Lymphoma,Non-HodgkinPhase 4NCT02996617
PEG-rhG-CSF in Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Receiving Chemotherapy to Prevent Neutropenia
A Phase 4 study testing rhG-CSF regimen and Pegylated rhG-CSF regimen in people with Lymphoma,Non-Hodgkin, run by Shandong Provincial Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Neutropenia is one of the most frequent adverse effects of chemotherapy, and the main factor to limit the dosage and the continuation of chemotherapy. The PEG-rhG-CSF has increased plasma half-life, and prolonged efficacy in compare with rhG-CSF. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lymphoma,Non-Hodgkin
- What is being tested?
- rhG-CSF regimen and Pegylated rhG-CSF regimen
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 240 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Nov 2016to Dec 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Investigator diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma(Highly invasive lymphoma/Burkitt lymphoma were excluded)
- Age 18 to 80 years
- ECOG performance status ≤ 2
- receive multi-cycle Chemotherapy naive
- grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in the patient's first cycle chemotherapy or the risk of neutropenia >20% without rhG-CSF support
- Expected survival time≥3 months; cNormal bone marrow function(absolute neutrophil count ≥1.5 × 109/L; platelet count ≥ 80 × 109/L)
- Liver function: transaminase≤2.5× upper limit of normal value，bilirubin≤2.5×upper limit of normal value; serum creatinine≤2×upper limit of normal value;
Who cannot join
- Patients with severe complications or severe infection;
- Invasion of central nervous system;
- Patients with severe visceral organ dysfunction, heart block, myocardial infarction within 6 months;
- Prior bone marrow stem cell or organ transplantation
- patients with severe allergic constitution, or those who are allergic to Escherichia coli products; 5. Patients participate in other clinical studies within 4 weeks;
- Pregnancy, lactation
- Other patients who are not suitable for the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Department of Hematology, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University
Jin'an, Shandong, 250012
Xin Wang, MD, PHD, 86-531-68778331, xinw007@126.com
changqing zhen, MD, 86-531-68778331, zcq1521@163.com
About this study
Neutropenia is one of the most frequent adverse effects of chemotherapy, and the main factor to limit the dosage and the continuation of chemotherapy. The PEG-rhG-CSF has increased plasma half-life, and prolonged efficacy in compare with rhG-CSF. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of PEG-rhG-CSF in preventing neutropenia following chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Read the detailed description
Neutropenia is a common clinical complication of chemotherapy in cancer patients. It is an important factor that delays the course of standard treatments in patients. Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) is an effective drug for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. However, for patients with neutropenia, multiple rhG-CSF treatments are usually required. This is likely to extend the antitumor treatment period and increase physical and mental stress in patients. Pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) is rhG-CSF chemically modified by a single methoxy polyethylene glycol group; it is able to alleviate neutropenia with a single dose. The aim of the present study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of preventive treatment with pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) on concurrent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and to provide a rational basis for its clinical application. Therefore, the investigators designed the multi-center, open-label,randomized controlled clinical study and aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between PEG-rhG-CSF and rhG-CSF in non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving chemotherapy.
