AzTrials
AzTrials

Plasma Cell MyelomaPhase 3ICARIA-MMNCT02990338

Multinational Clinical Study Comparing Isatuximab, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone to Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients

A Phase 3 study testing Isatuximab, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in people with Plasma Cell Myeloma, run by Sanofi at 111 sites in 24 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary Objective: To demonstrate the benefit of isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in the prolongation of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as compared to pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in participants with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Plasma Cell Myeloma
What is being tested?
Isatuximab, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
307 participants
Where
111 sitesin 24 countries
Study dates
22 Dec 2016to 1 Nov 2023
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age superior or equal to 18 years or country's legal age of majority if the legal age was superior to 18 years old.
  • Participants had a documented diagnosis of multiple myeloma with evidence of measurable disease i.e. serum M protein superior or equal to 0.5 grams per decilitre (g/dL) measured using serum protein immunoelectrophoresis and or urine M protein superior or equal to 200 mg per 24 hours measured using urine protein immunoelectrophoresis.
  • Participants had received at least 2 prior lines of anti-myeloma therapy, which must include at least 2 consecutive cycles of lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib or ixazomib) given alone or in combination.
  • Participants had failed treatment with lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib, or ixazomib) alone or in combination (Intolerant, progression within 6 months after reaching Partial Response or better).
  • Participants had progressed on or within 60 days after end of previous therapy before to study entry, i.e., refractory to the last line of treatment.

Who cannot join

  • Primary refractory multiple myeloma defined as participants who had never achieved at least a minimal response (MR) with any treatment during the disease course.
  • Free Light Chain measurable disease only.
  • Prior therapy with pomalidomide.
  • Any anti-myeloma drug treatment within 14 days before randomization, including dexamethasone.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status superior to 2.
  • Platelets inferior to 75 000 cells per microliter (mcL) if inferior to 50% of bone marrow (BM) nucleated cells are plasma cells, and inferior to 30 000 cells per mcL if superior or equal to 50% of BM nucleated cells are plasma cells. Platelet transfusion was not allowed within three days before the screening visit.
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Absolute neutrophil count inferior to 1000 per mcL (1*10^9/L).
  • Creatinine clearance inferior to 30 mL per minute (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] Formula).
  • Total bilirubin superior to 2*ULN (Upper Limit of Normal).
  • Corrected serum calcium superior to 14 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (superior to 3.5 millimoles per liter (mmol/L).
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) superior to 3*ULN.
  • Hypersensitivity to immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) (thalidomide or lenalidomide) defined as any hypersensitivity reaction leading to stop IMiDs within the 2 first cycles or toxicity, which does meet intolerance definition.
  • Hypersensitivity to dexamethasone, sucrose histidine (as base and hydrochloride salt), and polysorbate 80 or any of the components of study therapy that are not amenable to premedication with steroids, or H2 blockers that would prohibit further treatment with these agents.
  • Significant cardiac dysfunction; myocardial infarction within 12 months; unstable, poorly controlled angina pectoris.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman or female who intends to become pregnant during the participation in the study.
  • Male participants who disagreed to practice true abstinence or disagreed to use a condom during sexual contact with a pregnant female or a female of childbearing potential while participating in the study, during dose interruptions and at least 3 or 5 months following study treatment discontinuation, even if he had undergone a successful vasectomy.
  • All participants who disagreed to refrain from donating blood while on study treatment and for 4 weeks after discontinuation from this study treatment.
  • The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Trial locations and contacts

111 sites in 24 countries.

