful vasectomy.
- All participants who disagreed to refrain from donating blood while on study treatment and for 4 weeks after discontinuation from this study treatment.
- The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Trial locations and contacts
111 sites in 24 countries.
111 sites in 24 countries
France19 sites
Investigational Site Number : 2500021
Bayonne, 64100
Investigational Site Number : 2500008
Caen, 14033
Investigational Site Number : 2500009
Dijon, 21000
Investigational Site Number : 2500017
Grenoble, 38043
Investigational Site Number : 2500013
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85925
Investigational Site Number : 2500003
Lille, 59037
Investigational Site Number : 2500023
Limoges, 87042
Investigational Site Number : 2500019
Montpellier, 34295
Investigational Site Number : 2500002
Nantes, 44093
Investigational Site Number : 2500015
Paris, 75005
Investigational Site Number : 2500016
Paris, 75743
Investigational Site Number : 2500005
Pessac, 33600
Investigational Site Number : 2500004
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Investigational Site Number : 2500007
Poitiers, 86021
Investigational Site Number : 2500025
Reims, 51092
Investigational Site Number : 2500014
Rennes, 35033
Investigational Site Number : 2500001
Toulouse, 31059
Investigational Site Number : 2500012
Tours, 37044
Investigational Site Number : 2500018
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
Turkey (Türkiye)10 sites
Investigational Site Number : 7920001
Ankara, 06620
Investigational Site Number : 7920002
Antalya, 07050
Investigational Site Number : 7920005
Istanbul, 34010
Investigational Site Number : 7920006
Istanbul, 34381
Investigational Site Number : 7920003
Istanbul, 34390
Investigational Site Number : 7920004
Istanbul
Investigational Site Number : 7920008
Izmir, 35040
Investigational Site Number : 7920010
Izmir, 35340
Investigational Site Number : 7920009
Kayseri, 38039
Investigational Site Number : 7920007
Kocaeli, 41400
Italy9 sites
Investigational Site Number : 3800001
Bologna, 40138
Investigational Site Number : 3800010
Catania, 95123
Investigational Site Number : 3800009
Florence, 50134
Investigational Site Number : 3800008
Genova, 16132
Investigational Site Number : 3800007
Milan, 20132
Investigational Site Number : 3800002
Milan, 20133
Investigational Site Number : 3800006
Padova, 35128
Investigational Site Number : 3800004
Terni, 05100
Investigational Site Number : 3800003
Torino, 10126
Japan8 sites
Investigational Site Number : 3920006
Kyoto, Kyoto, 603-8151
Investigational Site Number : 3920001
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 467-8602
Investigational Site Number : 3920003
Okayama, Okayama-ken, 701-1192
Investigational Site Number : 3920004
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8543
Investigational Site Number : 3920005
Shibukawa-shi, Gunma, 377-0280
Investigational Site Number : 3920002
Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 150-8935
Investigational Site Number : 3920007
Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777
Investigational Site Number : 3920008
Suwa-shi, Nagano, 392-8510
Spain6 sites
Investigational Site Number : 7240001
Barcelona, Barcelona [Barcelona], 08035
Investigational Site Number : 7240003
Madrid, 28006
Investigational Site Number : 7240002
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008
Investigational Site Number : 7240004
Salamanca, 37007
Investigational Site Number : 7240006
Santander, Cantabria, 39008
Investigational Site Number : 7240005
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña [La Coruña], 15706
Australia5 sites
Investigational Site Number : 0360005
Melbourne, Victoria, 3000
Investigational Site Number : 0360002
Melbourne, Victoria, 3004
Investigational Site Number : 0360006
Richmond, Victoria, 3121
Investigational Site Number : 0360004
St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065
Investigational Site Number : 0360001
Waratah, New South Wales, 2298
Czechia5 sites
Investigational Site Number : 2030005
Brno, 62500
Investigational Site Number : 2030004
Hradec Králové, 50005
Investigational Site Number : 2030001
Olomouc, 77900
Investigational Site Number : 2030002
Ostrava - Poruba, 70852
Investigational Site Number : 2030003
Prague, 12808
Greece5 sites
Investigational Site Number : 3000002
Athens, 106 76
Investigational Site Number : 3000005
Athens, 11527
Investigational Site Number : 3000001
Athens, 11528
Investigational Site Number : 3000004
Pátrai, 26504
Investigational Site Number : 3000003
Thessaloniki, 57010
South Korea5 sites
Investigational Site Number : 4100007
Hwasun-gun, Jeollanam-do, 58128
Investigational Site Number : 4100006
Incheon, 21565
Investigational Site Number : 4100001
Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi, 03080
Investigational Site Number : 4100002
Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi, 06351
Investigational Site Number : 4100005
Seoul, 06591
Belgium4 sites
Investigational Site Number : 0560003
Antwerp, 2060
Investigational Site Number : 0560002
Brussels, 1090
Investigational Site Number : 0560004
Ghent, 9000
Investigational Site Number : 0560001
Leuven, 3000
New Zealand4 sites
Investigational Site Number : 5540002
Auckland, 2025
Investigational Site Number : 5540004
Dunedin, Otago, 9016
Investigational Site Number : 5540003
Hamilton, Waikato Region, 3204
Investigational Site Number : 5540001
Takapuna, Auckland, 1309
Poland4 sites
Investigational Site Number : 6160002
Chorzów, Silesian Voivodeship, 41-500
Investigational Site Number : 6160005
Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 31-501
Investigational Site Number : 6160003
Lublin, Lubusz Voivodeship, 20-081
Investigational Site Number : 6160001
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 02-776
Taiwan4 sites
Investigational Site Number : 1580004
Kaohsiung City, 833
Investigational Site Number : 1580002
Taichung, 40447
Investigational Site Number : 1580001
Taipei, 100
Investigational Site Number : 1580003
Taoyuan, 333
Canada3 sites
Investigational Site Number : 1240001
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
Investigational Site Number : 1240004
Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1
Investigational Site Number : 1240005
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4
Hungary3 sites
Investigational Site Number : 3480001
Budapest, 1083
Investigational Site Number : 3480003
Budapest, 1097
Investigational Site Number : 3480002
Debrecen, 4032
Portugal3 sites
Investigational Site Number : 6200004
Coimbra, 3000-075
Investigational Site Number : 6200002
Lisbon, 1070
Investigational Site Number : 6200001
Porto, 4200
Russia3 sites
Investigational Site Number : 6430004
Moscow, 125167
Investigational Site Number : 6430001
Moscow, 125284
Investigational Site Number : 6430002
Moscow, 129301
United Kingdom3 sites
Investigational Site Number : 8260002
London, London, City of, EC1A 7BE
Investigational Site Number : 8260003
London, London, City of, SE1 9RT
Investigational Site Number : 8260001
London, London, City of, WC1E6AG
United States2 sites
Dana Farber Site Number : 8400006
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
BRCR Medical Center Inc. Site Number : 8400002
Plantation, Florida, 33324
Sweden2 sites
Investigational Site Number : 7520004
Luleå, 97180
Investigational Site Number : 7520005
Uddevalla, 451 80
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study Comparing Isatuximab (SAR650984) in Combination With Pomalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone Versus Pomalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients With Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Primary Objective:
To demonstrate the benefit of isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in the prolongation of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as compared to pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in participants with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM).
Read more
Secondary Objectives:
- To evaluate the Overall Response Rate (ORR) as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria in each arm.
- To compare the Overall Survival (OS) between the two arms.
- To evaluate the Time To Progression (TTP) in each arm.
- To evaluate the PFS in high risk cytogenetic population in each arm.
- To evaluate the Duration of Response (DOR) in each arm.
- To evaluate the safety in both treatment arms.
- To determine the Pharmacokinetic profile of isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide.
- To evaluate the immunogenicity of isatuximab.
- To assess disease-specific and generic health-related quality of life (HRQL), disease and treatment-related symptoms, health state utility, and health status.
Read the detailed description
The duration of the study for the participants included a period for screening of up to 21 days (or up to 28 days for women who can become pregnant). Participants continued study treatment until disease progression, unacceptable adverse reaction, participants' wish or other reason of discontinuation.
During follow-up, participants who discontinued the study treatment due to progression of the disease were followed every 3 months (12 weeks) for survival (or until cut-off date), and participants who discontinued the study treatment prior to documentation of disease progression were followed-up every 4 weeks until disease progression, and then every 3 months (12 weeks) for survival (or until cut-off date).
