Breast CancerPhase 3NCT02995772
Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy Compared to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage IIIB/C and IV Breast Cancer Patients
A Phase 3 study testing Aromatase Inhibitors (Arimidex), Tamoxifen and SOB in people with Breast Cancer, run by Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital at 1 site in Indonesia.
Trial summary
This study compared long term outcome of stage IIIB/C and IV breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NAHT) and those treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Aromatase Inhibitors (Arimidex), Tamoxifen and SOB
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 122 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndonesia
- Study dates
- Nov 2011to Nov 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- IIIB/C and IV stage of breast cancer
- received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- had first and second biopsy (surgery) within 6 months
Who cannot join
- had mastectomy before treatment
- pregnant
- disagree to enter the study
- had been given hormonal therapy or chemotherapy before study
- had contra-indication of SOB for pre-menopausal patients
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Preoperative Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage IIIB and IV Breast Cancer Patients in Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital, Indonesia
This study compared long term outcome of stage IIIB/C and IV breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NAHT) and those treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)
Read the detailed description
This study compared long term outcome of stage IIIB/C and IV breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NAHT) and those treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) between 2011 and 2016.
The primary end points are overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) with Kaplan Meier.
This study was approved by Ethical Committee in Dharmais National Cancer Hospital.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Aromatase Inhibitors (Arimidex), Tamoxifen, SOB, FAC, Aromatase Inhibitors (Femara)
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Aromatase Inhibitors (Arimidex)Drug
Also called Anastrozole
Comparison of efficacy with chemotherapy
TamoxifenDrug
Also called Nolvadex, Soltamox
Comparison of efficacy with chemotherapy
SOBProcedure or surgery
Also called Salpingo-oophorectomy Bilateral
Comparison of efficacy with chemotherapy
FACDrug
Also called Fluorouracil, Adriamycin, Cytoxan
Comparison of efficacy with hormonal therapy
Aromatase Inhibitors (Femara)Drug
Also called Letrozole
Comparison of efficacy with chemotherapy
Aromatase Inhibitors (Aromasin)Drug
Also called Exemestane
Comparison of efficacy with chemotherapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy | Active comparator | Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy: Aromatase inhibitors (Arimidex, Femara, Aromasin), Tamoxifen, SOB and AI, SOB and Tamoxifen Receives: Drug: Aromatase Inhibitors (Arimidex); Drug: Tamoxifen; Procedure: SOB; Drug: Aromatase Inhibitors (Femara); Drug: Aromatase Inhibitors (Aromasin) |
| Neoadjuvant chemotherapy | Active comparator | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy: FAC 6 cycles Receives: Drug: FAC |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall survival
length of time from the date of pathological diagnosis until death from any cause
Measured: time from the date of pathological diagnosis until death from any cause and until minimum sample sizes are met and an average 3 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Progressive free survival
length of time from after treatment until tumor progression or death from any cause
Measured: time from after treatment until tumor progression or death from any cause and until minimum sample sizes are met and an average 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2011
- Primary completionNov 2018
- Study completionNov 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (24)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ramadhan Karsono, Doctoral, Study chair, Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02995772
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 049/PEP/08/2011
- Status last verified
- Jun 2019
- First submitted
- 14 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 19 Jun 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: We have not decided on this yet
Publications
Beatson GT. On the Treatment of Inoperable Cases of Carcinoma of the Mamma: Suggestions for a New Method of Treatment, with Illustrative Cases. Trans Med Chir Soc Edinb. 1896;15:153-179. No abstract available.
PubMed 29584099van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van't Veer LJ, Dai H, Hart AA, Voskuil DW, Schreiber GJ, Peterse JL, Roberts C, Marton MJ, Parrish M, Atsma D, Witteveen A, Glas A, Delahaye L, van der Velde T, Bartelink H, Rodenhuis S, Rutgers ET, Friend SH, Bernards R. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 19;347(25):1999-2009. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021967.
PubMed 12490681Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005 May 14-20;365(9472):1687-717. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66544-0.