111 sites in 24 countries

France19 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 2500021

    Bayonne, 64100

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500008

    Caen, 14033

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500009

    Dijon, 21000

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500017

    Grenoble, 38043

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500013

    La Roche-sur-Yon, 85925

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500003

    Lille, 59037

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500023

    Limoges, 87042

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500019

    Montpellier, 34295

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500002

    Nantes, 44093

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500015

    Paris, 75005

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500016

    Paris, 75743

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500005

    Pessac, 33600

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500004

    Pierre-Bénite, 69495

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500007

    Poitiers, 86021

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500025

    Reims, 51092

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500014

    Rennes, 35033

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500001

    Toulouse, 31059

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500012

    Tours, 37044

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500018

    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511

Other trials in France

Turkey (Türkiye)10 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 7920001

    Ankara, 06620

  • Investigational Site Number : 7920002

    Antalya, 07050

  • Investigational Site Number : 7920005

    Istanbul, 34010

  • Investigational Site Number : 7920006

    Istanbul, 34381

  • Investigational Site Number : 7920003

    Istanbul, 34390

  • Investigational Site Number : 7920004

    Istanbul

  • Investigational Site Number : 7920008

    Izmir, 35040

  • Investigational Site Number : 7920010

    Izmir, 35340

  • Investigational Site Number : 7920009

    Kayseri, 38039

  • Investigational Site Number : 7920007

    Kocaeli, 41400

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Italy9 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 3800001