- Conditions
- Plasma Cell Myeloma
- Being tested
- Isatuximab, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone
- Keywords
- Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IsatuximabDrug
Also called SAR650984, Sarclisa
Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion Route of administration: intravenous
PomalidomideDrug
Also called POMALYST IMNOVID
Pharmaceutical form: capsule Route of administration: oral
DexamethasoneDrug
Pharmaceutical form: tablets or solution for infusion Route of administration: oral or intravenous
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pd (pomalidomide + dexamethasone) | Active comparator | Participants received pomalidomide 4 milligrams (mg) Per os (PO) on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle plus dexamethasone 40 mg (participants greater than or equal to (>=) 75 years of age received 20 mg dexamethasone) PO on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or participant's wish to discontinue study treatment, or any other reason, whichever comes first (maximum exposure: 306.6 weeks). Receives: Drug: Pomalidomide; Drug: Dexamethasone |
| IPd (isatuximab + pomalidomide + dexamethasone) | Experimental | Participants received isatuximab 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 at Cycle 1, and then on Days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles plus pomalidomide 4 mg PO on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle and dexamethasone 40 mg (participants >= 75 years of age received 20 mg dexamethasone), PO or IV on Day 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or participant's wish to discontinue study treatment, or any other reason, whichever comes first (maximum exposure: 311.0 weeks). Receives: Drug: Isatuximab; Drug: Pomalidomide; Drug: Dexamethasone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS:time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) determined by Independent Response Committee (IRC) or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first. If progression or death was not observed, participant was censored at date of last progression-free tumor assessment prior to study cut-off date. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. PD as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria was defined as increase of >=25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of the following criteria: serum M-protein (the absolute increase must be >=0.5gram(g)/dL), serum M-protein increase >=1g/dL if lowest M component was >=5g/dL; urine M-component (absolute increase must be >=200mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s),>=50% increase from nadir in sum of the products of the maximal perpendicular diameters of measured lesions (SPD) of >1 lesion, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of a previous lesion >1 centimeter in short axis.
Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or the date of death from any cause, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration: 76.7 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (23)
Overall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Disease Response as Per Independent Response Committee (IRC)
ORR (IMWG criteria): percentage of participants with stringent complete response(sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), and partial response (PR) as best overall response, assessed by IRC. sCR:negative immunofixation on serum and urine,disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates plus normal free light chain(FLC)ratio(0.26-1.65), absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy.CR:negative immunofixation on serum and urine,disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates.VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation, not on electrophoresis/,>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100mg/24h/,>=90% decrease in SPD compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma. PR: >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by >=90%/<200mg/24h,if present at baseline,>=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas.
Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response Committee
BOR:best sequential response from start of treatment until disease progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment/data cut-off, whichever comes first. Ordering of evaluations from best to worse was: sCR,CR,VGPR,PR, minimal response (MR), stable disease (SD), PD, and not evaluable.CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates. sCR:CR as defined previously plus normal FLC ratio (0.26 to 1.65), absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation,>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100mg/24h,>=90% decrease in SPD compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma. PR: >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by >=90%/<200mg/24h. MR:>=25% but <=49% reduction in serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urine M-protein by 50-89%. SD: Not meeting criteria for CR,VGPR,PR,MR/PD.
Measured: From the date of randomization until disease progression, or death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better as Per Independent Response Committee
VGPR rate was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a VGPR or better as BOR. VGPR was defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or >=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 h or >=90% decrease in the sum of maximal perpendicular diameter compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma. BOR was defined as the best sequential response, using the IRC's assessment of response, from the start of treatment until disease progression (provided that the progression is subsequently confirmed in case of progression requiring confirmation), death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or cut-off date, whichever occurs first. CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates.
Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR): Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit as Per Independent Response Committee
CBR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a MR or better as BOR. MR was defined as >= 25% but <= 49% reduction in serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urine M-protein by 50-89%, which still exceed 200 mg/24h; if present at baseline, >=50% reduction in size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required. BOR was defined as the best sequential response, using the IRC's assessment of response, from the start of treatment until disease progression (provided that the progression is subsequently confirmed in case of progression requiring confirmation), death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or cut-off date, whichever occurs first.
Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Overall Survival (OS): Final Analysis
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to death from any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date participant was known to be alive or at the cut-off date, whichever comes first. This pre-specified final analysis was performed when the 220 OS events were met.