PubMed 15894097Cardoso F, van't Veer LJ, Bogaerts J, Slaets L, Viale G, Delaloge S, Pierga JY, Brain E, Causeret S, DeLorenzi M, Glas AM, Golfinopoulos V, Goulioti T, Knox S, Matos E, Meulemans B, Neijenhuis PA, Nitz U, Passalacqua R, Ravdin P, Rubio IT, Saghatchian M, Smilde TJ, Sotiriou C, Stork L, Straehle C, Thomas G, Thompson AM, van der Hoeven JM, Vuylsteke P, Bernards R, Tryfonidis K, Rutgers E, Piccart M; MINDACT Investigators. 70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 25;375(8):717-29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602253.
PubMed 27557300Asad J, Jacobson AF, Estabrook A, Smith SR, Boolbol SK, Feldman SM, Osborne MP, Boachie-Adjei K, Twardzik W, Tartter PI. Does oncotype DX recurrence score affect the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer? Am J Surg. 2008 Oct;196(4):527-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.021.
PubMed 18809056Teshome M, Hunt KK. Neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of breast cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2014 Jul;23(3):505-23. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
PubMed 24882348Mauriac L, MacGrogan G, Avril A, Durand M, Floquet A, Debled M, Dilhuydy JM, Bonichon F. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma larger than 3 cm: a unicentre randomized trial with a 124-month median follow-up. Institut Bergonie Bordeaux Groupe Sein (IBBGS). Ann Oncol. 1999 Jan;10(1):47-52. doi: 10.1023/a:1008337009350.
PubMed 10076721Chia YH, Ellis MJ, Ma CX. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in primary breast cancer: indications and use as a research tool. Br J Cancer. 2010 Sep 7;103(6):759-64. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605845. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
PubMed 20700118Bossuyt V, Provenzano E, Symmans WF, Boughey JC, Coles C, Curigliano G, Dixon JM, Esserman LJ, Fastner G, Kuehn T, Peintinger F, von Minckwitz G, White J, Yang W, Badve S, Denkert C, MacGrogan G, Penault-Llorca F, Viale G, Cameron D; Breast International Group-North American Breast Cancer Group (BIG-NABCG) collaboration. Recommendations for standardized pathological characterization of residual disease for neoadjuvant clinical trials of breast cancer by the BIG-NABCG collaboration. Ann Oncol. 2015 Jul;26(7):1280-91. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv161. Epub 2015 May 27.
PubMed 26019189Chuang E, Paul C, Flam A, McCarville K, Forst M, Shin S, Vahdat L, Swistel A, Simmons R, Osborne M. Breast cancer subtypes in Asian-Americans differ according to Asian ethnic group. J Immigr Minor Health. 2012 Oct;14(5):754-8. doi: 10.1007/s10903-012-9577-7.
PubMed 22286607Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Allred DC, Hagerty KL, Badve S, Fitzgibbons PL, Francis G, Goldstein NS, Hayes M, Hicks DG, Lester S, Love R, Mangu PB, McShane L, Miller K, Osborne CK, Paik S, Perlmutter J, Rhodes A, Sasano H, Schwartz JN, Sweep FC, Taube S, Torlakovic EE, Valenstein P, Viale G, Visscher D, Wheeler T, Williams RB, Wittliff JL, Wolff AC; American Society of Clinical Oncology; College of American Pathologists. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer (unabridged version). Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010 Jul;134(7):e48-72. doi: 10.5858/134.7.e48.
PubMed 20586616Marcus DM, Switchenko JM, Prabhu R, O'Regan R, Zelnak A, Fasola C, Mister D, Torres MA. Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy is Associated with Comparable Outcomes to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Post-Menopausal Women with Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Front Oncol. 2013 Dec 27;3:317. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00317. eCollection 2013.
PubMed 24409418Semiglazov VF, Semiglazov VV, Dashyan GA, Ziltsova EK, Ivanov VG, Bozhok AA, Melnikova OA, Paltuev RM, Kletzel A, Berstein LM. Phase 2 randomized trial of primary endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer. 2007 Jul 15;110(2):244-54. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22789.
