AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)NCT02990351

Efficacy of Loco-regional Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prior to Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Egypt

An observational study of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Living Donor Liver Transplantation, run by Ain Shams University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of loco-regional treatment prior Living Donor Liver Transplantation in patients with HCC. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
What is being tested?
loco regional therapies for HCC
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
29 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Dec 2014to Dec 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult Egyptian patients prepared for living donor liver transplantation , at Ain Shams Centre for Organ Transplantation (ASCOT) , Cairo Egypt

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients 18-65 years
  • Patients transplanted for HCC within Milan and UCSF criteria who underwent pre transplant bridge or down staging treatment for HCC

Who cannot join

  • Tumor progression on the waiting list
  • Vascular invasion by imaging studies
  • Extrahepatic or lymph node metastasis

About this study

Official title: Loco-regional Treatment for HCC Patients

This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of loco-regional treatment prior Living Donor Liver Transplantation in patients with HCC.

Read the detailed description

50 patients received LDLT at Ain Shams Centre for Organ Transplantation (ASCOT) over 1 year of whom data of 29 HCC patients were analyzed. Twenty patients met the Milan criteria (68.97%) \& 4 (13.8%) were beyond Milan but met UCSF criteria and 5 were exceeding UCSF criteria (17.2%).All patients underwent preoperative LRTs, The protocol of bridging/down staging, methods, duration of follow up, the number of the patients who were successfully down-staged before LT and their outcomes after LT were recorded.

Being tested
loco regional therapies for HCC
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • loco regional therapies for HCCProcedure or surgery

    29 HCC patients received locoregonal therapy as a bridging therapy for those who were within milan and as downstaging for those were initially beyond milan. The main LRT types used for our patients were TACE and or RFA and microwave ablation

Study groups in NCT02990351
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HCC patients29 HCC patients who had loco regional therapies for HCC were analyzed. Twenty patients met the Milan criteria (68.97%) \& 4 (13.8%) were beyond Milan but met UCSF criteria and 5 were exceeding UCSF criteria (17.2%).All patients underwent preoperative LRTs, The protocol of bridging/down staging, methods, duration of follow up, the number of the patients who were successfully down-staged before LT and their outcomes after LT were recorded.
Receives: Procedure: loco regional therapies for HCC

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Radiological Response ( complete / partial / tumour progression)in the Radiology (CT/ MRI) before transplantation

    the success of loco-regional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in term of radiological complete or partial response in the last spiral triphasic abdominal CT and /or MRI before transpalantation

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. the degree of accuracy between the last CT/ MRI and the pathology of explant in term of number , size and ablation (complete necrosis ) for HCC

    1. presence of viable tumour tissue in the explant pathology,
    2. mictro vascular invasion
    3. capsular or lymph node invasion the degree of accuracy between the last CT/ MRI and the pathology of explant

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Dec 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2014
  3. Primary completionDec 2015
  4. Study completionDec 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
29 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02990351
Sponsor's protocol ID
HCC and liver transplantation
Status last verified
Dec 2016
First submitted
4 Dec 2016
Last updated
13 Dec 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Living Donor Liver Transplantation, run by Ain Shams University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Radiological Response ( complete / partial / tumour progression)in the Radiology (CT/ MRI) before transplantation (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in