Measured: From the date of randomization to date of death from any cause or data cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration 245.6 weeks)
Time to Progression (TTP) as Per Independent Response Committee
TTP was defined as time from randomization to the date of first documentation of PD, as determined by the IRC. As per IMWG criteria, PD was defined for participants with increase of >= 25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of the following criteria: serum M-protein (the absolute increase must be >= 0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase >=1 g/dL if the lowest M component was >=5 g/dL; urine M-component (the absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s), >=50% increase from nadir in SPD of >1 lesion, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of a previous lesion >1 centimeter in short axis.
Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Progression Free Survival in High Risk Cytogenetic Population
PFS in high risk cytogenetic population was defined as PFS in subgroup of participants carrying high risk cytogenetic changes including del(17p), translocation (t)(4;14) or translocation t(14;16) assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD (determined by IRC) or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first. PD defined as per IMWG criteria as: increase of >=25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of following criteria: serum M-protein (absolute increase must be >=0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase >=1 g/dL if lowest M component was >=5 g/dL; urine M-component (absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s), >=50% increase from nadir in SPD of >1 lesion, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of previous lesion >1 centimeter (cm) in short axis.
Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or the date of death from any cause, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Independent Response Committee
DOR:time from date of first IRC determined response(PR or better) to date of first IRC-PD or death, whichever occurred first.DOR was determined only for participants who had achieved a response of PR or better based on disease assessment by IRC.If progression or death was not observed,participant was censored at date of participants last progression-free tumor assessment prior to initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment(if any)and study cut-off date. PD(IMWG criteria):increase of >=25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of following criteria: serum M-protein (absolute increase must be >=0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase >=1g/dL if lowest M component was >=5g/dL;urine M-component (absolute increase must be >=200mg/24 hour),appearance of new lesion(s), >=50% increase from nadir in SPD of >1 lesion,or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of a previous lesion >1 cm in short axis. PR:>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by >=90%/<200mg/24h.
Measured: From the date of the first IRC determined response to the date of first IRC progression or death, whichever occurred first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Time to First Response (TT1R) as Per Independent Response Committee
TT1R was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first IRC determined response (PR or better) that is subsequently confirmed. PR was defined as >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24 h. In addition to the above listed criteria, if present at baseline, a >=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required.
Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of first IRC determined response, or death or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Time to Best Response (TTBR) as Per Independent Response Committee
TTBR was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first occurrence of IRC determined BOR (PR or better) that was subsequently confirmed. PR was defined as >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24 h. In addition to the above listed criteria, if present at baseline, a >=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required. BOR was defined as the best sequential response, using the IRC's assessment of response, from the start of treatment until disease progression (provided that the progression is subsequently confirmed in case of progression requiring confirmation), death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or cut-off date, whichever occurs first.
Measured: From the date of randomization to date of first occurrence of IRC determined best overall response or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
MRD was assessed by next-generation sequencing in bone marrow samples from participants who achieved CR, to determine the depth of response at the molecular level. IMWG criteria for CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates. MRD was classified as positive or negative at the minimum sensitivity of 1 in 10^5 nucleated cells. MRD negativity was defined as the absence of the dominant clonotype sequence(s) identified in the bone marrow aspirate collected at screening. MRD positivity was defined as the presence of the dominant clonotype sequence(s) identified in the bone marrow aspirate collected at screening.
Measured: Up to 76.7 weeks
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened (according to the Investigator opinion), or became serious during the treatment period (time from the first dose of study treatments up to 30 days after last dose of study treatments). An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event.
Measured: From randomization up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum duration up to 241.6 weeks for Pd arm and 245.6 weeks for IPd arm)
Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at End of Infusion (CEOI)
CEOI was defined as the plasma concentration at end of infusion.
Measured: End of infusion on Cycle(C)1 Day(D)1 and Cycle1 Day 15; Cycle 2 Day 1; and Cycle 4 Day 1
Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Accumulation Ratio of Isatuximab at Concentration at the End of Infusion (CEOI)
Accumulation Ratio was defined as the ratio of CEOI of Cycle 2 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 4 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 1, where CEOI was the plasma concentration at the end of infusion.