- Conditions
- Lymphoma,Non-Hodgkin
- Being tested
- rhG-CSF regimen, Pegylated rhG-CSF regimen
- Keywords
- Lymphomas Non-Hodgkin's B-Cell, Lymphomas Non-Hodgkin's T-Cell, PEG-rhG-CSF, Neutropenia
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin, Lymphoma, B-Cell, Lymphoma, T-Cell, Neutropenia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
rhG-CSF regimenDrug
Also called Pegylated rhG-CSF regimen
Patients weren't preventive use of rhG-CSF.If their WBC≤1×10^ 9/L,they were administered rhG-CSF:5ug/kg/day until their WBC≥4×10^ 9/L.Chemotherapy regimen: CHOP: Epirubicin：70 mg/m2 , Cyclophosphamide：750 mg/m2, Vincristine: 1.4 mg/m2 , Prednison：100mg/d; CHOPE: Epirubicin：70 mg/m2, Cyclophosphamide：750 mg/m2,Vincristine: 1.4 mg/m2,Prednison：100mg/d,Etoposide: 100 mg/（m2•d）;EPOCH:etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin;Hyper-CVAD(A):hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine,doxorubicin, dexamethasone, cytarabine and methotrexate;GemOx-R:Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin;GDP:gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin
Pegylated rhG-CSF regimenDrug
Patients were administered pegylated rhG-CSF 6mg（weight≥45Kg）or 3mg（weight≤45Kg）once 24 hours after the end of chemotherapy drugs of every chemotherapy cycle.Chemotherapy regimen: CHOP: Epirubicin：70 mg/m2 , Cyclophosphamide：750 mg/m2, Vincristine: 1.4 mg/m2 , Prednison：100mg/d; CHOPE: Epirubicin：70 mg/m2, Cyclophosphamide：750 mg/m2,Vincristine: 1.4 mg/m2,Prednison：100mg/d,Etoposide: 100 mg/（m2•d）;EPOCH:etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin;Hyper-CVAD(A):hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine,doxorubicin, dexamethasone, cytarabine and methotrexate;GemOx-R:Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin;GDP:gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| rhG-CSF regimen | Active comparator | Patients weren't preventive use of rhG-CSF（ruibai 100ug）.If their WBC≤1×10^ 9/L,they were administered rhG-CSF:5ug/kg/day until their WBC≥4×10^ 9/L for total 4 courses. Receives: Drug: rhG-CSF regimen |
| Pegylated rhG-CSF regimen | Experimental | Patients were administered pegylated rhG-CSF 6mg（weight≥45Kg）or 3mg（weight≤45Kg）once 24 hours after the end of chemotherapy drugs of every chemotherapy cycle for total 4 courses. Receives: Drug: Pegylated rhG-CSF regimen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of grade 3/4 neutropenia（neutrophils≤1×10^ 9/L） in every cycle
Proportion of patients grade 3/4 neutropenia（neutrophils≤1×10^ 9/L）
Measured: through the study completion,an average of 4 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Rate of the chemotherapy delay
Proportion of chemotherapy delay(>7 days) caused by neutropenia
Measured: through the study completion,an average of 4 months
Rate of the febrile neutropenia in every cycle
Proportion of febrile caused by neutropenia
Measured: through the study completion,an average of 4 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2016
- Primary completionNov 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lymphoma,Non-HodgkinStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shandong Provincial Hospital
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Wang Xin, Shandong Provincial Hospital
- Investigators
- xin wang, MD, PHD, Study chair, Shandong Provincial Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02996617
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ShandongPH02
- Status last verified
- Dec 2016
- First submitted
- 19 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 19 Dec 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Green MD, Koelbl H, Baselga J, Galid A, Guillem V, Gascon P, Siena S, Lalisang RI, Samonigg H, Clemens MR, Zani V, Liang BC, Renwick J, Piccart MJ; International Pegfilgrastim 749 Study Group. A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2003 Jan;14(1):29-35. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg019.
PubMed 12488289Holmes FA, Jones SE, O'Shaughnessy J, Vukelja S, George T, Savin M, Richards D, Glaspy J, Meza L, Cohen G, Dhami M, Budman DR, Hackett J, Brassard M, Yang BB, Liang BC. Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2002 Jun;13(6):903-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf130.
PubMed 12123336Johnston E, Crawford J, Blackwell S, Bjurstrom T, Lockbaum P, Roskos L, Yang BB, Gardner S, Miller-Messana MA, Shoemaker D, Garst J, Schwab G. Randomized, dose-escalation study of SD/01 compared with daily filgrastim in patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jul;18(13):2522-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.13.2522.
PubMed 10893282Hadji P, Kostev K, Schroder-Bernhardi D, Ziller V. Cost comparison of outpatient treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) in Germany. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Apr;50(4):281-9. doi: 10.5414/cp201633.
PubMed 22456299Wen TJ, Wen YW, Chien CR, Chiang SC, Hsu WW, Shen LJ, Hsiao FY. Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia among breast cancer and Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients under Taiwan's national health insurance system. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Apr;23(2):288-293. doi: 10.1111/jep.12597. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
PubMed 27491287Shi YK, Chen Q, Zhu YZ, He XH, Wang HQ, Jiang ZF, Chang JH, Liu YP, Wang AL, Luo DY, Zhang Y, Ke XY, Li WL, Zhang WJ, Wang XW, Zhang YP, Wang JM, Liu XQ. Pegylated filgrastim is comparable with filgrastim as support for commonly used chemotherapy regimens: a multicenter, randomized, crossover phase 3 study. Anticancer Drugs. 2013 Jul;24(6):641-7. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3283610b5d.