    Bologna, 40138

  • Investigational Site Number : 3800010

    Catania, 95123

  • Investigational Site Number : 3800009

    Florence, 50134

  • Investigational Site Number : 3800008

    Genova, 16132

  • Investigational Site Number : 3800007

    Milan, 20132

  • Investigational Site Number : 3800002

    Milan, 20133

  • Investigational Site Number : 3800006

    Padova, 35128

  • Investigational Site Number : 3800004

    Terni, 05100

  • Investigational Site Number : 3800003

    Torino, 10126

Other trials in Italy

Japan8 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 3920006

    Kyoto, Kyoto, 603-8151

  • Investigational Site Number : 3920001

    Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 467-8602

  • Investigational Site Number : 3920003

    Okayama, Okayama-ken, 701-1192

  • Investigational Site Number : 3920004

    Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8543

  • Investigational Site Number : 3920005

    Shibukawa-shi, Gunma, 377-0280

  • Investigational Site Number : 3920002

    Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 150-8935

  • Investigational Site Number : 3920007

    Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777

  • Investigational Site Number : 3920008

    Suwa-shi, Nagano, 392-8510

Other trials in Japan

Spain6 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 7240001

    Barcelona, Barcelona [Barcelona], 08035

  • Investigational Site Number : 7240003

    Madrid, 28006

  • Investigational Site Number : 7240002

    Pamplona, Navarre, 31008

  • Investigational Site Number : 7240004

    Salamanca, 37007

  • Investigational Site Number : 7240006

    Santander, Cantabria, 39008

  • Investigational Site Number : 7240005

    Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña [La Coruña], 15706

Other trials in Spain

Australia5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 0360005

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3000

  • Investigational Site Number : 0360002

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3004

  • Investigational Site Number : 0360006

    Richmond, Victoria, 3121

  • Investigational Site Number : 0360004

    St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065

  • Investigational Site Number : 0360001

    Waratah, New South Wales, 2298

Other trials in Australia

Czechia5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 2030005

    Brno, 62500

  • Investigational Site Number : 2030004

    Hradec Králové, 50005

  • Investigational Site Number : 2030001

    Olomouc, 77900

  • Investigational Site Number : 2030002

    Ostrava - Poruba, 70852

  • Investigational Site Number : 2030003

    Prague, 12808

Other trials in Czechia

Greece5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 3000002

    Athens, 106 76

  • Investigational Site Number : 3000005

    Athens, 11527

  • Investigational Site Number : 3000001

    Athens, 11528

  • Investigational Site Number : 3000004

    Pátrai, 26504

  • Investigational Site Number : 3000003

    Thessaloniki, 57010

Other trials in Greece

South Korea5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 4100007

    Hwasun-gun, Jeollanam-do, 58128

  • Investigational Site Number : 4100006

    Incheon, 21565

  • Investigational Site Number : 4100001

    Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi, 03080

  • Investigational Site Number : 4100002

    Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi, 06351

  • Investigational Site Number : 4100005

    Seoul, 06591

Other trials in South Korea

Belgium4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 0560003

    Antwerp, 2060

  • Investigational Site Number : 0560002

    Brussels, 1090

  • Investigational Site Number : 0560004

    Ghent, 9000

  • Investigational Site Number : 0560001

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

New Zealand4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 5540002

    Auckland, 2025

  • Investigational Site Number : 5540004

    Dunedin, Otago, 9016

  • Investigational Site Number : 5540003

    Hamilton, Waikato Region, 3204

  • Investigational Site Number : 5540001

    Takapuna, Auckland, 1309

Other trials in New Zealand

Poland4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 6160002

    Chorzów, Silesian Voivodeship, 41-500

  • Investigational Site Number : 6160005

    Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 31-501

  • Investigational Site Number : 6160003

    Lublin, Lubusz Voivodeship, 20-081

  • Investigational Site Number : 6160001

    Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 02-776

Other trials in Poland

Taiwan4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 1580004

    Kaohsiung City, 833

  • Investigational Site Number : 1580002

    Taichung, 40447

  • Investigational Site Number : 1580001

    Taipei, 100

  • Investigational Site Number : 1580003

    Taoyuan, 333

Other trials in Taiwan

Canada3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 1240001

    Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4

  • Investigational Site Number : 1240004

    Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1

  • Investigational Site Number : 1240005

    Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4

Other trials in Canada

Hungary3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 3480001

    Budapest, 1083

  • Investigational Site Number : 3480003

    Budapest, 1097

  • Investigational Site Number : 3480002

    Debrecen, 4032

Other trials in Hungary

Portugal3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 6200004

    Coimbra, 3000-075

  • Investigational Site Number : 6200002

    Lisbon, 1070

  • Investigational Site Number : 6200001

    Porto, 4200

Other trials in Portugal

Russia3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 6430004

    Moscow, 125167

  • Investigational Site Number : 6430001

    Moscow, 125284

  • Investigational Site Number : 6430002

    Moscow, 129301

Other trials in Russia

United Kingdom3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 8260002

    London, London, City of, EC1A 7BE

  • Investigational Site Number : 8260003

    London, London, City of, SE1 9RT

  • Investigational Site Number : 8260001

    London, London, City of, WC1E6AG

Other trials in United Kingdom

United States2 sites
  • Dana Farber Site Number : 8400006

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • BRCR Medical Center Inc. Site Number : 8400002

    Plantation, Florida, 33324

Other trials in United States

Sweden2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 7520004

    Luleå, 97180

  • Investigational Site Number : 7520005

    Uddevalla, 451 80

Other trials in Sweden

Denmark1 site
  • Investigational Site Number : 2080002

    Aalborg, 9100

Other trials in Denmark

Germany1 site
  • Investigational Site Number : 2760001

    Leipzig, 04103

Other trials in Germany

Norway1 site
  • Investigational Site Number : 5780001

    Oslo, 0450

Other trials in Norway

Slovakia1 site
  • Investigational Site Number : 7030001

    Bratislava, 83310

Other trials in Slovakia

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study Comparing Isatuximab (SAR650984) in Combination With Pomalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone Versus Pomalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients With Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Primary Objective:

To demonstrate the benefit of isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in the prolongation of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as compared to pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in participants with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM).

Read more

Secondary Objectives:

  • To evaluate the Overall Response Rate (ORR) as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria in each arm.
  • To compare the Overall Survival (OS) between the two arms.
  • To evaluate the Time To Progression (TTP) in each arm.
  • To evaluate the PFS in high risk cytogenetic population in each arm.
  • To evaluate the Duration of Response (DOR) in each arm.
  • To evaluate the safety in both treatment arms.
  • To determine the Pharmacokinetic profile of isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide.
  • To evaluate the immunogenicity of isatuximab.
  • To assess disease-specific and generic health-related quality of life (HRQL), disease and treatment-related symptoms, health state utility, and health status.
Read the detailed description

The duration of the study for the participants included a period for screening of up to 21 days (or up to 28 days for women who can become pregnant). Participants continued study treatment until disease progression, unacceptable adverse reaction, participants' wish or other reason of discontinuation.