PubMed 17538978Preece PE, Wood RA, Mackie CR, Cuschieri A. Tamoxifen as initial sole treatment of localised breast cancer in elderly women: a pilot study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Mar 20;284(6319):869-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6319.869-a. No abstract available.
PubMed 6802332Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, Geyer CE, Kahlenberg MS, Robidoux A, Margolese RG, Hoehn JL, Vogel VG, Dakhil SR, Tamkus D, King KM, Pajon ER, Wright MJ, Robert J, Paik S, Mamounas EP, Wolmark N. Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 10;26(5):778-85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0235.
PubMed 18258986
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jun 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Preoperative Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage IIIB and IV Breast Cancer Patients in Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital, Indonesia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02995772
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 049/PEP/08/2011
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dharmais National Cancer Center HospitalOther government
- Study start
- Nov 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study compared long term outcome of stage IIIB/C and IV breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NAHT) and those treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)
Detailed description
This study compared long term outcome of stage IIIB/C and IV breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NAHT) and those treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) between 2011 and 2016.
The primary end points are overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) with Kaplan Meier.
This study was approved by Ethical Committee in Dharmais National Cancer Hospital.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy | Active comparator | Drug: Aromatase Inhibitors (Arimidex), Drug: Tamoxifen, Procedure: SOB, Drug: Aromatase Inhibitors (Femara), Drug: Aromatase Inhibitors (Aromasin)Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy: Aromatase inhibitors (Arimidex, Femara, Aromasin), Tamoxifen, SOB and AI, SOB and Tamoxifen |
| Neoadjuvant chemotherapy | Active comparator | Drug: FACNeoadjuvant chemotherapy: FAC 6 cycles |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- IIIB/C and IV stage of breast cancer
- received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- had first and second biopsy (surgery) within 6 months
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- had mastectomy before treatment
- pregnant
- disagree to enter the study
- had been given hormonal therapy or chemotherapy before study
- had contra-indication of SOB for pre-menopausal patients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Aromatase Inhibitors (Arimidex)Also: AnastrozoleComparison of efficacy with chemotherapy | Drug | Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy |
| TamoxifenAlso: Nolvadex, SoltamoxComparison of efficacy with chemotherapy | Drug | Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy |
| SOBAlso: Salpingo-oophorectomy BilateralComparison of efficacy with chemotherapy | Procedure or surgery | Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy |
| FACAlso: Fluorouracil, Adriamycin, CytoxanComparison of efficacy with hormonal therapy | Drug | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy |
| Aromatase Inhibitors (Femara)Also: LetrozoleComparison of efficacy with chemotherapy | Drug | Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy |
| Aromatase Inhibitors (Aromasin)Also: ExemestaneComparison of efficacy with chemotherapy | Drug | Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy |
Primary outcome
Overall survival
Time frame: time from the date of pathological diagnosis until death from any cause and until minimum sample sizes are met and an average 3 years
length of time from the date of pathological diagnosis until death from any cause
1 secondary outcome
Progressive free survival
Time frame: time from after treatment until tumor progression or death from any cause and until minimum sample sizes are met and an average 3 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jun 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 29584099Beatson GT. On the Treatment of Inoperable Cases of Carcinoma of the Mamma: Suggestions for a New Method of Treatment, with Illustrative Cases. Trans Med Chir Soc Edinb. 1896;15:153-179. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 12490681van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van't Veer LJ, Dai H, Hart AA, Voskuil DW, Schreiber GJ, Peterse JL, Roberts C, Marton MJ, Parrish M, Atsma D, Witteveen A, Glas A, Delahaye L, van der Velde T, Bartelink H, Rodenhuis S, Rutgers ET, Friend SH, Bernards R. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 19;347(25):1999-2009. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021967.
- Results publication: PubMed 15894097Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005 May 14-20;365(9472):1687-717. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66544-0.
