AzTrials
AzTrials

Colon CarcinomaNCT02991092

The Influence of Different Fluid Therapy Measures on the Postoperative Outcome in Fast Track of Colon Cancer.(FTSlapCC)

A study testing fluid administration in people with Colon Carcinoma, run by Quan Wang.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare the influence of two different fluid administration strategies on the clinical efficacy of patients with colorectal carcinoma during the fast-track surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Colon Carcinoma
What is being tested?
fluid administration
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Nov 2016to May 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • the age of 18-70 years old
  • the pathological diagnosis of colon cancer patients
  • no surgical intervention.

Who cannot join

  • patients with heart, lung, liver, renal function were significantly abnormal
  • body mass index kg >35 / m2
  • pregnancy
  • sepsis or systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients.
  • patients with severe malnutrition.

About this study

Official title: The Influence of Different Fluid Therapy Measures on the Postoperative Outcome in Fast Track of Colon Cancer After Laparoscopic Surgery.

To compare the influence of two different fluid administration strategies on the clinical efficacy of patients with colorectal carcinoma during the fast-track surgery.

Read the detailed description

Patients that were diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma by the First Hospital of Jilin University and were scheduled to undergo the laparoscopic surgery were prospectively included and divided into the experimental group and the control group with the random number method. After surgery, patients in the experiment group were provided with intravenous fluid administration at 1.0ml/Kg/h and encouraged to take food and drink water early after surgery, and the intravenous fluid administration was stopped immediately when the oral intake was more than 1500ml/h; patients in the control group strictly followed the fasting and were provided with the intravenous fluid administration according to "Total amount of fluid = physiological requirement + additional loss (fever + gastrointestinal decompression) + amount lost" until their intestinal function completely recovered. The blood volume change indicators (heart rate, mean arterial pressure, oxyhemoglobin saturation, inferior vena cava diameter /body surface area (VCD), intra-abdominal pressure, specific gravity of urine, BNP, etc.) and inflammation indicators (CRP, IL-6, TNF-a) of the two groups of patients were observed and a comparison was made of the recovery time of intestinal function, incidence of complications, hospitalization time after operation and hospitalization expenses of the two groups.

Conditions
Colon Carcinoma
Being tested
fluid administration
Keywords
colon carcinoma, liquid treatment, fast-track surgery
Medical subject headings
Colonic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • fluid administrationProcedure or surgery

    After surgery, patients in the experiment group were provided with intravenous fluid administration at 1.0ml/Kg/h and encouraged to take food and drink water early after surgery, and the intravenous fluid administration was stopped immediately when the oral intake was more than 1500ml/h; patients in the control group strictly followed the fasting and were provided with the intravenous fluid administration according to "Total amount of fluid = physiological requirement + additional loss (fever + gastrointestinal decompression) + amount lost" until their intestinal function completely recovered.

Study groups in NCT02991092
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
the experimental groupExperimentalAfter surgery, patients in the experiment group were provided with intravenous fluid administration at 1.0ml/Kg/h and encouraged to take food and drink water early after surgery, and the intravenous fluid administration was stopped immediately when the oral intake was more than 1500ml/h
Receives: Procedure: fluid administration
the control groupOtherpatients in the control group strictly followed the fasting and were provided with the intravenous fluid administration according to "Total amount of fluid = physiological requirement + additional loss (fever + gastrointestinal decompression) + amount lost" until their intestinal function completely recovered.
Receives: Procedure: fluid administration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. recovery time of intestinal function

    Measured: within the first 30 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. TNF-alpha

    Measured: the first day to the forth day After the operation

  2. CRP[=C reactive protein]ba

    Measured: the first day to the forth day After the operation

  3. IL-10[=interleukin-10]

    Measured: the first day to the forth day After the operation

  4. BNP[=type B natriuretic peptide]

    Measured: the first day to the forth day After the operation

  5. hospitalization time after operation(day)

    Measured: within the first 30 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Dec 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2016
  3. Primary completionMay 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
150 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02991092
Sponsor's protocol ID
FTSlapCC
Status last verified
Dec 2016
First submitted
30 Nov 2016
Last updated
13 Dec 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing fluid administration in people with Colon Carcinoma, run by Quan Wang.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

recovery time of intestinal function (time frame: within the first 30 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in