During follow-up, participants who discontinued the study treatment due to progression of the disease were followed every 3 months (12 weeks) for survival (or until cut-off date), and participants who discontinued the study treatment prior to documentation of disease progression were followed-up every 4 weeks until disease progression, and then every 3 months (12 weeks) for survival (or until cut-off date).

Being tested
Isatuximab, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone
Keywords
Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody
Medical subject headings
Multiple Myeloma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IsatuximabDrug

    Also called SAR650984, Sarclisa

    Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion Route of administration: intravenous

  • PomalidomideDrug

    Also called POMALYST IMNOVID

    Pharmaceutical form: capsule Route of administration: oral

  • DexamethasoneDrug

    Pharmaceutical form: tablets or solution for infusion Route of administration: oral or intravenous

Study groups in NCT02990338
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pd (pomalidomide + dexamethasone)Active comparatorParticipants received pomalidomide 4 milligrams (mg) Per os (PO) on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle plus dexamethasone 40 mg (participants greater than or equal to (>=) 75 years of age received 20 mg dexamethasone) PO on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or participant's wish to discontinue study treatment, or any other reason, whichever comes first (maximum exposure: 306.6 weeks).
Receives: Drug: Pomalidomide; Drug: Dexamethasone
IPd (isatuximab + pomalidomide + dexamethasone)ExperimentalParticipants received isatuximab 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 at Cycle 1, and then on Days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles plus pomalidomide 4 mg PO on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle and dexamethasone 40 mg (participants >= 75 years of age received 20 mg dexamethasone), PO or IV on Day 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or participant's wish to discontinue study treatment, or any other reason, whichever comes first (maximum exposure: 311.0 weeks).
Receives: Drug: Isatuximab; Drug: Pomalidomide; Drug: Dexamethasone

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS:time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) determined by Independent Response Committee (IRC) or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first. If progression or death was not observed, participant was censored at date of last progression-free tumor assessment prior to study cut-off date. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. PD as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria was defined as increase of >=25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of the following criteria: serum M-protein (the absolute increase must be >=0.5gram(g)/dL), serum M-protein increase >=1g/dL if lowest M component was >=5g/dL; urine M-component (absolute increase must be >=200mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s),>=50% increase from nadir in sum of the products of the maximal perpendicular diameters of measured lesions (SPD) of >1 lesion, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of a previous lesion >1 centimeter in short axis.

    Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or the date of death from any cause, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration: 76.7 weeks)

Secondary outcomes (23)
  1. Overall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Disease Response as Per Independent Response Committee (IRC)

    ORR (IMWG criteria): percentage of participants with stringent complete response(sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), and partial response (PR) as best overall response, assessed by IRC. sCR:negative immunofixation on serum and urine,disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates plus normal free light chain(FLC)ratio(0.26-1.65), absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy.CR:negative immunofixation on serum and urine,disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates.VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation, not on electrophoresis/,>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100mg/24h/,>=90% decrease in SPD compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma. PR: >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by >=90%/<200mg/24h,if present at baseline,>=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas.

    Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response Committee

    BOR:best sequential response from start of treatment until disease progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment/data cut-off, whichever comes first. Ordering of evaluations from best to worse was: sCR,CR,VGPR,PR, minimal response (MR), stable disease (SD), PD, and not evaluable.CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates. sCR:CR as defined previously plus normal FLC ratio (0.26 to 1.65), absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation,>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100mg/24h,>=90% decrease in SPD compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma. PR: >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by >=90%/<200mg/24h. MR:>=25% but <=49% reduction in serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urine M-protein by 50-89%. SD: Not meeting criteria for CR,VGPR,PR,MR/PD.

    Measured: From the date of randomization until disease progression, or death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

  3. Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better as Per Independent Response Committee

    VGPR rate was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a VGPR or better as BOR. VGPR was defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or >=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 h or >=90% decrease in the sum of maximal perpendicular diameter compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma. BOR was defined as the best sequential response, using the IRC's assessment of response, from the start of treatment until disease progression (provided that the progression is subsequently confirmed in case of progression requiring confirmation), death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or cut-off date, whichever occurs first. CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates.

    Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

  4. Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR): Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit as Per Independent Response Committee

    CBR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a MR or better as BOR. MR was defined as >= 25% but <= 49% reduction in serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urine M-protein by 50-89%, which still exceed 200 mg/24h; if present at baseline, >=50% reduction in size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required. BOR was defined as the best sequential response, using the IRC's assessment of response, from the start of treatment until disease progression (provided that the progression is subsequently confirmed in case of progression requiring confirmation), death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or cut-off date, whichever occurs first.

    Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

  5. Overall Survival (OS): Final Analysis

    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to death from any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date participant was known to be alive or at the cut-off date, whichever comes first. This pre-specified final analysis was performed when the 220 OS events were met.

    Measured: From the date of randomization to date of death from any cause or data cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration 245.6 weeks)

  6. Time to Progression (TTP) as Per Independent Response Committee

    TTP was defined as time from randomization to the date of first documentation of PD, as determined by the IRC. As per IMWG criteria, PD was defined for participants with increase of >= 25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of the following criteria: serum M-protein (the absolute increase must be >= 0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase >=1 g/dL if the lowest M component was >=5 g/dL; urine M-component (the absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s), >=50% increase from nadir in SPD of >1 lesion, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of a previous lesion >1 centimeter in short axis.

    Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

  7. Progression Free Survival in High Risk Cytogenetic Population

    PFS in high risk cytogenetic population was defined as PFS in subgroup of participants carrying high risk cytogenetic changes including del(17p), translocation (t)(4;14) or translocation t(14;16) assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD (determined by IRC) or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first. PD defined as per IMWG criteria as: increase of >=25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of following criteria: serum M-protein (absolute increase must be >=0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase >=1 g/dL if lowest M component was >=5 g/dL; urine M-component (absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s), >=50% increase from nadir in SPD of >1 lesion, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of previous lesion >1 centimeter (cm) in short axis.

    Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or the date of death from any cause, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

  8. Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Independent Response Committee

    DOR:time from date of first IRC determined response(PR or better) to date of first IRC-PD or death, whichever occurred first.DOR was determined only for participants who had achieved a response of PR or better based on disease assessment by IRC.If progression or death was not observed,participant was censored at date of participants last progression-free tumor assessment prior to initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment(if any)and study cut-off date. PD(IMWG criteria):increase of >=25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of following criteria: serum M-protein (absolute increase must be >=0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase >=1g/dL if lowest M component was >=5g/dL;urine M-component (absolute increase must be >=200mg/24 hour),appearance of new lesion(s), >=50% increase from nadir in SPD of >1 lesion,or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of a previous lesion >1 cm in short axis. PR:>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by >=90%/<200mg/24h.

    Measured: From the date of the first IRC determined response to the date of first IRC progression or death, whichever occurred first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

  9. Time to First Response (TT1R) as Per Independent Response Committee

    TT1R was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first IRC determined response (PR or better) that is subsequently confirmed. PR was defined as >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24 h. In addition to the above listed criteria, if present at baseline, a >=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required.

    Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of first IRC determined response, or death or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

  10. Time to Best Response (TTBR) as Per Independent Response Committee

    TTBR was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first occurrence of IRC determined BOR (PR or better) that was subsequently confirmed. PR was defined as >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24 h. In addition to the above listed criteria, if present at baseline, a >=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required. BOR was defined as the best sequential response, using the IRC's assessment of response, from the start of treatment until disease progression (provided that the progression is subsequently confirmed in case of progression requiring confirmation), death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or cut-off date, whichever occurs first.