Measured: End of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 4 Day 1
Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at 1 Hour After End of Infusion (CEOI+1 Hour)
CEOI+1 hour was defined as the plasma concentration of isatuximab at 1 hour after end of infusion.
Measured: Cycle 1:1 hour after End of Infusion on Day 1; Cycle 4:1 hour after End of Infusion on Day 1
PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at Ctrough
Trough Concentration (Ctrough) is the concentration prior to study drug administration.
Measured: Pre-infusion on C1D1, C1D8, C1D15, C1D22, C2D1, C2D15, C3D1, C3D15, C4D1, C4D15, C5D1, C6D1, C7D1, C8D1, C9D1, C10D1, C11D1, C12D1, C13D1, C14D1, C15D1, C16D1, C17D1, C18D1, C19D1, C20D1; End of treatment (EOT [30 days after last drug administration])
PK Parameter: Accumulation Ratio of Isatuximab at Trough Concentration (Ctrough)
Accumulation Ratio was defined as the ratio of Ctrough of Cycle 2 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 4 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 8, where Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.
Measured: Pre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 4 Day 1
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)
ADA were categorized as: pre-existing, treatment induced and treatment boosted response. Pre-existing ADA was defined as ADA that were present in samples drawn during the pretreatment period (i.e., before the first isatuximab administration). Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without preexisting ADA, including participants without pretreatment samples. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADA that increased at least 2 titer steps between pre-treatment and post-treatment.
Measured: From randomization up to 60 days after last dose of study drug (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) Score
EORTC-Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy and provides an assessment of participant reported outcome dimensions. EORTC QLQ-C30 included GHS/ QOL, functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and 6 single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Most questions from QLQ-C30 were a 4-point scale (1/Not at All to 4/Very Much), except Items 29-30, which comprise GHS scale and were a 7-point scale (1/Very Poor to 7/Excellent). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. A high score represented a favorable outcome with a best quality of life for participant.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Disease Symptoms Domain Score
EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. Disease symptoms domain is one of the four domain scores. Disease symptoms domain score used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0 -100 scale, where higher scores = more symptoms and lower health-related quality of life (HRQL) and lower score = less symptoms and more HRQL
Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Side Effects of Treatment Domain Score
EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. Side effects of treatment domain is one of the four domain scores. Side effects of treatment domain score used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale, where higher scores = more side effects and lower HRQL and lower scores = less side effects and better HRQL.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health State Utility Index Value
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status that provides a general assessment of health and wellbeing. The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has a 5-level response: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Response options are measured with a 5-point Likert scale (for the 5L version). The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates a better health state and lower score indicate worse health state.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L health state utility index (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale. The Visual Analogue Scale is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study start22 Dec 2016
- Primary completion22 Nov 2018
- Study completion1 Nov 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Plasma Cell MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 307 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Sciences & Operations, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02990338
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EFC14335
- Other IDs
- U1111-1180-6262, 2016-003097-41, 2016
- Acronym
- ICARIA-MM
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 17 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Publications
Attal M, Richardson PG, Rajkumar SV, San-Miguel J, Beksac M, Spicka I, Leleu X, Schjesvold F, Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Huang JS, Minarik J, Cavo M, Prince HM, Mace S, Corzo KP, Campana F, Le-Guennec S, Dubin F, Anderson KC; ICARIA-MM study group. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (ICARIA-MM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019 Dec 7;394(10214):2096-2107. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32556-5. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
PubMed 31735560Richardson PG, Perrot A, San-Miguel J, Beksac M, Spicka I, Leleu X, Schjesvold F, Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Huang JS, Minarik J, Cavo M, Prince HM, Malinge L, Dubin F, van de Velde H, Anderson KC. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (ICARIA-MM): follow-up analysis of a randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Mar;23(3):416-427. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00019-5. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
PubMed 35151415Richardson PG, Perrot A, Miguel JS, Beksac M, Spicka I, Leleu X, Schjesvold F, Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Huang SY, Minarik J, Cavo M, Prince HM, Mace S, Zhang R, Dubin F, Morisse MC, Anderson KC. Isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone versus pomalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: final overall survival analysis. Haematologica. 2024 Jul 1;109(7):2239-2249. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2023.284325.