- Results publication: PubMed 27557300Cardoso F, van't Veer LJ, Bogaerts J, Slaets L, Viale G, Delaloge S, Pierga JY, Brain E, Causeret S, DeLorenzi M, Glas AM, Golfinopoulos V, Goulioti T, Knox S, Matos E, Meulemans B, Neijenhuis PA, Nitz U, Passalacqua R, Ravdin P, Rubio IT, Saghatchian M, Smilde TJ, Sotiriou C, Stork L, Straehle C, Thomas G, Thompson AM, van der Hoeven JM, Vuylsteke P, Bernards R, Tryfonidis K, Rutgers E, Piccart M; MINDACT Investigators. 70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 25;375(8):717-29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602253.
- Results publication: PubMed 18809056Asad J, Jacobson AF, Estabrook A, Smith SR, Boolbol SK, Feldman SM, Osborne MP, Boachie-Adjei K, Twardzik W, Tartter PI. Does oncotype DX recurrence score affect the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer? Am J Surg. 2008 Oct;196(4):527-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.021.
- Results publication: PubMed 24882348Teshome M, Hunt KK. Neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of breast cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2014 Jul;23(3):505-23. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 10076721Mauriac L, MacGrogan G, Avril A, Durand M, Floquet A, Debled M, Dilhuydy JM, Bonichon F. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma larger than 3 cm: a unicentre randomized trial with a 124-month median follow-up. Institut Bergonie Bordeaux Groupe Sein (IBBGS). Ann Oncol. 1999 Jan;10(1):47-52. doi: 10.1023/a:1008337009350.
- Results publication: PubMed 20700118Chia YH, Ellis MJ, Ma CX. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in primary breast cancer: indications and use as a research tool. Br J Cancer. 2010 Sep 7;103(6):759-64. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605845. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 26019189Bossuyt V, Provenzano E, Symmans WF, Boughey JC, Coles C, Curigliano G, Dixon JM, Esserman LJ, Fastner G, Kuehn T, Peintinger F, von Minckwitz G, White J, Yang W, Badve S, Denkert C, MacGrogan G, Penault-Llorca F, Viale G, Cameron D; Breast International Group-North American Breast Cancer Group (BIG-NABCG) collaboration. Recommendations for standardized pathological characterization of residual disease for neoadjuvant clinical trials of breast cancer by the BIG-NABCG collaboration. Ann Oncol. 2015 Jul;26(7):1280-91. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv161. Epub 2015 May 27.
- Results publication: PubMed 22286607Chuang E, Paul C, Flam A, McCarville K, Forst M, Shin S, Vahdat L, Swistel A, Simmons R, Osborne M. Breast cancer subtypes in Asian-Americans differ according to Asian ethnic group. J Immigr Minor Health. 2012 Oct;14(5):754-8. doi: 10.1007/s10903-012-9577-7.
- Results publication: PubMed 20586616Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Allred DC, Hagerty KL, Badve S, Fitzgibbons PL, Francis G, Goldstein NS, Hayes M, Hicks DG, Lester S, Love R, Mangu PB, McShane L, Miller K, Osborne CK, Paik S, Perlmutter J, Rhodes A, Sasano H, Schwartz JN, Sweep FC, Taube S, Torlakovic EE, Valenstein P, Viale G, Visscher D, Wheeler T, Williams RB, Wittliff JL, Wolff AC; American Society of Clinical Oncology; College of American Pathologists. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer (unabridged version). Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010 Jul;134(7):e48-72. doi: 10.5858/134.7.e48.
- Results publication: PubMed 24409418Marcus DM, Switchenko JM, Prabhu R, O'Regan R, Zelnak A, Fasola C, Mister D, Torres MA. Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy is Associated with Comparable Outcomes to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Post-Menopausal Women with Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Front Oncol. 2013 Dec 27;3:317. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00317. eCollection 2013.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. We have not decided on this yet
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ramadhan Karsono, Doctoral study chair
Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Aromatase Inhibitors (Arimidex), Tamoxifen and SOB in people with Breast Cancer, run by Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital at 1 site in Indonesia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Indonesia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall survival (time frame: time from the date of pathological diagnosis until death from any cause and until minimum sample sizes are met and an average 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02995772, which also lists 24 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jun 2019.