PubMed 23571496Molineux G. Pegylation: engineering improved pharmaceuticals for enhanced therapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2002 Apr;28 Suppl A:13-6. doi: 10.1016/s0305-7372(02)80004-4.
PubMed 12173407
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Dec 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PEG-rhG-CSF in Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Receiving Chemotherapy to Prevent Neutropenia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02996617
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ShandongPH02
- Conditions
- Lymphoma,Non-Hodgkin
- Keywords
- Lymphomas Non-Hodgkin's B-Cell, Lymphomas Non-Hodgkin's T-Cell, PEG-rhG-CSF, Neutropenia
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Shandong Provincial HospitalOther government
- Study start
- Nov 2016
- Primary completion
- Nov 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Neutropenia is one of the most frequent adverse effects of chemotherapy, and the main factor to limit the dosage and the continuation of chemotherapy. The PEG-rhG-CSF has increased plasma half-life, and prolonged efficacy in compare with rhG-CSF. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of PEG-rhG-CSF in preventing neutropenia following chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Detailed description
Neutropenia is a common clinical complication of chemotherapy in cancer patients. It is an important factor that delays the course of standard treatments in patients. Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) is an effective drug for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. However, for patients with neutropenia, multiple rhG-CSF treatments are usually required. This is likely to extend the antitumor treatment period and increase physical and mental stress in patients. Pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) is rhG-CSF chemically modified by a single methoxy polyethylene glycol group; it is able to alleviate neutropenia with a single dose. The aim of the present study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of preventive treatment with pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) on concurrent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and to provide a rational basis for its clinical application. Therefore, the investigators designed the multi-center, open-label,randomized controlled clinical study and aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between PEG-rhG-CSF and rhG-CSF in non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving chemotherapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| rhG-CSF regimen | Active comparator | Drug: rhG-CSF regimenPatients weren't preventive use of rhG-CSF（ruibai 100ug）.If their WBC≤1×10^ 9/L,they were administered rhG-CSF:5ug/kg/day until their WBC≥4×10^ 9/L for total 4 courses. |
| Pegylated rhG-CSF regimen | Experimental | Drug: Pegylated rhG-CSF regimenPatients were administered pegylated rhG-CSF 6mg（weight≥45Kg）or 3mg（weight≤45Kg）once 24 hours after the end of chemotherapy drugs of every chemotherapy cycle for total 4 courses. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Investigator diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma(Highly invasive lymphoma/Burkitt lymphoma were excluded)
- Age 18 to 80 years
- ECOG performance status ≤ 2
- receive multi-cycle Chemotherapy naive
- grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in the patient's first cycle chemotherapy or the risk of neutropenia >20% without rhG-CSF support
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients with severe complications or severe infection;
- Invasion of central nervous system;
- Patients with severe visceral organ dysfunction, heart block, myocardial infarction within 6 months;
- Prior bone marrow stem cell or organ transplantation
- patients with severe allergic constitution, or those who are allergic to Escherichia coli products; 5. Patients participate in other clinical studies within 4 weeks;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| rhG-CSF regimenAlso: Pegylated rhG-CSF regimenPatients weren't preventive use of rhG-CSF.If their WBC≤1×10^ 9/L,they were administered rhG-CSF:5ug/kg/day until their WBC≥4×10^ 9/L.Chemotherapy regimen: CHOP: Epirubicin：70 mg/m2 , Cyclophosphamide：750 mg/m2, Vincristine: 1.4 mg/m2 , Prednison：100mg/d; CHOPE: Epirubicin：70 mg/m2, Cyclophosphamide：750 mg/m2,Vincristine: 1.4 mg/m2,Prednison：100mg/d,Etoposide: 100 mg/（m2•d）;EPOCH:etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin;Hyper-CVAD(A):hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine,doxorubicin, dexamethasone, cytarabine and methotrexate;GemOx-R:Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin;GDP:gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin | Drug | rhG-CSF regimen |
| Pegylated rhG-CSF regimenPatients were administered pegylated rhG-CSF 6mg（weight≥45Kg）or 3mg（weight≤45Kg）once 24 hours after the end of chemotherapy drugs of every chemotherapy cycle.Chemotherapy regimen: CHOP: Epirubicin：70 mg/m2 , Cyclophosphamide：750 mg/m2, Vincristine: 1.4 mg/m2 , Prednison：100mg/d; CHOPE: Epirubicin：70 mg/m2, Cyclophosphamide：750 mg/m2,Vincristine: 1.4 mg/m2,Prednison：100mg/d,Etoposide: 100 mg/（m2•d）;EPOCH:etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin;Hyper-CVAD(A):hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine,doxorubicin, dexamethasone, cytarabine and methotrexate;GemOx-R:Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin;GDP:gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin | Drug | Pegylated rhG-CSF regimen |
Primary outcome
Rate of grade 3/4 neutropenia（neutrophils≤1×10^ 9/L） in every cycle
Time frame: through the study completion,an average of 4 months
Proportion of patients grade 3/4 neutropenia（neutrophils≤1×10^ 9/L）
2 secondary outcomes
Rate of the chemotherapy delay
Time frame: through the study completion,an average of 4 months
Rate of the febrile neutropenia in every cycle
Time frame: through the study completion,an average of 4 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Dec 2016.