PubMed 38299578Beksac M, Spicka I, Hajek R, Bringhen S, Jelinek T, Martin T, Mikala G, Moreau P, Symeonidis A, Rawlings AM, van de Velde H, Richardson PG. Evaluation of isatuximab in patients with soft-tissue plasmacytomas: An analysis from ICARIA-MM and IKEMA. Leuk Res. 2022 Nov;122:106948. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2022.106948. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
PubMed 36108425Sunami K, Ikeda T, Huang SY, Wang MC, Koh Y, Min CK, Yeh SP, Matsumoto M, Uchiyama M, Iyama S, Shimazaki C, Lee JH, Kim K, Kaneko H, Kim JS, Lin TL, Campana F, Tada K, Iida S, Suzuki K; ICARIA-MM study group. Isatuximab-Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone Versus Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone in East Asian Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: ICARIA-MM Subgroup Analysis. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Aug;22(8):e751-e761. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
PubMed 35641409Wilmoth J, Colson K, Dubin F, Kellam C. Isatuximab: Nursing Considerations for Use in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Dec 1;25(6):706-712. doi: 10.1188/21.CJON.706-712.
PubMed 34800109Bringhen S, Pour L, Vorobyev V, Vural F, Warzocha K, Benboubker L, Koh Y, Maisnar V, Karlin L, Pavic M, Campana F, Le Guennec S, Menas F, van de Velde H, Richardson PG. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma according to prior lines of treatment and refractory status: ICARIA-MM subgroup analysis. Leuk Res. 2021 May;104:106576. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2021.106576. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
PubMed 33839618Schjesvold FH, Richardson PG, Facon T, Alegre A, Spencer A, Jurczyszyn A, Sunami K, Frenzel L, Min CK, Guillonneau S, Lin PL, Le-Guennec S, Campana F, van de Velde H, Bensfia S, Bringhen S. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: ICARIA-MM subgroup analysis. Haematologica. 2021 Apr 1;106(4):1182-1187. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.253450. No abstract available.
PubMed 32586908
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study Comparing Isatuximab (SAR650984) in Combination With Pomalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone Versus Pomalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients With Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02990338
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ICARIA-MM / EFC14335
- Conditions
- Plasma Cell Myeloma
- Keywords
- Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 307 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 22 Dec 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Dec 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary Objective:
To demonstrate the benefit of isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in the prolongation of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as compared to pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in participants with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM).
Secondary Objectives:
- To evaluate the Overall Response Rate (ORR) as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria in each arm.
- To compare the Overall Survival (OS) between the two arms.
- To evaluate the Time To Progression (TTP) in each arm.
- To evaluate the PFS in high risk cytogenetic population in each arm.
- To evaluate the Duration of Response (DOR) in each arm.
- To evaluate the safety in both treatment arms.
- To determine the Pharmacokinetic profile of isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide.
- To evaluate the immunogenicity of isatuximab.
- To assess disease-specific and generic health-related quality of life (HRQL), disease and treatment-related symptoms, health state utility, and health status.
Detailed description
The duration of the study for the participants included a period for screening of up to 21 days (or up to 28 days for women who can become pregnant). Participants continued study treatment until disease progression, unacceptable adverse reaction, participants' wish or other reason of discontinuation.
During follow-up, participants who discontinued the study treatment due to progression of the disease were followed every 3 months (12 weeks) for survival (or until cut-off date), and participants who discontinued the study treatment prior to documentation of disease progression were followed-up every 4 weeks until disease progression, and then every 3 months (12 weeks) for survival (or until cut-off date).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pd (pomalidomide + dexamethasone) | Active comparator | Drug: Pomalidomide, Drug: DexamethasoneParticipants received pomalidomide 4 milligrams (mg) Per os (PO) on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle plus dexamethasone 40 mg (participants greater than or equal to (>=) 75 years of age received 20 mg dexamethasone) PO on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or participant's wish to discontinue study treatment, or any other reason, whichever comes first (maximum exposure: 306.6 weeks). |
| IPd (isatuximab + pomalidomide + dexamethasone) | Experimental | Drug: Isatuximab, Drug: Pomalidomide, Drug: DexamethasoneParticipants received isatuximab 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 at Cycle 1, and then on Days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles plus pomalidomide 4 mg PO on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle and dexamethasone 40 mg (participants >= 75 years of age received 20 mg dexamethasone), PO or IV on Day 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or participant's wish to discontinue study treatment, or any other reason, whichever comes first (maximum exposure: 311.0 weeks). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age superior or equal to 18 years or country's legal age of majority if the legal age was superior to 18 years old.