    Measured: From the date of randomization to date of first occurrence of IRC determined best overall response or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

  11. Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)

    MRD was assessed by next-generation sequencing in bone marrow samples from participants who achieved CR, to determine the depth of response at the molecular level. IMWG criteria for CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates. MRD was classified as positive or negative at the minimum sensitivity of 1 in 10^5 nucleated cells. MRD negativity was defined as the absence of the dominant clonotype sequence(s) identified in the bone marrow aspirate collected at screening. MRD positivity was defined as the presence of the dominant clonotype sequence(s) identified in the bone marrow aspirate collected at screening.

    Measured: Up to 76.7 weeks

  12. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened (according to the Investigator opinion), or became serious during the treatment period (time from the first dose of study treatments up to 30 days after last dose of study treatments). An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event.

    Measured: From randomization up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum duration up to 241.6 weeks for Pd arm and 245.6 weeks for IPd arm)

  13. Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at End of Infusion (CEOI)

    CEOI was defined as the plasma concentration at end of infusion.

    Measured: End of infusion on Cycle(C)1 Day(D)1 and Cycle1 Day 15; Cycle 2 Day 1; and Cycle 4 Day 1

  14. Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Accumulation Ratio of Isatuximab at Concentration at the End of Infusion (CEOI)

    Accumulation Ratio was defined as the ratio of CEOI of Cycle 2 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 4 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 1, where CEOI was the plasma concentration at the end of infusion.

    Measured: End of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 4 Day 1

  15. Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at 1 Hour After End of Infusion (CEOI+1 Hour)

    CEOI+1 hour was defined as the plasma concentration of isatuximab at 1 hour after end of infusion.

    Measured: Cycle 1:1 hour after End of Infusion on Day 1; Cycle 4:1 hour after End of Infusion on Day 1

  16. PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at Ctrough

    Trough Concentration (Ctrough) is the concentration prior to study drug administration.

    Measured: Pre-infusion on C1D1, C1D8, C1D15, C1D22, C2D1, C2D15, C3D1, C3D15, C4D1, C4D15, C5D1, C6D1, C7D1, C8D1, C9D1, C10D1, C11D1, C12D1, C13D1, C14D1, C15D1, C16D1, C17D1, C18D1, C19D1, C20D1; End of treatment (EOT [30 days after last drug administration])

  17. PK Parameter: Accumulation Ratio of Isatuximab at Trough Concentration (Ctrough)

    Accumulation Ratio was defined as the ratio of Ctrough of Cycle 2 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 4 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 8, where Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.

    Measured: Pre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 4 Day 1

  18. Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)

    ADA were categorized as: pre-existing, treatment induced and treatment boosted response. Pre-existing ADA was defined as ADA that were present in samples drawn during the pretreatment period (i.e., before the first isatuximab administration). Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without preexisting ADA, including participants without pretreatment samples. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADA that increased at least 2 titer steps between pre-treatment and post-treatment.

    Measured: From randomization up to 60 days after last dose of study drug (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

  19. Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) Score

    EORTC-Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy and provides an assessment of participant reported outcome dimensions. EORTC QLQ-C30 included GHS/ QOL, functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and 6 single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Most questions from QLQ-C30 were a 4-point scale (1/Not at All to 4/Very Much), except Items 29-30, which comprise GHS scale and were a 7-point scale (1/Very Poor to 7/Excellent). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. A high score represented a favorable outcome with a best quality of life for participant.

    Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)

  20. Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Disease Symptoms Domain Score

    EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. Disease symptoms domain is one of the four domain scores. Disease symptoms domain score used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0 -100 scale, where higher scores = more symptoms and lower health-related quality of life (HRQL) and lower score = less symptoms and more HRQL

    Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)

  21. Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Side Effects of Treatment Domain Score

    EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. Side effects of treatment domain is one of the four domain scores. Side effects of treatment domain score used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale, where higher scores = more side effects and lower HRQL and lower scores = less side effects and better HRQL.

    Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)

  22. Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health State Utility Index Value

    The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status that provides a general assessment of health and wellbeing. The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has a 5-level response: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Response options are measured with a 5-point Likert scale (for the 5L version). The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates a better health state and lower score indicate worse health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)

  23. Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)

    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L health state utility index (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale. The Visual Analogue Scale is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Dec 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start22 Dec 2016
  3. Primary completion22 Nov 2018
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
307 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02990338
Sponsor's protocol ID
EFC14335
Other IDs
U1111-1180-6262, 2016-003097-41, 2016
Acronym
ICARIA-MM
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
4 Dec 2016
Last updated
17 Jan 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

Publications

  • Attal M, Richardson PG, Rajkumar SV, San-Miguel J, Beksac M, Spicka I, Leleu X, Schjesvold F, Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Huang JS, Minarik J, Cavo M, Prince HM, Mace S, Corzo KP, Campana F, Le-Guennec S, Dubin F, Anderson KC; ICARIA-MM study group. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (ICARIA-MM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019 Dec 7;394(10214):2096-2107. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32556-5. Epub 2019 Nov 14.

    PubMed 31735560
  • Richardson PG, Perrot A, San-Miguel J, Beksac M, Spicka I, Leleu X, Schjesvold F, Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Huang JS, Minarik J, Cavo M, Prince HM, Malinge L, Dubin F, van de Velde H, Anderson KC. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (ICARIA-MM): follow-up analysis of a randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Mar;23(3):416-427. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00019-5. Epub 2022 Feb 10.

    PubMed 35151415
  • Richardson PG, Perrot A, Miguel JS, Beksac M, Spicka I, Leleu X, Schjesvold F, Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Huang SY, Minarik J, Cavo M, Prince HM, Mace S, Zhang R, Dubin F, Morisse MC, Anderson KC. Isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone versus pomalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: final overall survival analysis. Haematologica. 2024 Jul 1;109(7):2239-2249. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2023.284325.

    PubMed 38299578
  • Beksac M, Spicka I, Hajek R, Bringhen S, Jelinek T, Martin T, Mikala G, Moreau P, Symeonidis A, Rawlings AM, van de Velde H, Richardson PG. Evaluation of isatuximab in patients with soft-tissue plasmacytomas: An analysis from ICARIA-MM and IKEMA. Leuk Res. 2022 Nov;122:106948. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2022.106948. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

    PubMed 36108425
  • Sunami K, Ikeda T, Huang SY, Wang MC, Koh Y, Min CK, Yeh SP, Matsumoto M, Uchiyama M, Iyama S, Shimazaki C, Lee JH, Kim K, Kaneko H, Kim JS, Lin TL, Campana F, Tada K, Iida S, Suzuki K; ICARIA-MM study group. Isatuximab-Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone Versus Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone in East Asian Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: ICARIA-MM Subgroup Analysis. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Aug;22(8):e751-e761. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

    PubMed 35641409
  • Wilmoth J, Colson K, Dubin F, Kellam C. Isatuximab: Nursing Considerations for Use in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Dec 1;25(6):706-712. doi: 10.1188/21.CJON.706-712.

    PubMed 34800109
  • Bringhen S, Pour L, Vorobyev V, Vural F, Warzocha K, Benboubker L, Koh Y, Maisnar V, Karlin L, Pavic M, Campana F, Le Guennec S, Menas F, van de Velde H, Richardson PG. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma according to prior lines of treatment and refractory status: ICARIA-MM subgroup analysis. Leuk Res. 2021 May;104:106576. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2021.106576. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

    PubMed 33839618
  • Schjesvold FH, Richardson PG, Facon T, Alegre A, Spencer A, Jurczyszyn A, Sunami K, Frenzel L, Min CK, Guillonneau S, Lin PL, Le-Guennec S, Campana F, van de Velde H, Bensfia S, Bringhen S. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: ICARIA-MM subgroup analysis. Haematologica. 2021 Apr 1;106(4):1182-1187. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.253450. No abstract available.

    PubMed 32586908

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Isatuximab, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in people with Plasma Cell Myeloma, run by Sanofi at 111 sites in 24 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 111 sites in France, Turkey (Türkiye), Italy, Japan, Spain and 19 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Dec 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression Free Survival (PFS) (time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or the date of death from any cause, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration: 76.7 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02990338, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jan 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in