- Background: PubMed 12488289Green MD, Koelbl H, Baselga J, Galid A, Guillem V, Gascon P, Siena S, Lalisang RI, Samonigg H, Clemens MR, Zani V, Liang BC, Renwick J, Piccart MJ; International Pegfilgrastim 749 Study Group. A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2003 Jan;14(1):29-35. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg019.
- Background: PubMed 12123336Holmes FA, Jones SE, O'Shaughnessy J, Vukelja S, George T, Savin M, Richards D, Glaspy J, Meza L, Cohen G, Dhami M, Budman DR, Hackett J, Brassard M, Yang BB, Liang BC. Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2002 Jun;13(6):903-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf130.
- Background: PubMed 10893282Johnston E, Crawford J, Blackwell S, Bjurstrom T, Lockbaum P, Roskos L, Yang BB, Gardner S, Miller-Messana MA, Shoemaker D, Garst J, Schwab G. Randomized, dose-escalation study of SD/01 compared with daily filgrastim in patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jul;18(13):2522-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.13.2522.
- Background: PubMed 22456299Hadji P, Kostev K, Schroder-Bernhardi D, Ziller V. Cost comparison of outpatient treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) in Germany. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Apr;50(4):281-9. doi: 10.5414/cp201633.
- Background: PubMed 27491287Wen TJ, Wen YW, Chien CR, Chiang SC, Hsu WW, Shen LJ, Hsiao FY. Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia among breast cancer and Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients under Taiwan's national health insurance system. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Apr;23(2):288-293. doi: 10.1111/jep.12597. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
- Background: PubMed 23571496Shi YK, Chen Q, Zhu YZ, He XH, Wang HQ, Jiang ZF, Chang JH, Liu YP, Wang AL, Luo DY, Zhang Y, Ke XY, Li WL, Zhang WJ, Wang XW, Zhang YP, Wang JM, Liu XQ. Pegylated filgrastim is comparable with filgrastim as support for commonly used chemotherapy regimens: a multicenter, randomized, crossover phase 3 study. Anticancer Drugs. 2013 Jul;24(6):641-7. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3283610b5d.
- Background: PubMed 12173407Molineux G. Pegylation: engineering improved pharmaceuticals for enhanced therapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2002 Apr;28 Suppl A:13-6. doi: 10.1016/s0305-7372(02)80004-4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Lymphoma,Non-Hodgkin
RecruitingPhase 2
Ibrutinib Combination Therapy in Transplant Ineligible Individuals With Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma
Non-hodgkin Lymphoma
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Brentuximab Vedotin and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With CD30-Positive Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, ALK-Negative
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Study of Oral MRT-2359 in Selected Cancer Patients
NSCLC, SCLC
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Multi-omics Profiling of Relapsed Extranodal Natural Killer (NK)/T-cell Lymphoma
Extranodal NK/T-cell Lymphoma, Nasal Type
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
xin wang, MD, PHD study chair
Shandong Provincial Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing rhG-CSF regimen and Pegylated rhG-CSF regimen in people with Lymphoma,Non-Hodgkin, run by Shandong Provincial Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact xin wang, MD, PHD (86-531-68778331, xinw007@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of grade 3/4 neutropenia（neutrophils≤1×10^ 9/L） in every cycle (time frame: through the study completion,an average of 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02996617, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Dec 2016.