- Participants had a documented diagnosis of multiple myeloma with evidence of measurable disease i.e. serum M protein superior or equal to 0.5 grams per decilitre (g/dL) measured using serum protein immunoelectrophoresis and or urine M protein superior or equal to 200 mg per 24 hours measured using urine protein immunoelectrophoresis.
- Participants had received at least 2 prior lines of anti-myeloma therapy, which must include at least 2 consecutive cycles of lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib or ixazomib) given alone or in combination.
- Participants had failed treatment with lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib, or ixazomib) alone or in combination (Intolerant, progression within 6 months after reaching Partial Response or better).
- Participants had progressed on or within 60 days after end of previous therapy before to study entry, i.e., refractory to the last line of treatment.
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Primary refractory multiple myeloma defined as participants who had never achieved at least a minimal response (MR) with any treatment during the disease course.
- Free Light Chain measurable disease only.
- Prior therapy with pomalidomide.
- Any anti-myeloma drug treatment within 14 days before randomization, including dexamethasone.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status superior to 2.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IsatuximabAlso: SAR650984, SarclisaPharmaceutical form: solution for infusion Route of administration: intravenous | Drug | IPd (isatuximab + pomalidomide + dexamethasone) |
| PomalidomideAlso: POMALYST IMNOVIDPharmaceutical form: capsule Route of administration: oral | Drug | IPd (isatuximab + pomalidomide + dexamethasone), Pd (pomalidomide + dexamethasone) |
| DexamethasonePharmaceutical form: tablets or solution for infusion Route of administration: oral or intravenous | Drug | IPd (isatuximab + pomalidomide + dexamethasone), Pd (pomalidomide + dexamethasone) |
Primary outcome
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or the date of death from any cause, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration: 76.7 weeks)
PFS:time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) determined by Independent Response Committee (IRC) or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first. If progression or death was not observed, participant was censored at date of last progression-free tumor assessment prior to study cut-off date. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. PD as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria was defined as increase of >=25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of the following criteria: serum M-protein (the absolute increase must be >=0.5gram(g)/dL), serum M-protein increase >=1g/dL if lowest M component was >=5g/dL; urine M-component (absolute increase must be >=200mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s),>=50% increase from nadir in sum of the products of the maximal perpendicular diameters of measured lesions (SPD) of >1 lesion, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of a previous lesion >1 centimeter in short axis.
23 secondary outcomes
Overall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Disease Response as Per Independent Response Committee (IRC)
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response Committee
Time frame: From the date of randomization until disease progression, or death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better as Per Independent Response Committee
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR): Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit as Per Independent Response Committee
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Overall Survival (OS): Final Analysis
Time frame: From the date of randomization to date of death from any cause or data cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration 245.6 weeks)
Time to Progression (TTP) as Per Independent Response Committee
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Progression Free Survival in High Risk Cytogenetic Population
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or the date of death from any cause, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Independent Response Committee
Time frame: From the date of the first IRC determined response to the date of first IRC progression or death, whichever occurred first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Time to First Response (TT1R) as Per Independent Response Committee
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first IRC determined response, or death or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Time to Best Response (TTBR) as Per Independent Response Committee
Time frame: From the date of randomization to date of first occurrence of IRC determined best overall response or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
Time frame: Up to 76.7 weeks
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: From randomization up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum duration up to 241.6 weeks for Pd arm and 245.6 weeks for IPd arm)
Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at End of Infusion (CEOI)
Time frame: End of infusion on Cycle(C)1 Day(D)1 and Cycle1 Day 15; Cycle 2 Day 1; and Cycle 4 Day 1
Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Accumulation Ratio of Isatuximab at Concentration at the End of Infusion (CEOI)
Time frame: End of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 4 Day 1
Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at 1 Hour After End of Infusion (CEOI+1 Hour)
Time frame: Cycle 1:1 hour after End of Infusion on Day 1; Cycle 4:1 hour after End of Infusion on Day 1
PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at Ctrough
Time frame: Pre-infusion on C1D1, C1D8, C1D15, C1D22, C2D1, C2D15, C3D1, C3D15, C4D1, C4D15, C5D1, C6D1, C7D1, C8D1, C9D1, C10D1, C11D1, C12D1, C13D1, C14D1, C15D1, C16D1, C17D1, C18D1, C19D1, C20D1; End of treatment (EOT [30 days after last drug administration])
PK Parameter: Accumulation Ratio of Isatuximab at Trough Concentration (Ctrough)
Time frame: Pre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 4 Day 1
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)
Time frame: From randomization up to 60 days after last dose of study drug (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) Score
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Disease Symptoms Domain Score
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Side Effects of Treatment Domain Score
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health State Utility Index Value
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jan 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 31735560Attal M, Richardson PG, Rajkumar SV, San-Miguel J, Beksac M, Spicka I, Leleu X, Schjesvold F, Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Huang JS, Minarik J, Cavo M, Prince HM, Mace S, Corzo KP, Campana F, Le-Guennec S, Dubin F, Anderson KC; ICARIA-MM study group. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (ICARIA-MM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019 Dec 7;394(10214):2096-2107. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32556-5. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
- Background: PubMed 35151415Richardson PG, Perrot A, San-Miguel J, Beksac M, Spicka I, Leleu X, Schjesvold F, Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Huang JS, Minarik J, Cavo M, Prince HM, Malinge L, Dubin F, van de Velde H, Anderson KC. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (ICARIA-MM): follow-up analysis of a randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Mar;23(3):416-427. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00019-5. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38299578Richardson PG, Perrot A, Miguel JS, Beksac M, Spicka I, Leleu X, Schjesvold F, Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Huang SY, Minarik J, Cavo M, Prince HM, Mace S, Zhang R, Dubin F, Morisse MC, Anderson KC. Isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone versus pomalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: final overall survival analysis. Haematologica. 2024 Jul 1;109(7):2239-2249. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2023.284325.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36108425Beksac M, Spicka I, Hajek R, Bringhen S, Jelinek T, Martin T, Mikala G, Moreau P, Symeonidis A, Rawlings AM, van de Velde H, Richardson PG. Evaluation of isatuximab in patients with soft-tissue plasmacytomas: An analysis from ICARIA-MM and IKEMA. Leuk Res. 2022 Nov;122:106948. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2022.106948. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35641409Sunami K, Ikeda T, Huang SY, Wang MC, Koh Y, Min CK, Yeh SP, Matsumoto M, Uchiyama M, Iyama S, Shimazaki C, Lee JH, Kim K, Kaneko H, Kim JS, Lin TL, Campana F, Tada K, Iida S, Suzuki K; ICARIA-MM study group. Isatuximab-Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone Versus Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone in East Asian Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: ICARIA-MM Subgroup Analysis. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Aug;22(8):e751-e761. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34800109Wilmoth J, Colson K, Dubin F, Kellam C. Isatuximab: Nursing Considerations for Use in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Dec 1;25(6):706-712. doi: 10.1188/21.CJON.706-712.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33839618Bringhen S, Pour L, Vorobyev V, Vural F, Warzocha K, Benboubker L, Koh Y, Maisnar V, Karlin L, Pavic M, Campana F, Le Guennec S, Menas F, van de Velde H, Richardson PG. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma according to prior lines of treatment and refractory status: ICARIA-MM subgroup analysis. Leuk Res. 2021 May;104:106576. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2021.106576. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32586908Schjesvold FH, Richardson PG, Facon T, Alegre A, Spencer A, Jurczyszyn A, Sunami K, Frenzel L, Min CK, Guillonneau S, Lin PL, Le-Guennec S, Campana F, van de Velde H, Bensfia S, Bringhen S. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: ICARIA-MM subgroup analysis. Haematologica. 2021 Apr 1;106(4):1182-1187. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.253450. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Related trials for Plasma Cell Myeloma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Window of Opportunity Trial to Learn if Linvoseltamab is Safe and Well Tolerated, and How Well it Works in Adult Participants With Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Not Already Received Treatment
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Sciences & Operations study director
Sanofi
111 sites in 24 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Isatuximab, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in people with Plasma Cell Myeloma, run by Sanofi at 111 sites in 24 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 111 sites in France, Turkey (Türkiye), Italy, Japan, Spain and 19 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Dec 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression Free Survival (PFS) (time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or the date of death from any cause, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration: 76.7 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02990338, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jan 2025.